On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a "one-man
>> hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't know why I
>> even bother anymore.
>
> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)

Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
testosterone, they start to lean right?
<https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>

Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing time
and data.

On 6/4/24 11:38 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
>Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>testosterone, they start to lean right?
><https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>

You will beLIEve *ANYTHING* you read, unless it's reputable, then you reject
it out of hand. No wonder you're a proud Catholic, heh. If I thought my
life was tough, boy, it's got to be better than being your retarded ass.

--
Joel W. Crump

On 2024-06-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
> On 2024-06-03 10:33 p.m., rbowman wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:42:36 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, following exact instructions to do the things that I intend to do
>>> with a Linux distribution makes me a moron. It only failed because I
>>> farted while doing it or something. Perhaps I didn't type the commands
>>> fast enough or didn't press Enter at the exact time the planets aligned.
>>> It's not Linux, it's never Linux. Some thing or body else is always at
>>> fault.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UnPzp2lmNk
>>
>> Why's everybody always picking on me?
>
> I'm not even complaining, I'm used to this behaviour from the Linux
> faithful. Whenever someone points out one of Linux's flaws or is soured
> on using it because of the rotten experience it provides them, the lot
> of you jump on anyone stating the obvious like flies on a turd. Any time
> anyone shows Linux to be bad in one way or another, this is the only
> response you can provide:

I've allowed (and stated many times) that Linux is probably not a good
choice for game players. I don't play games in Linux, therefore I don't have
the problems you seem to have. It's not rocket science, most video games are
made for the Windows platform. Any Linux Windows game playing solution is
going to be challenging.

> 1) Not me, never!
> 2) You must have done it wrong!

I don't have problems with Linux. Period. But I don't say you've done
something wrong — except (maybe) by picking a new distribution that seems to
be poorly supported and has a small user base.

> And then, when it is shown that Linux is the problem beyond a shadow of
> a doubt, and the person showing it is only looking for a bug to be fixed
> or for some problem to be corrected, you all disappear. It's the same
> thing here as it is on Linux forums on the web. Every so often, someone
> will "help" by asking the person to execute some obscure command which
> ends up doing nothing but making the problem worse.

We "disappear" by responding to you...? Okay, whatever. My "help" was the
suggestion that you find an older, better supported distribution. But I'm
not going to be that helpful to you because I don't play Windows video games
on Linux. Again, I suggest that people who want to play Windows video games
stick with Windows for their OS. How is this "disappearing?" With my limited
knowleged of Windows game playing on Linux, this is the best advice I can
give.

> But you're right. Facing serious problems on day _one_ is a lot better
> than having to learn something awful like sfc /scannow or dism /online
> /cleanup-image /scanhealth whenever problems emerge. Only in the perfect
> world of Linux where commands like "tcpdump -A -s 10240 'tcp port 80 and
> (((ip[2:2] - ((ip[0]&0xf)<<2)) - ((tcp[12]&0xf0)>>2)) != 0)' | egrep
> --line-buffered "^........(GET |HTTP\/|POST |HEAD )|^[A-Za-z0-9-]+: " |
> sed -r 's/^........(GET |HTTP\/|POST |HEAD )/\n\1/g'" are the norm can
> anyone be happy.

Windows has serious problems. Especially with updating. You know that, we
all know that. It's also spyware and it's getting worse by the day.

I'll say it one more time. If your goal is to play Windows video games,
stick with Windows. For those of use who DON'T play Windows video games, and
could care less about the bloated Microcrap Office Suite, Linux works well.
I simply DO NOT have problems with Linux. Period.

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:23:23 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:58:08 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <v3mdu0$arho$2@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:11:19 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
>>
>>> Point being, the wintrolls knew very little of the pedigree of Unix
>>> workstations until they were schooled.
>>
>> Abso-bloody-lutely.
>
> I've come to the conclusion that the person who asked you for the videos
> was never interested in the aesthetics of the workstation desktops of
> yore -- nor have they acknowledged those desktops' role in shaping the
> look-and-feel of Windows 95.
>
> They seem to be a Windows concern troll having a bit of fun with us...

Except the joke was on them. Now they seem to be trying desperately to
claim that the Windows desktop of the time looked much better than Unix,
hoping that if they shout it loud enough, that will somehow make it true.

What they forget is who was in charge of Microsoft at the time: Bill
Gates, whom Steve Jobs famously said had “no taste”.

Remember, the big advance in Windows 95 was in actually having a “Start”
menu for the first time.

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:36:15 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
wrote in <v3nc9f$fp63$3@dont-email.me>:

> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-06-04 8:23 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:58:08 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <v3mdu0$arho$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:11:19 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Point being, the wintrolls knew very little of the pedigree of Unix
>>>>> workstations until they were schooled.
>>>>
>>>> Abso-bloody-lutely.
>>>
>>> I've come to the conclusion that the person who asked you for the
>>> videos was never interested in the aesthetics of the workstation
>>> desktops of yore -- nor have they acknowledged those desktops' role in
>>> shaping the look-and-feel of Windows 95.
>>>
>>> They seem to be a Windows concern troll having a bit of fun with us...
>>
>> He wanted me to believe that UNIX desktops of the 90s were prettier
>> than what Windows 95 had to offer. That was a lie and his first two
>> videos demonstrated that they were in fact very ugly.
>
> http://toastytech.com/guis/ow3.html
>
> OpenWindows 3 - SunOS 4.1.4
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenWindows
>
> (Talks about OpenWindows 1, circa 1989, replacing the
> SunView/SunTools windowing system).

I was using olvwm on Linux in 1994.

https://imgur.com/o65Sr5r

--
-v

Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a "one-man
>>> hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't know why I
>>> even bother anymore.
>>
>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>
> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
> testosterone, they start to lean right?

:-D

> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>

Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats

LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell

Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start getting low
testosterone), they start to lurch right?

:-D

> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing time
> and data.

Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the meantime,
it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the problem.

--
There are three infallible ways of pleasing an author, and the three form a
rising scale of compliment: 1, to tell him you have read one of his books; 2,
to tell him you have read all of his books; 3, to ask him to let you read the
manuscript of his forthcoming book. No. 1 admits you to his respect; No. 2
admits you to his admiration; No. 3 carries you clear into his heart.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"

On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a "one-man
>>>> hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't know why I
>>>> even bother anymore.
>>>
>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>
>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>
> :-D
>
>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>
>
> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>
> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>
> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start getting low
> testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>
> :-D

Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?

"When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the
strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45% warmer
feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p < 0.001). Our
results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red shift" among
weakly-affiliated Democrats."

>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing time
>> and data.
>
> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the meantime,
> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the problem.

Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:23:23 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:58:08 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <v3mdu0$arho$2@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:11:19 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Point being, the wintrolls knew very little of the pedigree of Unix
>>>> workstations until they were schooled.
>>>
>>> Abso-bloody-lutely.
>>
>> I've come to the conclusion that the person who asked you for the videos
>> was never interested in the aesthetics of the workstation desktops of
>> yore -- nor have they acknowledged those desktops' role in shaping the
>> look-and-feel of Windows 95.
>>
>> They seem to be a Windows concern troll having a bit of fun with us...
>
> Except the joke was on them. Now they seem to be trying desperately to
> claim that the Windows desktop of the time looked much better than Unix,
> hoping that if they shout it loud enough, that will somehow make it true.
>
> What they forget is who was in charge of Microsoft at the time: Bill
> Gates, whom Steve Jobs famously said had “no taste”.
>
> Remember, the big advance in Windows 95 was in actually having a “Start”
> menu for the first time.

And what good is a pretty desktop if the OS tends to freeze up?

My mail-order Pentium desktop had Win NT (not DOS-Windows) for that reason.

(I did have to dig around to find an NT driver for an HP inkjet printer
"Certified for Window" Same for the modem card. :-D).

Later I slicked it and put RedHat 6 on it.

--
Keep it short for pithy sake.

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote at 15:21 this Tuesday (GMT):
> rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:23:47 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Hacker's Keyboard! Who needs a 138-key Windowsoft monstrosity!?
>>
>> I'm left handed so the number pad is wasted on me.
>
> I'm a lefty too, but can use the right hand pretty well, and for some reason I
> use touchpads with my right hand (and trackball with my left hand).

Hey same! (I use trackballs with my right hand too)

> In grad school I had to enter reams of numbers into a database in the computer
> center, so I'd use the right hand. The left hand was for the sandwiches.

Well, one-handed typing is different IMO..

>> Some of the laptop keyboard choices are extremely poor. In my Acer the
>> insert/delete key is the same size and immediately to the left of the power
>> key. Ain't that fun?
>>
>> I've never remotely approached being a touch typist but some of the
>> layouts must drive real typists crazy.
>
> My biggest bad typing habit is always using the left pinky for the Shift key.
> It's more annoying now since I still have some residual numbness/weakness from
> my neck surgery.

Yeah, but the standard layout kinda forces it..
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote at 21:46 this Tuesday (GMT):
> On 2024-06-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
>> On 2024-06-03 10:33 p.m., rbowman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:42:36 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep, following exact instructions to do the things that I intend to do
>>>> with a Linux distribution makes me a moron. It only failed because I
>>>> farted while doing it or something. Perhaps I didn't type the commands
>>>> fast enough or didn't press Enter at the exact time the planets aligned.
>>>> It's not Linux, it's never Linux. Some thing or body else is always at
>>>> fault.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UnPzp2lmNk
>>>
>>> Why's everybody always picking on me?
>>
>> I'm not even complaining, I'm used to this behaviour from the Linux
>> faithful. Whenever someone points out one of Linux's flaws or is soured
>> on using it because of the rotten experience it provides them, the lot
>> of you jump on anyone stating the obvious like flies on a turd. Any time
>> anyone shows Linux to be bad in one way or another, this is the only
>> response you can provide:
>
> I've allowed (and stated many times) that Linux is probably not a good
> choice for game players. I don't play games in Linux, therefore I don't have
> the problems you seem to have. It's not rocket science, most video games are
> made for the Windows platform. Any Linux Windows game playing solution is
> going to be challenging.

True, but Steam has made some effort in that department.

>> 1) Not me, never!
>> 2) You must have done it wrong!
>
> I don't have problems with Linux. Period. But I don't say you've done
> something wrong — except (maybe) by picking a new distribution that seems to
> be poorly supported and has a small user base.
>
>> And then, when it is shown that Linux is the problem beyond a shadow of
>> a doubt, and the person showing it is only looking for a bug to be fixed
>> or for some problem to be corrected, you all disappear. It's the same
>> thing here as it is on Linux forums on the web. Every so often, someone
>> will "help" by asking the person to execute some obscure command which
>> ends up doing nothing but making the problem worse.
>
> We "disappear" by responding to you...? Okay, whatever. My "help" was the
> suggestion that you find an older, better supported distribution. But I'm
> not going to be that helpful to you because I don't play Windows video games
> on Linux. Again, I suggest that people who want to play Windows video games
> stick with Windows for their OS. How is this "disappearing?" With my limited
> knowleged of Windows game playing on Linux, this is the best advice I can
> give.
>
>> But you're right. Facing serious problems on day _one_ is a lot better
>> than having to learn something awful like sfc /scannow or dism /online
>> /cleanup-image /scanhealth whenever problems emerge. Only in the perfect
>> world of Linux where commands like "tcpdump -A -s 10240 'tcp port 80 and
>> (((ip[2:2] - ((ip[0]&0xf)<<2)) - ((tcp[12]&0xf0)>>2)) != 0)' | egrep
>> --line-buffered "^........(GET |HTTP\/|POST |HEAD )|^[A-Za-z0-9-]+: " |
>> sed -r 's/^........(GET |HTTP\/|POST |HEAD )/\n\1/g'" are the norm can
>> anyone be happy.

Why are you using egrep? The sed part of the pipeline also seems a bit
iffy..

> Windows has serious problems. Especially with updating. You know that, we
> all know that. It's also spyware and it's getting worse by the day.
>
> I'll say it one more time. If your goal is to play Windows video games,
> stick with Windows. For those of use who DON'T play Windows video games, and
> could care less about the bloated Microcrap Office Suite, Linux works well.
> I simply DO NOT have problems with Linux. Period.

Don't forget Adobe.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:

> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a "one-man
>>>>> hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't know why I
>>>>> even bother anymore.
>>>>
>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>
>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>
>> :-D
>>
>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>
>>
>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>>
>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>
>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start getting
>> low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>
>> :-D
>
> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>
> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the
> strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45% warmer
> feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p < 0.001). Our
> results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red shift" among
> weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>
>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing time
>>> and data.
>>
>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the
>> meantime,
>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the problem.
>
> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.

Not necessary.

You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
and ask Him why He hates you.

--
-v

On 2024-06-05 8:07 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:23:23 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:58:08 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <v3mdu0$arho$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:11:19 -0000 (UTC), vallor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Point being, the wintrolls knew very little of the pedigree of Unix
>>>>> workstations until they were schooled.
>>>>
>>>> Abso-bloody-lutely.
>>>
>>> I've come to the conclusion that the person who asked you for the videos
>>> was never interested in the aesthetics of the workstation desktops of
>>> yore -- nor have they acknowledged those desktops' role in shaping the
>>> look-and-feel of Windows 95.
>>>
>>> They seem to be a Windows concern troll having a bit of fun with us...
>>
>> Except the joke was on them. Now they seem to be trying desperately to
>> claim that the Windows desktop of the time looked much better than Unix,
>> hoping that if they shout it loud enough, that will somehow make it true.
>>
>> What they forget is who was in charge of Microsoft at the time: Bill
>> Gates, whom Steve Jobs famously said had “no taste”.
>>
>> Remember, the big advance in Windows 95 was in actually having a “Start”
>> menu for the first time.
>
> And what good is a pretty desktop if the OS tends to freeze up?

You mean the way Ubuntu regularly does? I guess it's a one-man operation
which doesn't have enough testers.

<https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=111484>
<https://askubuntu.com/questions/1513394/ubuntu-24-04-fresh-install-system-settings-freezes-when-going-system-remot>
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061840>

> My mail-order Pentium desktop had Win NT (not DOS-Windows) for that reason.
>
> (I did have to dig around to find an NT driver for an HP inkjet printer
> "Certified for Window" Same for the modem card. :-D).
>
> Later I slicked it and put RedHat 6 on it.

How long after that did your Pentium desktop get up try to strangle you
in your sleep?

On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
> in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>
>> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a "one-man
>>>>>> hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't know why I
>>>>>> even bother anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>>
>>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>>
>>> :-D
>>>
>>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>
>>>
>>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>>>
>>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>>
>>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start getting
>>> low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>>
>>> :-D
>>
>> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>>
>> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the
>> strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45% warmer
>> feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p < 0.001). Our
>> results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red shift" among
>> weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>
>>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing time
>>>> and data.
>>>
>>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the
>>> meantime,
>>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the problem.
>>
>> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
>
> Not necessary.
>
> You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
> and ask Him why He hates you.

I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose my
data because some language file needs updating, and does not want me to
suffer with software whose features don't actually work. Perhaps Windows
doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to lose a few.

If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock God.

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:56:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
in <IfZ7O.37104$fBCb.8660@fx11.iad>:

> On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>> wrote in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a
>>>>>>> "one-man hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't
>>>>>>> know why I even bother anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>>>
>>>> :-D
>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>
>>>>
>>>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>>>>
>>>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>>>
>>>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start
>>>> getting low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>>>
>>>> :-D
>>>
>>> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>>>
>>> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone,
>>> the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45%
>>> warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p <
>>> 0.001). Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red
>>> shift" among weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing
>>>>> time and data.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the
>>>> meantime,
>>>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the
>>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
>>
>> Not necessary.
>>
>> You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
>> and ask Him why He hates you.
>
> I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose my
> data because some language file needs updating, and does not want me to
> suffer with software whose features don't actually work. Perhaps Windows
> doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to lose a few.
>
> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
> God.

I didn't "mock God" -- I mocked YOU, snowflake.

I guess I should have added a smiley...on the other hand, you
have been acting like a perfectly stinking and entitled jackass,
and you deserve to get zinged for it.

But if it bothers you that much -- sure, try the estrogen.

--
-v

On 2024-06-05 9:24 a.m., vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:56:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
> in <IfZ7O.37104$fBCb.8660@fx11.iad>:
>
>> On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>>> wrote in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a
>>>>>>>> "one-man hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I don't
>>>>>>>> know why I even bother anymore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>>>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>>>>
>>>>> :-D
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view>
>>>>>
>>>>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>>>>>
>>>>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start
>>>>> getting low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>>>>
>>>>> :-D
>>>>
>>>> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>>>>
>>>> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone,
>>>> the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45%
>>>> warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p <
>>>> 0.001). Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red
>>>> shift" among weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing
>>>>>> time and data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the
>>>>> meantime,
>>>>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the
>>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
>>>
>>> Not necessary.
>>>
>>> You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
>>> and ask Him why He hates you.
>>
>> I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose my
>> data because some language file needs updating, and does not want me to
>> suffer with software whose features don't actually work. Perhaps Windows
>> doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to lose a few.
>>
>> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>> God.
>
> I didn't "mock God" -- I mocked YOU, snowflake.
>
> I guess I should have added a smiley...on the other hand, you
> have been acting like a perfectly stinking and entitled jackass,
> and you deserve to get zinged for it.
>
> But if it bothers you that much -- sure, try the estrogen.

I'm entitled because I expect Linux to actually work after three decades
of development? Stupid me!

On 6/5/24 8:56 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
>If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock God.

Your fake-ass religion mocks God, as does your rejection of me, but you
prefer your delusional life, where whatever you believe is automatically
right, little boy, retard, fag.

--
Joel W. Crump

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:47:54 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
in <i0_7O.50063$5bN4.22016@fx17.iad>:

> On 2024-06-05 9:24 a.m., vallor wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:56:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>> wrote in <IfZ7O.37104$fBCb.8660@fx11.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>>>> wrote in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a
>>>>>>>>> "one-man hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I
>>>>>>>>> don't know why I even bother anymore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>>>>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/
view>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start
>>>>>> getting low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>>>>>
>>>>> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone,
>>>>> the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported
>>>>> 45%
>>>>> warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p <
>>>>> 0.001). Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red
>>>>> shift" among weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing
>>>>>>> time and data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the
>>>>>> meantime,
>>>>>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the
>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
>>>>
>>>> Not necessary.
>>>>
>>>> You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
>>>> and ask Him why He hates you.
>>>
>>> I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose
>>> my data because some language file needs updating, and does not want
>>> me to suffer with software whose features don't actually work. Perhaps
>>> Windows doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to lose a
>>> few.
>>>
>>> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>>> God.
>>
>> I didn't "mock God" -- I mocked YOU, snowflake.
>>
>> I guess I should have added a smiley...on the other hand, you have been
>> acting like a perfectly stinking and entitled jackass,
>> and you deserve to get zinged for it.
>>
>> But if it bothers you that much -- sure, try the estrogen.
>
> I'm entitled because I expect Linux to actually work after three decades
> of development? Stupid me!

But you're blaming "Linux" for a failure in _Lutris_.

That's like blaming Windows for a failure in _Photoshop_.

Do you see?

--
-v

Joel cRump wrote:
> little boy, retard, fag.
>
> https://postimg.cc/hzrRLgsL
>
>
indeed

On 05 Jun 2024 13:49:09 GMT, Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<66606cd5$0$2422123$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On 6/5/24 8:56 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>
>>If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>>God.
>
>
> Your fake-ass religion mocks God, as does your rejection of me, but you
> prefer your delusional life, where whatever you believe is
> automatically right, little boy, retard, fag.

Buddy, take a look in the mirror.

The USENET can't have two Jesus'. There's already Michael Christ
who haunts alt.atheism -- maybe you should have it out with him.

BTW, I don't think referring to people as "little boy, retard, fag"
is a very good demonstration of spiritual prowess. That's just me,
though.

--
-v

On 6/5/24 10:05 AM, % wrote:
>Joel cRump wrote:
>> little boy, retard, fag.
>>
> > https://postimg.cc/hzrRLgsL
> >
>indeed

Go play with matches at a gas station, fuckface.

--
Joel W. Crump

On 2024-06-05 9:51 a.m., vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:47:54 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
> in <i0_7O.50063$5bN4.22016@fx17.iad>:
>
>> On 2024-06-05 9:24 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:56:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>>> wrote in <IfZ7O.37104$fBCb.8660@fx11.iad>:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>>>>> wrote in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a
>>>>>>>>>> "one-man hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I
>>>>>>>>>> don't know why I even bother anymore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>>>>>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/
> view>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start
>>>>>>> getting low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone,
>>>>>> the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported
>>>>>> 45%
>>>>>> warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p <
>>>>>> 0.001). Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red
>>>>>> shift" among weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing
>>>>>>>> time and data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In the
>>>>>>> meantime,
>>>>>>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the
>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
>>>>> and ask Him why He hates you.
>>>>
>>>> I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose
>>>> my data because some language file needs updating, and does not want
>>>> me to suffer with software whose features don't actually work. Perhaps
>>>> Windows doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to lose a
>>>> few.
>>>>
>>>> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>>>> God.
>>>
>>> I didn't "mock God" -- I mocked YOU, snowflake.
>>>
>>> I guess I should have added a smiley...on the other hand, you have been
>>> acting like a perfectly stinking and entitled jackass,
>>> and you deserve to get zinged for it.
>>>
>>> But if it bothers you that much -- sure, try the estrogen.
>>
>> I'm entitled because I expect Linux to actually work after three decades
>> of development? Stupid me!
>
> But you're blaming "Linux" for a failure in _Lutris_.
>
> That's like blaming Windows for a failure in _Photoshop_.
>
> Do you see?

I also mentioned that before even installing the distribution, the
latest ISO available on the web site, it:

1) told me that it was no longer supported before even getting into the
test environment.
2) didn't detect my keyboard change in the installation process,
behaving like a US keyboard despite the fact that it was set to Canadian
French
3) required an update the moment it was installed requiring a restart,
then refused to boot into the desktop
4) after rescue and NVIDIA installation using their instructions, again
refused to boot into the system requiring a rescue
5) wouldn't play the video part of a video file using VLC whether it be
the proper package or the Flatpak unless the NVIDIA drivers were
uninstalled. With them installed, only Dragon Player worked alright
6) asked me to install an update right after it had already installed
updates
7) asked me to use a GPG key for keychain encryption then disregarded
the fact that it had been installed using the GPG command in the terminal

That is all on day _one_ and before even bothering with Lutris. Which
part of that list suggests that Linux works well?

On 2024-06-05 10:14 a.m., vallor wrote:
> On 05 Jun 2024 13:49:09 GMT, Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
> <66606cd5$0$2422123$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> On 6/5/24 8:56 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>
>>> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>>> God.
>>
>>
>> Your fake-ass religion mocks God, as does your rejection of me, but you
>> prefer your delusional life, where whatever you believe is
>> automatically right, little boy, retard, fag.
>
> Buddy, take a look in the mirror.
>
> The USENET can't have two Jesus'. There's already Michael Christ
> who haunts alt.atheism -- maybe you should have it out with him.
>
> BTW, I don't think referring to people as "little boy, retard, fag"
> is a very good demonstration of spiritual prowess. That's just me,
> though.

Besides, vallor pointed out that he wasn't mocking God and re-reading
what he wrote makes it clear that I misinterpreted the statement. I hate
that I had to read that and that Joel has such a profound hatred of the
being he feels abandoned him and turned him into a miserable homosexual.
Little does he know that every time he gets sodomized, he is distancing
himself from the Creator and joining the Destroyer.

On 2024-06-05 10:14 a.m., vallor wrote:
> On 05 Jun 2024 13:49:09 GMT, Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
> <66606cd5$0$2422123$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> On 6/5/24 8:56 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>
>>> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>>> God.
>>
>>
>> Your fake-ass religion mocks God, as does your rejection of me, but you
>> prefer your delusional life, where whatever you believe is
>> automatically right, little boy, retard, fag.
>
> Buddy, take a look in the mirror.
>
> The USENET can't have two Jesus'. There's already Michael Christ
> who haunts alt.atheism -- maybe you should have it out with him.
>
> BTW, I don't think referring to people as "little boy, retard, fag"
> is a very good demonstration of spiritual prowess. That's just me,
> though.

Besides, vallor pointed out that he wasn't mocking God and re-reading
what he wrote makes it clear that I misinterpreted the statement. I hate
that I had to read that and that Joel has such a profound hatred of the
being he feels abandoned him and turned him into a miserable homosexual.
Little does he know that every time he gets sodomized, he is distancing
himself from the Creator and joining the Destroyer.

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:25:15 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote
in <nz_7O.2336$R506.2121@fx36.iad>:

> On 2024-06-05 9:51 a.m., vallor wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:47:54 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>> wrote in <i0_7O.50063$5bN4.22016@fx17.iad>:
>>
>>> On 2024-06-05 9:24 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:56:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>>>> wrote in <IfZ7O.37104$fBCb.8660@fx11.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-06-05 8:33 a.m., vallor wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:01:34 -0400, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch>
>>>>>> wrote in <CsY7O.47392$Dsz1.41635@fx14.iad>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2024-06-05 7:58 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-04 11:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Either way, every one of these distributions behave like a
>>>>>>>>>>> "one-man hobby project that had zero third-party testing." I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't know why I even bother anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Door, meet AM's ass! :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does it bother you to know that when leftists are injected with
>>>>>>>>> testosterone, they start to lean right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/
>> view>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in
>>>>>>>> Democrats
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LMAO Read the abstract; funny as hell
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does it bother you than when men age (and also presumably start
>>>>>>>> getting low testosterone), they start to lurch right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has your lack of testosterone taken your reading ability?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional
>>>>>>> testosterone,
>>>>>>> the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported
>>>>>>> 45%
>>>>>>> warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president (p <
>>>>>>> 0.001). Our results demonstrate that testosterone induces a “red
>>>>>>> shift" among weakly-affiliated Democrats."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I'll leave you to your one-man projects. I'm done losing
>>>>>>>>> time and data.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry you have so much trouble with your Linux computer(s). In
>>>>>>>> the meantime,
>>>>>>>> it works fine for my projects. Makes you wonder where lies the
>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I need to be injected with estrogen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not necessary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You simply need to pray to our Heavenly Father, who art in Heaven,
>>>>>> and ask Him why He hates you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you have that in reverse. My Father does not want me to lose
>>>>> my data because some language file needs updating, and does not want
>>>>> me to suffer with software whose features don't actually work.
>>>>> Perhaps Windows doesn't work for you because God thinks you need to
>>>>> lose a few.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not
>>>>> mock God.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't "mock God" -- I mocked YOU, snowflake.
>>>>
>>>> I guess I should have added a smiley...on the other hand, you have
>>>> been acting like a perfectly stinking and entitled jackass,
>>>> and you deserve to get zinged for it.
>>>>
>>>> But if it bothers you that much -- sure, try the estrogen.
>>>
>>> I'm entitled because I expect Linux to actually work after three
>>> decades of development? Stupid me!
>>
>> But you're blaming "Linux" for a failure in _Lutris_.
>>
>> That's like blaming Windows for a failure in _Photoshop_.
>>
>> Do you see?
>
> I also mentioned that before even installing the distribution, the
> latest ISO available on the web site, it:
>
> 1) told me that it was no longer supported before even getting into the
> test environment.
> 2) didn't detect my keyboard change in the installation process,
> behaving like a US keyboard despite the fact that it was set to Canadian
> French 3) required an update the moment it was installed requiring a
> restart, then refused to boot into the desktop 4) after rescue and
> NVIDIA installation using their instructions, again refused to boot into
> the system requiring a rescue 5) wouldn't play the video part of a video
> file using VLC whether it be the proper package or the Flatpak unless
> the NVIDIA drivers were uninstalled. With them installed, only Dragon
> Player worked alright 6) asked me to install an update right after it
> had already installed updates 7) asked me to use a GPG key for keychain
> encryption then disregarded the fact that it had been installed using
> the GPG command in the terminal
>
> That is all on day _one_ and before even bothering with Lutris. Which
> part of that list suggests that Linux works well?

I don't know about Linux, but it's for danged sure the distro
doesn't work well. Sorry you had so much trouble with it.

Was the second update perhaps pulling in codecs from rpmfusion?
Fedora itself doesn't have any real codecs to speak of for starters.
But Nobara is supposed to use the extra codecs, which I assume
come from the rpmfusion repository. That could explain why vlc
didn't play your video. Another explanation could be failure to
connect properly with the NVIDIA driver.

I told my friend who reviewed Fedora 40 recently about Nobara,
and I'm going to forward your message to him for ideas about
what to test. I might try it out myself just to see how bad off
it is. But if I do try it, I'm not going to bother with Wayland,
since X11 is more of a known entity to me.

I also don't use Lutris -- I use Steam.

--
-v

On 6/5/24 10:14 AM, vallor wrote:
>On 05 Jun 2024 13:49:09 GMT, Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
><66606cd5$0$2422123$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> On 6/5/24 8:56 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>
>>>If you were expecting a courteous answer, I would suggest you not mock
>>>God.
>>
>> Your fake-ass religion mocks God, as does your rejection of me, but you
>> prefer your delusional life, where whatever you believe is
>> automatically right, little boy, retard, fag.
>
>Buddy, take a look in the mirror.
>
>The USENET can't have two Jesus'. There's already Michael Christ
>who haunts alt.atheism -- maybe you should have it out with him.
>
>BTW, I don't think referring to people as "little boy, retard, fag"
>is a very good demonstration of spiritual prowess. That's just me,
>though.

I'm not trying to be the same person Jesus was and is, nay pieces of dog
shit like Andrzej make me violent and spiteful, I'm Jesus' lawyer, as the
Eels put it, you'll get aspects of Jesus at times, but I'm not the entirety
of him in the flesh, he's created by more than myself.

--
Joel W. Crump