On 26/07/2024 23:29, Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-07-26 4:30 p.m., Joel wrote:
>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>>> female.
>>>>
>>>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>>>> conflict there.
>>>
>>> She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
>>> the past.
>>
>> Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
>> men and women.
>>
>> In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
>> reality and derangement.
>
>
> That's typical phobe talk, sure.
>
lala! put your hands hands over your ears and be in denial of anything
that contradicts the fantasy.

No one is remotely *scared* of 'transgender' people. Well not outside of
women who have to share a prison s or a toilet with an erect penis on
testosterone on the prowl.
So phobia cannot be the right word.
Once again you show yourself to be delusional.

You don't scare anyone, and neither does your boyfriend.
Lets do a deal. I wont tell you about what I do in the bedroom if you
will simply stop boring me with what you do.

--
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
its shoes.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>>>> She's [Joel Crump's GF] biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>> female.
>>>
>>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>>> conflict there.
>>
>> She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
>> the past.
>>
>LOL!
>
>Do you really think *people* have changed in the last 20 years?
>Bless!

People are meant to evolve, to gain intelligence, awareness, people in
2024 ought to be more cognizant of the trans identity concept, but in
a place like this, an Internet relic, you have people running Windows
XP and talking like it's still 1992. It's amazing, how people get
"set in their ways", as they say, and make asses of themselves,
spewing outmoded and discredited views.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 26/07/2024 22:31, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> D wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.
>
> You don't know much about it. For example:
>
> https://www.genome.gov/27557513/the-y-chromosome-beyond-gender-determination
>
> Although the Y chromosome's role in sex determination is clear, research
> has shown that it is undergoing rapid evolutionary deterioration. Many
> generations ago the Y chromosome was large, and contained as many genes as
> the X chromosome. Now it is a fraction of its past size and contains fewer
> than 80 functional genes. This has led to debates and concerns over the
> years regarding the Y chromosome's eventual destiny. Many speculate that
> the Y chromosome has become superfluous and could completely decay within
> the next 10 million years. While studies of the Y chromosome have been
> challenging due to the palindromic and repeat-rich nature of its DNA
> sequence, recent genomic advances have provided some unexpected insights.
>
> It ain't simple, stupid. Read the literature, get acquainted with the findings,
> :-D "edgelord" :-D.
>
Read the fictional literature and you too will Believe, drink the
koolaid, and die happy..

I see none of the research that is 'supporting' these conclusions is
specified.

If people don't have biological sex with each other the species will die
out.

Darwin Rules OK?

> Heh heh:
>

--
The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all
private property.

Karl Marx

On 26/07/2024 21:45, Joel wrote:
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>> female.
>>
>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>
>
> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>
You are the phobe dear.

Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

--
Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On 26/07/2024 23:29, Joel wrote:
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-26 4:30 p.m., Joel wrote:
>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>>>> female.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>>>>> conflict there.
>>>>
>>>> She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
>>>> the past.
>>>
>>> Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
>>> men and women.
>>>
>>> In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
>>> reality and derangement.
>>
>> That's typical phobe talk, sure.
>>
>lala! put your hands hands over your ears and be in denial of anything
>that contradicts the fantasy.
>
>No one is remotely *scared* of 'transgender' people. Well not outside of
>women who have to share a prison s or a toilet with an erect penis on
>testosterone on the prowl.
>So phobia cannot be the right word.
>Once again you show yourself to be delusional.
>
>You don't scare anyone, and neither does your boyfriend.
>Lets do a deal. I wont tell you about what I do in the bedroom if you
>will simply stop boring me with what you do.

No. You will acclimate to this, whenever it finally gets through to
you. We will not relent on de-marginalizing trans people.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 26/07/2024 23:55, Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>>> Nobody is scared of you [Joel Crump] or him [Joel's trans GF being misgendered by the phobe]. We'll also be keeping our children away
>>> >from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
>>>> to within an inch of your life if you come near them.
>>>
>>> Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
>>> kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
>>> dream on.
>>
>> ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
>> cock if it doesn't go too well for you?
>
>
> Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
> the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
> weak cis woman lover.
>

Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.

Yawn.

--
Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.

On 26/07/2024 22:24, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>>>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>>>
>>> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>>>
>> Actually it is.
>
> It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
> investigations.
>

We gave up on Lysenkoism, and eugenics, too.

--
How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think.

Adolf Hitler

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On 26/07/2024 21:45, Joel wrote:
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>
>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>> female.
>>>
>>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>>
>> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>>
>You are the phobe dear.
>
>Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it

I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
trans women, and my sexual history.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
>> the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
>> weak cis woman lover.
>
>Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
>'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.
>
>Yawn.

Not what I said. <yawn>

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 27/07/2024 03:25, Joel wrote:
> People are meant to evolve, to gain intelligence, awareness

Says who?

Honestly your mind is a mess of weird ideas.
No one is meant to do anything.
Those that manage to find sexual partners of the opposite sex and
produce children have their genes survicve. Those that do not, wont.

> people in
> 2024 ought

Another word not in Naturee's dictionary. No one 'ought' to be or think
or do anything,.

> to be more cognizant of the trans identity concept,
Why? I dont demand that you become cognisant of Druid ceremonies of the
century three hundred years before Christ? Or thge works of Brighanm
Young and teh church of the latter day saiunts?

> but in
> a place like this, an Internet relic, you have people running Windows
> XP and talking like it's still 1992.

"They think they're so clever and classless and free
But they're still fucking peasants, far as I can see"

> It's amazing, how people get
> "set in their ways", as they say, and make asses of themselves,
> spewing outmoded and discredited views.

Well don't do it.

'Transgender' is so 2023....

--
You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
kind word alone.

Al Capone

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> People are meant to evolve, to gain intelligence, awareness
>
>Says who?
>
>Honestly your mind is a mess of weird ideas.
>No one is meant to do anything.
>Those that manage to find sexual partners of the opposite sex and
>produce children have their genes survicve. Those that do not, wont.
>
>> people in
>> 2024 ought
>
>Another word not in Naturee's dictionary. No one 'ought' to be or think
>or do anything,.

That's what people stuck in their ways say, yeah, we know.

>> to be more cognizant of the trans identity concept,
>Why? I dont demand that you become cognisant of Druid ceremonies of the
>century three hundred years before Christ? Or thge works of Brighanm
>Young and teh church of the latter day saiunts?

None of that has to do with being tolerant of people in today's world.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 27/07/2024 03:29, Joel wrote:

> No. You will acclimate to this, whenever it finally gets through to
> you. We will not relent on de-marginalizing trans people.
>
Are you threatening me? You are trying to *induce* transphobia, aren't
you, by means of threats?

Poor little Joel. Desperately wanting any emotional reaction other than
a yawn and a 'put a sock in the transgender thing, there's a good chap.'

How did Kipling put it...

"Sore, sleepy, and hungry as he was, Mowgli could not help laughing when
the Bandar-log began, twenty at a time, to tell him how great and wise
and strong and gentle they were, and how foolish he was to wish to leave
them. "We are great. We are free. We are wonderful. We are the most
wonderful people in all the jungle! We all say so, and so it must be
true," they shouted. "Now as you are a new listener and can carry our
words back to the Jungle-People so that they may notice us in future, we
will tell you all about our most excellent selves." Mowgli made no
objection, and the monkeys gathered by hundreds and hundreds on the
terrace to listen to their own speakers singing the praises of the
Bandar-log, and whenever a speaker stopped for want of breath they would
all shout together: "This is true; we all say so." Mowgli nodded and
blinked, and said "Yes" when they asked him a question, and his head
spun with the noise. "Tabaqui the Jackal must have bitten all these
people," he said to himself, "and now they have madness. Certainly this
is dewanee, the madness. Do they never go to sleep? Now there is a cloud
coming to cover that moon. If it were only a big enough cloud I might
try to run away in the darkness. But I am tired."

--
"It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

On 27/07/2024 03:43, Joel wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 26/07/2024 21:45, Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>>> female.
>>>>
>>>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>>>
>>> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>>>
>> You are the phobe dear.
>>
>> Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it
>
>
> I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
> even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
> trans women, and my sexual history.
>

That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
about it. Trying to convince yourself.
I don't really give a fuck.

I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

--
The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before
its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

Anon.

On 27/07/2024 03:45, Joel wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
>>> the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
>>> weak cis woman lover.
>>
>> Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
>> 'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.
>>
>> Yawn.
>
>
> Not what I said. <yawn>
>
Pretty much exactly what you said.
Now its the dawn chorus outside and I am getting totally bored with your
narcissism so its time to plonk you
Bye, and have a miserable life.

--
The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before
its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

Anon.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>> No. You will acclimate to this, whenever it finally gets through to
>> you. We will not relent on de-marginalizing trans people.
>>
>Are you threatening me? You are trying to *induce* transphobia, aren't
>you, by means of threats?

It's no threat, it's a statement of fact. Time is on the side of
people realizing truth.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>>> You are the phobe dear.
>>>
>>> Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it
>>
>> I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
>> even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
>> trans women, and my sexual history.
>
>That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
>about it. Trying to convince yourself.
>I don't really give a fuck.
>
>I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

I am just indifferent to being seen naked by the public.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>>>> men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
>>>> the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
>>>> weak cis woman lover.
>>>
>>> Ive heard so many gay people try to get me into bed with that line.
>>> 'Male sex is so much more 'manly'.
>>>
>>> Yawn.
>>
>> Not what I said. <yawn>
>>
>Pretty much exactly what you said.
>Now its the dawn chorus outside and I am getting totally bored with your
>narcissism so its time to plonk you
>Bye, and have a miserable life.

I win.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 7/26/24 5:08 AM, D wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>
>> On 7/24/24 9:30 PM, Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
>>> Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
>>>
>>> Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
>>> him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
>>
>>  Gnome SUCKS anyway.
>>
>
> This is the truth!

It went in a really weird direction. Can't STAND it.

Still don't understand why the RHEL derivs all still
use it by default. Makes them totally annoying/offensive
to use.

On 7/26/24 8:55 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2024-07-26 3:32 a.m., 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>> On 7/24/24 9:30 PM, Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
>>> Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
>>>
>>> Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
>>> him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
>>
>>    Gnome SUCKS anyway.
>
> KDE sucks more though.

KDE is much more "usable" ... however at this
point it's become insanely fat, drags down the
CPU unacceptably and far MORE places where it
can go wrong. Seems to want to be Winders.

LXDE/XFCE *much* better.

"186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>On 7/26/24 8:55 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> On 2024-07-26 3:32 a.m., 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>
>>>    Gnome SUCKS anyway.
>>
>> KDE sucks more though.
>
> KDE is much more "usable" ... however at this
> point it's become insanely fat, drags down the
> CPU unacceptably and far MORE places where it
> can go wrong. Seems to want to be Winders.
>
> LXDE/XFCE *much* better.

Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> The Natural Philosopher wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>>>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>>>
>>> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>>>
>> Actually it is.
>
> It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
> investigations.

Yep, very easy. Do you have a Y, male, do you not have a Y, female.
Problem solved!

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> D wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.
>
> You don't know much about it. For example:
>
> https://www.genome.gov/27557513/the-y-chromosome-beyond-gender-determination
>
> Although the Y chromosome's role in sex determination is clear, research
> has shown that it is undergoing rapid evolutionary deterioration. Many
> generations ago the Y chromosome was large, and contained as many genes as
> the X chromosome. Now it is a fraction of its past size and contains fewer
> than 80 functional genes. This has led to debates and concerns over the
> years regarding the Y chromosome's eventual destiny. Many speculate that
> the Y chromosome has become superfluous and could completely decay within
> the next 10 million years. While studies of the Y chromosome have been
> challenging due to the palindromic and repeat-rich nature of its DNA
> sequence, recent genomic advances have provided some unexpected insights.
>
> It ain't simple, stupid. Read the literature, get acquainted with the findings,
> :-D "edgelord" :-D.
>
> Heh heh:
>
>

Hey retard, Y = male, not Y = female. Problem solved.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, CrudeSausage wrote:

> On 2024-07-26 4:45 p.m., Joel wrote:
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>
>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>> female.
>>>
>>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>>
>>
>> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>
> Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away from
> you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you to within
> an inch of your life if you come near them.

I'd say that sounds like a reasonable stance. Having the trans-crowd
taking care of children is child abuse and should be punished severely.

On Sat, 27 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 27/07/2024 03:43, Joel wrote:
>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 26/07/2024 21:45, Joel wrote:
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>>>> female.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>>>>
>>>> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>>>>
>>> You are the phobe dear.
>>>
>>> Afraid of your own sexuality, suppressing it and denying it
>>
>>
>> I'm actually remarkably *open* about my sex life, I've done gay porn
>> even, but I talk about it publicly, I make no secret of my interest in
>> trans women, and my sexual history.
>>
>
> That's how you suppress your feelings, By being overtly boring and open
> about it. Trying to convince yourself.
> I don't really give a fuck.
>
> I am not surprised you have done porn. A simple exhibitionist arent you?

I think you're close to the truth here. Not only is it revolting and a
sick lifestyle, I think as you say, that it is a marker of significant
mental illness. It expresses that he deep down feels like he has no worth,
and the only way he gets attention and "love" is to be revolting and being
used.

Sadly, it will probably end in alcohol and drugs and an early death if he
doesn't change his life.

On Sat, 27 Jul 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

> On 7/26/24 5:08 AM, D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/24/24 9:30 PM, Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
>>>> Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
>>>>
>>>> Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
>>>> him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
>>>
>>>  Gnome SUCKS anyway.
>>>
>>
>> This is the truth!
>
> It went in a really weird direction. Can't STAND it.
>
> Still don't understand why the RHEL derivs all still
> use it by default. Makes them totally annoying/offensive
> to use.

I find it ok, but too big and clunky. So I've been on xfce for many years
and have experimented with dwm from time to time. I am curious about cwm
though, maybe that could be worthwhile exploring! =)