Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

You need more time; and you probably always will.


sci / sci.electronics.repair / Signal Generator Source Impedance

SubjectAuthor
* Signal Generator Source ImpedanceCursitor Doom
+* Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceJeff Liebermann
|+* Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceCursitor Doom
||`- Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceJeff Liebermann
|`* Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceIan Jackson
| +- Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceCursitor Doom
| `- Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceRalph Mowery
+- Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceDan Green
`- Re: Signal Generator Source ImpedanceIan Jackson

1
Subject: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Cursitor Doom
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:23 UTC
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: cd@notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:23:13 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:23:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="26cff1648c2a261be1a8853e87698154";
logging-data="1239369"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1WrHKjrHLaEzoi+6rJfDDmmKz00F885E="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z11OyO16lMS8Uu8Js0fmzio8VNU=
View all headers

Gentlemen,

The service manual for this radio I'm re-aligning states to use an RF
signal generator with a source impedance of 60 ohms. I have never
heard of such a beast. I have a 50 ohm RF sig gen and a 70 ohm one. I
thought that would be all I'd ever need, but now this spanner gets
thrown into the works. I'm not having a good day so far!
Do I need to make up a suitable impedance transformer, or can I
proceed with the 50 or the 70 ohm ones I have, whilst making some
allowance for that (and if so, how should that allowance be made?)

CD.

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Jeff Liebermann
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:06 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jeffl@cruzio.com (Jeff Liebermann)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:06:55 -0700
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net SSBe2bEDB29o1EwdtIBOGggEazeTnjjOfla6DTZk5kQBWjSrUN
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xUZ4iUVBiZDLAjgtMXF9xmtw08I= sha256:scndeqPQ+3t0nYYJjaN5WKlIRni69JUT+gb7CjeL17w=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
View all headers

On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:23:13 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

>Gentlemen,

Nobody is gentle on Usenet.

>The service manual for this radio I'm re-aligning states to use an RF
>signal generator with a source impedance of 60 ohms. I have never
>heard of such a beast. I have a 50 ohm RF sig gen and a 70 ohm one. I
>thought that would be all I'd ever need, but now this spanner gets
>thrown into the works. I'm not having a good day so far!
>Do I need to make up a suitable impedance transformer, or can I
>proceed with the 50 or the 70 ohm ones I have, whilst making some
>allowance for that (and if so, how should that allowance be made?)
>
>CD.

There actually is such a generator:
<https://fairradio.com/product/sg-376/>
"1-1.25 V into 60 ohms (IF) with attenuation to 100 db in 1 or 10 db
steps."

Such generators appeared when the manufacturer wanted to produce a
generator that worked reasonably well with both 50 and 75 ohms.
Hint: (50 + 75) / 2 = 62.5 ohms
My guess(tm) is that users were losing (or stealing) the minimum loss
pads required to go from 50 to 75 ohms with one front panel connector:
<https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/catv-minimum-loss-pad-for-75937-measurements.html>
The mismatch loss from 50 to 75 ohms is only 0.4dB, so you're not
likely to see much of an effect from using the "wrong" impedance
unless you're working with microwave frequencies.

A much bigger problem is that 50 and 75 ohm BNC connectors use
different center pin sizes.
<https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=30120&d=1258015846>
I wrecked the 75 ohm receptacle on a CATV sweep generator by force
fitting a 50 ohm BNC plug. Color coding my cables have largely
prevent a recurrence. Green tape or nail polish for 50 ohms and
violet for 75 ohms.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Dan Green
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:03 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dhg99908@hotmail.se (Dan Green)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 23:03:42 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <lqht2j5c5ennba2fh57agrndl8l7kmvmgv@4ax.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com>
Reply-To: dhg99908@hotmail.se
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:03:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cac28d9792094f37962d482f9c07d1b9";
logging-data="1361748"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mKGZwIwwljR1bJHzMZvlSOIMugu3JS0E="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BxAsvDoNZeq6ofudXfuJHJs4kEA=
View all headers

Can you not just use a bit of 50 ohm microstrip PCB? sever the trace
in one place and insert a 10 ohm SMD resistor into the gap. Then place
it in series with the output from your 50 ohm generator?

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Cursitor Doom
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:26 UTC
References: 1 2
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: cd@notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:26:11 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <pulv2j50lmlmh2qdc293n2tgc8uuk8sp2s@4ax.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com> <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:26:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cac28d9792094f37962d482f9c07d1b9";
logging-data="1981016"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2/uDZhYm8Sl9J2u2PWhZPUr418Kul9ks="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Dzgy+4jjCMu3/dmkn6RtQuCZ2tA=
View all headers

On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:06:55 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:23:13 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Gentlemen,
>
>Nobody is gentle on Usenet.
>
>>The service manual for this radio I'm re-aligning states to use an RF
>>signal generator with a source impedance of 60 ohms. I have never
>>heard of such a beast. I have a 50 ohm RF sig gen and a 70 ohm one. I
>>thought that would be all I'd ever need, but now this spanner gets
>>thrown into the works. I'm not having a good day so far!
>>Do I need to make up a suitable impedance transformer, or can I
>>proceed with the 50 or the 70 ohm ones I have, whilst making some
>>allowance for that (and if so, how should that allowance be made?)
>>
>>CD.
>
>There actually is such a generator:
><https://fairradio.com/product/sg-376/>
>"1-1.25 V into 60 ohms (IF) with attenuation to 100 db in 1 or 10 db
>steps."
>
>Such generators appeared when the manufacturer wanted to produce a
>generator that worked reasonably well with both 50 and 75 ohms.
>Hint: (50 + 75) / 2 = 62.5 ohms
>My guess(tm) is that users were losing (or stealing) the minimum loss
>pads required to go from 50 to 75 ohms with one front panel connector:
><https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/catv-minimum-loss-pad-for-75937-measurements.html>
>The mismatch loss from 50 to 75 ohms is only 0.4dB, so you're not
>likely to see much of an effect from using the "wrong" impedance
>unless you're working with microwave frequencies.
>
>A much bigger problem is that 50 and 75 ohm BNC connectors use
>different center pin sizes.
><https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=30120&d=1258015846>
>I wrecked the 75 ohm receptacle on a CATV sweep generator by force
>fitting a 50 ohm BNC plug. Color coding my cables have largely
>prevent a recurrence. Green tape or nail polish for 50 ohms and
>violet for 75 ohms.

Aha. Saw what you did there, Jeff: resistor colour code; green = 5 But
Violet Gives Willingly. ;-)

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Jeff Liebermann
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:20 UTC
References: 1 2 3
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jeffl@cruzio.com (Jeff Liebermann)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:20:56 -0700
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <63ov2jhhdp4c3fvp77escpiejuguj8ihea@4ax.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com> <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com> <pulv2j50lmlmh2qdc293n2tgc8uuk8sp2s@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net BU3/wfsXXn1UYgNl8+2AOQ/33SC6KoxwotslQeQEbocOXKsM9F
Cancel-Lock: sha1:04oGnqsK2eZxOlRHJZqCLqBcP20= sha256:BuPYIvL5XpUj6+SBKPPVFpbIXZGY0bDX88ULgU3Z8bw=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
View all headers

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:26:11 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:06:55 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
>wrote:
(chomp)
>>A much bigger problem is that 50 and 75 ohm BNC connectors use
>>different center pin sizes.
>><https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=30120&d=1258015846>
>>I wrecked the 75 ohm receptacle on a CATV sweep generator by force
>>fitting a 50 ohm BNC plug. Color coding my cables have largely
>>prevent a recurrence. Green tape or nail polish for 50 ohms and
>>violet for 75 ohms.
>
>Aha. Saw what you did there, Jeff: resistor colour code; green = 5 But
>Violet Gives Willingly. ;-)

I thought about it and decided I didn't need to color code the cables
beyond the green (5) and violet (7). For 50 ohms, a second stripe
would have been black (0), which is invisible when applied to coax
cable with a black outer jacket. For 75 ohms, the use of a green
second stripe to would guarantee confusion with the 50 ohm cables. I
decided that a 2nd color coded stripe was a bad idea.

Mostly, I use vinyl electrical tape, but had some difficulties
obtaining violet tape. Shrink tube was better, but more difficult to
attach with different diameter coax cables. I finally settled on
embalming the tape with transparent packing tape, which also allowed
me to attach text to the cable.

I also have small round sticky dots in green or violet for identifying
the impedance of the BNC receptacles. Noticing a color mismatch
before inserting the BNC plug has prevented a few disasters when I'm
working late and half asleep.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Ian Jackson
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:23 UTC
References: 1 2
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk (Ian Jackson)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:23:31 +0100
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <pMlnTlGzzQMmFwm9@brattleho.plus.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com>
<4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
X-Trace: individual.net 1MiebxcSR03HvIF/PBiYRAxVkAamm+AM1LSjzGF7RdzDxQlECV
X-Orig-Path: g3ohx.co.uk!ianREMOVETHISjackson
Cancel-Lock: sha1:W++d1RR2Nw9IISFiF8DsZerLCBI= sha256:LK8tpNyPZYWmGGokYAYdTaC9H38eq9gsWJOVTXr09nA=
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-S (<X4bqWuJ$KPDA+PCjtRJoeAxfP6>)
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240430-0, 30/04/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
View all headers

In message <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@cruzio.com> writes
>On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:23:13 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Gentlemen,
>
>Nobody is gentle on Usenet.
>
>>The service manual for this radio I'm re-aligning states to use an RF
>>signal generator with a source impedance of 60 ohms. I have never
>>heard of such a beast. I have a 50 ohm RF sig gen and a 70 ohm one. I
>>thought that would be all I'd ever need, but now this spanner gets
>>thrown into the works. I'm not having a good day so far!
>>Do I need to make up a suitable impedance transformer, or can I
>>proceed with the 50 or the 70 ohm ones I have, whilst making some
>>allowance for that (and if so, how should that allowance be made?)
>>
>>CD.
>
>There actually is such a generator:
><https://fairradio.com/product/sg-376/>
>"1-1.25 V into 60 ohms (IF) with attenuation to 100 db in 1 or 10 db
>steps."
>
>Such generators appeared when the manufacturer wanted to produce a
>generator that worked reasonably well with both 50 and 75 ohms.
>Hint: (50 + 75) / 2 = 62.5 ohms
>My guess(tm) is that users were losing (or stealing) the minimum loss
>pads required to go from 50 to 75 ohms with one front panel connector:
><https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/catv-minimum-los
>s-pad-for-75937-measurements.html>
>The mismatch loss from 50 to 75 ohms is only 0.4dB, so you're not
>likely to see much of an effect from using the "wrong" impedance
>unless you're working with microwave frequencies.
>
>A much bigger problem is that 50 and 75 ohm BNC connectors use
>different center pin sizes.
><https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=30120&d
>=1258015846>
>I wrecked the 75 ohm receptacle on a CATV sweep generator by force
>fitting a 50 ohm BNC plug. Color coding my cables have largely
>prevent a recurrence. Green tape or nail polish for 50 ohms and
>violet for 75 ohms.
>
Despite over 40 years in the CATV industry, I've never seen any 50 or 75
ohm BNCs that weren't mechanically mateable. The mating parts of the
metalwork are usually pretty-well identical.

OK, with some 50 versions the point of the male pin might be just a
little bit blunter, but there's little chance of it splaying the female
receptacle. Otherwise, the diameter of the pin is the same. But note
that with the 75 ohm the hole at the rear end of the pin and receptacle
might be a rather tight fit for the inner of 50 ohm coax.

What makes one connector 50 ohms and the other 75 is that the amount of
the PTFE dielectric is considerably cut back in the 75 (making it as
air-spaced as possible). IIRC, the 50 is the more constant-impedance,
which makes it more-usable to higher frequencies).

On the other hand, the N-connector is a very different beast. The pin of
the 50 ohm has a much greater diameter than the 75 (which may be what
the photo shows). If you insert a 50 ohm male into a 75 ohm female, you
will almost certainly cause irreparable damage to the female (in some
companies I believe it's still a hanging offence), while a 75 male into
a 50 ohm female won't male contact.

Finally, the inner parts of a female BNC and an N are very similar, and
you can usually mate either with a 75 ohm N (but not with a 50, as the
pin diameter is too large).
>
>

--
Ian
Aims and ambitions are neither attainments nor achievements

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Ian Jackson
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:01 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk (Ian Jackson)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:01:13 +0100
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <Ztr772HJXRMmFwyb@brattleho.plus.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
X-Trace: individual.net eZU8Zq2A4iYwa+5FKAhZ7gz3lp+E6000CI5A+CwHJxEz4e9di9
X-Orig-Path: g3ohx.co.uk!ianREMOVETHISjackson
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RTxOx3/siJ8AWBI4YO5a7ET1lWo= sha256:rUjkEYVEJZPyTxhBGLTuVTClrgSzWlbEm6rRlr8Hn5o=
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-S (<X9eqW6d$KPTF6PCj9BMoeAlLJO>)
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240430-0, 30/04/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
View all headers

In message <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com>, Cursitor Doom
<cd@notformail.com> writes
>Gentlemen,
>
>The service manual for this radio I'm re-aligning states to use an RF
>signal generator with a source impedance of 60 ohms. I have never
>heard of such a beast. I have a 50 ohm RF sig gen and a 70 ohm one. I
>thought that would be all I'd ever need, but now this spanner gets
>thrown into the works. I'm not having a good day so far!
>Do I need to make up a suitable impedance transformer, or can I
>proceed with the 50 or the 70 ohm ones I have, whilst making some
>allowance for that (and if so, how should that allowance be made?)
>
Some German equipment had impedances of 60 ohm .
--
Ian
Aims and ambitions are neither attainments nor achievements

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Cursitor Doom
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 10:20 UTC
References: 1 2 3
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: cd@notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 11:20:25 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <is2c3jhr2s2kq0ehakg6kqod6860d5j0hv@4ax.com>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com> <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com> <pMlnTlGzzQMmFwm9@brattleho.plus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 12:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7b31c1544863ea3dc112cd3372a7a8cf";
logging-data="1227869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qWcdmArFC6vnRLropsyYzuRfL+KJPdGE="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JmphbeMS36RwI9F2pFIAzzI5eQo=
View all headers

On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:23:31 +0100, Ian Jackson
<ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com>, Jeff Liebermann
><jeffl@cruzio.com> writes
>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:23:13 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Gentlemen,
>>
>>Nobody is gentle on Usenet.
>>
>>>The service manual for this radio I'm re-aligning states to use an RF
>>>signal generator with a source impedance of 60 ohms. I have never
>>>heard of such a beast. I have a 50 ohm RF sig gen and a 70 ohm one. I
>>>thought that would be all I'd ever need, but now this spanner gets
>>>thrown into the works. I'm not having a good day so far!
>>>Do I need to make up a suitable impedance transformer, or can I
>>>proceed with the 50 or the 70 ohm ones I have, whilst making some
>>>allowance for that (and if so, how should that allowance be made?)
>>>
>>>CD.
>>
>>There actually is such a generator:
>><https://fairradio.com/product/sg-376/>
>>"1-1.25 V into 60 ohms (IF) with attenuation to 100 db in 1 or 10 db
>>steps."
>>
>>Such generators appeared when the manufacturer wanted to produce a
>>generator that worked reasonably well with both 50 and 75 ohms.
>>Hint: (50 + 75) / 2 = 62.5 ohms
>>My guess(tm) is that users were losing (or stealing) the minimum loss
>>pads required to go from 50 to 75 ohms with one front panel connector:
>><https://www.analog.com/en/resources/technical-articles/catv-minimum-los
>>s-pad-for-75937-measurements.html>
>>The mismatch loss from 50 to 75 ohms is only 0.4dB, so you're not
>>likely to see much of an effect from using the "wrong" impedance
>>unless you're working with microwave frequencies.
>>
>>A much bigger problem is that 50 and 75 ohm BNC connectors use
>>different center pin sizes.
>><https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=30120&d
>>=1258015846>
>>I wrecked the 75 ohm receptacle on a CATV sweep generator by force
>>fitting a 50 ohm BNC plug. Color coding my cables have largely
>>prevent a recurrence. Green tape or nail polish for 50 ohms and
>>violet for 75 ohms.
>>
>Despite over 40 years in the CATV industry, I've never seen any 50 or 75
>ohm BNCs that weren't mechanically mateable. The mating parts of the
>metalwork are usually pretty-well identical.
>
>OK, with some 50 versions the point of the male pin might be just a
>little bit blunter, but there's little chance of it splaying the female
>receptacle. Otherwise, the diameter of the pin is the same. But note
>that with the 75 ohm the hole at the rear end of the pin and receptacle
>might be a rather tight fit for the inner of 50 ohm coax.
>
>What makes one connector 50 ohms and the other 75 is that the amount of
>the PTFE dielectric is considerably cut back in the 75 (making it as
>air-spaced as possible). IIRC, the 50 is the more constant-impedance,
>which makes it more-usable to higher frequencies).
>
>On the other hand, the N-connector is a very different beast. The pin of
>the 50 ohm has a much greater diameter than the 75 (which may be what
>the photo shows). If you insert a 50 ohm male into a 75 ohm female, you
>will almost certainly cause irreparable damage to the female (in some
>companies I believe it's still a hanging offence), while a 75 male into
>a 50 ohm female won't male contact.
>
>Finally, the inner parts of a female BNC and an N are very similar, and
>you can usually mate either with a 75 ohm N (but not with a 50, as the
>pin diameter is too large).
>>
>>

Same danger with SMA and 3.5mm connectors. At first glance they appear
the same, but they're not - and mating them can cause *very* expensive
damage if it's a high-end RF cable.

Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
From: Ralph Mowery
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 18:54 UTC
References: 1 2 3
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: rmowery42@charter.net (Ralph Mowery)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Signal Generator Source Impedance
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 14:54:32 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <MPG.40a04e77980a8718989f6a@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <c71t2j1970vdo512sgmchlil2drip46al7@4ax.com> <4k2t2jdaq5jotm57mvss543qmsk060stnq@4ax.com> <pMlnTlGzzQMmFwm9@brattleho.plus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 20:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0dfe691837b4339459648f863bded52";
logging-data="1423785"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7WGFvGXqP61azL+sa0XDqTT3Me7FK154="
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:grHYPFR5pi76SLMHAv6WBoNYLtA=
View all headers

In article <pMlnTlGzzQMmFwm9@brattleho.plus.com>,
ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk says...
>
> >A much bigger problem is that 50 and 75 ohm BNC connectors use
> >different center pin sizes.
> ><https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=30120&d
> >=1258015846>
> >I wrecked the 75 ohm receptacle on a CATV sweep generator by force
> >fitting a 50 ohm BNC plug. Color coding my cables have largely
> >prevent a recurrence. Green tape or nail polish for 50 ohms and
> >violet for 75 ohms.
> >
> Despite over 40 years in the CATV industry, I've never seen any 50 or 75
> ohm BNCs that weren't mechanically mateable. The mating parts of the
> metalwork are usually pretty-well identical.
>
> OK, with some 50 versions the point of the male pin might be just a
> little bit blunter, but there's little chance of it splaying the female
> receptacle. Otherwise, the diameter of the pin is the same. But note
> that with the 75 ohm the hole at the rear end of the pin and receptacle
> might be a rather tight fit for the inner of 50 ohm coax.
>
> What makes one connector 50 ohms and the other 75 is that the amount of
> the PTFE dielectric is considerably cut back in the 75 (making it as
> air-spaced as possible). IIRC, the 50 is the more constant-impedance,
> which makes it more-usable to higher frequencies).
>
> On the other hand, the N-connector is a very different beast. The pin of
> the 50 ohm has a much greater diameter than the 75 (which may be what
> the photo shows). If you insert a 50 ohm male into a 75 ohm female, you
> will almost certainly cause irreparable damage to the female (in some
> companies I believe it's still a hanging offence), while a 75 male into
> a 50 ohm female won't male contact.
>
> Finally, the inner parts of a female BNC and an N are very similar, and
> you can usually mate either with a 75 ohm N (but not with a 50, as the
> pin diameter is too large).
> >
>
>

That is the way I have seen it in the US. Ok to mate the 50 and 75 ohm
BNCs but not the 50 and 75 ohm N connectors.

I do not recall which way it is if you stick a BNC to a N connector.
Just that it can be done if the pin size matches up.

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor