https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1dhe1i0/uk_telegraph_the_toxic_legacy_of_lockdown_is/

The toxic legacy of lockdown is destroying our political system
Until politicians come clean about the devastating costs it inflicted,
we will be stuck in this cycle of failure
JANET DALEY
15 June 2024 • 2:16pm
Janet Daley

A sign which says "stay at home to save lives" on the A470
CREDIT: Matthew Horwood
I have never known a general election like this one. I cannot remember a
national campaign in my lifetime in which the only question for voters
was who they hated less.
There have certainly been moments in the past when a sitting government
was so loathed that its defeat was clearly inevitable, but on those
occasions there was at least some hope and optimism attaching to the
rivals who would displace them.
Now, from both the evidence of opinion polling, which shows almost no
enthusiasm for Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister in what is regarded as
a presidential contest, and the anecdotal, word-of-mouth currency that
is often more accurate, the conclusion is unavoidable.
Apart from vested interests in the public sector and the trade unions
(some of which appear to be making their support conditional on promises
of greater power), the electorate does not appear to much like the
Labour Party or its leader – but will still vote for them.
They are unaffected by the fact that the party’s policy statements are
evasive and its aims platitudinous, because they are not interested in
them at all. Labour’s sole function is to act as a blunt instrument with
which to beat the Tories. This applies equally to Reform, which might as
well change its name to Revenge.
This fulminating rage must be acknowledged and will have to play itself
out through the electoral process, but before we enter that dark place
in which we are governed by people nobody wanted, it is important to
examine this phenomenon, because it is the most serious threat to
healthy democracy in the postwar era. What is happening in Britain is
not unique.
Virtually all of the Western governments who presided over the pandemic
years are being thrown out, sometimes with deeply disturbing
consequences that could never have been anticipated a mere decade ago.
Politics in the most advanced countries of what was known as the Free
World has become deranged. Populations once believed to have renounced
febrile demagoguery and nativist hatred, having absorbed the terrible
lessons of the 20th century, are once again infected by them.
What is going on here? In this country, the conditions of ordinary life
for most people – even those groups who consider themselves unfairly
disadvantaged – are surely not as bad as they were in, say, the 1970s,
when the lights were going out on a regular rota, public transport was
frequently shut down completely by national strikes, and my generation
had to cope with devastating interest-rate rises and soaring inflation.
Of course there is genuine hardship and frustration – particularly over
the possibility of home ownership, which is the key to independent
adulthood – but this overwhelming fury is surely disproportionate to the
conditions of everyday life.
The crucial complaint is that “nothing works”, which applies almost
entirely to the public sector, and that no one in government seems to be
able to fix this. The assumption is that the governing party is either
utterly incompetent or indifferent to the needs of ordinary people.
This exasperation is exacerbated by the fact that neither the
Conservatives, who have been in power, nor Labour, which has been in
official opposition, can utter the truth. Government policies devised to
deal with the pandemic and the energy crisis created by the war in
Ukraine have tanked the economy.
Locking people up in their homes and paying them not to work destroyed
the possibility of creating new wealth and saw governments print
mountains of money that debased the currency. Energy bills were
subsidised by even more money from the Treasury.
But the governing party was not alone in its responsibility for creating
this disaster. Labour was not only complicit in these plans, it was
positively exuberant about them. Indeed, Sir Keir wanted earlier
lockdown, more lockdown and longer lockdown.
There was no respectable, mainstream political voice arguing that the
economic and social damage done by this decision to shut down the
country – and thus disable all the mechanisms of productive,
wealth-creating activity – might be catastrophic.
And there is still no one from the governing class prepared to say that
repairing this damage is going to require the kind of sacrifices to
which modern electorates are not accustomed.
More money cannot be poured into public services without raising taxes.
And raising taxes is a sure-fire way of killing any prospect of creating
new wealth, which makes a nonsense of Labour’s commitment to increase
growth.
Somebody is going to have to come clean about this if the democratic
process is to regain credibility. The Government, egged on by the
Opposition, was running on empty, spending funds that didn’t exist, for
the best part of two years, and the day of reckoning has finally arrived.
Now, as it happens this truth that dare not speak its name coincides
with a new era in public speech. Social media has opened channels for
the dissemination of what can be completely irresponsible, often false
and pathologically vicious content.
Troll armies, sometimes robotically generated, roam unchecked across a
landscape whose boundaries are largely unmonitored. Unverifiable and
untraceable sources fling out wholesale bile or blatant deception on a
scale that is truly overwhelming.
The Centre for Policy Studies issued a report last week suggesting that
this could be the first “deepfake election”, in which simulated video
clips of politicians making damaging statements are being circulated online.
Whipping up hatred and distrust is the whole point of this nasty new
game and there is only one way to stop its progress: some politician or
other is going to have to tell the truth.
We need a Churchillian voice to deliver the blood, sweat and tears
message, which would at least show respect for the intelligence of the
populace: there are no easy solutions to our current problems.
We are going to ask you to make sacrifices and accept some
disappointments. Remember that we have always survived as a nation by
facing difficult times with courage and resourcefulness.
But maybe it is too late for that.

> Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsabout 11 hours ago
> ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 17 Jun 2024 07:20:14 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1dhe1i0/uk_telegraph_the_toxic_legacy_of_lockdown_is/
>> The toxic legacy of lockdown is destroying our political system
> Your country, the Flippines, doesn't HAVE a political system, gook!
>
> <b'ris>
Mangina, my country is the United States of America.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.

Michael

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1dhe1i0/uk_telegraph_the_toxic_legacy_of_lockdown_is/
>>
>> The toxic legacy of lockdown is destroying our political system
>> Until politicians come clean about the devastating costs it inflicted,
>> we will be stuck in this cycle of failure
>> JANET DALEY
>> 15 June 2024 • 2:16pm
>> Janet Daley
>>
>> A sign which says "stay at home to save lives" on the A470
>> CREDIT: Matthew Horwood
>> I have never known a general election like this one. I cannot remember a
>> national campaign in my lifetime in which the only question for voters
>> was who they hated less.
>> There have certainly been moments in the past when a sitting government
>> was so loathed that its defeat was clearly inevitable, but on those
>> occasions there was at least some hope and optimism attaching to the
>> rivals who would displace them.
>> Now, from both the evidence of opinion polling, which shows almost no
>> enthusiasm for Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister in what is regarded as
>> a presidential contest, and the anecdotal, word-of-mouth currency that
>> is often more accurate, the conclusion is unavoidable.
>> Apart from vested interests in the public sector and the trade unions
>> (some of which appear to be making their support conditional on promises
>> of greater power), the electorate does not appear to much like the
>> Labour Party or its leader – but will still vote for them.
>> They are unaffected by the fact that the party’s policy statements are
>> evasive and its aims platitudinous, because they are not interested in
>> them at all. Labour’s sole function is to act as a blunt instrument with
>> which to beat the Tories. This applies equally to Reform, which might as
>> well change its name to Revenge.
>> This fulminating rage must be acknowledged and will have to play itself
>> out through the electoral process, but before we enter that dark place
>> in which we are governed by people nobody wanted, it is important to
>> examine this phenomenon, because it is the most serious threat to
>> healthy democracy in the postwar era. What is happening in Britain is
>> not unique.
>> Virtually all of the Western governments who presided over the pandemic
>> years are being thrown out, sometimes with deeply disturbing
>> consequences that could never have been anticipated a mere decade ago.
>> Politics in the most advanced countries of what was known as the Free
>> World has become deranged. Populations once believed to have renounced
>> febrile demagoguery and nativist hatred, having absorbed the terrible
>> lessons of the 20th century, are once again infected by them.
>> What is going on here? In this country, the conditions of ordinary life
>> for most people – even those groups who consider themselves unfairly
>> disadvantaged – are surely not as bad as they were in, say, the 1970s,
>> when the lights were going out on a regular rota, public transport was
>> frequently shut down completely by national strikes, and my generation
>> had to cope with devastating interest-rate rises and soaring inflation.
>> Of course there is genuine hardship and frustration – particularly over
>> the possibility of home ownership, which is the key to independent
>> adulthood – but this overwhelming fury is surely disproportionate to the
>> conditions of everyday life.
>> The crucial complaint is that “nothing works”, which applies almost
>> entirely to the public sector, and that no one in government seems to be
>> able to fix this. The assumption is that the governing party is either
>> utterly incompetent or indifferent to the needs of ordinary people.
>> This exasperation is exacerbated by the fact that neither the
>> Conservatives, who have been in power, nor Labour, which has been in
>> official opposition, can utter the truth. Government policies devised to
>> deal with the pandemic and the energy crisis created by the war in
>> Ukraine have tanked the economy.
>> Locking people up in their homes and paying them not to work destroyed
>> the possibility of creating new wealth and saw governments print
>> mountains of money that debased the currency. Energy bills were
>> subsidised by even more money from the Treasury.
>> But the governing party was not alone in its responsibility for creating
>> this disaster. Labour was not only complicit in these plans, it was
>> positively exuberant about them. Indeed, Sir Keir wanted earlier
>> lockdown, more lockdown and longer lockdown.
>> There was no respectable, mainstream political voice arguing that the
>> economic and social damage done by this decision to shut down the
>> country – and thus disable all the mechanisms of productive,
>> wealth-creating activity – might be catastrophic.
>> And there is still no one from the governing class prepared to say that
>> repairing this damage is going to require the kind of sacrifices to
>> which modern electorates are not accustomed.
>> More money cannot be poured into public services without raising taxes.
>> And raising taxes is a sure-fire way of killing any prospect of creating
>> new wealth, which makes a nonsense of Labour’s commitment to increase
>> growth.
>> Somebody is going to have to come clean about this if the democratic
>> process is to regain credibility. The Government, egged on by the
>> Opposition, was running on empty, spending funds that didn’t exist, for
>> the best part of two years, and the day of reckoning has finally arrived.
>> Now, as it happens this truth that dare not speak its name coincides
>> with a new era in public speech. Social media has opened channels for
>> the dissemination of what can be completely irresponsible, often false
>> and pathologically vicious content.
>> Troll armies, sometimes robotically generated, roam unchecked across a
>> landscape whose boundaries are largely unmonitored. Unverifiable and
>> untraceable sources fling out wholesale bile or blatant deception on a
>> scale that is truly overwhelming.
>> The Centre for Policy Studies issued a report last week suggesting that
>> this could be the first “deepfake election”, in which simulated video
>> clips of politicians making damaging statements are being circulated online.
>> Whipping up hatred and distrust is the whole point of this nasty new
>> game and there is only one way to stop its progress: some politician or
>> other is going to have to tell the truth.
>> We need a Churchillian voice to deliver the blood, sweat and tears
>> message, which would at least show respect for the intelligence of the
>> populace: there are no easy solutions to our current problems.
>> We are going to ask you to make sacrifices and accept some
>> disappointments. Remember that we have always survived as a nation by
>> facing difficult times with courage and resourcefulness.
>> But maybe it is too late for that.
>
> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>
> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
> longer effective.
>
> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>
> So how are you ?
>
I am wonderfully hungry!

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsa day ago
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:21:44 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> Mangina, my country is the United States of America.
> Gook, you are delusional. Your country is the Asiatic shithole known
> as the Flippines.
> Nithing, you yet again deny that I am an American.

>> You are a Nazi.
> You are a gook.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

Are you still hurting from how Kickboxer kickboxed you all around
these newsgroups?

>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else,
> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, below all else
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

>Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsabout an hour ago
> Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:17:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
> How the fuck CAN it be, gook? I'm WHITE and you're a shitskinned
> mongoloid!
Skin color is a superficial characteristic.

>> Are you still hurting from how Kickboxer kickboxed you all around
>> these newsgroups?
> Are YOU still hurting from how I kicked your grik lover Grikboxer®™
> off Usenet all those years ago? He never showed his grubby unshaven
> semitic face here again!
Kickboxer did a number on you.

He also did a number of Losswe Cannon, JeSSe, Heinrich, Carolina
Reb, and Boedicia.

Now here is Keren Nguyen, nee Swanson, celebrating sixteen years
with her husband.

https://www.instagram.com/p/C8PkE9apG9m/?img_index=1

You can see the love! (and much more happened behind closed doors.)

The following article explains your pathology.

http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/

History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer
"anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular
societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet
commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

> Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells4 days ago
> ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:00:12 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
> ...

>> Now here is Keren Nguyen, nee Swanson, celebrating sixteen years
>> with her husband.
>> https://www.instagram.com/p/C8PkE9apG9m/?img_index=1
> Nguyen? Sounds like she's 'married' to a gook in an illegal bestial
> reliationship.
There is nothing illegal nor bestial about their marriage.

Here is a picture of her with him during their high school days.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_C36KR-7zB0/frame0.jpg

A vlog of Keren when she was pregnant for the first time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic1r4sQs7qg

And their YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/@kkandbabyj/videos

She and her husband are such a shining example of heterosexuality
for all normal humanity!

Michael

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wellsabout 6 hours ago
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:43:40 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> There is nothing illegal nor bestial about their marriage.
> Their bestial 'marriage' is like totally illegal, gook.
Wrong!

>> Here is a picture of her with him during their high school days.
>> https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_C36KR-7zB0/frame0.jpg
> Underage bestiality - that's even WORSE!
It is heterosexuality, and it is awesome they got started young!

>> A vlog of Keren when she was pregnant for the first time.
>> http://youtu.be/ic1r4sQs7qg
> I hope she had the sub-baby euthanised upon excretion.
You hoped wrong.

She gave birth to a boy named Jackson.

And she and her husband have four more children.
>> And their YouTube channel.
> Hideous.
There is nothing hideous about love, heterosexuality, and matrimony!

>> She and her husband are such a shining example of heterosexuality
>> for all normal humanity!
> She and her gook 'mate' are such a shining example of bestiality for
> all subnormal subhumanity such as YOU!
There is no bestiality!

Michael

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells4 days ago
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:10:14 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

>> You hoped wrong.
> She should have done and spared the world another hideous hybrid.
Hideous?

Here is a YouTube playlist of Jackson.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkeSSdElG0g&list=PLvhqjNEyQjYpu5FkezzkInohIJ-bz8TSA

You can comment on the videos.

>> She gave birth to a boy named Jackson.
> She excreted a hideous subhuman sub-baby.
There is nothing hideous or subhuman about her son.

Here is the family now, with five children.

https://www.instagram.com/p/C7-ZR8ZMGtI/?img_index=1

Michael