On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:

> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.

LMFAO!

Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their
basements...

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 18:26:06 -0500, DFS wrote:

> Linux devs also use their race-car beds ...

Oddly specific accusation alert:

What do *you* know about race-car beds?

CrudeSausage wrote:

> (idiocy snipped)

Idiot.

On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>
>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>
>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>
>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>
> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.

Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.

And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense
than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm
guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT
of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit :
> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral
>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very
>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also
>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source
>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own
>> schedules.
>
>
> LMFAO!
>
> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their
> basements...

LMAO!

--
CrudeSausage

Le 2024-12-22 à 00:41, RonB a écrit :
> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
>>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
>>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
>>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
>>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
>>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
>>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
>>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
>>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>>
>>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
>>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
>>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
>>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
>>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>>
>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
>> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
>> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
>> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
>> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.
>
> Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
> inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
> have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.

That might be true today, but the woke garbage didn't have its place in
university when I was there. It was always easy to spot the progressive
broad and unless she was very attractive and we wanted to sleep with
her, we just ignored everything she had to say as the world should.
Progressive women are up there with negroes as the stupidest human
beings alive.

> And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense
> than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm
> guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT
> of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings.

There are meetings in every field including Education. Part of why
meetings are necessary is because anyone working in a place like
Microsoft or Google needs to be reminded that they are working with
others and that they are sharing resources. As such, if a child-fondler
decides that he can write a component alone, not provide any comments
and demand that his superiors just "trust him" on the quality of his
code, it won't fly. What one does needs to be comprehensible to the
other. That's why there is consistency in code like what Apple is
selling to consumers. That's why one component in Windows works well
with the other. It's not all band-aided together the way that it is in
Linux.

--
CrudeSausage

On 12/22/24 12:41 AM, RonB wrote:
> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
>>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
>>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
>>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
>>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
>>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
>>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
>>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
>>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>>
>>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
>>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
>>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
>>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
>>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>>
>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
>> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
>> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
>> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
>> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.
>
> Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
> inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
> have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.

Has RonB ever been able to clearly define what 'Woke' actually is?

You know ... critical thinking, not propaganda.

> And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense
> than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm
> guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT
> of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings.

Big words from a 'retiree' of a dozen random jobs.

-hh

Le 2024-12-22 à 09:24, -hh a écrit :
> On 12/22/24 12:41 AM, RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red
>>>>>>>> Hat. There
>>>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help
>>>>>>>> them to
>>>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't
>>>>>>>> have one
>>>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
>>>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
>>>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to
>>>>> get the
>>>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>>>
>>>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>>>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke
>>>> "progressives" in
>>>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids
>>>> the
>>>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can
>>>> have
>>>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they
>>>> become
>>>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>>>
>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
>>> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
>>> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
>>> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
>>> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.
>>
>> Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
>> inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they
>> (may)
>> have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.
>
> Has RonB ever been able to clearly define what 'Woke' actually is?

The belief that the White man is responsible for all of society's
problems, that blacks are not responsible for any of the issues that
consistently surround them, that non-White cultures should be allowed
free entry into whichever Western nation and be given continuous
welfare, that Whites should be dead last in the selection process for
promotions or positions, that White as a race should be destroyed
through the promotion of interbreeding, that homosexuals are oppressed,
that homosexuality should get equal representation in media despite
being a minuscule fraction of the population, that equality is not
sufficient and that society should instead strive for equity... all of
which are meant to destabilize society much like they were during the
cultural revolution in China to facilitate entry of Communism. It should
also be noted that being reluctant to live in a community with the
people mentioned above or their advocates is White supremacy, as is the
desire to not be mugged, see your wife raped or your child kidnapped or
murdered by those same people. In fact, refusing to allow your taxes to
be used to pay for the people above rather than to maintain roads or
help out brave men who served your country is also White supremacy.

RonB is free to disagree with what I said. Let me just say, however,
that I am not interested in any of the dozen links you'll send me as a
rebuttal. Communism, Communists and useful progressive idiots and their
opinions will not change my mind. The more progressive you are, the
closer you are to Corky in Life Goes On, except that he seemed like a
fun dude.

> You know ... critical thinking, not propaganda.

Like the critical thinking you routinely refuse to do by pasting links
rather than expressing your opinion in a comprehensible way. You are
free to use your barrage of progressive propaganda as a crutch for the
opinion they've inserted into your head, but we are also free to refuse
to read any of them because we've already seen your shpiel in 1989
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVcbY3Tf_TE&pp=ygUKY29ya3kgcmFwcw%3D%3D>

< snip >

--
CrudeSausage

On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit :
>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral
>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very
>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also
>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source
>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own
>>> schedules.
>>
>>
>> LMFAO!
>>
>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their
>> basements...
>
> LMAO!

Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the
brain.)

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Le 2024-12-22 à 00:41, RonB a écrit :
>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
>>>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
>>>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
>>>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
>>>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
>>>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
>>>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
>>>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
>>>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>>>
>>>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>>>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
>>>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
>>>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
>>>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
>>>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>>>
>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
>>> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
>>> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
>>> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
>>> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.
>>
>> Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
>> inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
>> have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.
>
> That might be true today, but the woke garbage didn't have its place in
> university when I was there. It was always easy to spot the progressive
> broad and unless she was very attractive and we wanted to sleep with
> her, we just ignored everything she had to say as the world should.
> Progressive women are up there with negroes as the stupidest human
> beings alive.

It's been true for decades. My uncle was a dissertation short of a PhD and
my father rightly made the observation that all his intelligence was
"educated out of him."

I have no idea about "Progressive" (Woke) women. I never wanted to sleep
with anyone I wasn't married to.

>> And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense
>> than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm
>> guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT
>> of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings.
>
> There are meetings in every field including Education. Part of why
> meetings are necessary is because anyone working in a place like
> Microsoft or Google needs to be reminded that they are working with
> others and that they are sharing resources. As such, if a child-fondler
> decides that he can write a component alone, not provide any comments
> and demand that his superiors just "trust him" on the quality of his
> code, it won't fly. What one does needs to be comprehensible to the
> other. That's why there is consistency in code like what Apple is
> selling to consumers. That's why one component in Windows works well
> with the other. It's not all band-aided together the way that it is in
> Linux.

Most corporate meetings are a complete waste of time. What they do is enable
gutless managers to "pass the buck," and never make a hard decision on their
own — or even really know what the hell is going on with those he's supposed
to be "managing."

As for Microsoft or Apple "quality," I'm guessing whatever quality you're
getting is from the engineers who ignore the stupid meetings and other crap
the corporate wonks try to saddle them with. I've seen too many of these
nepotistic drones to have any faith in corporate management.

I'm not a Musk fan, but he basically gutted Twitter of its many corporate
wonks. Do you see any major detrimental changes in what's now called X?

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 12/22/24 11:19 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> Le 2024-12-22 à 09:24, -hh a écrit :
>> On 12/22/24 12:41 AM, RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>>>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red
>>>>>>>>> Hat. There
>>>>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money
>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the
>>>>>>>>> parts that
>>>>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help
>>>>>>>>> them to
>>>>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't
>>>>>>>>> have one
>>>>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the
>>>>>>>> pedophile
>>>>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>>>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to
>>>>>> get the
>>>>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>>>>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke
>>>>> "progressives" in
>>>>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give
>>>>> kids the
>>>>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts
>>>>> can have
>>>>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they
>>>>> become
>>>>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
>>>> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
>>>> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
>>>> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
>>>> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.
>>>
>>> Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
>>> inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they
>>> (may)
>>> have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.
>>
>> Has RonB ever been able to clearly define what 'Woke' actually is?
>
> The belief that the White man is responsible for all of society's
> problems, ...

Because that posture allows you to play the VICTIM card instead of
honestly acknowledging that there's been longstanding systematic
advantages to being white (& male) over others...and you want to
maintain your status quo of being advantaged.

> ...that blacks are not responsible for any of the issues that
> consistently surround them, that non-White cultures should be allowed
> free entry into whichever Western nation and be given continuous
> welfare, ...

Which you know are fictitious claims, especially since US immigration
policy even since 1964 has highly favored white Europeans over others:
see Chinese Exclusion Act.

> that Whites should be dead last in the selection process for
> promotions or positions, that White as a race should be destroyed
> through the promotion of interbreeding, that homosexuals are oppressed,
> that homosexuality should get equal representation in media despite
> being a minuscule fraction of the population, that equality is not
> sufficient and that society should instead strive for equity...

Because it wasn't because of Equity that the US got CoVid checks? /s

> ...all of which are meant to destabilize society much like they were
> during the cultural revolution in China to facilitate entry of Communism.

Destabilizes? No, that's not what such a policy does; try again.

> It should
> also be noted that being reluctant to live in a community with the
> people mentioned above or their advocates is White supremacy, as is the
> desire to not be mugged, see your wife raped or your child kidnapped or
> murdered by those same people. In fact, refusing to allow your taxes to
> be used to pay for the people above rather than to maintain roads or
> help out brave men who served your country is also White supremacy.

Or - you're simply trying to redefine what wealth-based 'class' is, and
contriving an excuse for why you shouldn't have to pay a fair share of
taxes to society.

> RonB is free to disagree with what I said. Let me just say, however,
> that I am not interested in any of the dozen links you'll send me as a
> rebuttal. Communism, Communists and useful progressive idiots and their
> opinions will not change my mind. The more progressive you are, the
> closer you are to Corky in Life Goes On, except that he seemed like a
> fun dude.

Typically, I provide links to preemptively STFU lying assholes and
hypocrites; that you're offended by them shows that it works.

>> You know ... critical thinking, not propaganda.
>
> Like the critical thinking you routinely refuse to do by pasting links
> rather than expressing your opinion in a comprehensible way.

Not my fault that you only comprehend at a 5th grade reading level.

> You are
> free to use your barrage of progressive propaganda as a crutch for the
> opinion they've inserted into your head, but we are also free to refuse
> to read any of them because we've already seen your shpiel in 1989
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVcbY3Tf_TE&pp=ygUKY29ya3kgcmFwcw%3D%3D>

Whatever deluded fantasy lets you get through the day, snowflake.

BTW, you inevitably don't know (nor care) that Harvard University's
origination of a 'Diversity' policy a century ago was actually an
attempt to restore the Status Quo favoritism for the traditional
protestant while male Anglo Saxons in student admissions:

It was done in response to how an "undesirable minority" had been
beating white men on Harvard's --> merits only <-- admissions test, and
had risen to ~20% of the student population.

I'd provide the cites, but you've claimed to be offended by them...

-hh

Le 2024-12-23 à 01:31, RonB a écrit :
> On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit :
>>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral
>>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very
>>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also
>>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source
>>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own
>>>> schedules.
>>>
>>>
>>> LMFAO!
>>>
>>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their
>>> basements...
>>
>> LMAO!
>
> Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the
> brain.)

I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I
still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my
main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what
I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options.

--
CrudeSausage

Le 2024-12-23 à 01:44, RonB a écrit :
> On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Le 2024-12-22 à 00:41, RonB a écrit :
>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :
>>>>> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :
>>>>>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
>>>>>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
>>>>>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
>>>>>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
>>>>>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
>>>>>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
>>>>>>>>> without the other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
>>>>>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
>>>>>>>> fruitcakes they employ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
>>>>>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
>>>>>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
>>>>> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
>>>>> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
>>>>> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
>>>>> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
>>>>> fanboi partisans for a specific product.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
>>>> the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
>>>> university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
>>>> afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
>>>> have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.
>>>
>>> Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
>>> inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
>>> have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.
>>
>> That might be true today, but the woke garbage didn't have its place in
>> university when I was there. It was always easy to spot the progressive
>> broad and unless she was very attractive and we wanted to sleep with
>> her, we just ignored everything she had to say as the world should.
>> Progressive women are up there with negroes as the stupidest human
>> beings alive.
>
> It's been true for decades. My uncle was a dissertation short of a PhD and
> my father rightly made the observation that all his intelligence was
> "educated out of him."
>
> I have no idea about "Progressive" (Woke) women. I never wanted to sleep
> with anyone I wasn't married to.

In my 20s, I only cared about looks so it was natural for me to be
attracted to _some_ progressive women. They don't usually take care of
themselves as well as the conservative women do so they end up being
gross fairly quickly though.

>>> And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense
>>> than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm
>>> guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT
>>> of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings.
>>
>> There are meetings in every field including Education. Part of why
>> meetings are necessary is because anyone working in a place like
>> Microsoft or Google needs to be reminded that they are working with
>> others and that they are sharing resources. As such, if a child-fondler
>> decides that he can write a component alone, not provide any comments
>> and demand that his superiors just "trust him" on the quality of his
>> code, it won't fly. What one does needs to be comprehensible to the
>> other. That's why there is consistency in code like what Apple is
>> selling to consumers. That's why one component in Windows works well
>> with the other. It's not all band-aided together the way that it is in
>> Linux.
>
> Most corporate meetings are a complete waste of time. What they do is enable
> gutless managers to "pass the buck," and never make a hard decision on their
> own — or even really know what the hell is going on with those he's supposed
> to be "managing."

I see this in education meetings too. We usually discuss problems and
everyone is afraid to offer a solution even though it is obvious what
needs to be done. Since I don't care about being liked by my peers, I
usually let them speak in circles for a while and then state the
obvious. Once I do, the meeting usually ends.

> As for Microsoft or Apple "quality," I'm guessing whatever quality you're
> getting is from the engineers who ignore the stupid meetings and other crap
> the corporate wonks try to saddle them with. I've seen too many of these
> nepotistic drones to have any faith in corporate management.
>
> I'm not a Musk fan, but he basically gutted Twitter of its many corporate
> wonks. Do you see any major detrimental changes in what's now called X?

I only use Gab. I am a fan of Andrew Torba and his _consistent_ defense
of free speech. I will not use a platform which believes in any kind of
moderation.

--
CrudeSausage

Le 2024-12-23 à 06:18, -hh a écrit :

< snipped, unread >

Go share your Communist gobbledegook with low-IQ negroes. I have no
interest in it. I will only read your posts about technology.

--
CrudeSausage

On 12/23/24 12:03 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> Le 2024-12-23 à 06:18, -hh a écrit :
>
> < snipped, unread >
>
> Go share your Communist gobbledegook with low-IQ ...

That's what I'm doing.

> I have no interest in it.

Translation: you're a sore loser.

> I will only read your posts about technology.

Translation: and you know that you're a sore loser too.

-hh

On 2024-12-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Le 2024-12-23 à 01:31, RonB a écrit :
>> On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit :
>>>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral
>>>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very
>>>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also
>>>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source
>>>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own
>>>>> schedules.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LMFAO!
>>>>
>>>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their
>>>> basements...
>>>
>>> LMAO!
>>
>> Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the
>> brain.)
>
> I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I
> still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my
> main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what
> I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options.

I realize that. I get the idea you really want to use Linux, but you want it
to do some of the things (like play games) the same as Windows. I see a lot
of people on Reddit who say they want to move to Linux from Windows, and ask
what's the best distribution for games. If I respond, I just tell them
they'll probably want to dual-boot or stick with Windows for gaming. I'm
guessing there will be some fairly good PCs that will be abandoned (or moved
to Linux) when Microsoft forces Windows 11 on Windows 10 users.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2024-12-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I
>> still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my
>> main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what
>> I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options.
>
>I realize that. I get the idea you really want to use Linux, but you want it
>to do some of the things (like play games) the same as Windows. I see a lot
>of people on Reddit who say they want to move to Linux from Windows, and ask
>what's the best distribution for games. If I respond, I just tell them
>they'll probably want to dual-boot or stick with Windows for gaming. I'm
>guessing there will be some fairly good PCs that will be abandoned (or moved
>to Linux) when Microsoft forces Windows 11 on Windows 10 users.

Microsoft can always claim that older computers are well supported by
Linux, so they don't need to genuinely support them with Winblows
(other than with unsupported versions pre-10), but it's funny how
people don't get that message, and stick with painfully slow systems
running Windows 10 or 11, without heavy-duty hardware.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-12-23 19:14, -hh wrote:
> On 12/23/24 12:03 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> Le 2024-12-23 à 06:18, -hh a écrit :
>>
>> < snipped, unread >
>>
>> Go share your Communist gobbledegook with low-IQ ...
>
> That's what I'm doing.
>
>
>> I have no interest in it.
>
> Translation:  you're a sore loser.
>
>> I will only read your posts about technology.
>
> Translation:  and you know that you're a sore loser too.

Every time I remove you from my filter, I end up regretting it. Back in
you go.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch

On 2024-12-24 04:49, RonB wrote:
> On 2024-12-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Le 2024-12-23 à 01:31, RonB a écrit :
>>> On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit :
>>>>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral
>>>>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very
>>>>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also
>>>>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source
>>>>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own
>>>>>> schedules.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LMFAO!
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their
>>>>> basements...
>>>>
>>>> LMAO!
>>>
>>> Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the
>>> brain.)
>>
>> I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I
>> still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my
>> main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what
>> I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options.
>
> I realize that. I get the idea you really want to use Linux, but you want it
> to do some of the things (like play games) the same as Windows. I see a lot
> of people on Reddit who say they want to move to Linux from Windows, and ask
> what's the best distribution for games. If I respond, I just tell them
> they'll probably want to dual-boot or stick with Windows for gaming. I'm
> guessing there will be some fairly good PCs that will be abandoned (or moved
> to Linux) when Microsoft forces Windows 11 on Windows 10 users.

Games are becoming less of an issue for me since I don't really have
that much time to play anyway. When I do have time, I'm a lot more
likely to play NHL on the console or Civilization on the PC. Everything
else seems like too much of an investment.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch

On 12/27/24 5:16 PM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
> On 2024-12-23 19:14, -hh wrote:
>> On 12/23/24 12:03 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>> Le 2024-12-23 à 06:18, -hh a écrit :
>>>
>>> < snipped, unread >
>>>
>>> Go share your Communist gobbledegook with low-IQ ...
>>
>> That's what I'm doing.
>>
>>
>>> I have no interest in it.
>>
>> Translation:  you're a sore loser.
>>
>>> I will only read your posts about technology.
>>
>> Translation:  and you know that you're a sore loser too.
>
> Every time I remove you from my filter, I end up regretting it. Back in
> you go.

Which is a public admission that you're surrendering to the fact that
you can't stand being reminded of how you're a luzer.

For as has been noted where you've not stepped up:

> The belief that the White man is responsible for all of society's
> problems, ...

hh> Because that posture allows you to play the VICTIM card instead
hh> of honestly acknowledging that there's been longstanding
hh> systematic advantages to being white (& male) over others...and
hh> you want to maintain your status quo of being advantaged.

> ...that blacks are not responsible for any of the issues that
> consistently surround them, that non-White cultures should be
> allowed free entry into whichever Western nation and be given
> continuous welfare, ...

hh> Which you know are fictitious claims, especially since US
hh> immigration policy even since 1964 has highly favored white
hh> Europeans over others: see Chinese Exclusion Act.

> that Whites should be dead last in the selection process for
> promotions or positions, that White as a race should be destroyed
> through the promotion of interbreeding, that homosexuals are
> oppressed, that homosexuality should get equal representation in
> media despite being a minuscule fraction of the population, that
> equality is not sufficient and that society should instead strive
> for equity...

hh> Because it wasn't because of Equity that the US got CoVid checks? /s

> ...all of which are meant to destabilize society much like they
> were during the cultural revolution in China to facilitate entry
> of Communism.

hh> Destabilizes? No, that's not what such a policy does; try again.

> It should also be noted that being reluctant to live in a community
> with the people mentioned above or their advocates is White supremacy,
> as is the desire to not be mugged, see your wife raped or your child
> kidnapped or murdered by those same people. In fact, refusing to
> allow your taxes to be used to pay for the people above rather than
> to maintain roads or help out brave men who served your country is
> also White supremacy.

hh> Or - you're simply trying to redefine what wealth-based 'class' is,
hh> and contriving an excuse for why you shouldn't have to pay a fair
hh> share of taxes to society.

> RonB is free to disagree with what I said. Let me just say, however,
> that I am not interested in any of the dozen links you'll send me
> as a rebuttal. Communism, Communists and useful progressive idiots
> and their opinions will not change my mind. The more progressive
> you are, the closer you are to Corky in Life Goes On, except that
> he seemed like a fun dude.

hh> Typically, I provide links to preemptively STFU lying assholes
hh> and hypocrites; that you're offended by them shows that it works.

>> You know ... critical thinking, not propaganda.
>
> Like the critical thinking you routinely refuse to do by pasting
> links rather than expressing your opinion in a comprehensible way.

hh> Not my fault that you only comprehend at a 5th grade reading level.

> You are free to use your barrage of progressive propaganda as a
> crutch for the opinion they've inserted into your head, but we
> are also free to refuse to read any of them because we've already
> seen your shpiel in 1989
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVcbY3Tf_TE&pp=ygUKY29ya3kgcmFwcw%3D%3D>

hh> Whatever deluded fantasy lets you get through the day, snowflake.

hh> BTW, you inevitably don't know (nor care) that Harvard University's
hh> origination of a 'Diversity' policy a century ago was actually
hh> an attempt to restore the Status Quo favoritism for the
hh> traditional protestant while male Anglo Saxons in student
hh> admissions:
hh>
hh> It was done in response to how an "undesirable minority" had
hh> been beating white men on Harvard's --> merits only <-- admissions
hh> test, and had risen to ~20% of the student population.
hh>
hh> I'd provide the cites, but you've claimed to be offended by them...

Plus this week's update is how Elon and Vivek has prompted a civil
war within MAGA on their support for more immigrants on H1-B visas
because Americans are lazy and uneducated...and DJT is supporting
the Tech Bros over his 'American First' base. Seems that they're
shocked that the face eating leopard has chosen to eat their face.

And one URL, just in case you've entirely missed this week's news:

"Trump sides with tech bosses in Maga fight over immigrant visas"

<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyv7gxp02yo>

TL;DR: now live with the consequences of who you voted for, MAGA.

-hh