Someone want to explain what this cretinous edgelord drama is doing in
alt.folklore.computers?

On 26/07/2024 17:44, D wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

>>>
>> Reality is a social construct.
>>
>> That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
>> completely failed to understand what they were being taught.
>
> And a dangerous one. Being hit in the head with a socially constructed
> rock, still hurts! ;) But I certainly wouldn't mind if a lot of
> socialists here did try to jump out the window, since gravity is
> obviously a social construct! ;)

Oh that's easy, self identify as a carrion crow and Robert is a relative.

--
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight
and understanding".

Marshall McLuhan

On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>
>>
>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>
> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>
Actually it is.

--
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight
and understanding".

Marshall McLuhan

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>
>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>
>Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>
>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>
>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> gender! ;)
>
>
> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
> female.
>

Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
conflict there.

--
“Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,”

– Ludwig von Mises

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:15:26 +0100
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
> > D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
> >>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
> >>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
> >>>
> >>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
> >>>
> >> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
> >> gender! ;)
> >
> >
> > She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
> > female.
> >
>
> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
> conflict there.
>

How about taking this to a relevant NG?
FU: afc dropped

--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>
>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>
>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>> gender! ;)
>>
>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>> female.
>
>Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>conflict there.

She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
the past.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>
>>
>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>
> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:

> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>
>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>
>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> gender! ;)
>
>
> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
> female.

Is and always will be male. Idiot.

"Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:15:26 +0100
>The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>> > D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>> >>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>> >>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>> >>>
>> >>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>> >>>
>> >> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> >> gender! ;)
>> >
>> > She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>> > female.
>>
>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>> conflict there.
>
>How about taking this to a relevant NG?
>FU: afc dropped

If you had simply ignored the post, I wouldn't have written this
reply, with your Followup-To header rejected.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>
>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>
>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>> gender! ;)
>>
>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>> female.
>
>Is and always will be male. Idiot.

That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>> female.
>>
>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>
>
> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>
but is he female mentally , emotionally or is he just a dick to suck

The Natural Philosopher wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>
>>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>>
>> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>>
> Actually it is.

It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
investigations.

--
There is always one thing to remember: writers are always selling somebody out.
-- Joan Didion, "Slouching Towards Bethlehem"

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>The Natural Philosopher wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>>
>>>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>>>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>>>
>>> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>>>
>> Actually it is.
>
>It's all X/Y with you guys, regardless of the findings of scientific
>investigations.

Right, see: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955456/

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

D wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Gender, male ane female is very simple. Don't be stupid.

You don't know much about it. For example:

https://www.genome.gov/27557513/the-y-chromosome-beyond-gender-determination

Although the Y chromosome's role in sex determination is clear, research
has shown that it is undergoing rapid evolutionary deterioration. Many
generations ago the Y chromosome was large, and contained as many genes as
the X chromosome. Now it is a fraction of its past size and contains fewer
than 80 functional genes. This has led to debates and concerns over the
years regarding the Y chromosome's eventual destiny. Many speculate that
the Y chromosome has become superfluous and could completely decay within
the next 10 million years. While studies of the Y chromosome have been
challenging due to the palindromic and repeat-rich nature of its DNA
sequence, recent genomic advances have provided some unexpected insights.

It ain't simple, stupid. Read the literature, get acquainted with the findings,
:-D "edgelord" :-D.

Heh heh:

--
You will give someone a piece of your mind, which you can ill afford.

D <nospam@example.net> writes:

> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, yeti wrote:
>
>> Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
>>> (with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
>>> that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
>>> or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>
>> Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
>> answers.
>
> Except that gender is a fact with short and simple answers. Only
> socialist, woke people and retards do not understand what a man and a
> woman is.

Pasta & Ramen!

--
|rom The Future. +++ Breaking News From The Future. +++ Breaking News F|
| The USoA are switching to the binary number system because |
| having more than 1+1 distinct digits is far too woke. |
|+ #MABA + #makeAmericaBinaryAgain + #USA + #USoA + #woke + #MABA + #ma|

On 2024-07-26 4:30 p.m., Joel wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>> female.
>>
>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>> conflict there.
>
>
> She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
> the past.

Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
men and women.

In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
reality and derangement.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Joel Crump: "My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude."

On 2024-07-26 4:41 p.m., D wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>
>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>
>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>> gender! ;)
>>
>>
>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>> female.
>
> Is and always will be male. Idiot.

+1

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Joel Crump: "My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude."

On 2024-07-26 4:45 p.m., Joel wrote:
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>> female.
>>
>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>
>
> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.

Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away
from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Joel Crump: "My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude."

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2024-07-26 4:30 p.m., Joel wrote:
>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>
>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>> female.
>>>
>>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>>> conflict there.
>>
>> She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
>> the past.
>
>Yes, because it's old-fashioned to think that the world consists only of
>men and women.
>
>In reality, it's not a fashion thing at all. It's the difference between
>reality and derangement.

That's typical phobe talk, sure.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2024-07-26 4:45 p.m., Joel wrote:
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>
>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>> female.
>>>
>>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>>
>> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>
>Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away
>from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
>to within an inch of your life if you come near them.

Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
dream on.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-07-26 6:30 p.m., Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-07-26 4:45 p.m., Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>>>> gender! ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>>>> female.
>>>>
>>>> Is and always will be male. Idiot.
>>>
>>> That's what "idiot" phobes say, ignorantly, yes.
>>
>> Nobody is scared of you or him. We'll also be keeping our children away
>>from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
>> to within an inch of your life if you come near them.
>
>
> Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
> kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
> dream on.

ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
cock if it doesn't go too well for you?

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Joel Crump: "My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude."

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>>> Nobody is scared of you [Joel Crump] or him [Joel's trans GF being misgendered by the phobe]. We'll also be keeping our children away
>>>from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
>>> to within an inch of your life if you come near them.
>>
>> Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
>> kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
>> dream on.
>
>ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
>cock if it doesn't go too well for you?

Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
weak cis woman lover.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-07-26 6:55 p.m., Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>>> Nobody is scared of you [Joel Crump] or him [Joel's trans GF being misgendered by the phobe]. We'll also be keeping our children away
>>> >from you and to prove that we're not scared, we'll very gladly beat you
>>>> to within an inch of your life if you come near them.
>>>
>>> Oh really, you think I'd be intimidated by you? I've stood up to all
>>> kinds of mother fuckers, I'm a bad boy despite being thin. You can
>>> dream on.
>>
>> ROFL! Will your "girlfriend" be there to hit me from behind with "her"
>> cock if it doesn't go too well for you?
>
>
> Hint: men who like trans women are *extra* masculine, they can handle
> the vibe of a trans woman whose body produces testosterone. You're a
> weak cis woman lover.

ROFL! Alright, into the bin you go.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 26/07/2024 21:30, Joel wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 26/07/2024 20:54, Joel wrote:
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
>>> female.
>>
>> Has he seen a a psychiatrist? There seems to be some deep unresolved
>> conflict there.
>
>
> She's perfectly sane, you're just a typical Usenet person, stuck in
> the past.
>
LOL!

Do you really think *people* have changed in the last 20 years?
Bless!

--
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
its shoes.