On 2024-09-11, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>
>>> That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
>>> more, just recently.
>>
>>Got any actual evidence that he was a Muslim, chrisv?
>
> A false assumption that I made.
>
>>You're parroting right wing misinformation (again)
>
> First time that I can recall. But mark it on your calendar,
> -highhorse. For once, I was wrong.
>

So we can be certain it wasn't a blonde haired, blue eyed swede who was responsible?
Thankful. That makes me sleep better at night. Lord knows these swedes are causing problems
everywhere.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:32:00 -0500, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>
>
>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:u4l1ejp9h9olbgbrdd8aatjci0pqgqdel0@4ax.com...
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>So[, during the 2020 riots in the U.S.,] destroying businesses, many
>>>>>owned by minorities, stealing flat screen TVs from Bestbuy and so
>>>>>forth makes things right again?
>>>>>
>>>>>You are seriously screwed up and quite ignorant as well.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such, I'm saying that you
>>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>>> enforcement.
>>>
>>>Are you kidding?
>>>That kind of behavior is unacceptable for any reason.
>>>We have a democracy where people in charge can be voted out.
>>>We also allow free speech and PEACEFUL protesting.
>>>The libby left places like Portland, NYC, Minneapolis and so forth stood
>>>down and allowed it to
>>>happen.
>>>Why have laws and law enforcement when the brass tell them not to do
>>>anything?
>>
>>
>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>
>Well you ignore the abuses of the rioters. How much property damage was
>done? How much stuff was looted? How many people hurt?
>
>Seems to me you are awful dismissive of the abuses of rioters.
>

Which came first - abusive cops or abusive rioters?

Why MAGA HATES Walz
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIKy8-ccu40>

--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:31:02 -0500, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>I see.. so the out of control law enforcement were rioting?

No, you don't see. You don't see at all.

Prices are no better at the Stellantis dealer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCipJzAy5gQ

Donald Trump is clickbaiting his own press releases.
"This could be my final message" under a picture of JD Vance.
He's resorting to clickbait to get people to read his emails. He's teasing that
Vance may not be on his ticket anymore to get people to read his emails. If
these people had any dignity whatsoever, it's long gone now.
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/R04oXgYG44s>

--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vbsn6m$3oagb$4@dont-email.me:

>
>
>>
>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>
> Well you ignore the abuses of the rioters. How much property damage
> was done? How much stuff was looted?

As of October 14, 2022, the approximate
losses suffered as a result of the siege
at the Capitol totaled $2,881,360

Who is going to pay that back?

> Seems to me you are awful dismissive of the abuses of rioters.

According to Trump there were no rioters,
just "patriots peacefully protesting"

On 2024-09-11, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
>>>more, just recently.
>>>
>>>This negro killed six white people with his truck. That news got
>>>buried pretty quickly, didn't it? Apparently that worthless thug
>>>George Floyd was more valuable to society.
>>>
>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack
>>
>> So you're just knee deep in racism, now, Chris? Get a brain, jeez.
>
> Some of the long-time COLA posters have taken a dark turn in the last few
> years. :-(

It's a result of responding to Woke COLA posters' snark with no substance.

Take a bow, ChrisA.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 11 Sep 2024 21:41:55 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
wrote:

>On 2024-09-11, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:frl1ejh87o02568kkvln77l1imjpla93c3@4ax.com...
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>So[, during the 2020 riots in the U.S.,] destroying businesses, many
>>>>>>>>owned by minorities, stealing flat screen TVs from Bestbuy and so
>>>>>>>>forth makes things right again?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You are seriously screwed up and quite ignorant as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such, I'm saying that you
>>>>>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>>>>>> enforcement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you kidding?
>>>>>>That kind of behavior is unacceptable for any reason.
>>>>>>We have a democracy where people in charge can be voted out.
>>>>>>We also allow free speech and PEACEFUL protesting.
>>>>>>The libby left places like Portland, NYC, Minneapolis and so forth stood
>>>>>>down and allowed it to
>>>>>>happen.
>>>>>>Why have laws and law enforcement when the brass tell them not to do
>>>>>>anything?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>>>>>
>>>>There are bad cops. No questioning that. However the number of bad cops vs
>>>>the number of good ones
>>>>is minuscule.
>>>>The only time people hear about it is when it's a white cop vs a black
>>>>perp and the usual race
>>>>baiters like Sharpton, Crump and so forth come crawling out of the
>>>>woodwork and pollute the media.
>>>>
>>>>Why does the left wing media barely cover police officers being killed by
>>>>perps?
>>>>Where is Sharpton, Crump etc
>>>>whenhttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/18/trump-tcja-tax-cuts-are-slated-to-expire-after-next-year.html?os
>>>>=os it's a white officer being executed by a black perp with a record a
>>>>mile long?
>>>>The solution is to investigate, bring charges if warranted and have a
>>>>trial.
>>>>That is the justice system we have.
>>>>Destroying businesses to steal Nike Air Jordan sneakers is not the answer.
>>>>
>>>>BTW, have you ever viewed video of these rioters stealing work boots?
>>>>Asking for a friend.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ben Crump is a qualified attorney, not a fucking "race baiter",
>>
>> "As Benjamin Crump continues to carve out his niche in the legal arena, it
>> is time America recognizes what's going on. The George Floyd attorney is not
>> a crusader for justice, he's an opportunistic race profiteer. More
>> sophisticated than the local ambulance chaser-but ambitious in a similarly
>> distasteful way-he scours news reports to find examples of deadly
>> interactions between Americans he can miscast as a racist relics of a bygone
>> era."
>>
>> https://nationalcenter.org/ncppr/2021/12/03/benjamin-crump-americas-racial-justice-profiteer/
>>
>> Not everyone seems to agree with your characterization of him.
>>
>>
>> >Al Sharpton isn't such either, really,
>>
>> "Yet Friday's race-baiting, however deplorable, is also ironic. It may have
>> benefited Sharpton's interests - and certainly his ego - but it also
>> undercut a black mayor struggling to govern an increasingly unstable city."
>>
>> https://nypost.com/2023/05/19/al-sharptons-racial-incitement-back-on-full-display-in-subway-case/
>>
>
>Agreed.
>And the progressive media will never point that out.
>They depend upon the people to be fools.
>And it's working.

The trailer is out for the movie Trump does NOT want you to see, the biopic,
"The Apprentice."
https://tinyurl.com/mra97hwe

--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

On 9/11/2024 6:47 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
> news:vbsn6m$3oagb$4@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>>
>> Well you ignore the abuses of the rioters. How much property damage
>> was done? How much stuff was looted?
>
>
> As of October 14, 2022, the approximate
> losses suffered as a result of the siege
> at the Capitol totaled $2,881,360
>
> Who is going to pay that back?

Chump change. Nancy Pelosi should pay it because she lied about a
simple protest being an insurrection.

Portland lost $25 million when a black drug addict committed suicide by
cop.

Minneapolis lost $500 million because that pussy Tim Walz just stood by
and let a bunch of lawless thugs wreck the city.

On 9/11/24 4:53 PM, pothead wrote:
> On 2024-09-11, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
>> news:vbs381$3jrfe$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On 9/10/24 7:30 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-10, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So[, during the 2020 riots in the U.S.,] destroying businesses, many
>>>>>>>> owned by minorities, stealing flat screen TVs from Bestbuy and so
>>>>>>>> forth makes things right again?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are seriously screwed up and quite ignorant as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such, I'm saying that you
>>>>>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>>>>>> enforcement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you kidding?
>>>>>> That kind of behavior is unacceptable for any reason.
>>>>>> We have a democracy where people in charge can be voted out.
>>>>>> We also allow free speech and PEACEFUL protesting.
>>>>>> The libby left places like Portland, NYC, Minneapolis and so forth
>>>>>> stood down and allowed it to
>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>> Why have laws and law enforcement when the brass tell them not to do
>>>>>> anything?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>>>>>
>>>> There are bad cops. No questioning that. However the number of bad
>>>> cops vs the number of good ones is minuscule.
>>>
>>> Wish that was true, but with the FOP endorsing Trump this past week, we
>>> have to now conclude that at least 51% are bad cops.
>>
>> Why? Because YOU disagree with their politics?

No, I'm merely noting the fact that the majority voted to support a
convicted felon, which shows their contempt for Rule of Law.

>> By that standard I could condemn every Democrat for the endorsement of Biden
>> and then Kamala..
>
> Hugh "abacus" Huntzinger has been letting his scuba tank run low
> in effect depriving him of O2.
> His logic is seriously flawed.
>
> Why not look at how many officers there are in the US.
> How many encounters with potential criminals they have.
> And how many of these encounters result in complaints
> after altercations with the police.

No need to, for you're not able to dispute the facts: that a majority of
the FOP union voters chose to support a felon over a prosecutor. That
fact tells us who actually supports Rule of Law and who doesn't.

> Ignore race. All encounters are game.
> Even High horse Hugh knows that if these incidents were in any
> form large in number, the MSM would
> be all over them and thus making them high profile.
>
> Next to snit Michael Glasser, hh has to be the biggest moron on usenet.
>
> I'll bet he drives around in his car wearing a face diaper even though he is alone.
> Those types do exist.
>

Cope harder, but it doesn't change the facts: that the majority of the
FOP voting membership chooses to support a felon over a prosecutor.

-hh

On 9/11/24 6:19 PM, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>
>>> That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
>>> more, just recently.
>>
>> Got any actual evidence that he was a Muslim, chrisv?
>
> A false assumption that I made.

Unfortunately, vetting one's information sources has become both very
necessary, as there's a huge amount of deliberate misinformation
propaganda being pushed out this decade.

>> You're parroting right wing misinformation (again)
>
> First time that I can recall. But mark it on your calendar,
> -highhorse. For once, I was wrong.

So noted; thanks.

-hh

On 2024-09-12, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 9/11/24 4:53 PM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-09-11, Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
>>> news:vbs381$3jrfe$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 9/10/24 7:30 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-10, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So[, during the 2020 riots in the U.S.,] destroying businesses, many
>>>>>>>>> owned by minorities, stealing flat screen TVs from Bestbuy and so
>>>>>>>>> forth makes things right again?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are seriously screwed up and quite ignorant as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such, I'm saying that you
>>>>>>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>>>>>>> enforcement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you kidding?
>>>>>>> That kind of behavior is unacceptable for any reason.
>>>>>>> We have a democracy where people in charge can be voted out.
>>>>>>> We also allow free speech and PEACEFUL protesting.
>>>>>>> The libby left places like Portland, NYC, Minneapolis and so forth
>>>>>>> stood down and allowed it to
>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>> Why have laws and law enforcement when the brass tell them not to do
>>>>>>> anything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>>>>>>
>>>>> There are bad cops. No questioning that. However the number of bad
>>>>> cops vs the number of good ones is minuscule.
>>>>
>>>> Wish that was true, but with the FOP endorsing Trump this past week, we
>>>> have to now conclude that at least 51% are bad cops.
>>>
>>> Why? Because YOU disagree with their politics?
>
>
> No, I'm merely noting the fact that the majority voted to support a
> convicted felon, which shows their contempt for Rule of Law.
>
>
>>> By that standard I could condemn every Democrat for the endorsement of Biden
>>> and then Kamala..
>>
>> Hugh "abacus" Huntzinger has been letting his scuba tank run low
>> in effect depriving him of O2.
>> His logic is seriously flawed.
>>
>> Why not look at how many officers there are in the US.
>> How many encounters with potential criminals they have.
>> And how many of these encounters result in complaints
>> after altercations with the police.
>
> No need to, for you're not able to dispute the facts: that a majority of
> the FOP union voters chose to support a felon over a prosecutor. That
> fact tells us who actually supports Rule of Law and who doesn't.
>
>
>> Ignore race. All encounters are game.
>> Even High horse Hugh knows that if these incidents were in any
>> form large in number, the MSM would
>> be all over them and thus making them high profile.
>>
>> Next to snit Michael Glasser, hh has to be the biggest moron on usenet.
>>
>> I'll bet he drives around in his car wearing a face diaper even though he is alone.
>> Those types do exist.
>>
>
> Cope harder, but it doesn't change the facts: that the majority of the
> FOP voting membership chooses to support a felon over a prosecutor.
>
>
> -hh
>

Again, the above does not address the point that the number of bad cops is minuscule compared to
the good ones.
Oh and a person in not legally a convicted felon until a sentence is entered into the proper court
documents.
Either way, these verdicts will be overturned on appeal and at some point even the most low
information voters will wake up and realize that the justice system has been weaponized by the
Biden regime for the purpose of taking out their opponents. And the more intelligent people will
realize that if can happen to Trump, it can happen to them as well.
That's what happens in a banana republic.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris Word Salad Special Of The Day
Served Complete With Venn Diagram Dressing

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:17:14 -0700, alan downs <alandowns@facebook.com> wrote:

>Chump change. Nancy Pelosi should pay it because she lied about a
>simple protest being an insurrection.
>
>Portland lost $25 million when a black drug addict committed suicide by
>cop.
>
>Minneapolis lost $500 million because that pussy Tim Walz just stood by
>and let a bunch of lawless thugs wreck the city.

Is there no end to the cowflops the right will eat?

--
KA-MA-LA!

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:okp5ejtqbcpj6o8tq7qp36mlu6p529g4pu@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:17:14 -0700, alan downs
> <alandowns@facebook.com> wrote:
>
>>Chump change. Nancy Pelosi should pay it because she lied about a
>>simple protest being an insurrection.
>>
>>Portland lost $25 million when a black drug addict committed suicide
>>by cop.
>>
>>Minneapolis lost $500 million because that pussy Tim Walz just stood
>>by and let a bunch of lawless thugs wreck the city.
>
> Is there no end to the cowflops the right will eat?
>

Even the rightards cannot explain
Trump's call to Walz praising him for
his handling of the BLM crowds.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-praised-walz-george-floyd-riot-
response-2020-audio-shows-very-happy

chrisv wrote:
> Ken wrote:
>
>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>>
>>> Get back to us when some psycho figures out a way to kill 43 people with a knife
>>> in a day.
>>
>> How many people were killed on 9-11 with box cutters?? Oh, I guess that
>> doesn't count.
>
> That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
> more, just recently.
>
> This negro killed six white people with his truck. That news got
> buried pretty quickly, didn't it? Apparently that worthless thug
> George Floyd was more valuable to society.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack
>
lets all talk stupid

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qge4ejponbrnqq7dou0p1l43bipvelrep6@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:31:02 -0500, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

Let's restore what you snipped out (adjusted to show proper order)

>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such,
>>>I'm saying that you
>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>> enforcement.

End

>>I see.. so the out of control law enforcement were rioting?
>
> No, you don't see. You don't see at all.

Of course I didn't see it, but Joel claims he did.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hde4ejp5igu45d54mv8183i0mt5kclmf8h@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:32:00 -0500, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:u4l1ejp9h9olbgbrdd8aatjci0pqgqdel0@4ax.com...
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>So[, during the 2020 riots in the U.S.,] destroying businesses, many
>>>>>>owned by minorities, stealing flat screen TVs from Bestbuy and so
>>>>>>forth makes things right again?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are seriously screwed up and quite ignorant as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such, I'm saying that you
>>>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>>>> enforcement.
>>>>
>>>>Are you kidding?
>>>>That kind of behavior is unacceptable for any reason.
>>>>We have a democracy where people in charge can be voted out.
>>>>We also allow free speech and PEACEFUL protesting.
>>>>The libby left places like Portland, NYC, Minneapolis and so forth stood
>>>>down and allowed it to
>>>>happen.
>>>>Why have laws and law enforcement when the brass tell them not to do
>>>>anything?
>>>
>>>
>>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>>
>>Well you ignore the abuses of the rioters. How much property damage was
>>done? How much stuff was looted? How many people hurt?
>>
>>Seems to me you are awful dismissive of the abuses of rioters.
>>
>
> Which came first - abusive cops or abusive rioters?

Easy.. the abusive rioters were first on the scene.

On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:43:55 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Ken wrote:
>
>>Governor Swill wrote:
>>>
>>> Get back to us when some psycho figures out a way to kill 43 people with a knife
>>> in a day.
>>
>>How many people were killed on 9-11 with box cutters?? Oh, I guess that
>>doesn't count.
>
>That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
>more, just recently.
>
>This negro killed six white people with his truck. That news got
>buried pretty quickly, didn't it? Apparently that worthless thug
>George Floyd was more valuable to society.
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack

You know why that story disappeared?

"On November 16, 2022, he was sentenced to six consecutive life sentences
without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 762.5 years to be served
consecutively."

End of story.

--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:50:53 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-09-12, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> Cope harder, but it doesn't change the facts: that the majority of the
>> FOP voting membership chooses to support a felon over a prosecutor.

>Again, the above does not address the point that the number of bad cops is minuscule compared to
>the good ones.

Nor does it excuse the Fraternal Order of Police from endorsing a convicted
felon (with sixty counts yet to be tried) over a career prosecutor.

>Oh and a person in not legally a convicted felon until a sentence is entered into the proper court
>documents.
>Either way, these verdicts will be overturned on appeal and at some point even the most low
>information voters will wake up and realize that the justice system has been weaponized by the
>Biden regime for the purpose of taking out their opponents. And the more intelligent people will
>realize that if can happen to Trump, it can happen to them as well.
>That's what happens in a banana republic.

Tell the Culligan man to take the acid cake out of your water softener. It's
your brain that's getting softened.

--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:55:00 -0500, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>
>
>"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:hde4ejp5igu45d54mv8183i0mt5kclmf8h@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:32:00 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:u4l1ejp9h9olbgbrdd8aatjci0pqgqdel0@4ax.com...
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>So[, during the 2020 riots in the U.S.,] destroying businesses, many
>>>>>>>owned by minorities, stealing flat screen TVs from Bestbuy and so
>>>>>>>forth makes things right again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are seriously screwed up and quite ignorant as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not condoning the rioting and looting as such, I'm saying that you
>>>>>> can expect that to occur, in the context of out-of-control law
>>>>>> enforcement.
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you kidding?
>>>>>That kind of behavior is unacceptable for any reason.
>>>>>We have a democracy where people in charge can be voted out.
>>>>>We also allow free speech and PEACEFUL protesting.
>>>>>The libby left places like Portland, NYC, Minneapolis and so forth stood
>>>>>down and allowed it to
>>>>>happen.
>>>>>Why have laws and law enforcement when the brass tell them not to do
>>>>>anything?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're being dismissive of the abuses of police.
>>>
>>>Well you ignore the abuses of the rioters. How much property damage was
>>>done? How much stuff was looted? How many people hurt?
>>>
>>>Seems to me you are awful dismissive of the abuses of rioters.
>>>
>>
>> Which came first - abusive cops or abusive rioters?
>
>Easy.. the abusive rioters were first on the scene.
>

So your claim is that no cop has ever been abusive until the first BLM march?

Interesting.

--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vbv070$adf4$7@dont-email.me:

>>
>> Which came first - abusive cops or abusive rioters?
>
> Easy.. the abusive rioters were first on the scene.

So why were the Capitol Police
at fault for trying to defend the
Capitol?

RonB wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>> Joel wrote:
>>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>>That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
>>>>more, just recently.
>>>>
>>>>This negro killed six white people with his truck. That news got
>>>>buried pretty quickly, didn't it? Apparently that worthless thug
>>>>George Floyd was more valuable to society.
>>>>
>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack
>>>
>>> So you're just knee deep in racism, now, Chris?

Knee-deep in the anti-white racism that flourishes in this county, and
much of Europe as well.

>> Get a brain, jeez.

Get a clue on how much violence against whites is perpetrated by
blacks, and it almost *never* makes the news.

But let some entitled asshole pro football player get taken from his
car after being a total uncooperative dick, rolling-up his tinted
windows when the cops are trying to talk to him, and it's national
news! *Shitty*, whining *assholes* on ESPN and elsewhere have a
fscking conniption!

Where's the conniption when stuff like the below happens?

https://www.newsweek.com/white-student-hospitalized-brutal-attack-school-sparks-outrage-1852254

Could you *imagine* the outrage, if the races had been reversed?

>> Some of the long-time COLA posters have taken a dark turn in the last few
>> years. :-(

Is it "dark" that leftists will call you a "racist" if you think, for
example, Kamala is an idiot? Or is that OK, with you?

>It's a result of responding to Woke COLA posters' snark with no substance.

Not just COLA posters, of course. GD leftists.

-hh wrote:

>No need to, for you're not able to dispute the facts: that a majority of
>the FOP union voters chose to support a felon over a prosecutor. That
>fact tells us who actually supports Rule of Law and who doesn't.

Incorrect. It doesn't tell us anything, when we think that the Trump
charges were ridiculous and only brought because of who he is.

Whether or not you agree that the Trump charges were fair, or not, is
irrelevant.

Your response will be deleted, unread, idiot.

--
"the COLA fanboys seem to never grok [that choice has costs]." -
lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

pothead wrote:

>Either way, these verdicts will be overturned on appeal and at some point even the most low
>information voters will wake up and realize that the justice system has been weaponized by the
>Biden regime for the purpose of taking out their opponents. And the more intelligent people will
>realize that if can happen to Trump, it can happen to them as well.

The leftists like it that way, man! The state knows best. The
constitution is a "dangerous threat"!

Charlie Glock wrote:

>So we can be certain it wasn't a blonde haired, blue eyed swede who was responsible?
>Thankful. That makes me sleep better at night. Lord knows these swedes are causing problems
>everywhere.

Well the real point is that it was a knife attack.

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Joel wrote:
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>That negro Muslim in England slaughtered 3 children, and injured many
>>>>>more, just recently.
>>>>>
>>>>>This negro killed six white people with his truck. That news got
>>>>>buried pretty quickly, didn't it? Apparently that worthless thug
>>>>>George Floyd was more valuable to society.
>>>>>
>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack
>>>>
>>>> So you're just knee deep in racism, now, Chris?
>
>Knee-deep in the anti-white racism that flourishes in this county, and
>much of Europe as well.
>
>>> Get a brain, jeez.
>
>Get a clue on how much violence against whites is perpetrated by
>blacks, and it almost *never* makes the news.
>
>But let some entitled asshole pro football player get taken from his
>car after being a total uncooperative dick, rolling-up his tinted
>windows when the cops are trying to talk to him, and it's national
>news! *Shitty*, whining *assholes* on ESPN and elsewhere have a
>fscking conniption!
>
>Where's the conniption when stuff like the below happens?
>
>https://www.newsweek.com/white-student-hospitalized-brutal-attack-school-sparks-outrage-1852254
>
>Could you *imagine* the outrage, if the races had been reversed?

Am I supposed to think they targeted him because of race, or
something? There's nothing to suggest that's so. It was probably one
of those teen-boy violence things, that unfortunately happen. It's
repugnant, but not unheard of.

>>> Some of the long-time COLA posters have taken a dark turn in the last few
>>> years. :-(
>
>Is it "dark" that leftists will call you a "racist" if you think, for
>example, Kamala is an idiot? Or is that OK, with you?

It is racist to call Kamala Harris an idiot, yes, because she isn't
one. The basis for calling her that is the black side of her
personality, OMFG she laughs sometimes, oh no, we're gonna have WWIII
because she's so this and that, give me a fucking break. She's a 60-
year-old attorney, former senator and current vice president. I
embrace her, I admire her, she is an intellectual peer, and yes Donald
Trump is as well, but let's be egalitarian in our approach to
politics. It's OK to be a mix of African and Indian, just as it was
OK for Barack Obama to be a mix of African and Caucasian. It's about
who the person is, not what they look like.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>pothead wrote:
>
>>Either way, these verdicts will be overturned on appeal and at some point even the most low
>>information voters will wake up and realize that the justice system has been weaponized by the
>>Biden regime for the purpose of taking out their opponents. And the more intelligent people will
>>realize that if can happen to Trump, it can happen to them as well.
>
>The leftists like it that way, man! The state knows best. The
>constitution is a "dangerous threat"!

And yet you don't speak out about the Dobbs decision, blatantly
ignoring the constitutional rights of people? My sig quotes the 14th
amendment, clearly giving broad individual liberty, which was in part
the basis for Roe. What is your position on this?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.