Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

While you recently had your problems on the run, they've regrouped and are making another attack.


sci / sci.med.vision / Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?

SubjectAuthor
* Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
+- Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
+* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Robert
|`* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
| `* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Robert
|  `* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
|   `* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
|    `- Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Robert
+* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Judy Brisson
|`- Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
`* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Bob F
 `* Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Mehran Ziadloo
  `- Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?Bob F

1
Subject: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:11 UTC
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d52:0:b0:31f:3d2:6fb6 with SMTP id h18-20020ac87d52000000b0031f03d26fb6mr6297532qtb.293.1659165067666;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5962:0:b0:473:5996:2a13 with SMTP id
eq2-20020ad45962000000b0047359962a13mr5985876qvb.37.1659165067403; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 00:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:11:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2164
View all headers

Disclaimer, I just saw the same exact conversation from 2003 and I'm asking pretty much the same question since I didn't get my answer from that one.

I just got my polarized prescription sunglasses and while I was checking them in the store, I didn't see any issues with them. But as soon as I looked at a computer screen with them at home, the problem was very obvious. The best way I can explain it is by showing it to you:

https://ibb.co/rd80TmQ

As you can see in the image above, it's very ugly and the distortion is all over the place. The white background of the image is a laptop's LCD.

I do have the option of going back to the store and demanding a replacement.. But before I do that, I was wondering if I should ask for new ones without polarization since such problems are inevitable or they've just screwed up and they can actually deliver uniformly polarized prescription sunglasses? Please in your answer include conditions where such defects might be inevitable (like maybe astigmatism?).

Thanks.
Mehran

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:17 UTC
References: 1
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:d02:b0:474:81cc:599e with SMTP id 2-20020a0562140d0200b0047481cc599emr6273358qvh.29.1659165429256;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e4d:0:b0:31f:36b7:5b16 with SMTP id
i13-20020ac85e4d000000b0031f36b75b16mr6360702qtx.132.1659165429045; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 00:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <42816e16-00f5-4612-b660-4cbb9796074bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:17:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 0
View all headers

BTW, if you have any idea how this could have happened, I would love to hear your thoughts. Is this problem due to cheap lens or the craftsman who cut them into shape has screwed up?

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Robert
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:59 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!Q4PiVF6FGi027ZfmDitaPA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: redelm@ev1.net.invalid (Robert)
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:59:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="11356"; posting-host="Q4PiVF6FGi027ZfmDitaPA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
View all headers

Mehran Ziadloo <mehranziadloo@gmail.com> wrote in part:
> Disclaimer, I just saw the same exact conversation from
> 2003 and I'm asking pretty much the same question since I
> didn't get my answer from that one.

You checked -- good for you!

> I just got my polarized prescription sunglasses and while
> I was checking them in the store, I didn't see any issues
> with them. But as soon as I looked at a computer screen
> with them at home, the problem was very obvious. The best
> way I can explain it is by showing it to you:
>
> https://ibb.co/rd80TmQ
>
> As you can see in the image above, it's very ugly and the
> distortion is all over the place. The white background of
> the image is a laptop's LCD.

I don't view images. But you should be aware that polarization
runs in different directions, say up-down versus left-right.
Many displays generate polarized light and will "black out"
when viewed through polarized lenses _at_a_particular_angle.
Is the problem the same when you rotate the glasses or the
screen 90deg ?

> I do have the option of going back to the store and demanding
> a replacement. But before I do that, I was wondering if I
> should ask for new ones without polarization since such
> problems are inevitable or they've just screwed up and
> they can actually deliver uniformly polarized prescription
> sunglasses? Please in your answer include conditions where
> such defects might be inevitable (like maybe astigmatism?).
>
> Thanks. Mehran

HTH
-- Robert

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:25 UTC
References: 1 2
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1c8c:b0:473:408f:ddd6 with SMTP id ib12-20020a0562141c8c00b00473408fddd6mr7589402qvb.74.1659191140329;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2268:b0:473:1196:c599 with SMTP id
gs8-20020a056214226800b004731196c599mr7366637qvb.14.1659191140105; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 07:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com> <tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <71d1ad41-4dde-4e78-9c53-fd7b4c3ad12en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:25:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2564
View all headers

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the reply. I wish that Google Group supported embedded images so you don't have to click on an external link to see the image. But unfortunately, it doesn't. The best I can describe my prescription sunglasses' polarization situation is that it's not uniform. Meaning that it has patterns composed of curves. The shape of the curves gives you a feeling as if they are caused by cutting the lenses. As if when the crafts(wo)man was cutting them into shape, the lenses were heated and caused the distortions. At least that's my personal (uneducated) theory. The curves are kinda pretty but definitely, they are not making my glasses any better.

To answer your question, when I rotate the glasses while looking at some LCD, the amount of light that gets through changes (as it should). I can still see the aforementioned patterns, it's just that they'll be less pronounced (they are most pronounced when I keep them level). But the main issue is the curved patterns.

And BTW, the explained distortion only applies to the polarization, and if I'm looking at some scenery where polarization does not do anything, I won't be seeing these patterns. That's why I missed them when I was checking them in their shop.

Thanks again,
Mehran

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Robert
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:20 UTC
References: 1 2 3
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!Q4PiVF6FGi027ZfmDitaPA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: redelm@ev1.net.invalid (Robert)
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:20:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tc3i86$1nqo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com> <tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <71d1ad41-4dde-4e78-9c53-fd7b4c3ad12en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="57176"; posting-host="Q4PiVF6FGi027ZfmDitaPA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
View all headers

Mehran Ziadloo <mehranziadloo@gmail.com> wrote in part:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I wish that Google Group supported
> embedded images so you don't have to click on an external
> link to see the image. But unfortunately, it doesn't. The

Nor should it. I'm reading on USENET which never did.

> best I can describe my prescription sunglasses' polarization
> situation is that it's not uniform. Meaning that it has
> patterns composed of curves. The shape of the curves
> gives you a feeling as if they are caused by cutting the
> lenses. As if when the crafts(wo)man was cutting them into
> shape, the lenses were heated and caused the distortions. At
> least that's my personal (uneducated) theory. The curves
> are kinda pretty but definitely, they are not making my
> glasses any better.

When I look at the (untinted) rear window of my car, I see
an interesting checkerboard pattern which shifts as I rotate
my head. I presume this is deliberate to reduce glare.
The world is a very sophisticated place underneath.

> To answer your question, when I rotate the glasses while
> looking at some LCD, the amount of light that gets through
> changes (as it should). I can still see the aforementioned
> patterns, it's just that they'll be less pronounced (they
> are most pronounced when I keep them level). But the main
> issue is the curved patterns.

They might be accidental from non-uniform heat treatment,
or they might be deliberate to achieve some effect like
circular polarization. The latter should be more uniform,
and you could check by looking at a uniform polarized source
like a white laptop screen.

> And BTW, the explained distortion only applies to the
> polarization, and if I'm looking at some scenery where
> polarization does not do anything, I won't be seeing these
> patterns. That's why I missed them when I was checking them
> in their shop.

Then it might be hard to argue unless you can demonstrate
non-uniformity indicating manufacturing error.

> Thanks again, Mehran
-- Robert

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:46 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e51:0:b0:31f:4202:c31d with SMTP id i17-20020ac85e51000000b0031f4202c31dmr7721664qtx.490.1659195993744;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 08:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4449:b0:6b2:83d3:2e13 with SMTP id
w9-20020a05620a444900b006b283d32e13mr6823432qkp.658.1659195993575; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 08:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 08:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tc3i86$1nqo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
<tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <71d1ad41-4dde-4e78-9c53-fd7b4c3ad12en@googlegroups.com>
<tc3i86$1nqo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fdfc01da-37e3-4300-a1f7-b31c194da4a7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 15:46:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 8
View all headers

What I can say for sure is that the patterns I'm complaining about are NOT deliberate. The curves are very random, more like what you get as a result of a natural process.

So, my question still stands. Should I just ask for non-polarized lenses next time or this is just a screw up which can be avoided? I'm asking this because even though I've had prescription sunglasses before but they were never polarized and I don't know if this is a common issue that most people learn to live with or not.

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:33 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:296:b0:31f:5e7:272c with SMTP id z22-20020a05622a029600b0031f05e7272cmr8086572qtw.146.1659202390327;
Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2342:b0:473:bcd6:a3b7 with SMTP id
hu2-20020a056214234200b00473bcd6a3b7mr8220520qvb.88.1659202390105; Sat, 30
Jul 2022 10:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fdfc01da-37e3-4300-a1f7-b31c194da4a7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
<tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <71d1ad41-4dde-4e78-9c53-fd7b4c3ad12en@googlegroups.com>
<tc3i86$1nqo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fdfc01da-37e3-4300-a1f7-b31c194da4a7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <681b5ea3-f3ff-4ee6-9ef3-4d605a48872dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:33:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2114
View all headers

I just made a new discovery! And it's very interesting. I've put the aforementioned polarized glasses on top of my non-polarized prescription glasses. And similar distortions exist even on my non-polarized lenses. I believe this means that such distortions exist on all my previous lenses even though I could never see them before. I have 4 pairs of glasses, all roughly with the same prescriptions (gathered over the years). Similar (but not identical) distortions can be observed if I put the polarized lenses in top of them and look at a computer LCD.

I'm still not sure if this counts as a defect or not. In fact, after this discovery I'm even less sure.

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Robert
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:59 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!Q4PiVF6FGi027ZfmDitaPA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: redelm@ev1.net.invalid (Robert)
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 19:59:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tc42is$el8$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com> <tc3a0c$b2s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <71d1ad41-4dde-4e78-9c53-fd7b4c3ad12en@googlegroups.com> <tc3i86$1nqo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fdfc01da-37e3-4300-a1f7-b31c194da4a7n@googlegroups.com> <681b5ea3-f3ff-4ee6-9ef3-4d605a48872dn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="15016"; posting-host="Q4PiVF6FGi027ZfmDitaPA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
View all headers

Mehran Ziadloo <mehranziadloo@gmail.com> wrote in part:
> I just made a new discovery! And it's very interesting. I've
> put the aforementioned polarized glasses on top of my
> non-polarized prescription glasses. And similar distortions
> exist even on my non-polarized lenses. I believe this means
> that such distortions exist on all my previous lenses even
> though I could never see them before. I have 4 pairs of
> glasses, all roughly with the same prescriptions (gathered
> over the years). Similar (but not identical) distortions
> can be observed if I put the polarized lenses in top of
> them and look at a computer LCD.

Distortions are present in all lenses, moreso with cylinder to
correct astigmatism. And very much worse if the lenses have
not been properly fitted (centered) on their eyes. On the
table or a sheet of ruled paper the distortions are obvious.

> I'm still not sure if this counts as a defect or not.
> In fact, after this discovery I'm even less sure.

Something repeatable is not a defect.
It might be a design flaw.

-- Robert

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Judy Brisson
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 01:19 UTC
References: 1
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:130a:b0:31f:450f:ac8e with SMTP id v10-20020a05622a130a00b0031f450fac8emr16717940qtk.498.1659403176787;
Mon, 01 Aug 2022 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d90:0:b0:326:b431:6cd3 with SMTP id
c16-20020ac87d90000000b00326b4316cd3mr10690356qtd.511.1659403176636; Mon, 01
Aug 2022 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=67.69.21.250; posting-account=DorVeQoAAACh7Szelvo77XcLYM3CjVsz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.69.21.250
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1dd90786-802f-40dc-9800-29416b5c8042n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: judybrisson@rogers.com (Judy Brisson)
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 01:19:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 28
View all headers

On Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 3:11:08 AM UTC-4, mehran...@gmail.com wrote:
> Disclaimer, I just saw the same exact conversation from 2003 and I'm asking pretty much the same question since I didn't get my answer from that one..
>
> I just got my polarized prescription sunglasses and while I was checking them in the store, I didn't see any issues with them. But as soon as I looked at a computer screen with them at home, the problem was very obvious. The best way I can explain it is by showing it to you:
>
> https://ibb.co/rd80TmQ
>
> As you can see in the image above, it's very ugly and the distortion is all over the place. The white background of the image is a laptop's LCD.
>
> I do have the option of going back to the store and demanding a replacement. But before I do that, I was wondering if I should ask for new ones without polarization since such problems are inevitable or they've just screwed up and they can actually deliver uniformly polarized prescription sunglasses? Please in your answer include conditions where such defects might be inevitable (like maybe astigmatism?).
>
> Thanks.
> Mehran
Computer screens are often polarized and will not be at the same angle as your glasses so you will get those weird effects if using sunglasses to view your computer. The issue is with your monitor, not the glasses. However, you should not be using sunglasses to view your computer anyway. Use clear, non polarized glasses with your computer.

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 05:24 UTC
References: 1 2
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:18d:b0:31f:e8e:4660 with SMTP id s13-20020a05622a018d00b0031f0e8e4660mr17833557qtw.176.1659417876865;
Mon, 01 Aug 2022 22:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5fc9:0:b0:31f:c75:1b75 with SMTP id
k9-20020ac85fc9000000b0031f0c751b75mr17290202qta.586.1659417876668; Mon, 01
Aug 2022 22:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 22:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1dd90786-802f-40dc-9800-29416b5c8042n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com> <1dd90786-802f-40dc-9800-29416b5c8042n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3dce98ff-fc6d-4ca3-b876-e7f59814d30en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 05:24:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2118
View all headers

Thanks, Judy for your input.

I understand that polarized glasses are not made for looking at computer screens and I've done so only to test them. But that does not mean that problem is the screen. I can see the issue even if I look at the sky by them. The patterns are not as pronounced as the computer screen but they are there. I can also see them when I wear the glasses and look in the mirror and see my eyes behind the lenses (when the light goes through the lenses twice). There's no doubt in my mind that this is not how these lenses are supposed to be but at the same time I'm not sure if it's the maker's fault or this due to my prescription. Basically, I don't know if I should ask them to remake new polarized lenses for me or ones without polarization.

Regards,
Mehran

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Bob F
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:05 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bobnospam@gmail.com (Bob F)
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:05:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <tcbata$1hg1p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:04:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c606db5671d76d22c9e01e871b7b1655";
logging-data="1622073"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX188c0lrxnjkMY7WtX2HpC91"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:K3t/EF8/npItOHqjwNsDeG35qhY=
In-Reply-To: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
View all headers

On 7/30/2022 12:11 AM, Mehran Ziadloo wrote:
> Disclaimer, I just saw the same exact conversation from 2003 and I'm asking pretty much the same question since I didn't get my answer from that one.
>
> I just got my polarized prescription sunglasses and while I was checking them in the store, I didn't see any issues with them. But as soon as I looked at a computer screen with them at home, the problem was very obvious. The best way I can explain it is by showing it to you:
>
> https://ibb.co/rd80TmQ
>
> As you can see in the image above, it's very ugly and the distortion is all over the place. The white background of the image is a laptop's LCD.
>
> I do have the option of going back to the store and demanding a replacement. But before I do that, I was wondering if I should ask for new ones without polarization since such problems are inevitable or they've just screwed up and they can actually deliver uniformly polarized prescription sunglasses? Please in your answer include conditions where such defects might be inevitable (like maybe astigmatism?).
>

What did they say when you addressed this problem to the place that sold
you the glasses?

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Mehran Ziadloo
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 14:41 UTC
References: 1 2
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e54:0:b0:341:b0a6:ef3b with SMTP id i20-20020ac85e54000000b00341b0a6ef3bmr1768294qtx.132.1659624076604;
Thu, 04 Aug 2022 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:30c:b0:31f:108a:899 with SMTP id
q12-20020a05622a030c00b0031f108a0899mr1793528qtw.439.1659624076360; Thu, 04
Aug 2022 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tcbata$1hg1p$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227;
posting-account=CQnapQoAAAAP5yHdJmJ6BT7HIomrFuQw
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:569:7fe8:9300:8c07:517d:32f:a227
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com> <tcbata$1hg1p$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <abb0ff34-2a06-434f-991f-4dbbef6e1e87n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: mehranziadloo@gmail.com (Mehran Ziadloo)
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:41:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1456
View all headers

Hey Bob,

They are happy to replace them for me. It's just that they are saying there's no guarantee that the new ones will be any better. Apparently, the problem is the result of the pressure they apply when they are adding the polarized coating.

Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
From: Bob F
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 22:46 UTC
References: 1 2 3
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bobnospam@gmail.com (Bob F)
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Subject: Re: Are my polarized prescription sungalsses defective?
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:46:38 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <tchi75$2u2at$3@dont-email.me>
References: <b8c6a663-a091-4b83-a8d4-5606800f9d41n@googlegroups.com>
<tcbata$1hg1p$1@dont-email.me>
<abb0ff34-2a06-434f-991f-4dbbef6e1e87n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 22:45:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b6ce1dddbf20260e68ac09b214e83f7b";
logging-data="3082589"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1872un9mXnVToHqSGRHi/H9"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rJQK074BlvdpE1oz+1eQL4lVFeI=
In-Reply-To: <abb0ff34-2a06-434f-991f-4dbbef6e1e87n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
View all headers

On 8/4/2022 7:41 AM, Mehran Ziadloo wrote:
> Hey Bob,
>
> They are happy to replace them for me. It's just that they are saying there's no guarantee that the new ones will be any better. Apparently, the problem is the result of the pressure they apply when they are adding the polarized coating.

That is informative.

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor