Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>>>> Heh. BTW, I bought my MacBook at Micro Center.
>>>>>
>>>>> So? The MacBook product line was discontinued a ~decade ago (3/2015).
>>>>
>>>> When I bought it has nothing to do with Apple partnering with the
>>>> store's employee, genius. It was a good deal.
>>>
>>> Again, you're trying to compare ONE company to EVERY OTHER COMPANY in
>>> the same product space.
>>
>> I'm doing so because the Mac is the Delsym of computers. A pretty
>> good facsimile of a real PC but yet missing some basic, foundational,
>> natural existence. Dexers getting high on Delsym because it's what
>> they see at Walgreens and CVS, and make some ass-backward
>> rationalization for why they need that odd-duck product to trip on
>> DXM, is the same exact phenomenon as the weirdo buying a fuckin'
>> expensive Mac, because they suck Apple's dick so hard.
>>
>> Go lease a car, dummy.
>
>What is "basic, foundational, natural existence" even suppose to mean in
>this context?
>
>What is Apple supposedly "missing"?

Non-gimmicky computers.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-08 16:49, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Give a specific example of how menus on Windows OR Linux are
>>>> "interconnected" in a way that macOS is not.
>>>>
>>>> Put up or shut up.
>>>
>>> Navigating Apple's GUI, particularly the phone iteration of their
>>> weirdness, just isn't like Win10 or 11, or the Cinnamon DE on Linux -
>>> nor the "easy mode" of Samsung.
>>
>> Do you not know what the words "specific example" mean?
>
>
> Windows 10 and 11, and the Cinnamon DE on Linux, are specific examples
> of GUIs.
>

But you're supposed to provide a specific example to support your claim:

"Apple menus are not interconnected enough."

So do so.

Put up or shut up.

On 2024-12-08 16:47, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Apple is not analogous to either NewEgg or Micro Center...
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, it is, they are both purveyors of motherboards. Micro
>>>>> Center will be happy to work with Apple, but you can buy any PC
>>>>> imaginable.
>>>>
>>>> Apple is not a "purveyor of motherboards", doofus.
>>>
>>> Then what does the SoC sit on, doofus?
>>
>> To be a "purveyor" of something is to indicate that you sell that thing
>> ON ITS OWN.
>>
>> Apple doesn't sell motherboards. They sell computers.
>>
>> Just like Maytag isn't a "purveyor of electric motors" just because
>> washing machines have an electric motor in them.
>
>
> Do you even hear yourself yammering, there?
>

What part of my argument don't you understand?

Would you call Maytag a "purveyor of electric motors"?

Yes or no.

On 2024-12-08 16:48, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Heh. BTW, I bought my MacBook at Micro Center.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So? The MacBook product line was discontinued a ~decade ago (3/2015).
>>>>>
>>>>> When I bought it has nothing to do with Apple partnering with the
>>>>> store's employee, genius. It was a good deal.
>>>>
>>>> Again, you're trying to compare ONE company to EVERY OTHER COMPANY in
>>>> the same product space.
>>>
>>> I'm doing so because the Mac is the Delsym of computers. A pretty
>>> good facsimile of a real PC but yet missing some basic, foundational,
>>> natural existence. Dexers getting high on Delsym because it's what
>>> they see at Walgreens and CVS, and make some ass-backward
>>> rationalization for why they need that odd-duck product to trip on
>>> DXM, is the same exact phenomenon as the weirdo buying a fuckin'
>>> expensive Mac, because they suck Apple's dick so hard.
>>>
>>> Go lease a car, dummy.
>>
>> What is "basic, foundational, natural existence" even suppose to mean in
>> this context?
>>
>> What is Apple supposedly "missing"?
>
>
> Non-gimmicky computers.
>

What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>>> Give a specific example of how menus on Windows OR Linux are
>>>>> "interconnected" in a way that macOS is not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Put up or shut up.
>>>>
>>>> Navigating Apple's GUI, particularly the phone iteration of their
>>>> weirdness, just isn't like Win10 or 11, or the Cinnamon DE on Linux -
>>>> nor the "easy mode" of Samsung.
>>>
>>> Do you not know what the words "specific example" mean?
>>
>> Windows 10 and 11, and the Cinnamon DE on Linux, are specific examples
>> of GUIs.
>
>But you're supposed to provide a specific example to support your claim:
>
>"Apple menus are not interconnected enough."
>
>So do so.
>
>Put up or shut up.

Pick up an iPhone. Try to do more than one thing at once. It's
incredible, my mom swears by these goofy phones, but I am as with
Samsung as could be.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> Apple is not analogous to either NewEgg or Micro Center...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, it is, they are both purveyors of motherboards. Micro
>>>>>> Center will be happy to work with Apple, but you can buy any PC
>>>>>> imaginable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apple is not a "purveyor of motherboards", doofus.
>>>>
>>>> Then what does the SoC sit on, doofus?
>>>
>>> To be a "purveyor" of something is to indicate that you sell that thing
>>> ON ITS OWN.
>>>
>>> Apple doesn't sell motherboards. They sell computers.
>>>
>>> Just like Maytag isn't a "purveyor of electric motors" just because
>>> washing machines have an electric motor in them.
>>
>> Do you even hear yourself yammering, there?
>
>What part of my argument don't you understand?
>
>Would you call Maytag a "purveyor of electric motors"?
>
>Yes or no.

Why is that relevant?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?

Everything.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-08 17:05, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Give a specific example of how menus on Windows OR Linux are
>>>>>> "interconnected" in a way that macOS is not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Put up or shut up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Navigating Apple's GUI, particularly the phone iteration of their
>>>>> weirdness, just isn't like Win10 or 11, or the Cinnamon DE on Linux -
>>>>> nor the "easy mode" of Samsung.
>>>>
>>>> Do you not know what the words "specific example" mean?
>>>
>>> Windows 10 and 11, and the Cinnamon DE on Linux, are specific examples
>>> of GUIs.
>>
>> But you're supposed to provide a specific example to support your claim:
>>
>> "Apple menus are not interconnected enough."
>>
>> So do so.
>>
>> Put up or shut up.
>
>
> Pick up an iPhone. Try to do more than one thing at once. It's
> incredible, my mom swears by these goofy phones, but I am as with
> Samsung as could be.
>

So your claim was pure balonium.

Got it.

On 2024-12-08 17:06, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Apple is not analogous to either NewEgg or Micro Center...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, it is, they are both purveyors of motherboards. Micro
>>>>>>> Center will be happy to work with Apple, but you can buy any PC
>>>>>>> imaginable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple is not a "purveyor of motherboards", doofus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then what does the SoC sit on, doofus?
>>>>
>>>> To be a "purveyor" of something is to indicate that you sell that thing
>>>> ON ITS OWN.
>>>>
>>>> Apple doesn't sell motherboards. They sell computers.
>>>>
>>>> Just like Maytag isn't a "purveyor of electric motors" just because
>>>> washing machines have an electric motor in them.
>>>
>>> Do you even hear yourself yammering, there?
>>
>> What part of my argument don't you understand?
>>
>> Would you call Maytag a "purveyor of electric motors"?
>>
>> Yes or no.
>
>
> Why is that relevant?
>

It's called:

an ANALOGY!

Apple is no more a "purveyor of motherboards" than Maytag is a purveyor
of electric motors.

NewEgg or Micro Center will sell you a motherboard.

Apple will sell you a complete COMPUTER.

On 2024-12-08 17:07, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?
>
>
> Everything.
>

Why can't you produce a single actual answer?

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Apple is not analogous to either NewEgg or Micro Center...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, it is, they are both purveyors of motherboards. Micro
>>>>>>>> Center will be happy to work with Apple, but you can buy any PC
>>>>>>>> imaginable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apple is not a "purveyor of motherboards", doofus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then what does the SoC sit on, doofus?
>>>>>
>>>>> To be a "purveyor" of something is to indicate that you sell that thing
>>>>> ON ITS OWN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apple doesn't sell motherboards. They sell computers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just like Maytag isn't a "purveyor of electric motors" just because
>>>>> washing machines have an electric motor in them.
>>>>
>>>> Do you even hear yourself yammering, there?
>>>
>>> What part of my argument don't you understand?
>>>
>>> Would you call Maytag a "purveyor of electric motors"?
>>>
>>> Yes or no.
>>
>> Why is that relevant?
>
>It's called:
>
>an ANALOGY!
>
>Apple is no more a "purveyor of motherboards" than Maytag is a purveyor
>of electric motors.
>
>NewEgg or Micro Center will sell you a motherboard.
>
>Apple will sell you a complete COMPUTER.

You ever hear of a distinction without a difference?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-08 17:20, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Apple is not analogous to either NewEgg or Micro Center...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, it is, they are both purveyors of motherboards. Micro
>>>>>>>>> Center will be happy to work with Apple, but you can buy any PC
>>>>>>>>> imaginable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apple is not a "purveyor of motherboards", doofus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then what does the SoC sit on, doofus?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To be a "purveyor" of something is to indicate that you sell that thing
>>>>>> ON ITS OWN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple doesn't sell motherboards. They sell computers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just like Maytag isn't a "purveyor of electric motors" just because
>>>>>> washing machines have an electric motor in them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you even hear yourself yammering, there?
>>>>
>>>> What part of my argument don't you understand?
>>>>
>>>> Would you call Maytag a "purveyor of electric motors"?
>>>>
>>>> Yes or no.
>>>
>>> Why is that relevant?
>>
>> It's called:
>>
>> an ANALOGY!
>>
>> Apple is no more a "purveyor of motherboards" than Maytag is a purveyor
>> of electric motors.
>>
>> NewEgg or Micro Center will sell you a motherboard.
>>
>> Apple will sell you a complete COMPUTER.
>
>
> You ever hear of a distinction without a difference?
>

Yes.

There is a real distinction between a company that sells components and
a company that sells complete systems.

On 2024-12-08 17:24, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>> What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?
>>>
>>> Everything.
>>
>> Why can't you produce a single actual answer?
>
>
> Go to apple.com. From the first moment, you're in this corporate,
> proprietary world. And going all the way to being the proud lessee of
> a Mac completes it, and pick up an iPhone while you're at it! Do you
> need AirTags?
>
> For fuck's sake, how are you this stupid?
>

What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?

Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?

How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?

As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>>> What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?
>>>>
>>>> Everything.
>>>
>>> Why can't you produce a single actual answer?
>>
>> Go to apple.com. From the first moment, you're in this corporate,
>> proprietary world. And going all the way to being the proud lessee of
>> a Mac completes it, and pick up an iPhone while you're at it! Do you
>> need AirTags?
>>
>> For fuck's sake, how are you this stupid?
>
>What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?
>
>Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?
>
>How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?
>
>As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.

Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-08 20:51, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything.
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you produce a single actual answer?
>>>
>>> Go to apple.com. From the first moment, you're in this corporate,
>>> proprietary world. And going all the way to being the proud lessee of
>>> a Mac completes it, and pick up an iPhone while you're at it! Do you
>>> need AirTags?
>>>
>>> For fuck's sake, how are you this stupid?
>>
>> What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?
>>
>> Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?
>>
>> How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?
>>
>> As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.
>
>
> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>

For once... ...explain WHY you think that.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>> What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?
>>>
>>> Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?
>>>
>>> How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?
>>>
>>> As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.
>>
>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>
>For once... ...explain WHY you think that.

Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
Just retardation.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-08 23:32, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>> What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?
>>>>
>>>> How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?
>>>>
>>>> As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.
>>>
>>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>>
>> For once... ...explain WHY you think that.
>
>
> Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
> them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
> Just retardation.
>

You think being able to locate something that you've lost or that's been
taken from you isn't useful?

How is that "an invented purpose"?

And you don't pay Apple for USING them. You pay Apple just to buy them.
There's no ongoing charged.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>>>
>>> For once... ...explain WHY you think that.
>>
>> Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
>> them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
>> Just retardation.
>
>You think being able to locate something that you've lost or that's been
>taken from you isn't useful?
>
>How is that "an invented purpose"?
>
>And you don't pay Apple for USING them. You pay Apple just to buy them.
>There's no ongoing charged.

Look at yourself. Flailing around like a moron. All because you are
so loyal a customer to this cash cow Apple. Or their employee ...

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-08 23:51, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>>>>
>>>> For once... ...explain WHY you think that.
>>>
>>> Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
>>> them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
>>> Just retardation.
>>
>> You think being able to locate something that you've lost or that's been
>> taken from you isn't useful?
>>
>> How is that "an invented purpose"?
>>
>> And you don't pay Apple for USING them. You pay Apple just to buy them.
>> There's no ongoing charged.
>
>
> Look at yourself. Flailing around like a moron. All because you are
> so loyal a customer to this cash cow Apple. Or their employee ...
>

Look at yourself.

Just pretending that people like to be able to find lost items.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>>>>>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>>>>>
>>>>> For once... ...explain WHY you think that.
>>>>
>>>> Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
>>>> them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
>>>> Just retardation.
>>>
>>> You think being able to locate something that you've lost or that's been
>>> taken from you isn't useful?
>>>
>>> How is that "an invented purpose"?
>>>
>>> And you don't pay Apple for USING them. You pay Apple just to buy them.
>>> There's no ongoing charged.
>>
>> Look at yourself. Flailing around like a moron. All because you are
>> so loyal a customer to this cash cow Apple. Or their employee ...
>
>Look at yourself.
>
>Just pretending that people like to be able to find lost items.

Don't lose the items in the first place, derp.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-09 00:14, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For once... ...explain WHY you think that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
>>>>> them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
>>>>> Just retardation.
>>>>
>>>> You think being able to locate something that you've lost or that's been
>>>> taken from you isn't useful?
>>>>
>>>> How is that "an invented purpose"?
>>>>
>>>> And you don't pay Apple for USING them. You pay Apple just to buy them.
>>>> There's no ongoing charged.
>>>
>>> Look at yourself. Flailing around like a moron. All because you are
>>> so loyal a customer to this cash cow Apple. Or their employee ...
>>
>> Look at yourself.
>>
>> Just pretending that people like to be able to find lost items.
>
>
> Don't lose the items in the first place, derp.
>

So you're saying that if someone screws up, they should just have no
recourse?

But you said rather more than that they aren't really useful.

You said they were "devilish".

Care to explain?

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

>> Don't lose the items [so that one would need Apple AirTag devices] in the first place, derp.
>
>So you're saying that if someone screws up, they should just have no
>recourse?
>
>But you said rather more than that they aren't really useful.
>
>You said they were "devilish".
>
>Care to explain?

Screwing up is all a mind game being played by the enemies with you.
Apple gets the profit, you get to be a "beta" as the dumbasses say.
Rise above Apple's AirTag scheme.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:tghcljd787ivaahca0l80pgnqfr9cogpdc@4ax.com...
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>> What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?
>>>
>>> Everything.
>>
>>Why can't you produce a single actual answer?
>
>
> Go to apple.com. From the first moment, you're in this corporate,
> proprietary world. And going all the way to being the proud lessee of
> a Mac completes it, and pick up an iPhone while you're at it! Do you
> need AirTags?
>
> For fuck's sake, how are you this stupid?

IOW, No, you don't have any actual answer.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4otclj1odo1etrnsrmi2bnbcbidadatvkq@4ax.com...
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> What is "gimmicky" about a Mac?
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything.
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you produce a single actual answer?
>>>
>>> Go to apple.com. From the first moment, you're in this corporate,
>>> proprietary world. And going all the way to being the proud lessee of
>>> a Mac completes it, and pick up an iPhone while you're at it! Do you
>>> need AirTags?
>>>
>>> For fuck's sake, how are you this stupid?
>>
>>What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?
>>
>>Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?
>>
>>How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?
>>
>>As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.
>
>
> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.

anything is a "very useful invention by the devil" as everything can be good
or evil depending on how people chose to use it.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:107dlj9a2jn41k8uf6u3tcre07msi1vo5m@4ax.com...
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>>> What makes a Mac "gimmicky"?
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, why can't you provide a simple answer to that question?
>>>>
>>>> How am I a "lessee" when I buy a Mac?
>>>>
>>>> As for AirTags: they're a very useful invention.
>>>
>>> Hint: AirTags are a very useful invention by the devil.
>>
>>For once... ...explain WHY you think that.
>
>
> Because they serve an invented purpose, namely you paying Apple for
> them, using them, feeling excited when they locate something for you.
> Just retardation.

Strange, I consider the idea of being able to track and important package,
tool or device in real time to be a very useful and possibly necessary
function.
But again, it's not the device it's how people CHOSE to use it.
I mean we could claim computers are evil, cars are evil, etc.