Exactly two years after the Uvalde school massacre, families of victims
Friday filed multiple state lawsuits in California and Texas against
social media giant Meta, Activision � the maker of the popular video game
"Call of Duty" � and Daniel Defense, the manufacturer of the AR-15 which
the teen gunman used in the shooting.

The wrongful death lawsuits come just two days after the same group of 19
families reached a $2 million settlement with the city of Uvalde over the
May 24, 2022, Robb Elementary School massacre, which killed 19 students
and two teachers.

One of the two lawsuits was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court
against both Activision and Meta � Instagram's parent company. The second
lawsuit, against Daniel Defense, was filed in Uvalde District Court.

The lawsuits were filed by attorney Josh Koskoff, who is also representing
the same 19 families who were part of Wednesday's $2 million settlement.

Friday's lawsuits claim that Instagram, Activision and Daniel Defense have
been "partnering�in a scheme that preys upon insecure, adolescent boys,"
attorneys said in a news release.

Attorneys claim that Meta and Activision "enabled and emboldened firearm
manufacturers' efforts to expand the market for their weapons by granting
unprecedented, direct and 24/7 access to children."

The lawsuits allege that the gunman, on his 18th birthday, purchased the
AR-15 used in the Uvalde shooting because "he was targeted and cultivated
online by Instagram, Activision and Daniel Defense. This three-headed
monster knowingly exposed him to the weapon, conditioned him to see it as
a tool to solve his problems and trained him to use it," Koskoff said in a
statement.

According to the lawsuits, the Uvalde gunman downloaded "Call of Duty:
Modern Warfare" in November 2021, and had been playing previous iterations
of "Call of Duty" since he was 15 years old. The video game prominently
features a model of the AR-15, known as DDM4V7, that was used in the
shooting, the lawsuits allege.

"Simultaneously, on Instagram, the shooter was being courted through
explicit, aggressive marketing," attorneys said. "In addition to hundreds
of images depicting and venerating the thrill of combat, Daniel Defense
used Instagram to extol the illegal, murderous use of its weapons."

On April 27, 2022, attorneys say, the gunman created an account with
Daniel Defense and added a DDM4V7 to his online cart. Then on May 16,
2022, just 23 minutes after midnight on his 18th birthday, he purchased
the weapon � just eight days before the Uvalde shooting.

In an interview with CBS News Friday, Koskoff said that the two lawsuits
are "working in concert with each other."

"Instagram creates a connection between �an adolescent �and the gun and a
gun company," Koskoff said. "And nobody exploited Instagram for this
purpose more than Daniel Defense. If Instagram can prevent people from
posting pictures of their private parts, they can prevent people from
posting pictures of an AR-15. And of course, Instagram doesn't care. They
don't care. All they care about is driving traffic and generating
attention, drawing attention and getting their ad revenue."

In a statement provided to CBS News, an Activision spokesperson said the
"Uvalde shooting was horrendous and heartbreaking in every way, and we
express our deepest sympathies to the families and communities who remain
impacted by this senseless act of violence. Millions of people around the
world enjoy video games without turning to horrific acts."

CBS News has also reached out to Meta and Daniel Defense for comment on
the litigation.

The same group of families also said Wednesday they are filing a $500
million federal lawsuit against nearly 100 state police officers who took
part in the botched law enforcement response to the shooting, along with
former Robb Elementary School principal Mandy Gutierrez and Pete
Arredondo, the school district's police chief who was fired months after
the shooting.

An extensive 575-page Justice Department report released in January
determined there were a series of "cascading failures" in the law
enforcement response that day. The report said that 77 minutes elapsed
from when law enforcement first arrived on the scene, to when the suspect
was confronted and killed.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uvalde-shooting-families-wrongful-death-
lawsuit-meta-activision-daniel-defense/

Kick Homer wrote:
> In <v2s6ec$2pue0$1@dont-email.me> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>> It’s about time US gun manufacturers were brought to heel. Also, theyâ
> €™ve
>> been turning a blind eye for years, decades, to the smuggling of their
>> products into neighbouring countries and aggravating the violent crime
>> problems there. Problems which are also fed by the appetite in the US for
>> the narcotic substances those violent criminals are producing in those
>> countries.
>
> You'd prefer to be hacked to death with machetes?
>
> Imagine a world with no guns.
>
> Your choices of death would be stabbing, stoning, beating, burning, hacking,
> bound to a tree for animals to eat.
>
> The list is long.
>
> If someone decides to kill you, they will use any means available. How long
> it takes simply prolongs their satisfaction.

If someone decides to kill me, I knock their teeth out. This is a
deterrent upon their decision process. You can also buy some
bulletproof armor and a helmet. I don't know why you think fortune
favors the sick in the head.