https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/

Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL

“Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias!” To be fair, it’s past time to
rephrase the oft-used Ethics Alarm catch phase as, “Nah, the mainstream
media doesn’t just take marching orders from the Democratic National
Committee to cover for Biden’s indefensible leadership!”

Too long, I know. OK, it needs some work.

Suddenly, all through the news media over the weekend, the tale of how
President Ronald Reagan intervened with a threat to withhold arms that
had already been approved for delivery to Israel to force the nation to
change its military strategy was being thrown in the faces of Biden
critics and Israel supporters. Huh. Where did that come from?

Surprise! It came from the New York Times, the flagship of the corrupt,
partisan media, just in time to fuel the “advocacy journalists'” efforts
over the weekend to help block Israel’s right to defend its existence
and its citizens from terrorism.

Interviewing GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, and by “interviewing” I mean
debating as she took the side of Democrats, the Biden Administration,
the anti-Semitic students roiling campuses and Hamas, NBC News anchor
Kristen Welker said, “As you know, former President Ronald Reagan, on
multiple occasions, withheld weapons to impact Israel’s military
actions,” Welker said. “Did President Reagan show that using U.S.
military aid, as leverage, can actually be an effective way to rein in
and impact Israel’s policy?”

What a perfect factoid to weaponize for an appeal to authority and
Rationalization #32. The Unethical Role Model: “He/She would have done
the same thing”! The timely Times revelation: in August of 1982, Israel
was shelling Palestinian terrorist strongholds in Lebanon, then a
failing state in the throes of a civil war, with Palestinian forces
controlling territory on its southern border. President Reagan saw films
of a Lebanese child horribly wounded in the attack, and called up then
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to threaten a withdrawal of U.S.
aid if the shelling didn’t stop. Begin gave in. The Times also informed
its readers that President Eisenhower threatened economic sanctions and
to cut off aid to force Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
after it invaded Egypt in 1956. So, the Times concluded, “If it was
reasonable for the Republican presidential icon to limit arms to impose
his will on Israel…it should be acceptable for the current Democratic
president to do the same.” Well, the Times wrote “they argued,” meaning
defenders of all-things Democrat, but we know, or should, that by “they”
in such situations, the mainstream media means “we.”

Thereby pre-programmed, Welker sprung the “But Reagan did it!” argument
on Graham after he said, “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war
they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize causalities.”
The Reagan “gotcha!” is a facile and dishonest comparison designed for
ignorant members of the public and wielded by either ignorant or
deliberately deceptive journalists like Welker. First, the two
situations are not sufficiently analogous. Lebanon was in turmoil, and
the nation was not being governed by elected terrorists; its citizens
were literally caught in the crossfire. Israel was not at war with
Lebanon. It is at war with Gaza, because the Gazan government attacked
Israel on October 7. Second, 1982 is not 2024. As even the Times points
out, it was Democrats then that advocated complete support of Israel’s
right to defend itself, and Republicans who were tepid in their
support—and Democrats condemned them for it. Moreover, acceptance of the
fact that Israel must employ extraordinary means to to survive has
solidified over the decades, as Iran continues to threaten eventual
nuclear annihilation, Hamas has continued to lob missiles into Israel in
defiance of ceasefires and international law, and hope of a peaceful
“two-state solution” has been repeatedly dashed.

Finally, and one would think obviously, the fact that “Reagan did it”
doesn’t mean Reagan was right. That Israel is still being threatened by
Palestinian terrorists over 40 years later suggests that we might not be
where we are today if the U.S. had allowed Begin to do what he believed
was best for his own nation and its citizens in 1982. Even as the Times
describes it, Reagan made an emotional decision based on seeing the
image an injured child. “Think of the children!” Shame on him. That is
the level of analysis being used by the pro-Hamas protesters. Competent
Presidents and national leaders do not act because their heartstrings
get tugged on. (I suspect Nancy…)

If Senator Graham had been quicker on his metaphorical feet, he would
have asked Welker to describe the circumstances that led Israel to shell
Lebanon, since she was citing it as a fair analogy. She didn’t know. (It
wasn’t explained in the Times piece.) She was just mouthing a retort
scripted for her to defend NBC’s favorite party and its President from
criticism while confusing her audience.

mmm

Michael Ejercito wrote:

>https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/
>
>
>Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
>Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
>MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>
>
>“Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias!” To be fair, it’s past time to
>rephrase the oft-used Ethics Alarm catch phase as, “Nah, the mainstream
>media doesn’t just take marching orders from the Democratic National
>Committee to cover for Biden’s indefensible leadership!”
>
>Too long, I know. OK, it needs some work.
>
>Suddenly, all through the news media over the weekend, the tale of how
>President Ronald Reagan intervened with a threat to withhold arms that
>had already been approved for delivery to Israel to force the nation to
>change its military strategy was being thrown in the faces of Biden
>critics and Israel supporters. Huh. Where did that come from?
>
>Surprise! It came from the New York Times, the flagship of the corrupt,
>partisan media, just in time to fuel the “advocacy journalists'” efforts
>over the weekend to help block Israel’s right to defend its existence
>and its citizens from terrorism.
>
>Interviewing GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, and by “interviewing” I mean
>debating as she took the side of Democrats, the Biden Administration,
>the anti-Semitic students roiling campuses and Hamas, NBC News anchor
>Kristen Welker said, “As you know, former President Ronald Reagan, on
>multiple occasions, withheld weapons to impact Israel’s military
>actions,” Welker said. “Did President Reagan show that using U.S.
>military aid, as leverage, can actually be an effective way to rein in
>and impact Israel’s policy?”
>
>What a perfect factoid to weaponize for an appeal to authority and
>Rationalization #32. The Unethical Role Model: “He/She would have done
>the same thing”! The timely Times revelation: in August of 1982, Israel
>was shelling Palestinian terrorist strongholds in Lebanon, then a
>failing state in the throes of a civil war, with Palestinian forces
>controlling territory on its southern border. President Reagan saw films
>of a Lebanese child horribly wounded in the attack, and called up then
>Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to threaten a withdrawal of U.S.
>aid if the shelling didn’t stop. Begin gave in. The Times also informed
>its readers that President Eisenhower threatened economic sanctions and
>to cut off aid to force Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
>after it invaded Egypt in 1956. So, the Times concluded, “If it was
>reasonable for the Republican presidential icon to limit arms to impose
>his will on Israel…it should be acceptable for the current Democratic
>president to do the same.” Well, the Times wrote “they argued,” meaning
>defenders of all-things Democrat, but we know, or should, that by “they”
>in such situations, the mainstream media means “we.”
>
>
>Thereby pre-programmed, Welker sprung the “But Reagan did it!” argument
>on Graham after he said, “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war
>they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize causalities.”
>The Reagan “gotcha!” is a facile and dishonest comparison designed for
>ignorant members of the public and wielded by either ignorant or
>deliberately deceptive journalists like Welker. First, the two
>situations are not sufficiently analogous. Lebanon was in turmoil, and
>the nation was not being governed by elected terrorists; its citizens
>were literally caught in the crossfire. Israel was not at war with
>Lebanon. It is at war with Gaza, because the Gazan government attacked
>Israel on October 7. Second, 1982 is not 2024. As even the Times points
>out, it was Democrats then that advocated complete support of Israel’s
>right to defend itself, and Republicans who were tepid in their
>support—and Democrats condemned them for it. Moreover, acceptance of the
>fact that Israel must employ extraordinary means to to survive has
>solidified over the decades, as Iran continues to threaten eventual
>nuclear annihilation, Hamas has continued to lob missiles into Israel in
>defiance of ceasefires and international law, and hope of a peaceful
>“two-state solution” has been repeatedly dashed.
>
>Finally, and one would think obviously, the fact that “Reagan did it”
>doesn’t mean Reagan was right. That Israel is still being threatened by
>Palestinian terrorists over 40 years later suggests that we might not be
>where we are today if the U.S. had allowed Begin to do what he believed
>was best for his own nation and its citizens in 1982. Even as the Times
>describes it, Reagan made an emotional decision based on seeing the
>image an injured child. “Think of the children!” Shame on him. That is
>the level of analysis being used by the pro-Hamas protesters. Competent
>Presidents and national leaders do not act because their heartstrings
>get tugged on. (I suspect Nancy…)
>
>If Senator Graham had been quicker on his metaphorical feet, he would
>have asked Welker to describe the circumstances that led Israel to shell
>Lebanon, since she was citing it as a fair analogy. She didn’t know. (It
>wasn’t explained in the Times piece.) She was just mouthing a retort
>scripted for her to defend NBC’s favorite party and its President from
>criticism while confusing her audience.
>
>mmm

In the interim, the only godly way to win the war against terrorism
and bigotry is as shown on-line at http://WonderfullyHungry.org in the
Person of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Who is our #1 Example of
living "wonderfully hungry" ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ).

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

(Biden) 05/13/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

<TheDeath> 05/13/24 Quack/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

.... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

>Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

>He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
>
>'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

>Psalms
>81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt:
>open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

>Proverbs
>13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of
>the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

>Joel
>2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
>the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
>people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

>Psalms
>107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

>Acts
>14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by
>giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
>your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

> someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

>> Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

>> John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing
>> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

>> 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
>> not in us.
>>
>> 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
>> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
>>
>> 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is
>> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

On Mon, 13 May 2024 07:49:05 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/
>
>
>Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
>Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
>MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>
> <FLUSH MONKEY CHATTER>

That senile old fart doesn't know his ass from his elbow, but he's
smart enough to know that most normal people can't stomach jews and
will vote for Biden on that issue alone. Remember the famous words of
Secretary of State James Baker, "Fuck the jews!"

But why on earth, do our TOP Aryan women do this?

"Face of German neo-Nazi Party" Sucks Black Dick on Camera
---------------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/lnscf3m

Wendy Iwanow, yet another TOP neo-Nazi woman who sucked Black Dick on Camera
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/zle4mty

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/
>>
>>
>> Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
>> Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
>> MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>
>>
>> “Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias!” To be fair, it’s past time to
>> rephrase the oft-used Ethics Alarm catch phase as, “Nah, the mainstream
>> media doesn’t just take marching orders from the Democratic National
>> Committee to cover for Biden’s indefensible leadership!”
>>
>> Too long, I know. OK, it needs some work.
>>
>> Suddenly, all through the news media over the weekend, the tale of how
>> President Ronald Reagan intervened with a threat to withhold arms that
>> had already been approved for delivery to Israel to force the nation to
>> change its military strategy was being thrown in the faces of Biden
>> critics and Israel supporters. Huh. Where did that come from?
>>
>> Surprise! It came from the New York Times, the flagship of the corrupt,
>> partisan media, just in time to fuel the “advocacy journalists'” efforts
>> over the weekend to help block Israel’s right to defend its existence
>> and its citizens from terrorism.
>>
>> Interviewing GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, and by “interviewing” I mean
>> debating as she took the side of Democrats, the Biden Administration,
>> the anti-Semitic students roiling campuses and Hamas, NBC News anchor
>> Kristen Welker said, “As you know, former President Ronald Reagan, on
>> multiple occasions, withheld weapons to impact Israel’s military
>> actions,” Welker said. “Did President Reagan show that using U.S.
>> military aid, as leverage, can actually be an effective way to rein in
>> and impact Israel’s policy?”
>>
>> What a perfect factoid to weaponize for an appeal to authority and
>> Rationalization #32. The Unethical Role Model: “He/She would have done
>> the same thing”! The timely Times revelation: in August of 1982, Israel
>> was shelling Palestinian terrorist strongholds in Lebanon, then a
>> failing state in the throes of a civil war, with Palestinian forces
>> controlling territory on its southern border. President Reagan saw films
>> of a Lebanese child horribly wounded in the attack, and called up then
>> Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to threaten a withdrawal of U.S.
>> aid if the shelling didn’t stop. Begin gave in. The Times also informed
>> its readers that President Eisenhower threatened economic sanctions and
>> to cut off aid to force Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
>> after it invaded Egypt in 1956. So, the Times concluded, “If it was
>> reasonable for the Republican presidential icon to limit arms to impose
>> his will on Israel…it should be acceptable for the current Democratic
>> president to do the same.” Well, the Times wrote “they argued,” meaning
>> defenders of all-things Democrat, but we know, or should, that by “they”
>> in such situations, the mainstream media means “we.”
>>
>>
>> Thereby pre-programmed, Welker sprung the “But Reagan did it!” argument
>> on Graham after he said, “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war
>> they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize causalities.”
>> The Reagan “gotcha!” is a facile and dishonest comparison designed for
>> ignorant members of the public and wielded by either ignorant or
>> deliberately deceptive journalists like Welker. First, the two
>> situations are not sufficiently analogous. Lebanon was in turmoil, and
>> the nation was not being governed by elected terrorists; its citizens
>> were literally caught in the crossfire. Israel was not at war with
>> Lebanon. It is at war with Gaza, because the Gazan government attacked
>> Israel on October 7. Second, 1982 is not 2024. As even the Times points
>> out, it was Democrats then that advocated complete support of Israel’s
>> right to defend itself, and Republicans who were tepid in their
>> support—and Democrats condemned them for it. Moreover, acceptance of the
>> fact that Israel must employ extraordinary means to to survive has
>> solidified over the decades, as Iran continues to threaten eventual
>> nuclear annihilation, Hamas has continued to lob missiles into Israel in
>> defiance of ceasefires and international law, and hope of a peaceful
>> “two-state solution” has been repeatedly dashed.
>>
>> Finally, and one would think obviously, the fact that “Reagan did it”
>> doesn’t mean Reagan was right. That Israel is still being threatened by
>> Palestinian terrorists over 40 years later suggests that we might not be
>> where we are today if the U.S. had allowed Begin to do what he believed
>> was best for his own nation and its citizens in 1982. Even as the Times
>> describes it, Reagan made an emotional decision based on seeing the
>> image an injured child. “Think of the children!” Shame on him. That is
>> the level of analysis being used by the pro-Hamas protesters. Competent
>> Presidents and national leaders do not act because their heartstrings
>> get tugged on. (I suspect Nancy…)
>>
>> If Senator Graham had been quicker on his metaphorical feet, he would
>> have asked Welker to describe the circumstances that led Israel to shell
>> Lebanon, since she was citing it as a fair analogy. She didn’t know. (It
>> wasn’t explained in the Times piece.) She was just mouthing a retort
>> scripted for her to defend NBC’s favorite party and its President from
>> criticism while confusing her audience.
>>
>> mmm
>
> In the interim, the only godly way to win the war against terrorism
> and bigotry is as shown on-line at http://WonderfullyHungry.org in the
> Person of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Who is our #1 Example of
> living "wonderfully hungry" ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ).
No doubt about it!

>
> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
> appetite for food right now too.
>
> So how are you ?
>
I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/
>>>
>>>
>>> Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
>>> Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
>>> MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> “Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias!” To be fair, it’s past time to
>>> rephrase the oft-used Ethics Alarm catch phase as, “Nah, the mainstream
>>> media doesn’t just take marching orders from the Democratic National
>>> Committee to cover for Biden’s indefensible leadership!”
>>>
>>> Too long, I know. OK, it needs some work.
>>>
>>> Suddenly, all through the news media over the weekend, the tale of how
>>> President Ronald Reagan intervened with a threat to withhold arms that
>>> had already been approved for delivery to Israel to force the nation to
>>> change its military strategy was being thrown in the faces of Biden
>>> critics and Israel supporters. Huh. Where did that come from?
>>>
>>> Surprise! It came from the New York Times, the flagship of the corrupt,
>>> partisan media, just in time to fuel the “advocacy journalists'” efforts
>>> over the weekend to help block Israel’s right to defend its existence
>>> and its citizens from terrorism.
>>>
>>> Interviewing GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, and by “interviewing” I mean
>>> debating as she took the side of Democrats, the Biden Administration,
>>> the anti-Semitic students roiling campuses and Hamas, NBC News anchor
>>> Kristen Welker said, “As you know, former President Ronald Reagan, on
>>> multiple occasions, withheld weapons to impact Israel’s military
>>> actions,” Welker said. “Did President Reagan show that using U.S.
>>> military aid, as leverage, can actually be an effective way to rein in
>>> and impact Israel’s policy?”
>>>
>>> What a perfect factoid to weaponize for an appeal to authority and
>>> Rationalization #32. The Unethical Role Model: “He/She would have done
>>> the same thing”! The timely Times revelation: in August of 1982, Israel
>>> was shelling Palestinian terrorist strongholds in Lebanon, then a
>>> failing state in the throes of a civil war, with Palestinian forces
>>> controlling territory on its southern border. President Reagan saw films
>>> of a Lebanese child horribly wounded in the attack, and called up then
>>> Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to threaten a withdrawal of U.S.
>>> aid if the shelling didn’t stop. Begin gave in. The Times also informed
>>> its readers that President Eisenhower threatened economic sanctions and
>>> to cut off aid to force Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
>>> after it invaded Egypt in 1956. So, the Times concluded, “If it was
>>> reasonable for the Republican presidential icon to limit arms to impose
>>> his will on Israel…it should be acceptable for the current Democratic
>>> president to do the same.” Well, the Times wrote “they argued,” meaning
>>> defenders of all-things Democrat, but we know, or should, that by “they”
>>> in such situations, the mainstream media means “we.”
>>>
>>>
>>> Thereby pre-programmed, Welker sprung the “But Reagan did it!” argument
>>> on Graham after he said, “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war
>>> they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize causalities.”
>>> The Reagan “gotcha!” is a facile and dishonest comparison designed for
>>> ignorant members of the public and wielded by either ignorant or
>>> deliberately deceptive journalists like Welker. First, the two
>>> situations are not sufficiently analogous. Lebanon was in turmoil, and
>>> the nation was not being governed by elected terrorists; its citizens
>>> were literally caught in the crossfire. Israel was not at war with
>>> Lebanon. It is at war with Gaza, because the Gazan government attacked
>>> Israel on October 7. Second, 1982 is not 2024. As even the Times points
>>> out, it was Democrats then that advocated complete support of Israel’s
>>> right to defend itself, and Republicans who were tepid in their
>>> support—and Democrats condemned them for it. Moreover, acceptance of the
>>> fact that Israel must employ extraordinary means to to survive has
>>> solidified over the decades, as Iran continues to threaten eventual
>>> nuclear annihilation, Hamas has continued to lob missiles into Israel in
>>> defiance of ceasefires and international law, and hope of a peaceful
>>> “two-state solution” has been repeatedly dashed.
>>>
>>> Finally, and one would think obviously, the fact that “Reagan did it”
>>> doesn’t mean Reagan was right. That Israel is still being threatened by
>>> Palestinian terrorists over 40 years later suggests that we might not be
>>> where we are today if the U.S. had allowed Begin to do what he believed
>>> was best for his own nation and its citizens in 1982. Even as the Times
>>> describes it, Reagan made an emotional decision based on seeing the
>>> image an injured child. “Think of the children!” Shame on him. That is
>>> the level of analysis being used by the pro-Hamas protesters. Competent
>>> Presidents and national leaders do not act because their heartstrings
>>> get tugged on. (I suspect Nancy…)
>>>
>>> If Senator Graham had been quicker on his metaphorical feet, he would
>>> have asked Welker to describe the circumstances that led Israel to shell
>>> Lebanon, since she was citing it as a fair analogy. She didn’t know. (It
>>> wasn’t explained in the Times piece.) She was just mouthing a retort
>>> scripted for her to defend NBC’s favorite party and its President from
>>> criticism while confusing her audience.
>>>
>>> mmm
>>
>> In the interim, the only godly way to win the war against terrorism
>> and bigotry is as shown on-line at http://WonderfullyHungry.org in the
>> Person of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Who is our #1 Example of
>> living "wonderfully hungry" ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ).
>
> No doubt about it!
>
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>> appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
>>>> Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
>>>> MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> “Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias!” To be fair, it’s past time to
>>>> rephrase the oft-used Ethics Alarm catch phase as, “Nah, the mainstream
>>>> media doesn’t just take marching orders from the Democratic National
>>>> Committee to cover for Biden’s indefensible leadership!”
>>>>
>>>> Too long, I know. OK, it needs some work.
>>>>
>>>> Suddenly, all through the news media over the weekend, the tale of how
>>>> President Ronald Reagan intervened with a threat to withhold arms that
>>>> had already been approved for delivery to Israel to force the nation to
>>>> change its military strategy was being thrown in the faces of Biden
>>>> critics and Israel supporters. Huh. Where did that come from?
>>>>
>>>> Surprise! It came from the New York Times, the flagship of the corrupt,
>>>> partisan media, just in time to fuel the “advocacy journalists'” efforts
>>>> over the weekend to help block Israel’s right to defend its existence
>>>> and its citizens from terrorism.
>>>>
>>>> Interviewing GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, and by “interviewing” I mean
>>>> debating as she took the side of Democrats, the Biden Administration,
>>>> the anti-Semitic students roiling campuses and Hamas, NBC News anchor
>>>> Kristen Welker said, “As you know, former President Ronald Reagan, on
>>>> multiple occasions, withheld weapons to impact Israel’s military
>>>> actions,” Welker said. “Did President Reagan show that using U.S.
>>>> military aid, as leverage, can actually be an effective way to rein in
>>>> and impact Israel’s policy?”
>>>>
>>>> What a perfect factoid to weaponize for an appeal to authority and
>>>> Rationalization #32. The Unethical Role Model: “He/She would have done
>>>> the same thing”! The timely Times revelation: in August of 1982, Israel
>>>> was shelling Palestinian terrorist strongholds in Lebanon, then a
>>>> failing state in the throes of a civil war, with Palestinian forces
>>>> controlling territory on its southern border. President Reagan saw films
>>>> of a Lebanese child horribly wounded in the attack, and called up then
>>>> Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to threaten a withdrawal of U.S.
>>>> aid if the shelling didn’t stop. Begin gave in. The Times also informed
>>>> its readers that President Eisenhower threatened economic sanctions and
>>>> to cut off aid to force Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
>>>> after it invaded Egypt in 1956. So, the Times concluded, “If it was
>>>> reasonable for the Republican presidential icon to limit arms to impose
>>>> his will on Israel…it should be acceptable for the current Democratic
>>>> president to do the same.” Well, the Times wrote “they argued,” meaning
>>>> defenders of all-things Democrat, but we know, or should, that by “they”
>>>> in such situations, the mainstream media means “we.”
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thereby pre-programmed, Welker sprung the “But Reagan did it!” argument
>>>> on Graham after he said, “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war
>>>> they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize causalities.”
>>>> The Reagan “gotcha!” is a facile and dishonest comparison designed for
>>>> ignorant members of the public and wielded by either ignorant or
>>>> deliberately deceptive journalists like Welker. First, the two
>>>> situations are not sufficiently analogous. Lebanon was in turmoil, and
>>>> the nation was not being governed by elected terrorists; its citizens
>>>> were literally caught in the crossfire. Israel was not at war with
>>>> Lebanon. It is at war with Gaza, because the Gazan government attacked
>>>> Israel on October 7. Second, 1982 is not 2024. As even the Times points
>>>> out, it was Democrats then that advocated complete support of Israel’s
>>>> right to defend itself, and Republicans who were tepid in their
>>>> support—and Democrats condemned them for it. Moreover, acceptance of the
>>>> fact that Israel must employ extraordinary means to to survive has
>>>> solidified over the decades, as Iran continues to threaten eventual
>>>> nuclear annihilation, Hamas has continued to lob missiles into Israel in
>>>> defiance of ceasefires and international law, and hope of a peaceful
>>>> “two-state solution” has been repeatedly dashed.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, and one would think obviously, the fact that “Reagan did it”
>>>> doesn’t mean Reagan was right. That Israel is still being threatened by
>>>> Palestinian terrorists over 40 years later suggests that we might not be
>>>> where we are today if the U.S. had allowed Begin to do what he believed
>>>> was best for his own nation and its citizens in 1982. Even as the Times
>>>> describes it, Reagan made an emotional decision based on seeing the
>>>> image an injured child. “Think of the children!” Shame on him. That is
>>>> the level of analysis being used by the pro-Hamas protesters. Competent
>>>> Presidents and national leaders do not act because their heartstrings
>>>> get tugged on. (I suspect Nancy…)
>>>>
>>>> If Senator Graham had been quicker on his metaphorical feet, he would
>>>> have asked Welker to describe the circumstances that led Israel to shell
>>>> Lebanon, since she was citing it as a fair analogy. She didn’t know. (It
>>>> wasn’t explained in the Times piece.) She was just mouthing a retort
>>>> scripted for her to defend NBC’s favorite party and its President from
>>>> criticism while confusing her audience.
>>>>
>>>> mmm
>>>
>>> In the interim, the only godly way to win the war against terrorism
>>> and bigotry is as shown on-line at http://WonderfullyHungry.org in the
>>> Person of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Who is our #1 Example of
>>> living "wonderfully hungry" ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ).
>>
>> No doubt about it!
>>
>>>
>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>>> appetite for food right now too.
>>>
>>> So how are you ?
>>
>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>
> While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
> 8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
> 17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
> COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
> Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
> Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
> always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
> including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
> all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
> the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
>
> Laus DEO !
>
Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Michael

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/13/biden-stabs-israel-in-the-back-to-keep-his-anti-semitic-vote-and-gets-justly-hammered-for-his-betrayal-mainstream-media-to-the-rescue/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Biden Stabs Israel in the Back to Keep His Anti-Semitic Vote and Gets
>>>>> Justly Hammered For His Betrayal? Mainstream Media To The Rescue!
>>>>> MAY 13, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> “Nah, there’s no mainstream media bias!” To be fair, it’s past time to
>>>>> rephrase the oft-used Ethics Alarm catch phase as, “Nah, the mainstream
>>>>> media doesn’t just take marching orders from the Democratic National
>>>>> Committee to cover for Biden’s indefensible leadership!”
>>>>>
>>>>> Too long, I know. OK, it needs some work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suddenly, all through the news media over the weekend, the tale of how
>>>>> President Ronald Reagan intervened with a threat to withhold arms that
>>>>> had already been approved for delivery to Israel to force the nation to
>>>>> change its military strategy was being thrown in the faces of Biden
>>>>> critics and Israel supporters. Huh. Where did that come from?
>>>>>
>>>>> Surprise! It came from the New York Times, the flagship of the corrupt,
>>>>> partisan media, just in time to fuel the “advocacy journalists'” efforts
>>>>> over the weekend to help block Israel’s right to defend its existence
>>>>> and its citizens from terrorism.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interviewing GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, and by “interviewing” I mean
>>>>> debating as she took the side of Democrats, the Biden Administration,
>>>>> the anti-Semitic students roiling campuses and Hamas, NBC News anchor
>>>>> Kristen Welker said, “As you know, former President Ronald Reagan, on
>>>>> multiple occasions, withheld weapons to impact Israel’s military
>>>>> actions,” Welker said. “Did President Reagan show that using U.S.
>>>>> military aid, as leverage, can actually be an effective way to rein in
>>>>> and impact Israel’s policy?”
>>>>>
>>>>> What a perfect factoid to weaponize for an appeal to authority and
>>>>> Rationalization #32. The Unethical Role Model: “He/She would have done
>>>>> the same thing”! The timely Times revelation: in August of 1982, Israel
>>>>> was shelling Palestinian terrorist strongholds in Lebanon, then a
>>>>> failing state in the throes of a civil war, with Palestinian forces
>>>>> controlling territory on its southern border. President Reagan saw films
>>>>> of a Lebanese child horribly wounded in the attack, and called up then
>>>>> Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to threaten a withdrawal of U.S.
>>>>> aid if the shelling didn’t stop. Begin gave in. The Times also informed
>>>>> its readers that President Eisenhower threatened economic sanctions and
>>>>> to cut off aid to force Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula
>>>>> after it invaded Egypt in 1956. So, the Times concluded, “If it was
>>>>> reasonable for the Republican presidential icon to limit arms to impose
>>>>> his will on Israel…it should be acceptable for the current Democratic
>>>>> president to do the same.” Well, the Times wrote “they argued,” meaning
>>>>> defenders of all-things Democrat, but we know, or should, that by “they”
>>>>> in such situations, the mainstream media means “we.”
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thereby pre-programmed, Welker sprung the “But Reagan did it!” argument
>>>>> on Graham after he said, “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war
>>>>> they can’t afford to lose, and work with them to minimize causalities.”
>>>>> The Reagan “gotcha!” is a facile and dishonest comparison designed for
>>>>> ignorant members of the public and wielded by either ignorant or
>>>>> deliberately deceptive journalists like Welker. First, the two
>>>>> situations are not sufficiently analogous. Lebanon was in turmoil, and
>>>>> the nation was not being governed by elected terrorists; its citizens
>>>>> were literally caught in the crossfire. Israel was not at war with
>>>>> Lebanon. It is at war with Gaza, because the Gazan government attacked
>>>>> Israel on October 7. Second, 1982 is not 2024. As even the Times points
>>>>> out, it was Democrats then that advocated complete support of Israel’s
>>>>> right to defend itself, and Republicans who were tepid in their
>>>>> support—and Democrats condemned them for it. Moreover, acceptance of the
>>>>> fact that Israel must employ extraordinary means to to survive has
>>>>> solidified over the decades, as Iran continues to threaten eventual
>>>>> nuclear annihilation, Hamas has continued to lob missiles into Israel in
>>>>> defiance of ceasefires and international law, and hope of a peaceful
>>>>> “two-state solution” has been repeatedly dashed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, and one would think obviously, the fact that “Reagan did it”
>>>>> doesn’t mean Reagan was right. That Israel is still being threatened by
>>>>> Palestinian terrorists over 40 years later suggests that we might not be
>>>>> where we are today if the U.S. had allowed Begin to do what he believed
>>>>> was best for his own nation and its citizens in 1982. Even as the Times
>>>>> describes it, Reagan made an emotional decision based on seeing the
>>>>> image an injured child. “Think of the children!” Shame on him. That is
>>>>> the level of analysis being used by the pro-Hamas protesters. Competent
>>>>> Presidents and national leaders do not act because their heartstrings
>>>>> get tugged on. (I suspect Nancy…)
>>>>>
>>>>> If Senator Graham had been quicker on his metaphorical feet, he would
>>>>> have asked Welker to describe the circumstances that led Israel to shell
>>>>> Lebanon, since she was citing it as a fair analogy. She didn’t know. (It
>>>>> wasn’t explained in the Times piece.) She was just mouthing a retort
>>>>> scripted for her to defend NBC’s favorite party and its President from
>>>>> criticism while confusing her audience.
>>>>>
>>>>> mmm
>>>>
>>>> In the interim, the only godly way to win the war against terrorism
>>>> and bigotry is as shown on-line at http://WonderfullyHungry.org in the
>>>> Person of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Who is our #1 Example of
>>>> living "wonderfully hungry" ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ).
>>>
>>> No doubt about it!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>>>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>>>> appetite for food right now too.
>>>>
>>>> So how are you ?
>>>
>>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>>
>> While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
>> 8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
>> 17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
>> COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
>> Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
>> Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
>> always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
>> including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
>> all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
>> the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
>>
>> Laus DEO !
>
> Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Just please do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have done for you,
Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12).

(Biden) 05/14/24 Again, behold ...

Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...

.... just as being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" (i.e. longing to eat
at the rich man's table) Lazarus was the rich man's sin that he wanted
Father Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers not to commit.

Just as this sinning against "wonderfully hungry" Lazarus caused the
rich man to lose his salvation despite being a "son of Abraham," we
are in danger of losing our salvation and automatically going straight
to Hell for being unkind to Michael Ejercito.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/JaC_fVym8fA/m/yClWTlaVAAAJ

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
SHEIN2 days ago
> ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 13 May 2024 13:54:56 -0400, HeartQuack Andrew
> <***@EmoryCardiology.com> wrote:
>> <end trichotomy>
> Now begin penectomy, gook!
Mangina, you are just jealous of Dr. Chung!

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.

Michael

(Biden) 05/15/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/4hQGB6qU.12

(Biden) 05/15/24 Again, behold ...

Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...

.... just as being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" (i.e. longing to eat
at the rich man's table) Lazarus was the rich man's sin that he wanted
Father Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers not to commit.

Just as this sinning against "wonderfully hungry" Lazarus caused the
rich man to lose his salvation despite being a "son of Abraham," we
are in danger of losing our salvation and automatically going straight
to Hell for being unkind to Michael Ejercito.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/JaC_fVym8fA/m/yClWTlaVAAAJ

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

<Biden> 05/15/24 Quack/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

.... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

>Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

>He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
>
>'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

>Psalms
>81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt:
>open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

>Proverbs
>13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of
>the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

>Joel
>2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
>the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
>people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

>Psalms
>107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

>Acts
>14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by
>giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
>your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

> someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

>> Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

>> John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing
>> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

>> 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
>> not in us.
>>
>> 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
>> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
>>
>> 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is
>> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

On Wed, 15 May 2024 07:11:41 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
>SHEIN2 days ago
>> ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 13 May 2024 13:54:56 -0400, HeartQuack Andrew
>> <***@EmoryCardiology.com> wrote:
>>> <end trichotomy>
>> Now begin penectomy, gook!
> Mangina, you are just jealous of Dr. Chung!

Why would a White man like the Rev'd be jealous of a slant-eyed Quack
implicated in the death of one young retarded negress and the sexual
assault of his neighbor's dog?

>
> You are a Nazi

You are an idiot

>
> As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

As an idiot, you are above all else a useless gook.

> Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINabout 16 hours ago

> Yup.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Yes.
>
> Sure.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Right on, all counts.
>
> Certainly.
>
> Is there, any doubt?
>
> Beyond, debate.
>
> It's so, fucking obvious.
>
> Like, totally.
>
> He sure, is.
>
> Damn, right!
>
> Of, course.
>
> Clearly.
>
> Unequivocally.
>
> Random, one-line drivel.
>
> Me, too.
>
> That is, right.
>
> No doubt, about it.
>
> You got, THAT right!
Nithing, you are wrong on all counts.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

(Biden) 05/16/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/4hQGB6qU.12

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> (Ethics) 05/12/24 Again behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement ...
>>
>> The eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned perpetually not being able to
>> say/write in this thread &/or elsewhere that they're "wonderfully
>> hungry" when greeted means they're perpetually cursed (Jeremiah 17:5)
>> by GOD to have COVID infecting their brains (See
>> https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk for the science).
>>
> Here is a link to the Nazi nithings' wall of shame!
>
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.israel/c/mpPNA0lDbmA/m/qVJ-c9QGGQAJ
>
>
>KKK "Grand Dragon" molested his granddaughter
>http://tinyurl.com/ou674td
>
>Leading US neo-Nazi jailed for child porn possession
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom
>
>More on neo-nazis and child porn
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7469180.stm
>
>neo-Nazi leader shot dead by his 10 year old son whom he abused
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jeff_Hall
>
>Frank Collin, leader of the National Socialist Party of America: pedophile
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Collin
>
>"Aryan Nations" leader, convicted of theft, is also a pedophile
>http://tinyurl.com/q2qm743
>
>Fugitive Nazis who built a paedophile paradise in the sun
>http://tinyurl.com/p8sungc
>
>neo-Nazi attacks women with hammer, gets 248-year sentence
>http://tinyurl.com/pcblep5
>
>http://tinyurl.com/oa55jxz
>Notorious German Neo-Nazi Tino Brandt Charged With Child Abuse
>
>Nazis were "sexually aroused by necrophilia, bestiality and sadism"
>http://tinyurl.com/kppjbuc
>
>White supremacist beat a five year old to death
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_W._Ryan
>
>British neo-Nazis torture, murder 17 month old boy
>http://tinyurl.com/nlddf8
>
>British neo-Nazi sentenced to life for raping a two year old girl
>http://tinyurl.com/o3obact
>
>Child porn found on computer of neo-Nazi Holocaust Museum shooter
>http://tinyurl.com/nqvkoba
>
>White supremacists rob and murder a family, including an 8 year old girl
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevie_Kehoe
>
>British KKK "leader" is a convicted child molester
>http://tinyurl.com/pcdav6g
>http://www.bernardomahoney.com/forthcb/ootdie/articles/wiw.shtml
>http://tinyurl.com/opmajuf
>
>Hungarian neo-Nazis murder four year old boy
>http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article3835961.ece
>
>BNP paedophile convicted
>http://libcom.org/news/bnp-murderer-paedophile-convicted-22062012
>
>And ANOTHER BNP paedophile convicted!
>http://libcom.org/news/bnp-paedophile-jailed-13012006
>
>White supremacist tortured and sexually assaulted teen stepdaughters
>http://tinyurl.com/pucouny
>
>Nigel Hesmondalgh, British neo-Nazi: jailed for possessing a series
>of degrading photos and videos of children.
>https://malatesta32.wordpress.com/2014/09/06/edl-sex-offenders-list/
>
>Shaun Jones, British neo-Nazi: jailed for raping a 12 year old girl
>https://malatesta32.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/updated-edl-nonce-list/
>http://tinyurl.com/qxefndm
>
>Kane Hutchinson, British neo-Nazi: jailed for abusing young boys
>http://tinyurl.com/oc3zm2w
>
>John Broomfield, British neo-Nazi: jailed for child abuse images
>http://tinyurl.com/pxfq6ux
>https://liveraf.wordpress.com/tag/john-broomfield/
>
>Mervyn Jones, British neo-Nazi: 17 years for "sustained and prolific sex
>crimes"
>http://tinyurl.com/q838xlf
>http://tinyurl.com/oa87ea8
>
>Darren Francis, British neo-Nazi: multiple sex offences, illegal drugs
>http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.co.il/2010/07/bnp-paedophile-every-parents-worst.html
>
>James Mullen, British neo-Nazi, repeatedly kicked his pregnant girlfriend
>in the stomach, attacked others, incl. a 10-year-old girl
>http://tinyurl.com/pth57ou
>
>Wayne McCurry, British neo-Nazi, convicted of attacking two 14-year-old
>girls
>More on this sick nazoid animal: http://tinyurl.com/penov2z
>
>Eliot Jones, British neo-Nazi, sentenced for blackmail and child abuse
>Yes, business as usual with the nazoid sickos.
>More in: http://tinyurl.com/p89ypar
>
>Jeff Marsh, British neo-Nazi "leader", jailed for attacking a woman
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casuals_United

Source:
https://narkive.com/NPpRdH1k.48

Such is the tragic fruit of the spirit of the anti-christ:

https://AntiChrist45.com

Such tragic fruit is the opposite of the fruit of the Holy Spirit
which is as described in Galatians 5:22-3 as being "love, joy, peace,
patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, and self-control."

It is further written that we are to recognize others by their fruit.

So please do as our LORD Jesus & I have done for you,
Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12).

(Biden) 05/16/24 Again, behold ...

Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...

.... just as being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" (i.e. longing to eat
at the rich man's table) Lazarus was the rich man's sin that he wanted
Father Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers not to commit.

Just as this sinning against "wonderfully hungry" Lazarus caused the
rich man to lose his salvation despite being a "son of Abraham," we
are in danger of losing our salvation and automatically going straight
to Hell for being unkind to Michael Ejercito.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/JaC_fVym8fA/m/yClWTlaVAAAJ

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

<Biden> 05/16/24 Quack/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

.... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

>Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

>He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
>
>'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

>Psalms
>81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt:
>open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

>Proverbs
>13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of
>the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

>Joel
>2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
>the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
>people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

>Psalms
>107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

>Acts
>14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by
>giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
>your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

> someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

>> Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

>> John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing
>> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

>> 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
>> not in us.
>>
>> 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
>> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
>>
>> 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is
>> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
SHEINabout 10 hours ago
>
> Needledick, you are full of shit....jew diarrhoea, to be precise.
Wrong again!

The following article explains your pathology.

http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/

History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer
"anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular
societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet
commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

(Biden) 05/16/24 AgainX2 praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/4hQGB6qU.12

(Biden) 05/16/24 AgainX2, behold ...

Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...

.... just as being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" (i.e. longing to eat
at the rich man's table) Lazarus was the rich man's sin that he wanted
Father Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers not to commit.

Just as this sinning against "wonderfully hungry" Lazarus caused the
rich man to lose his salvation despite being a "son of Abraham," we
are in danger of losing our salvation and automatically going straight
to Hell for being unkind to Michael Ejercito.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/JaC_fVym8fA/m/yClWTlaVAAAJ

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart

....because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

<Biden> 05/16/24 Quack/KK againX2 vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...

https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10

Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ

"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."

Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:

(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ

(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M

(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM

(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM

(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ

.... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are
http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ

Laus DEO !

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Bottom line:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/h5lE-mr0DAAJ

<begin trichotomy>

(1) Born-again (John 3:3 & 5) humans - Folks who have GOD's Help (i.e.
Holy Spirit) to stop (John 5:14) sinning by being
http://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) **but** are still
able to choose via their own "free will" to be instead
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) trapped in the
entangling (Hebrews 12:1) deadly (i.e. killed immortals Adam&Eve) sin
of gluttony (Proverbs 23:2).

(2) Eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) humans - Folks who will never have
GOD's Help (i.e. Holy Spirit) to stop being
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) as evident by their
constant vainjangling (1 Timothy 1:6) about everything except how to
stop (John 5:14) sinning.

(3) Perishing humans - The remaining folks who may possibly (Matthew
19:26) become born-again (John 3:3 & 5) as new (2 Corinthians 5:17)
creatures in Christ.

<end trichotomy>

Suggested further reading:
http://T3WiJ.com

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM/NSkTJxvFBAAJ

>Shame on andrew, look at his red face.

LIE.

The color of my face in **not** visible here on USENET nor is the
color of my face red for those who can see me.

>He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
>
>'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'

Such are the lies coming from the lying pens of the
http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (Genesis 25:32) commentators.

That which is "spiritual" is independent of time so that there
would've been no reference to "now."

Therefore, the LORD is referring to physical hunger here instead of
the spiritual "hunger and thirst for righteousness" elsewhere in
Scripture.

Indeed, physical hunger can **not** coexist with physical thirst
because the latter results in the loss of saliva needed for physical
hunger.

It is when we hunger for food "now" (Luke 6:21a) that we are able to
eat food "now."

No such time constraints exist for "spiritual hunger."

Moreover, the perspective of Luke 6:21a through the eyes of a
physician (i.e. Dr. Luke) would be logically expected to be physical
instead of spiritual.

All glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD for His compelling you
to unwittingly demonstrate your ever worsening cognitive condition
which is tragically a consequence of His cursing (Jeremiah 17:5) you
more than ever.

Laus DEO !

+++

someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
(in a vain attempt to refute posts about being wonderfully hungry)

>Psalms
>81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt:
>open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.

Indeed, receiving a mouthful (Psalm 81:10) of manna from GOD will only
make His http://WDJW.great-site.net/Redeemed want even more, so that
we're even http://bit.ly/wonderfully_hungrier with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD.

Laus DEO !

>Proverbs
>13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of
>the wicked is in need.

Indeed, the righteous know to be satisfied (Luke 6:21a) with an omer
(Exodus 16:16) of manna, while the wicked need (Proverbs 13:25) this
knowledge as evident by their eating until they are full (i.e.
satiated).

>Joel
>2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
>the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
>people shall never be ashamed.

Indeed, an omer (32 ounces per Revelation 6:6) of manna is plenty
(Joel 2:26) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD and to
the shame of you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned.

Laus DEO ! !

>Psalms
>107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.

Indeed, being filled (Psalm 107:9) with an omer (Exodus 16:16) of
manna is a Wonderful (Isaiah 9:6) thing while being satiated (i.e.
full) is evil.

>Acts
>14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by
>giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
>your hearts with food and gladness."

In the interim, you, who are eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned, will
never be satisfied (Acts 14:17) because you are ever more cursed
(Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M/KgM8NFKuAQAJ

+++

> someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/mXmFD9kIocc/y8GNXircBQAJ

>> Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:

Actually, sin is **not** defined in 1 John 1:8-10

>> John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing
>> status. He includes himself in that status.

John was a Jew instead of a Greek so there is really no reason to
think that Greek grammar is relevant here.

>> 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
>> not in us.
>>
>> 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins,
>> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
>>
>> 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is
>> not in us.

John also wrote earlier at John 5:14 that LORD Jesus commands:

"Now stop sinning or something worse may happen to you." (John 5:14)

And, indeed, your being eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) & ever more
cursed (Jeremiah 17:5) by GOD, as evident by your ever worsening
cognitive deficits, is really worse.

Now again, here's how to really stop sinning as LORD Jesus commands
(John 5:14):

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/2-Qpn-o81J4/ldGubKEZAgAJ

While wonderfully hungry ( http://bit.ly/Philippians4_12 ) in the Holy
Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy 8:3) me to hunger right now (Luke
6:21a), I again pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse
(Jeremiah 17:5) you, who are eternally condemned (Mark 3:29), more
than ever in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO ! ! !

Again, this is done in hopes of convincing all reading this to stop
being http://bit.ly/terribly_hungry (2 Kings 6:29) where all are in
danger of becoming eternally condemned (Mark 3:29) just as had
happened to Ananias and Sapphira and more contemporaneously to Bob
Pastorio.

Again, the LORD did strike dead http://bit.ly/Bob_Pastorio on Fool's
day just 9+ years ago:

http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/8728.html

Again, this is done ...

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://WDJW.great-site.net/VAT from around the heart