On 7/23/2024 4:44 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Ahlstrom and Crump probably got hard at the thought that the man might
> have been killed. If Crooks had succeeded, I imagine Crump would have
> invited Ahlstrom over for a fuck.

eww!

> I'm not sure how that works with two bottoms though.

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph62b0d14a3df69

Did you miss my joke about Ahlstrom's wife screaming at him and putting
the fear of Jayne in him... turns out 'fear of Jayne' is a nickname for
their sex toy.

LOL!

On 7/24/24 10:04 AM, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>
>> The problem that Cheatle has is that the stuff that the Congressmen
>> wanted her to speak on (in public) are CUI, SBU & classified data: it
>> violates her security clearance to say those in a non-secure venue.
>
> Oh, the number of shell casings found on the roof, which she refused
> to answer, is "classified", is it?

There's other categories besides Classified listed above: Oops!

Clearly, you don't know what the real differences are, yet you still
foolishly chose to open your pie hole and say something stupid. Again.

> You're an idiot, defending the indefensible. Again.

Nope & Cry Harder.

Particularly since if you had any actually meaningful real life
experience working with guns & ammo, you'd know how easy it is for a
cartridge case to roll away & get lost in the bushes/etc...and Murphy of
course makes that happen during a brass accountability is important.

> Your response will be deleted unread. Again.
>

That's too bad for you, because you now can't ever comment on additional
insights I provide, such as all of the things that merit being checked
before making official conclusions: all the surroundings need to be
swept, fired & unfired rounds counted, packaging cross-checked, places
searched, receipts, etc to see if the round counts correctly add up.
Likewise, to make sure that everything is consistent with a single
shooter, work to recover all of the slugs possible to match up
ballistics, which requires review angles & lots of video to assess
trajectories to find these strays wherever they went: in an outdoor
uncontrolled setting like this, unless you get profoundly lucky, its
multiple man-weeks worth of on site fieldwork (after lab work) which
can't effectively be done in just a week even with an ~infinite budget.

-hh

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:31:36 -0400, Joel wrote:

> I'm saying that DJT is the reincarnation of Hitler, literally. That's
> what makes him so special, and magically able to get votes from people
> who you can't believe could even figure out how to register to vote.
> He's the antichrist. I'm the real second coming, and you don't believe
> it because I'm a freaky bisexual and whatnot. You're obsessed with
> believing in white superiority, it's just an illusion, it's holding you
> back, you're a slave to Satan. Satan is a white nationalist.

I doubt Savitri Devi would have seen Trump as an incarnation of Vishnu
even if we are in the Kali Yuga. We will have to wait for Kalki.

-hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 7/24/24 10:04 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> -hh wrote:
>>
>>> The problem that Cheatle has is that the stuff that the Congressmen
>>> wanted her to speak on (in public) are CUI, SBU & classified data: it
>>> violates her security clearance to say those in a non-secure venue.
>>
>> Oh, the number of shell casings found on the roof, which she refused
>> to answer, is "classified", is it?
>
> There's other categories besides Classified listed above: Oops!

I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)

--
Q: Are we not men?
A: We are Vaxen.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> -hh wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>> -hh wrote:
>>>
>>>> The problem that Cheatle has is that the stuff that the Congressmen
>>>> wanted her to speak on (in public) are CUI, SBU & classified data: it
>>>> violates her security clearance to say those in a non-secure venue.
>>>
>>> Oh, the number of shell casings found on the roof, which she refused
>>> to answer, is "classified", is it?
>>
>> There's other categories besides Classified listed above: Oops!

You're still an idiot defending for her behavior. Oops!

>I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
>their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)

Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
"modes of operation", would it?

-hh wrote:

>Just what white-only constructs have you erected that you
>believe are actually worth preserving? Slavery? The KKK? Jim Crow?
>Nazism? Redlining? Nepotism? Misogynistic Evangelical Churches?

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:29:31 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
> "modes of operation", would it?

Certainly, if there were fewer cases than shots fired. I suppose they
could have rolled off the steeply sloped roof...

On 2024-07-24, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:44:19 -0400, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote in
>>
>> <k00ksnip>
>>
>> You have no evidence for anything like this. Please cease your
>> parataxic distortion.
>
> Ron and Slimer have gone off the rails.

Right. Off the rails going Stupidville, Gullible City and Woketown Junction.
Just put your brain in neutral, Chris, and "emote." (Like I have to tell you
to do that, it's obvious you're already well acquainted with the art of
logic canceling.)

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

On 2024-07-24, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>
>>The problem that Cheatle has is that the stuff that the Congressmen
>>wanted her to speak on (in public) are CUI, SBU & classified data: it
>>violates her security clearance to say those in a non-secure venue.
>
> Oh, the number of shell casings found on the roof, which she refused
> to answer, is "classified", is it?
>
> You're an idiot, defending the indefensible. Again.
>
> Your response will be deleted unread. Again.

Cheatle is gone. At least one incompetent DEI hire crashed and burned. Now
it's Kamala's turn.

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

On 7/24/24 4:29 PM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> -hh wrote:
>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The problem that Cheatle has is that the stuff that the Congressmen
>>>>> wanted her to speak on (in public) are CUI, SBU & classified data: it
>>>>> violates her security clearance to say those in a non-secure venue.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, the number of shell casings found on the roof, which she refused
>>>> to answer, is "classified", is it?
>>>
>>> There's other categories besides Classified listed above: Oops!
>
> You're still an idiot defending for her behavior. Oops!
>
>> I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
>> their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)

For Chris Ahlstrom:

"Due to the investigative nature of the undercover Secret Services'
operatives' investigative duties, their identities were to remain
'secret,' thereby creating the name Secret Service."

<https://www.secretservice.gov/thoseothersecretservices>

>
> Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
> "modes of operation", would it?

Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.

-hh

-hh wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

She stonewalled. She lied. She refused to answer questions even when
there was no valid reason not to. Your hot air notwithstanding.

Idiot.

-hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 7/24/24 4:29 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
>>> their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)
>
> For Chris Ahlstrom:
>
> "Due to the investigative nature of the undercover Secret Services'
> operatives' investigative duties, their identities were to remain
> 'secret,' thereby creating the name Secret Service."
>
> <https://www.secretservice.gov/thoseothersecretservices>

Thanks!

>> Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
>> "modes of operation", would it?
>
> Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
> chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.

Of course. He's a k00k about certain topics.

"Show us on this doll where woke / vaccines / anthropogenic global warming /
evolution / Biden / Hillary / Harris hurt you."

:-D

--
Q: Why do mountain climbers rope themselves together?
A: To prevent the sensible ones from going home.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> -highhorse wrote:
>>
>> (snipped, unread)
>> Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
>> chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.

It's an example that proves the point of them withholding information.
The dishonesty is all yours, as usual.

"You don't get answers We consider that 'sensitive' information.
Oops!"

What a prick!

>Of course. He's a k00k about certain topics.

That's rather ironic, considering how many truths you deny, and
falsehoods you embrace.

>"Show us on this doll where woke / vaccines / anthropogenic global warming /
>evolution / Biden / Hillary / Harris hurt you."

What a lame, dishonest attack.

On 7/25/24 7:33 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> -highhorse wrote:
>>>
>>> (snipped, unread)
>>> Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
>>> chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.
>
> It's an example that proves the point of them withholding information.
> The dishonesty is all yours, as usual.
>
> "You don't get answers We consider that 'sensitive' information.
> Oops!"
>
> What a prick!

Nope. All that you're doing here chrisv is confessing that you've never
held a position of personal responsibility which required information
controls, be they as Trade Secrets, Security Clearance(s), NDA, etc.

Because of that, you revert to your usual jealous attempts to disabuse
that which you know that you're incapable of / don't understand.

-hh

On 7/25/24 7:02 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> -hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 7/24/24 4:29 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
>>>> their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)
>>
>> For Chris Ahlstrom:
>>
>> "Due to the investigative nature of the undercover Secret Services'
>> operatives' investigative duties, their identities were to remain
>> 'secret,' thereby creating the name Secret Service."
>>
>> <https://www.secretservice.gov/thoseothersecretservices>
>
> Thanks!

No problem. I was curious about it myself.

>>> Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
>>> "modes of operation", would it?
>>
>> Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
>> chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.
>
> Of course. He's a k00k about certain topics.
>
> "Show us on this doll where woke / vaccines / anthropogenic global warming /
> evolution / Biden / Hillary / Harris hurt you."
>
> :-D
>

We all have our hot buttons which send off into kook land. Some here on
COLA are simply more prone to flying off the handle...and showing it.
Here, I do know that if USSS policies are anything like the ones that
I've worked under, that our Public Affairs office wouldn't allow me to
deviate anywhere from the approved script .. and what chrisv doesn't
understand with that is that some such transgressions are worse than
simply being fired: one can be (a) fired, (b) stripped of pension, (c)
fined, and (d) go to jail.

Plus all of his anti-left rants on freedom while ignoring what the right
has published as their agenda. Case in point, P2025, page 589:

[quote]
Sabbath Rest. God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest, and until very
recently the Judeo-Christian tradition sought to honor that mandate by
moral and legal regulation of work on that day. Moreover, a shared day
off makes it possible for families and communities to enjoy time off
together, rather than as atomized individuals, and provides a healthier
cadence of life for everyone. Unfortunately, that communal day of rest
has eroded under the pressures of consumerism and secularism, especially
for low-income workers.

* Congress should encourage communal rest by amending the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) to require that workers be paid time and a half for
hours worked on the Sabbath. That day would default to Sunday, except
for employers with a sincere religious observance of a Sabbath at a
different time (e.g., Friday sundown to Saturday sundown); the
obligation would transfer to that period instead. Houses of worship (to
the limited extent they may have FLSA-covered employees) and employers
legally required to operate around the clock (such as hospitals and
first responders) would be exempt, as would workers otherwise exempt
from overtime.
[/quote]

But wait, there's more:

[quote]
Alternative View. While some conservatives believe that the government
should encourage certain religious observance by making it more
expensive for employers and consumers to not partake in those
observances, other conservatives believe that the government’s role is
to protect the free exercise of religion by eliminating barriers as
opposed to erecting them. Whereas imposing overtime rules on the Sab-
bath would lead to higher costs and limited access to goods and services
and reduce work available on the Sabbath (while also incentivizing some
people—through higher wages—to desire to work on the Sabbath), the
proper role of government in helping to enable individuals to practice
their religion is to reduce barriers to work options and to fruitful
employer and employee relations. The result: ample job options that do
not require work on the Sabbath so that individuals in roles that
sometimes do require Sabbath work are empowered to negotiate directly
with their employer to achieve their desired schedule.
[/quote]

TL;DR:

1. This eliminates overtime pay. Not just for extra hours, but in
undesirable hours (eg, 2nd/3rd shifts).

2. It mandates Sunday as a 'day of rest' .. adding back 1.5x pay if
you're compelled to work on the Christian sabbath, but then pulls that
back with carve-out exceptions for those who *don't* get OT if they're
working in an allegedly essential job (police, fire, medical, etc).

How's that for "Freedom!"?

There's tons more...the whole manifesto can be found here:

<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24088042-project-2025s-mandate-for-leadership-the-conservative-promise>

For example, here's the next few paragraphs after the above:

[quote]
Teleworking. COVID made telework ubiquitous, but the law and regulations
are still stuck in an era when telework was unique.

* Congress should clarify that overtime for telework applies only if the
employee exceeds 10 hours of work in a specific day (and the total hours
for the week exceed 40).

* DOL should clarify that an employee given the option to telework need
only record time if the quantity of work assigned for that day exceeds
the usual amount of work that employee performs so that the employee
need not track every time he logs in and out and the employer need not
do so either.

* DOL should clarify that a home office is not subject to OSHA
regulations and that time to set up a home office is not compensable
time or eligible for overtime calculations. DOL should likewise clarify
that reimbursement for home office expenses is not part of an employee’s
regular rate, even if those reimbursements are repetitive (such as for
internet or cell phone service).
[/quote]

Translation?
1. Telework only allowed for 10+ hour days;
2. Telework only allowed if it results in _more_ work output;
3. Telework is fine in 'sweatshop' conditions;
4. No worker compensation for telework expenses (business tax code).

-hh

-hh

On 7/22/24 10:32 PM, chrisv wrote:
> Charlie Glock wrote:
>
>> Hey what happened to that tranny freak in charge of nuclear waste who was stealling girls underwear?
>> Maybe she is shacking up with Hunter and his hooker harem?
>
> https://www.theamericanconservative.com/bidens-poster-boy-for-perv-arrested-on-felony-charges/
>

I missed that one. Wow. Just wow.
I do remember the tranny get together on the White House lawn. Brandon
seemed smitten by the one who exposed his boobies.

--
Luke

On 7/24/24 10:04 AM, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>
>> The problem that Cheatle has is that the stuff that the Congressmen
>> wanted her to speak on (in public) are CUI, SBU & classified data: it
>> violates her security clearance to say those in a non-secure venue.
>
> Oh, the number of shell casings found on the roof, which she refused
> to answer, is "classified", is it?
>
> You're an idiot, defending the indefensible. Again.
>
> Your response will be deleted unread. Again.
>
It's not what she refused to answer for whatever reason, it was her
complete lack of knowledge about the overall big picture of the incident
that was most disturbing.

I watched a little of Wray's testimony yesterday and I will I didn't
agree with some things he said, the guy was 100% professional and you
could easily tell that he was in charge and knows his shit.

I disagreed mostly with his comment that Biden never appeared
cognitively impaired to him.
That's a lie.
But otherwise, Cheatle was an unprofessional, disorganized mess compared
to Wray.

--
Luke

On 2024-07-25, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> -hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 7/24/24 4:29 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
>>>> their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)
>>
>> For Chris Ahlstrom:
>>
>> "Due to the investigative nature of the undercover Secret Services'
>> operatives' investigative duties, their identities were to remain
>> 'secret,' thereby creating the name Secret Service."
>>
>> <https://www.secretservice.gov/thoseothersecretservices>
>
> Thanks!
>
>>> Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
>>> "modes of operation", would it?
>>
>> Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
>> chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.
>
> Of course. He's a k00k about certain topics.
>
> "Show us on this doll where woke / vaccines / anthropogenic global warming /
> evolution / Biden / Hillary / Harris hurt you."

The mRNA "vaccine" (kill shot) didn't hurt me because I didn't take it. My
niece, on the other hand, was in the hospital for nearly three days right
after taking it and she now she's a young mother with myocarditis. (She was
in the Army Reserve so she was required to take it.)

The mRNA "vaccine" (so-called) has far more reports on the VAERS system than
ALL OTHER vaccines combined in 50 years of VAERS reports. You can continue
being a gullible moron, Chris, or you can actually learn something. I'm
guessing you'll choose to remain stupid. That seems to be your way.

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

On 2024-07-25 11:24 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-07-25, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> -hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 7/24/24 4:29 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice that the Service is, errrr, Secret. Perhaps to protect
>>>>> their mode(s) of operation? (Besides covering their asses.)
>>>
>>> For Chris Ahlstrom:
>>>
>>> "Due to the investigative nature of the undercover Secret Services'
>>> operatives' investigative duties, their identities were to remain
>>> 'secret,' thereby creating the name Secret Service."
>>>
>>> <https://www.secretservice.gov/thoseothersecretservices>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>>> Oh, telling us how many bullet cases they found would divulge their
>>>> "modes of operation", would it?
>>>
>>> Solely by itself, it generally shouldn't, but that's precisely why
>>> chrisv dishonestly cherrypicked only that one question out of many.
>>
>> Of course. He's a k00k about certain topics.
>>
>> "Show us on this doll where woke / vaccines / anthropogenic global warming /
>> evolution / Biden / Hillary / Harris hurt you."
>
> The mRNA "vaccine" (kill shot) didn't hurt me because I didn't take it. My
> niece, on the other hand, was in the hospital for nearly three days right
> after taking it and she now she's a young mother with myocarditis. (She was
> in the Army Reserve so she was required to take it.)
>
> The mRNA "vaccine" (so-called) has far more reports on the VAERS system than
> ALL OTHER vaccines combined in 50 years of VAERS reports. You can continue
> being a gullible moron, Chris, or you can actually learn something. I'm
> guessing you'll choose to remain stupid. That seems to be your way.

Ahlstrom's been a gullible moron his entire life. You can't teach an old
dog new tricks.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>> I'm saying that DJT is the reincarnation of Hitler, literally.
>
>Moron.

You're just in denial of that fact.

>> That's
>> what makes him so special, and magically able to get votes from people
>> who you can't believe could even figure out how to register to vote.
>> He's the antichrist.
>
>You know nothing of Christianity and are therefore ill equipped to
>comment on who is or isn't the Anti-Christ. Trump is not the one pushing
>a religion that is contrary to Christ; you faggots are.

When did Jesus say anything about "faggots"? That was all Paul.

>> I'm the real second coming, and you don't
>> believe it because I'm a freaky bisexual and whatnot.
>
>More moronic behaviour.

You will find out it's true. I'm just trying to give you a head
start.

>> You're obsessed
>> with believing in white superiority, it's just an illusion, it's
>> holding you back, you're a slave to Satan. Satan is a white
>> nationalist.
>
>It's not White superiority, it's White survival at this point. From
>every direction, organization, communities and cultures are trying to
>destroy what we have built.

Aw, cry me a fuckin' river, crackers.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>>>> Poor Ron, accusing me of being clueless as he spews nonsense.
>>>
>>> Which part is nonsense? Biden did not have the privilege and Trump
>>> indeed did. There is no lie there as the Supreme Court determined when
>>> they dismissed the charges against Trump for this very matter.
>>
>> Oh the Supreme Court said that, well, see my extra text in my sig, to
>> settle that. I'm the authority, not Alito, not Trump.
>
>The only thing you're an authority on is wanking.
>
>> I'm not going
>> to entertain the known-to-be authoritarian, constitution-denying
>> "Supreme Court", which is a club for Clarence Thomas and the other
>> four who voted for Alito's opinion in Dobbs, to prop up Trump's
>> attempt at dictatorship, and turn women's internal organs into state
>> property.
>
>I kneel to thee Lord Wank-a-lot.

You're a juvenile, racist, sexist, homophobic fuckwad.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

-hh wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 7/25/24 7:02 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
> <brevsnip>
>
>> "Show us on this doll where woke / vaccines / anthropogenic global warming /
>> evolution / Biden / Hillary / Harris hurt you."
>
> We all have our hot buttons which send off into kook land. Some here on
> COLA are simply more prone to flying off the handle...and showing it.
> Here, I do know that if USSS policies are anything like the ones that
> I've worked under, that our Public Affairs office wouldn't allow me to
> deviate anywhere from the approved script .. and what chrisv doesn't
> understand with that is that some such transgressions are worse than
> simply being fired: one can be (a) fired, (b) stripped of pension, (c)
> fined, and (d) go to jail.

Our corporate training drilled that into us regularly. And then we
had .mil training to do as will.

> TL;DR: <snipped>

From the party of "small government".

--
Q: Why do mountain climbers rope themselves together?
A: To prevent the sensible ones from going home.

-hh wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

Ladies and Gents, I give you -highhorse, the world's most
argumentative idiot.

Seriously, is there anyone else on the planet who is defending Cheatle
and the secret service, after their spectacular failure?

-hh wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

Was anyone fooled?

Luke wrote:

>Cheatle was an unprofessional, disorganized mess compared
>to Wray.

And an evasive weasel. And a fool.