On 15 Jan 2025 14:22:29 GMT, vallor wrote:

>
> Is this a dipole?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_antenna
>

Yes, it is. But a dummy like you could never tell.

A Rhombic is merely 2 V-antennas connected end-to-end
and a V-antenna is ... guess what ... a dipole.

Give it up, loser. You haven't a leg to stand on.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:26:51 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<pan$b5c74$65460671$b69b76f0$73f9a684@linux.rocks>:

> On 15 Jan 2025 14:22:29 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
>
>> Is this a dipole?
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_antenna
>>
>>
> Yes, it is. But a dummy like you could never tell.
>
> A Rhombic is merely 2 V-antennas connected end-to-end and a V-antenna is
> ... guess what ... a dipole.
>
> Give it up, loser. You haven't a leg to stand on.

If -- as you claim -- every antenna is a "dipole", then what
use is there in the term?

I think this is another of your sophomoric semantics arguments.

So...is this a dipole?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopole_antenna

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.12.9 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
"A day without radiation is a day without sunshine."

On 15 Jan 2025 16:38:52 GMT, vallor wrote:

>
> If -- as you claim -- every antenna is a "dipole", then what
> use is there in the term?
>

The "term" is for professionals.

Amateurs, like you, are left floating in the swamp.

Now go away. I don't want to hear any more of your ignoramus
bullshit.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

On 15 Jan 2025 16:38:52 GMT, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in
<luq6ksFfc8fU1@mid.individual.net>:

> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:26:51 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote
> in <pan$b5c74$65460671$b69b76f0$73f9a684@linux.rocks>:
>
>> On 15 Jan 2025 14:22:29 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Is this a dipole?
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_antenna
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, it is. But a dummy like you could never tell.
>>
>> A Rhombic is merely 2 V-antennas connected end-to-end and a V-antenna
>> is ... guess what ... a dipole.
>>
>> Give it up, loser. You haven't a leg to stand on.
>
> If -- as you claim -- every antenna is a "dipole", then what use is
> there in the term?
>
> I think this is another of your sophomoric semantics arguments.
>
> So...is this a dipole?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopole_antenna

Feeb did the snip-and-snark again!

So according to Feeb, a monopole antenna is a dipole antenna.

Glad that's all cleared up.

Sigmonster for Feeb again:

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.12.9 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
"It seems to me that your antenna doesn't bring in too many
stations anymore."

On 15 Jan 2025 17:07:43 GMT, vallor wrote:

>
> So according to Feeb, a monopole antenna is a dipole antenna.
>
>

Yes, it fucking is.

Consider what an antenna (in 3-30Mhz) is supposed to produce.
It is supposed to produce a propagating electromagnetic (EM) wave.

What is an EM wave?

It is an oscillating electric field in space that goes up and
then goes down, etc., and there is there is no fucking way in
the universe to produce such a phenomenon (for 3-30Mhz) other
than a fucking dipole antenna.

Your fucking problem (among many other fucking problems) is
that you cannot understand that the basic dipole radiator has
been modified in many ways to produce such effects as
horizontal/vertical polarization and directional gain.

But whatever modification it is still a fucking dipole radiator.

Otherwise, the laws of Maxwell would be violated and that's
something that does not happen in the real world (your dumb-
fuck imagination may be excepted but your nobody gives
a flying fuck about your dumb-fuck imagination).

The case is closed.

Now don't bother me again about your stupid technical fantasies.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:01:14 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<pan$55db6$3fc31e5a$d165b8af$dd7e7acf@linux.rocks>:

> On 15 Jan 2025 17:07:43 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
>
>> So according to Feeb, a monopole antenna is a dipole antenna.
>>
>>
>>
> Yes, it fucking is.

No, it fucking isn't.

And you know it. Who do you think you're fooling?

More's the point: Who are people going to listen to?
Someone with the references that back him up, or some
Usenet Poe troll crank living with 2009 drives?

ObLinux:

$ factor 258
258: 2 3 43

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.12.9 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
"Boys will be boys, and so will a lot of middle-aged men."

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 19:06:00 +0000, 🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈Jen🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 Dershmender
💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🐶笛🌈💐🌻🌺🌹🌻💐🌷🌺🌈 wrote:

>
> Did you get QSpice downloaded so you can solve you circuit simulation problem? I got it to install on linux/wine. Bet you can't.
>

Fuck that goon shit.

Ngspice is the best for everyone except goon-shitting assholes:

https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

On 15 Jan 2025 19:25:39 GMT, vallor wrote:

>
> More's the point: Who are people going to listen to?
> Someone with the references that back him up, or some
> Usenet Poe troll crank living with 2009 drives?
>

No one in their right mind is ever going to listen to some
Mickey Mouse network administrator.

The case is closed.

Now get back to your little boy games.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

On 1/15/25 2:25 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:01:14 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
> <pan$55db6$3fc31e5a$d165b8af$dd7e7acf@linux.rocks>:
>
>> On 15 Jan 2025 17:07:43 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>
>>
>>> So according to Feeb, a monopole antenna is a dipole antenna.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, it fucking is.
>
> No, it fucking isn't.
>
> And you know it. Who do you think you're fooling?
>
> More's the point: Who are people going to listen to?
> Someone with the references that back him up, or some
> Usenet Poe troll crank living with 2009 drives?
>
> ObLinux:
>
> $ factor 258
> 258: 2 3 43

The very name _di_pole suggests that it is different than a _mono_pole.
I imagine that in Larry Pietraskiewicz's world, there is no difference
between a unicycle and a tricycle.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

On 1/14/25 5:15 PM, Joel wrote:
>
> DFS changed the quote line to call Physfitfreak "SandChimp".

SandChimp is a curse. Cro-magnon is an objective description. "DFS" is
too dumb to understand the difference.

On 1/14/25 8:07 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 1/14/25 7:02 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> Many Christians, asked to explain the
>> Trinity in their own words, will come up with one of the many heresies.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_heresies
>>
>
>
>
> What a pile of pure Penis X bullshit.
>
> Isaac Newton got commissioned by Church to look into this Penisity crap.
> He took his time and made a thorough research and found the culprit
> lunatic who first started it. Some lunatic outcast in the middle of some
> desert. He promptly reported his results to that Church (the document
> exists today, it's in the English language), concluding that, "It was
> just a pile of nonsense that this guy for the first time began expounding."
>
> Or something to that effect.
>
> A suggestion. Since the two on either sides are just balls and the
> middle one a Penis, why not calling the whole thing Penisity to stay to
> the point?
>
> Is there another Mormon in this forum left? I feel like kicking some
> Mormon ass. Does "DFS" have Mormonitis?

Don't shy away. If anybody here is Mormon come forward and say it. You'd
be pussy too if you don't.

I have a feeling "DFS" is infected with Peniscus Mormonitis.

On 1/14/25 7:35 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Nick Charles wrote:
>
>> Farley Flud wrote:
>>> Nick Charles wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You really are a sad, pathetic little shit aren't you?
>>>
>>> Nope. But you certainly are.
>>>
>>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>>
>> That's it? "I know you are but what am I? Neener neener"?
>>
>> Wow. How old are you? 12?
>>
>> You really are a sad, pathetic little shit. Playing with dirty little
>> kiddie toy antiques and bragging about how great they are.
>
> Don't be too hard on Fabian. He's silly, not serious.
>

This "Nick" thing is trying to get my dick's attention. That's all. Poor
sucker.

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:07:27 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:

>
> This "Nick" thing is trying to get my dick's attention. That's all. Poor
> sucker.
>

You got it.

This NG reminds me of the quip by Jim Morrison of the Doors during
a New York concert when he said:

"That's New York. It's the only place where guys rush the stage."

I can say:

That's COLA. It's the only place where supposedly mature men become
worthless groupies.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

On 1/15/25 4:24 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:07:27 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>>
>> This "Nick" thing is trying to get my dick's attention. That's all. Poor
>> sucker.
>>
>
> You got it.
>
> This NG reminds me of the quip by Jim Morrison of the Doors during
> a New York concert when he said:
>
> "That's New York. It's the only place where guys rush the stage."
>
> I can say:
>
> That's COLA. It's the only place where supposedly mature men become
> worthless groupies.
>
>
>
>

They come here to learn. From you as well as from my dick.