On 2024-09-30 1:31 p.m., % wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>>> When you sent
>>>>> this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job
>>>>> keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind
>>>>> your
>>>>> link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in
>>>>> your message, not a screenshot of text.
>>>>
>>>> Fail.  Heh.
>>>
>>> Yep, I'm not that surprised. You can't understand. You can't respect
>>> others, you can only request them to respect you. But it doesn't work
>>> that way. The respect goes either both ways or doesn't go.
>>>
>>>> 2024 Usenet ...
>>>
>>> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
>>> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>>
>>
>> Free hint, I'm here because of Linux, politics, and to keep Usenet
>> relevant, not to please un-modern people who might even be a majority,
>> here.
>>
> >
> get a job you lazy queer

Getting his ass destroyed by his "girlfriend" is tough work.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>Getting his ass destroyed by his "girlfriend" is tough work.

Is sex that big in a relationship, to you? I want trans women for
more than their gocks, although I like cock.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-10-01, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>Getting his ass destroyed by his "girlfriend" is tough work.
>
>
> Is sex that big in a relationship, to you? I want trans women for
> more than their gocks, although I like cock.
>
So you like chicks with dicks?
Why?
That's weird.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris Word Salad Special Of The Day
Served Complete With Venn Diagram Dressing

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2024-10-01, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>>Getting his ass destroyed by his "girlfriend" is tough work.
>>
>> Is sex that big in a relationship, to you? I want trans women for
>> more than their gocks, although I like cock.
>>
>So you like chicks with dicks?
>Why?
>That's weird.

They're women with a male body, transgender women, I love them.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

% <present@qmail.net> wrote:
>Joel wrote:
>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>> 2024 Usenet ...
>>>
>>> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
>>> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>>
>> Free hint, I'm here because of Linux, politics, and to keep Usenet
>> relevant, not to please un-modern people who might even be a majority,
>> here.
>>
>get a job you lazy queer

I do more work than anyone.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-10-01, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>On 2024-10-01, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Getting his ass destroyed by his "girlfriend" is tough work.
>>>
>>> Is sex that big in a relationship, to you? I want trans women for
>>> more than their gocks, although I like cock.
>>>
>>So you like chicks with dicks?
>>Why?
>>That's weird.
>
>
> They're women with a male body, transgender women, I love them.
>
To each her own.
My take.

They are men dressing up to pretend they are women.
I haven't met a man yet who doesn't think these people are freaks.

However, this is a free country, at least until the democrats take control, so
do what makes you happy as I will not judge.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris Word Salad Special Of The Day
Served Complete With Venn Diagram Dressing

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2024-09-30 2:38 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-29 2:20 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>> Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> 2024 Usenet ...
>>>>
>>>> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
>>>> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>>>
>>> I'm just waiting for him to call you homophobic for disagreeing with
>>> him. That's how the feeble-minded usually work.
>>
>> Yep. The Woke insult you all they want, but if you return the insult they
>> whine that you're a "hater." Strangely enough they never apply that epithet
>> to themselves.
>
>I've gotten to the point that when they call me a racist, a sexist (this
>one's not true, I'm very kind to women), a homophobe, a transphobe, an
>anti-Semite or whatever else, I just say "yes." Their entire attack
>revolves around you being labelled something so that whatever comes out
>of your mouth is immediately dismissed by anyone listening who is just
>as stupid. In my experience, people no longer care about labels and will
>actually listen to what you're saying so once you smile and say "sure, I
>am all those things you say," they'll scream and repeat that you
>admitted to it, but everyone else will listen to your argument and
>generally agree with it. They'll end up looking like the screeching
>banshees that they are, and you will have won the argument.

You're a white guy.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29 2:20 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>> Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> 2024 Usenet ...
>>>
>>> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
>>> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>>
>> I'm just waiting for him to call you homophobic for disagreeing with
>> him. That's how the feeble-minded usually work.
>
>Yep. The Woke insult you all they want, but if you return the insult they
>whine that you're a "hater." Strangely enough they never apply that epithet
>to themselves.

You're asking for the KKK to be the guiding light, though, we're
demanding a better world than that.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>>>> I want trans women for
>>>> more than their gocks, although I like cock.
>>>>
>>>So you like chicks with dicks?
>>>Why?
>>>That's weird.
>>
>> They're women with a male body, transgender women, I love them.
>>
>To each her own.
>My take.
>
>They are men dressing up to pretend they are women.
>I haven't met a man yet who doesn't think these people are freaks.
>
>However, this is a free country, at least until the democrats take control, so
>do what makes you happy as I will not judge.

They're not freaks, they're human beings. Get with consensus reality.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 9/30/2024 3:56 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:05:12 -0000 (UTC), Phillip Frabott wrote:

> But it is quite apparent that you are just another GNU/Linux freeloader who
> wants freedom, only as in beer, without giving anything in return.

Will the real Feeb (Larry A Pietraskiewicz) please stand up?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
I just finished a payroll processing program
for my own use. I would like to contribute this masterpiece
as a FOSS project.

Why? Because I would want the recognition and fame. That's all.
I couldn't care less about the "community."
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Feeb, Feb 2019

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>On 9/19/2024 8:57 AM, vallor wrote:
>
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux lm 6.11.0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Sep 19 04:20:54 PDT 2024 x86_64
>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> real 384.60
>> user 18007.15
>> sys 3648.83
>
>There's medication you can take for OCD, you know.

There are drugs that make one more obsessive than a diagnosed OCD
person. To me, vallor's observation of RAM use is normal. Maybe you
trust Copilot+ to handle that for you.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 9/30/2024 3:35 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:01:58 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> In WSL, on the other hand:
>
> Judging from your example of a diehard Dimdows fanatic who can no longer
> get through their day
"his" day. Never ever call me a "they", bozo, or I'll send Joel Crump
around to your place sniffing for your 'girl cock'.

> without resorting to Linux,

A last resort.

For a while now I used Linux only for wget, because the GNU for Windows
binary of wget was so old. 2008ish.

But I tried it, and it works fine other than it usually requires the
--no-check-certificate flag on the websites I'm downloading.

> the day can’t be far off before WSL2 becomes a mandatory part
> of a Dimdows install.

Keep hope alive!

On 9/30/2024 11:39 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 9/19/2024 8:57 AM, vallor wrote:
>>
>>> $ uname -a
>>> Linux lm 6.11.0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Sep 19 04:20:54 PDT 2024 x86_64
>>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> real 384.60
>>> user 18007.15
>>> sys 3648.83
>>
>> There's medication you can take for OCD, you know.
>
>
> There are drugs that make one more obsessive than a diagnosed OCD
> person.

I'm sure.

You've used meth, right? Can you describe what it feels like? What do
you do and think about while you're high on it?

> To me, vallor's observation of RAM use is normal. Maybe you
> trust Copilot+ to handle that for you.

I was referring to his obsession with installing new Linux kernels every
time he changes his underwear.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>> There's medication you can take for OCD, you know.
>>
>> There are drugs that make one more obsessive than a diagnosed OCD
>> person.
>
>I'm sure.
>
>You've used meth, right? Can you describe what it feels like? What do
>you do and think about while you're high on it?

I have snorted strong, hydrochloride crystal meth, once. I basically
was unable to eat or sleep for three days. The high lasted part of
the first day. Stay away from this Satanic crap. Red Bull, Full
Throttle and Mtn Dew Kickstart Orange exist.

>> To me, vallor's observation of RAM use is normal. Maybe you
>> trust Copilot+ to handle that for you.
>
>I was referring to his obsession with installing new Linux kernels every
>time he changes his underwear.

He's "advocating Linux", dude. The great control he has even as a
Mint user.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>On 9/30/2024 3:35 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:01:58 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> In WSL, on the other hand:
>>
>> Judging from your example of a diehard Dimdows fanatic who can no longer
>> get through their day
>
>"his" day. Never ever call me a "they", bozo, or I'll send Joel Crump
>around to your place sniffing for your 'girl cock'.

Relax, Beavis. Using "they" in passing is very common, today.

> > without resorting to Linux,
>
>A last resort.
>
>For a while now I used Linux only for wget, because the GNU for Windows
>binary of wget was so old. 2008ish.
>
>But I tried it, and it works fine other than it usually requires the
>--no-check-certificate flag on the websites I'm downloading.

So, admitting that Winblows really does blow.

>> the day can’t be far off before WSL2 becomes a mandatory part
>> of a Dimdows install.
>
>Keep hope alive!

Microsoft Windows on a computer you keep a long time, depending on
that arbitrary, aging version, until your computer finally blows its
brains out.

I choose Linux.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-09-30, Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> wrote:
> I've been hesitant to get involved here because of all the non-constructive back
> and forth going on about the Cooledit program. But I'll just leave this here..
>
> I'm all for developers building new software. I don't think there is anything
> wrong with that. Choices are always good and should be a thing we strive for.
> However, one thing that I always look at when looking at software that tries to
> do things the other software out there already does is, what problem is this new
> program trying to solve? If the software does nothing innovative to solve a
> problem that exists that isn't already solved with other software already on the
> market then as far as I'm concerned, whats the point? It might just be a waste
> of time. Now I haven't looked at Cooledit myself but I would have to ask what
> exact technological issue is Cooledit solving that other software does not
> already solve?
>
> To clarify, 'technological issue' does not mean a UI update or a modern look. I
> mean, hard fact, there is a glaring problem that needs to be solved and cooledit
> solves it where no one else does. Because if you can't answer that question then
> was it really worth developing. Another thing that always gets missed when
> trying to market a new software program is the developer doesn't know what the
> software is bad at doing. So I'll ask the question, where is Cooledit lacking?
> If the developer can't give a clear answer to that question or says "It does
> everything great" then they need to go back to the drawing board and do more
> research because there is no such thing as a perfect program and if you don't
> know what the software is bad at then it cannot be built upon it's shortcoming
> later and the developer hasn't looked hard enough at their program.
>
> These are two questions I always ask everyone that comes to me (at work) with a
> new concept, idea, or finished program/product. What problem is it trying to
> solve and what are it's shortcomings. Answer those before you try to sell
> someone on a new product, service, or software. It will help you in the long
> run.
>
> I won't speculate on the word of other people that are for and against Cooledit
> because neither side really is having a constructive conversation. I will say if
> the developer can answer the two questions above (which should include examples
> of other software that tries to solve the same issue and comes short) then
> that's a better spotlight advertisement.
>
> Hopefully this is coming as a constructive reply to that conversation and will
> give everyone something to think about. I chose not to include all the back and
> forth conversations in this thread on my reply because it's just not
> constructive with name calling on both sides and I didn't want to get involved
> in that aspect. I just thought I'd give my general perspective on things and
> suggest the developers consider how they could answer the two questions I
> proposed here as a way to find better ways to market the software and understand
> the limitations of their software and find future improvements on it's
> shortcomings as it's lifecycle continues.
> Phillip Frabott
> ----------
> - Adam: Is a void really a void if it returns?
> - Jack: No, it's just nullspace at that point.
> ----------

Basically I think if someone wants to release a new text editor, they don't
have to justify doing so. Just wanting to do it is enough of a reason.

That said, neither CoolEdit or JOE are "new" applications. JOE was first
released on August 22, 1992 and CoolEdit was originally part of Midnight
Commander file utility, originally named "mcedit." Not sure when mcedit
first came out, but Midnight Commander (mc) was first released in 1994. I
think I read that mcedit, itself, came out in 1998. I don't know what's
changed since then or how it got the CoolEdit name — or what features
were added over the years. But CoolEdit's origin is not new.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-09-30 2:38 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-29 2:20 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>> Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet, you posted this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/fUXvwdR.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As unlike your claim of using your brain about the subject, you refuse
>>>>>> to used your brain to understand what's explained to you, I'll answer
>>>>>> that just once.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For a start, I don't know what he posted and I don't care. When you sent
>>>>>> this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job
>>>>>> keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind your
>>>>>> link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in
>>>>>> your message, not a screenshot of text.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fail. Heh.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, I'm not that surprised. You can't understand. You can't respect
>>>> others, you can only request them to respect you. But it doesn't work
>>>> that way. The respect goes either both ways or doesn't go.
>>>>
>>>>> 2024 Usenet ...
>>>>
>>>> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
>>>> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>>>
>>> I'm just waiting for him to call you homophobic for disagreeing with
>>> him. That's how the feeble-minded usually work.
>>
>> Yep. The Woke insult you all they want, but if you return the insult they
>> whine that you're a "hater." Strangely enough they never apply that epithet
>> to themselves.
>
> I've gotten to the point that when they call me a racist, a sexist (this
> one's not true, I'm very kind to women), a homophobe, a transphobe, an
> anti-Semite or whatever else, I just say "yes." Their entire attack
> revolves around you being labelled something so that whatever comes out
> of your mouth is immediately dismissed by anyone listening who is just
> as stupid. In my experience, people no longer care about labels and will
> actually listen to what you're saying so once you smile and say "sure, I
> am all those things you say," they'll scream and repeat that you
> admitted to it, but everyone else will listen to your argument and
> generally agree with it. They'll end up looking like the screeching
> banshees that they are, and you will have won the argument.

Most of the Woke are incapable of a logical argument. They're completely
emotion-driven. They think they've scored a major victory by calling you a
"racist" or whatever is their favorite insult of the day. That is as far as
their tiny brains go — that's all they're programmed to do. They're cultists
who have no clue why they believe what they believe. They just regurgitate
MSM bullshit and think their screeches makes sense. And you're right, more
and more people are ignoring the labels because they no longer mean anything
because they're so misused. You're now a "racist" for being born white.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> wrote:

>Not having to rely on GTK/Qt or any
>other X UI framework is a pretty good selling point. Means it can be used on
>systems that require minimal X windows deployments with minimal dependencies.
>I've never used MC myself so I can't speak to that, but there is probably a good
>market for a minimal dependency editor in a GUI system for those who do use a
>GUI so that's pretty cool.

Microsoft's C-centric editor for Linux is interestingly nice.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

>[What RonB is calling] Woke are incapable of a logical argument. They're completely
>emotion-driven. They think they've scored a major victory by calling you a
>"racist" or whatever is their favorite insult of the day. That is as far as
>their tiny brains go — that's all they're programmed to do. They're cultists
>who have no clue why they believe what they believe. They just regurgitate
>MSM bullshit and think their screeches makes sense. And you're right, more
>and more people are ignoring the labels because they no longer mean anything
>because they're so misused. You're now a "racist" for being born white.

Actually, sir, I don't think you are a racist.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-10-01 2:36 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30 2:38 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-29 2:20 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>>> Le 29-09-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet, you posted this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/fUXvwdR.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As unlike your claim of using your brain about the subject, you refuse
>>>>>>> to used your brain to understand what's explained to you, I'll answer
>>>>>>> that just once.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For a start, I don't know what he posted and I don't care. When you sent
>>>>>>> this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job
>>>>>>> keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind your
>>>>>>> link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in
>>>>>>> your message, not a screenshot of text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fail. Heh.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, I'm not that surprised. You can't understand. You can't respect
>>>>> others, you can only request them to respect you. But it doesn't work
>>>>> that way. The respect goes either both ways or doesn't go.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2024 Usenet ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's
>>>>> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take.
>>>>
>>>> I'm just waiting for him to call you homophobic for disagreeing with
>>>> him. That's how the feeble-minded usually work.
>>>
>>> Yep. The Woke insult you all they want, but if you return the insult they
>>> whine that you're a "hater." Strangely enough they never apply that epithet
>>> to themselves.
>>
>> I've gotten to the point that when they call me a racist, a sexist (this
>> one's not true, I'm very kind to women), a homophobe, a transphobe, an
>> anti-Semite or whatever else, I just say "yes." Their entire attack
>> revolves around you being labelled something so that whatever comes out
>> of your mouth is immediately dismissed by anyone listening who is just
>> as stupid. In my experience, people no longer care about labels and will
>> actually listen to what you're saying so once you smile and say "sure, I
>> am all those things you say," they'll scream and repeat that you
>> admitted to it, but everyone else will listen to your argument and
>> generally agree with it. They'll end up looking like the screeching
>> banshees that they are, and you will have won the argument.
>
> Most of the Woke are incapable of a logical argument. They're completely
> emotion-driven. They think they've scored a major victory by calling you a
> "racist" or whatever is their favorite insult of the day. That is as far as
> their tiny brains go — that's all they're programmed to do. They're cultists
> who have no clue why they believe what they believe. They just regurgitate
> MSM bullshit and think their screeches makes sense. And you're right, more
> and more people are ignoring the labels because they no longer mean anything
> because they're so misused. You're now a "racist" for being born white.

And I'm a racist for noticing that Haitian drivers here in Montreal
always drive 20km/h slower than the maximum limit, that they don't watch
where they're going, that they stop for no reason when there is no
traffic in front of them, that they are generally lazy in a classroom,
that they don't understand even the most basic of instructions etc..

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>[Allegedly,] I'm a racist for noticing that Haitian drivers here in Montreal
>always drive 20km/h slower than the maximum limit, that they don't watch
>where they're going, that they stop for no reason when there is no
>traffic in front of them, that they are generally lazy in a classroom,
>that they don't understand even the most basic of instructions etc..

You are projecting Caucasian North American values onto another
culture, arbitrarily, out of a secret agenda to discredit them as
people, if that isn't racism, well, what do we say is racism?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 10/1/2024 12:06 AM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 9/30/2024 3:35 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:01:58 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> In WSL, on the other hand:
>>>
>>> Judging from your example of a diehard Dimdows fanatic who can no longer
>>> get through their day
>>
>> "his" day. Never ever call me a "they", bozo, or I'll send Joel Crump
>> around to your place sniffing for your 'girl cock'.
>
>
> Relax, Beavis. Using "they" in passing is very common, today.

Not when you know you're addressing a sane person.

>>> without resorting to Linux,
>>
>> A last resort.
>>
>> For a while now I used Linux only for wget, because the GNU for Windows
>> binary of wget was so old. 2008ish.
>>
>> But I tried it, and it works fine other than it usually requires the
>> --no-check-certificate flag on the websites I'm downloading.
>
>
> So, admitting that Winblows really does blow.

It's a wget/developer issue, not a Windows issue. The port of wget to
Windows I use was last updated in 2008.

https://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/wget.htm

But I just now found what looks like a more recent version
https://eternallybored.org/misc/wget/

-------------------------------------------------------------
$ wget --version
GNU Wget 1.21.4 built on mingw32.

+cares +digest +gpgme +https +ipv6 +iri +large-file +metalink -nls
+ntlm +opie +psl +ssl/openssl

Wgetrc:
C:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/etc/wgetrc (system)
Compile:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DSYSTEM_WGETRC="/opt/misc-x64/etc/wgetrc"
-DLOCALEDIR="/opt/misc-x64/share/locale" -I. -I../../src -I../lib
-I../../lib -I/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DCARES_STATICLIB
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DPCRE2_STATIC
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DHAVE_LIBSSL -I
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DNDEBUG -ggdb
-mtune=broadwell -mtune=znver2 -O2 -pipe
Link:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DCARES_STATICLIB
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DPCRE2_STATIC
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DHAVE_LIBSSL -I
-IC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/include -DNDEBUG -ggdb
-mtune=broadwell -mtune=znver2 -O2 -pipe -L/opt/misc-x64/lib
-LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib -lmetalink
-LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib -lcares
-LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib -lpcre2-8
-LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib -lidn2
-LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib64 -lssl -lcrypto -L -lz
-LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib -lpsl -lws2_32 -lole32 -lcrypt32
-lexpat -LC:/msys64/qemu/opt/misc-x64/lib -lgpgme ../lib/libgnu.a
-lws2_32 -lws2_32 -lws2_32 -lws2_32 /opt/misc-x64/lib/libiconv.a
/opt/misc-x64/lib/libunistring.a /opt/misc-x64/lib/libiconv.a
-lws2_32

Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Originally written by Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org>.
Please send bug reports and questions to <bug-wget@gnu.org>.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Definitely a much newer version. And it works without the
--no-check-certificate flag. Amazingly, the executable above is 21x
larger than the original.

Hey, see what I did there? I added terminal output directly into a
Usenet post. Mind = blown.

>>> the day can’t be far off before WSL2 becomes a mandatory part>>> of
a Dimdows install.
>>
>> Keep hope alive!
>
>
> Microsoft Windows on a computer you keep a long time,

I ran my last system ~12 years. Same mobo and case and power supply,
but upgraded the RAM and video card and storage and monitor.

> depending on that arbitrary, aging version,

meaningless babble

Keep this in mind: most of the world will use desktop Windows their
entire lives.

> until your computer finally blows its brains out.

ha! So far my Windows systems exhibit no suicidal ideation.

> I choose Linux.

And Wine to run Windows apps.

I'm just not close to being willing to give up MS Office, Notepad++,
SumatraPDF and other apps in exchange for the Linux alternatives. FML
if I was ever forced to use LibreOffice and Thunar every day - that is
some seriously craptastic software.

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 23:46:30 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
<vdfrag$2jbdn$3@dont-email.me>:

> On 9/30/2024 11:39 PM, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/19/2024 8:57 AM, vallor wrote:
>>>
>>>> $ uname -a
>>>> Linux lm 6.11.0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Sep 19 04:20:54 PDT 2024 x86_64
>>>> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>
>>>> real 384.60
>>>> user 18007.15
>>>> sys 3648.83
>>>
>>> There's medication you can take for OCD, you know.
>>
>>
>> There are drugs that make one more obsessive than a diagnosed OCD
>> person.
>
> I'm sure.
>
> You've used meth, right? Can you describe what it feels like? What do
> you do and think about while you're high on it?
>
>
>
>> To me, vallor's observation of RAM use is normal. Maybe you
>> trust Copilot+ to handle that for you.
>
>
> I was referring to his obsession with installing new Linux kernels every
> time he changes his underwear.

Uh, DFS -- if you are changing your underwear only every week, you
should have a talk with a doctor.

Meanwhile, I like to test new kernels -- and the only person I've
ever encountered that has a problem with that is you.

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.11.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>On 10/1/2024 12:06 AM, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/30/2024 3:35 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>>
> >>> the day can’t be far off before WSL2 becomes a mandatory part>>> of
>a Dimdows install.
>>>
>>> Keep hope alive!
>>
>> Microsoft Windows on a computer you keep a long time,
>
>I ran my last system ~12 years. Same mobo and case and power supply,
>but upgraded the RAM and video card and storage and monitor.

And with Linux, that box would still be like new.

>> depending on that arbitrary, aging version,
>
>meaningless babble
>
>Keep this in mind: most of the world will use desktop Windows their
>entire lives.

Speaking of "meaningless", "most of the world" isn't motivated to know
about the alternative.

>> until your computer finally blows its brains out.
>
>ha! So far my Windows systems exhibit no suicidal ideation.

And yet you did finally replace it, to get Win11.

>> I choose Linux.
>
>And Wine to run Windows apps.

Very selected, minor ones.

>I'm just not close to being willing to give up MS Office, Notepad++,
>SumatraPDF and other apps in exchange for the Linux alternatives. FML
>if I was ever forced to use LibreOffice and Thunar every day - that is
>some seriously craptastic software.

You would put up with Win11Copilot for that shit? Christ.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:
> You're asking for the KKK to be the guiding light, though, we're
> demanding a better world than that.
>
>
https://postimg.cc/yWdnsJYC