On 1/8/25 11:01 AM, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:59:22 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Nah, we're not thinking in terms of race with that accusation, we're
>> thinking in terms of *bigotry* as expressed by denigration of a whole
>> group of people based on race.
>
> But race doesn't exist. Or does it? The liberals are fine with giving a
> group of people special privileges based on race.

Race does not exist. You got THAT right. It's just some subjective
little matter that does not play any role anywhere. But species do
exist. And cro-magnons are another species different from Modern Humans.

Species matter! Proof? One survives and leads and makes future of
mankind, another goes extinct, dude. Extinct! And it is always the less
evolved that goes extinct.

How many times have you read my ACOB (and other parallel) blogs from
beginning to end? You know what I'm talking about, but as a cro-magnon,
do not dare to address it. Your collective nature keeps you silent cause
other cro-magnons are staying silent on this.

Thank god you're an "engineer" :-( The worst, the most useless,
scientist is a cro-magnon scientist. They're a heap of no good dead
weight that true scientists have to constantly watch and keep them from
spreading lies. Science does not belong to cro-magnons. In their hands,
it becomes military industrial complexes. Why? Because you have a _fear_
deep into your nature. For good reasons too. The fear of sensing Modern
Human around you. A more evolved, more capable, more enduring Modern Human!

rbowman wrote:

> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>
>> SUV : Infiniti QX80 car : Porsche Panamera
>
> I'd go for a Cayman.

I'd go for the the Panamera. I like sedans better than SUV's.

If I was filthy rich, a Rolls-Royce Ghost would be great for cruising,
the only drawback being how "showy" it is.

A 911 for days when a sportier ride is desired.

--
"[chrisv] forgot his daughter is a Windows user." - DumFSck, lying
shamelessly

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>
>> No, Carlos, telling the world that we will all be under water unless we
>> give lots of money to some cabal of elites is what's propaganda and
>> complete bullshit.

Worse yet are the mandates that take away our freedoms.

Everyone knows that they want to be able to shut off our cars
remotely, to restrict our travel freedoms, right? And control when we
run our air conditions, and what we eat, and all sorts of other
things. Utter tyranny, is the plan.

>Yes.
>The impact of a putative net zero campaign will massively outweigh a 1
>°C rise and a sea level rise of four inches.
>
>In both cost and environmental destruction

I agree. There is no answer to the problems with mining. There is no
answer to the problems from being utterly dependant upon communist
China for everything from minerals to the completed car or solar panel
or wind turbine or power transformer.

The West takes a massive hit, while China laughs and builds a hundred
coal plants every year. They are happy to take our money and make
everything for us, until we are as dependant and as weak as babies.

On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:27:12 -0600, chrisv wrote:

>
> a Rolls-Royce Ghost would be great for cruising,
>

Why you wanna cruise? You wanna pick up bitches?

Ain't no bitch gonna want to get on with your sorry ass.

Haaaaaa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

On 2025-01-08 17:45, chrisv wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>
>>> No, Carlos, telling the world that we will all be under water unless we
>>> give lots of money to some cabal of elites is what's propaganda and
>>> complete bullshit.
>
> Worse yet are the mandates that take away our freedoms.
>
> Everyone knows that they want to be able to shut off our cars
> remotely, to restrict our travel freedoms, right? And control when we
> run our air conditions, and what we eat, and all sorts of other
> things. Utter tyranny, is the plan.

It indeed looks like that. It might not have been obvious around 2010 or
so, but once Snowden revealed what kind of surveillance Westerners are
under and seeing the behaviour of Marxists since that time, it's pretty
clear that they want nothing less than total control.

>> Yes.
>> The impact of a putative net zero campaign will massively outweigh a 1
>> °C rise and a sea level rise of four inches.
>>
>> In both cost and environmental destruction
>
> I agree. There is no answer to the problems with mining. There is no
> answer to the problems from being utterly dependant upon communist
> China for everything from minerals to the completed car or solar panel
> or wind turbine or power transformer.
>
> The West takes a massive hit, while China laughs and builds a hundred
> coal plants every year. They are happy to take our money and make
> everything for us, until we are as dependant and as weak as babies.

Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to
annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the
minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric
vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military
reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking...

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

Diego Garcia <dg@linux.rocks> wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:27:12 -0600, chrisv wrote:
>
>> a Rolls-Royce Ghost would be great for cruising,
>
>Why you wanna cruise? You wanna pick up bitches?
>
>Ain't no bitch gonna want to get on with your sorry ass.
>
>Haaaaaa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

You've bragged about sexual contact with underage girls, you obviously
can't handle mature women, so I'm gonna say chrisv is above you.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to
> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the
> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric
> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military
> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking...

https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/

Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't
done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and
certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible.

Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. The
SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa.

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:03:40 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Race isn't a nature concept, its obviously a sociological and political
> construct, and fluid to some extent.

If you have a E-V38 Y chromosome I'm guessing you can't pass for a Swede.

On 2025-01-08 18:20, Joel wrote:
> Diego Garcia <dg@linux.rocks> wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:27:12 -0600, chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> a Rolls-Royce Ghost would be great for cruising,
>>
>> Why you wanna cruise? You wanna pick up bitches?
>>
>> Ain't no bitch gonna want to get on with your sorry ass.
>>
>> Haaaaaa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
>
> You've bragged about sexual contact with underage girls, you obviously
> can't handle mature women, so I'm gonna say chrisv is above you.

The underage girls aren't yet mature enough to realize how much of a
loser the pedophile that was hitting on them is.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

On 2025-01-08 19:42, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to
>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the
>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric
>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military
>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking...
>
> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/
>
> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't
> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and
> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible.
>
> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. The
> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa.

There will be lots of resistance simply because Canadians have
traditionally seen themselves as "better" than Americans and don't want
to be a part of the "inferior" culture. In reality, there is nothing
better here except for the women in Quebec. They look better than what
the US produces, but they're just as dim.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2025-01-08 18:20, Joel wrote:
>> Diego Garcia <dg@linux.rocks> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:27:12 -0600, chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>>> a Rolls-Royce Ghost would be great for cruising,
>>>
>>> Why you wanna cruise? You wanna pick up bitches?
>>>
>>> Ain't no bitch gonna want to get on with your sorry ass.
>>>
>>> Haaaaaa, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>>
>> You've bragged about sexual contact with underage girls, you obviously
>> can't handle mature women, so I'm gonna say chrisv is above you.
>
>The underage girls aren't yet mature enough to realize how much of a
>loser the pedophile that was hitting on them is.

Basically, yeah, Larry is essentially admitting he's socially awkward.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 1/8/2025 3:05 PM, -hh wrote:
> On 1/8/25 12:13 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 1/8/2025 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Makes me wonder about what the median age is on this newsgroup.
>>> I suspect that very few (if any) are still under age 45, if not 50
>>
>> Poster        Age        Source
>> ============  =========  =============
>> -hh           mid 60s?   guess
>> Ahlstrom      67         online
>> Carpentier    50s?       guess
>> D'Oliveiro    60s?       posts about old tech
>> DFS           62         birth certificate
>> Feeb          43         online
>> Joel          late 40s   Joel
>> PhysFitFreak  70s        online
>> Relf          64         Relf
>> RonB          70s        RonB
>> Slimer        mid 40s    Slimer
>> candycane     30s?       guess
>> rbowman       75         rbowman
>> shitv         late 50s?  his posts
>> vallor        58         online
>>
>> approx
>> median        62
>> avg           59
>
> And n=15.
>
> Good guess for me.
>
> I could put together an anonymous SurveyMonkey poll if folks think it
> was worthwhile for this ...but it is just idle curiosity on my part for
> just how old we surviving USENET posters have become.
>
> Could also delve into other demographics too, such as how many are
> retired (my guess: ~40%?), or what OSs they really use where <g>.  Of
> course, being self-reported & unconfirmed, its only as reliable as its
> participants.

The scary thing is how few children this subset of Whites has produced.

I'd say the 14 of us in that list have 10 offspring total

Poster Children
========== ========
-hh 0
Ahlstrom 1 daughter
Carpentier 0
D'Oliveiro 0
DFS 0
Feeb 0
Joel 0
Relf 2 (1 of each)
RonB 5 na
Slimer 1 son
candycane 0
rbowman 0
shitv 1 daughter
vallor 0

It should be at least 30 or 40, to carry on the race.

By comparison, my wife's 3 cousins that are a little younger than us
have 14 children between them.

On 1/8/2025 3:14 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 1/8/25 10:56 AM, rbowman wrote:
>> n Wed, 8 Jan 2025 09:32:45 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> At 75, you're still kicking ass.  Knee or hip problems?  I'm just 62 but
>>> I think I'm getting arthritis in my right hip.
>
>
> That's another clue for you, DFS, being cro-magnon. Modern Human rarely
> ever gets old age issues in his 60s.

More of your never-ending hairy-eared-Iranian ignorance.

"The prevalence of osteoarthritis increases with age, with the highest
incidence occurring in individuals between the ages of 55 and 64. It is
estimated that about 50% of people over the age of 65 will develop
osteoarthritis in at least one joint."

Also:

"Osteoarthritis (OA) is prevalent in Iran"

> As human evolves, old age problems go farther and farther into older
> age. You are less evolved than Modern Human.

Whites in the US live longer and better than you hairy chimps in Iran.
It's no wonder you escaped that shithole country to live around
Caucasians. If you weren't welcomed here, it would've been another
White Western country, of course.

"Where do most Iranians migrate to?
Iranian diaspora - Wikipedia. Over one million of these people and
their extended families live in the United States, with anywhere between
100k-500k living in countries such as Australia, Canada, Germany,
Israel, Sweden, Turkey, and the United Kingdom."

heh! Just how bad do you hirsute freaks want blue eyes and blonde hair?

> Frankly, and with no pretense, my dick is more evolved than you sorry
> ass sub-code-monkey. Don't get that ever wrong.
>
> But your fingers do not have arthritic pain yet, so finger yourself
> while you can.

70+ years old and constantly talking about your dick and fingering?

Too much sand got in your brain, gozuk.

On 1/8/2025 3:25 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:

> A more evolved, more capable, more enduring Modern Human!

Judging by your home, you don't seem very capable of anything.

https://imgur.com/qzQP63p

On 1/8/25 7:09 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:03:40 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Race isn't a nature concept, its obviously a sociological and political
>> construct, and fluid to some extent.
>
> If you have a E-V38 Y chromosome I'm guessing you can't pass for a Swede.

Arguments based that down into genes don't mean anything. We all share
genes with mice too, so ... Are they any basis on which we decide who's
cro-magnon human and who Modern Human? Such arguments won't apply and
are all beside the point.

The argument that makes you a cro-magnon species and me a Modern Human
is based on much more recent events, and involving the last ice age
trapping the Africans who'd gotten to Europe. They've got everything to
do with geography and temperature, especially the amount of exposure to
sunlight. Only and only the tiny percentage of them which happened to
get born albino could get enough sun to survive in long term scales.

I'm not some "engineer" man's fucking tutor. Go dig them out for
yourself, and if you are any capable, think past what they tell you as
well about stuff they cannot tell you cause they're often cro-magnons
themselves.

On 1/8/25 8:18 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2025-01-08 19:42, rbowman wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to
>>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the
>>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric
>>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military
>>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking...
>>
>> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/
>>
>> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries...  Historically, Denmark hasn't
>> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and
>> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland
>> feasible.
>>
>> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows.
>> The
>> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa.
>
> There will be lots of resistance simply because Canadians have
> traditionally seen themselves as "better" than Americans and don't want
> to be a part of the "inferior" culture. In reality, there is nothing
> better here except for the women in Quebec. They look better than what
> the US produces, but they're just as dim.

Talk/jokes/etc aside, Canada will not be joined with
the USA any time soon. The culture/system/history is
just too different for a good fit.

Trump makes these statements For EFFECT ... not because
he's really serious. He mostly wants Canada to deal with
all the immigrants coming down. He's a native salesman
and thus creates grand illusions - intending to deal
somewhere to the middle.

With Greenland, for example, it was barely a week after
he talked about buying/occupying that Denmark suddenly
put a LOT more money into defense efforts there. This
is more what he really wanted. As an actual territory,
Greenland would be a huge money-loser. SO, real world,
expect more EU and US military watch bases there. That
is 'good enough'.

On 2025-01-08, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:59:22 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Nah, we're not thinking in terms of race with that accusation, we're
>> thinking in terms of *bigotry* as expressed by denigration of a whole
>> group of people based on race.
>
> But race doesn't exist. Or does it? The liberals are fine with giving a
> group of people special privileges based on race.

The Woke seem confused on that issue. Of course the Woke aren't having a
very good time right now, so they may a little constipated. Ford, McDonald's
and Walmart are the latest to drop (or curtail) the DEI BS.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2025-01-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-08 12:01, rbowman wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:59:22 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Nah, we're not thinking in terms of race with that accusation, we're
>>> thinking in terms of *bigotry* as expressed by denigration of a whole
>>> group of people based on race.
>>
>> But race doesn't exist. Or does it? The liberals are fine with giving a
>> group of people special privileges based on race.
>
> They'll do whatever it takes to advance Communism, including calling
> their ideology things as ridiculous as Social Democracy. I mean, they're
> gone from being Marxists to Liberals to Progressive to the Woke, so they
> don't mind changing the word once it becomes synonymous with extreme
> stupidity.

It's not a matter of thinking. They've been brainwashed into believing
emotion equals reason. Whatever the latest talking point on CNN or MSNBC
they're glom on to it for dear life (probably teary-eyed when they do).

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

Joel wrote:
> What's so bad about taking it up the ass?
>
>
https://postimg.cc/GTd7gbyt

rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:03:40 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Race isn't a nature concept, its obviously a sociological and political
>> construct, and fluid to some extent.
>
> If you have a E-V38 Y chromosome I'm guessing you can't pass for a Swede.

Which race of dog have you owned?

There's far more variation between dog breeds than between human "races".

I always get a laugh when some white dude, seeing the children of a biracial
couple, says, "they look black".

Meanwhile, the black dude says "they look white". :-D

--
Marriage is the sole cause of divorce.

rbowman wrote:

>On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to
>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the
>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric
>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military
>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking...
>
>https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/
>
>Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't
>done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and
>certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible.

Greenland would be a great place to put all the wannabe migrants. Let
them prove their worth there, for a few years, before letting them
into the mainland.

On 1/8/25 5:45 PM, chrisv wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>
>>> No, Carlos, telling the world that we will all be under water unless we
>>> give lots of money to some cabal of elites is what's propaganda and
>>> complete bullshit.
>
> Worse yet are the mandates that take away our freedoms.
>
> Everyone knows that they want to be able to shut off our cars
> remotely, to restrict our travel freedoms, right?

I was consultant on such a study twenty years ago. No, its purpose
wasn't to restrict travel freedoms: it was that police pursuits often
becoming high speed chases which were dangerous to the public, as they
often ended in a crash with collateral damage/death to innocent bystanders.

> And control when we run our air conditions, ...

If you don't want expensive utilities, then accept some conveniences.
Its a simple principle & trade-off.

> ... and what we eat, and all sorts of other
> things. Utter tyranny, is the plan.

If you want safe food, expect restrictions on the dangerous stuff.
Its a simple principle & trade-off.

>> Yes.
>> The impact of a putative net zero campaign will massively outweigh a 1
>> °C rise and a sea level rise of four inches.
>>
>> In both cost and environmental destruction

Golly, its interesting to see the goalpost shift here from "it ain't
happening at all" to now being "oh, but its too expensive to fix".

> I agree. There is no answer to the problems with mining.

Depends on what answer one is looking for: a short term gratification
of cheap energy, or more holistic perspective of addressing the costs of
most of its actual externality costs too? For example, a "clean up the
mess you've caused" tax to pay for the damage that it is doing (and has
done) would create the market incentive to reduce its externality costs,
and shift the market to less bad alternatives...even if the tax money is
never spent as it should be on actual clean-up.

> There is no
> answer to the problems from being utterly dependant upon communist
> China for everything from minerals to the completed car or solar panel
> or wind turbine or power transformer.

True, the West has allowed short term capitalism to be the priority and
outweigh strategic positioning, but there has been some leadership to
allow some rebalancing. For example, because of policy, domestic
manufacturing capacity of solar cells has quadrupled since Biden took
office.

<https://seia.org/news/american-solar-panel-manufacturing-capacity-increases-71-q1-2024-industry-reaches-200-gigawatt/>

<https://www.spglobal.com/commodity-insights/en/news-research/latest-news/electric-power/102224-us-solar-manufacturing-soars-but-gaps-and-uncertainty-persist>

> The West takes a massive hit, while China laughs and builds a hundred
> coal plants every year. They are happy to take our money and make
> everything for us, until we are as dependant and as weak as babies.

Yet we keep on buying stuff at WalMart, because we're unwilling to pay
more for domestically produced.

Gosh, its almost as if there strategically needs to be Federal mandates
which prevent us from being so dumb and avoid doing what we know is
profoundly bad for us ... but there's folks who bitch it "takes away our
freedoms": one can't have your cake & eat it too.

-hh

On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 20:16:09 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

>
> The underage girls aren't yet mature enough to realize how much of a
> loser the pedophile that was hitting on them is.
>

Anyone who knows, knows this.

There are two groups of "underage" girls:

1) Those that you pick up.

2) Those that pick up you.

Quiz:

Which of the two aforementioned groups is the larger?

Times's up!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

--
Hail Linux! Hail FOSS! Hail Stallman!

On 2025-01-08 22:50, DFS wrote:
> On 1/8/2025 3:05 PM, -hh wrote:
>> On 1/8/25 12:13 PM, DFS wrote:
>>> On 1/8/2025 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Makes me wonder about what the median age is on this newsgroup.
>>>> I suspect that very few (if any) are still under age 45, if not 50
>>>
>>> Poster        Age        Source
>>> ============  =========  =============
>>> -hh           mid 60s?   guess
>>> Ahlstrom      67         online
>>> Carpentier    50s?       guess
>>> D'Oliveiro    60s?       posts about old tech
>>> DFS           62         birth certificate
>>> Feeb          43         online
>>> Joel          late 40s   Joel
>>> PhysFitFreak  70s        online
>>> Relf          64         Relf
>>> RonB          70s        RonB
>>> Slimer        mid 40s    Slimer
>>> candycane     30s?       guess
>>> rbowman       75         rbowman
>>> shitv         late 50s?  his posts
>>> vallor        58         online
>>>
>>> approx
>>> median        62
>>> avg           59
>>
>> And n=15.
>>
>> Good guess for me.
>>
>> I could put together an anonymous SurveyMonkey poll if folks think it
>> was worthwhile for this ...but it is just idle curiosity on my part
>> for just how old we surviving USENET posters have become.
>>
>> Could also delve into other demographics too, such as how many are
>> retired (my guess: ~40%?), or what OSs they really use where <g>.  Of
>> course, being self-reported & unconfirmed, its only as reliable as its
>> participants.
>
> The scary thing is how few children this subset of Whites has produced.
>
> I'd say the 14 of us in that list have 10 offspring total
>
> Poster      Children
> ==========  ========
> -hh           0
> Ahlstrom      1 daughter
> Carpentier    0
> D'Oliveiro    0
> DFS           0
> Feeb          0
> Joel          0
> Relf          2 (1 of each)
> RonB          5 na
> Slimer        1 son
> candycane     0
> rbowman       0
> shitv         1 daughter
> vallor        0
>
> It should be at least 30 or 40, to carry on the race.
>
> By comparison, my wife's 3 cousins that are a little younger than us
> have 14 children between them.

It is looking like the next generation is going to be a lot more
productive in that respect since conservatism seems to be very popular
with them. However, the biggest issue shouldn't be raising the birth
rate; it should be decreasing the birth rate of people who produce
children because the government rewards them for doing so. Here in
Quebec, Muslims produce a platoon of children because the government aid
they receive for each one of them accumulates to such an extent that
they don't need to work at all. They feed them bugs or whatever the heck
Muslims eat and drive around in a shitty, rusty Dodge Caravan, so you
know their expenses are low. They are basically being paid to replace
the productive population with garbage people who go on to create
criminal or rape gangs and terrorists.

If you don't believe that last part, tell yourself that here in
Montreal, the area of St-Léonard used to be Italian and peaceful. Now,
it's overrun with Algerians (who used to be the people who terrorized
the Mediterranean as pirates, kidnapping coastal peoples and turning
them into slaves), and criminality has skyrocketed.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

On 2025-01-08 22:51, DFS wrote:
> On 1/8/2025 3:25 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>> A more evolved, more capable, more enduring Modern Human!
>
>
> Judging by your home, you don't seem very capable of anything.
>
> https://imgur.com/qzQP63p

Those kinds of homes are reserved for the intellectually superior, for sure.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative