chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>they downplay the importance of children and families. They
>undermine the family.

That's discredited hate speech, the cause is very accommodating of and
alert to children and teens' needs and concerns.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:46:13 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>about childless people.
>
>I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>attacked "childless people".
>
>Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>have children."
>
>"This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>anti-family and anti-child," he said.

Which it hasn't. Vance is the one skipping the vote to expand the child tax credit this
week.

#nevertrump
Denmark has just arrested a Russian spy.
<https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/06/11/denmark-arrests-suspected-russian-spy-a85372>
"Australia charges Russian-born married couple with espionage"
<https://www.reuters.com/world/australia-charges-russian-born-married-couple-with-espionage-2024-07-12/#:~:text=SYDNEY%2C%20July%2012%20(Reuters),send%20it%20to%20Russian%20officials.>
Meanwhile, Hungary changes visa requirements to make it easier for Russian spies to enter
the EU. Bupapest's decision to loosen restrictions from Russia in 'national security
risk' says European People's Party.
<https://www.ft.com/content/b2a4ebd8-df41-43fe-8d63-602c1d50e899>

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 18:03:16 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Joel wrote:
>
>>>"This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>>anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>
>> (gibberish snipped)
>
>It obviously does not insult them. "Anti family" and "anti child"
>isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>some brain power to understand the difference, here.

Not as much as it takes to say what you actually mean, apparently.

Have you not wondered why you guys have to go back after, and clean up misunderstandings
from what you said before?

#nevertrump
A Ukrainian soldier proudly shows off his [vegetable] garden next to a trench.
It's a amazing and huge!
<https://x.com/trajaykay/status/1816243082863542553>

On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 18:40:10 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>chrisv wrote:
>
>>"Anti family" and "anti child"
>>isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>>some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>
>As in they downplay the importance of children and families. They
>undermine the family.

It wasn't Democrats who, in rewriting the tax code in 2017, eliminated deductions for
children.

#nevertrump
"Front Line Puppies, have you ever seen a more beautiful dog? My Tosiya is going to be
pretty jealous that I met such a badass pup with no fear of artillery."
Ukrainian servicemen love their pets!
<https://x.com/frontlinekit/status/1816036427873829073>

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>> about childless people.
>
> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
> attacked "childless people".
>
> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
> have children."

That’s damage control.

> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
> anti-family and anti-child," he said.

Which is merely a dog whistle statement of being opposed to women having
personal freedoms, including bodily autonomy.

-hh

Governor Swill wrote:

>>It obviously does not insult them. "Anti family" and "anti child"
>>isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>>some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>
>Not as much as it takes to say what you actually mean, apparently.
>
>Have you not wondered why you guys have to go back after, and clean up misunderstandings
>from what you said before?

I don't wonder, because I already know why. There are lots of stupid,
dishonest assholes in the world who are constantly looking to
interpret what others say in the most uncharitable and insulting
fashion, so that they can attack.

For example a Linux advocate might say something like "Linux is
perfect for your situation", and some dumb fsck will attack them as a
"moron" who thinks that Linux is "perfect", as in zero bugs or flaws.

--
'If "Linux just works" and "Linux is perfect for anything" we would
not have a single bug report ever - past, present or future. But it
turns out lots of morons make those kind of ridiculous claims about
Linux' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly

On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>about childless people.
>
> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
> attacked "childless people".
>
> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
> have children."
>
> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>
Because MSNBC told him so.
I'll bet he's also a gold card member of "The View" as well.

Oh, and BTW, where are all these feminists when men dressed as women invade their safe havens like
showers, bathrooms and such?

Where are these feminists when men who pretend to be women are beating the living shit out of
biological females in the Olympics? Like boxing for example.
Where are the legions of Hollywood feminists who attack some stupid statements made by Trump?
Lastly, where are these feminists protesting how radical Muslims treat women, oh and LBGTQ as well,
like animals and kill them for whatever minor reason?

So where are they?

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>
>>>"This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>>anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>
>> (gibberish snipped)
>
> It obviously does not insult them. "Anti family" and "anti child"
> isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
> some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>
The left ARE anti family, anti Western religion, anti morality and many other evil leaning
ideologies.
Look at their actions instead of their words.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
>
>>"Anti family" and "anti child"
>>isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>>some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>
> As in they downplay the importance of children and families. They
> undermine the family.

Indeed.
The last 3.5 years have shown that and more.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On 2024-08-02, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>> about childless people.
>>
>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>> attacked "childless people".
>>
>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>> have children."
>
> That’s damage control.

Wrong.
That is explaining what he meant.

Damage control is:

1. Govt Track scrubbing it's articles declaring Kamala Harris the most liberal Senator in history.

<https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/us-news/govtrack-scrubbed-its-rating-that-had-kamala-harris-as-most-
liberal-senator-in-2019-after-biden-dropped-out/>

2. Attempting to explain away Joe Biden's major flubs. The latest being Joe Biden boarding the
wrong plane yesterday.

3. The media in 4 short weeks going from reporting how Kamala is the worst of everything to all of
a sudden her becoming the next Margaret Thatcher.

4. In a matter of days , Joe Biden going from sharp as a tack to a cognitive mess.

The list is endless.

If Trump can manage to stay focused on policy, he is going to absolutely destroy Kamala because her
record is atrocious and so far left Bernie is like a modern day Reagan. And no matter how hard she
tries to walk back policies like anti fracking, antil fossil fuel, anti ICE, pro defunding the
police, setting up bail funds for BLM destroying cities and so forth, she cannot hide and the media
despite trying their best cannot protect her.

>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>
> Which is merely a dog whistle statement of being opposed to women having
> personal freedoms, including bodily autonomy.
>
> -hh

Good luck with that narrative.
People have had enough of Biden/Harris.
And sending the abortion issue back to the states is not opposing women's personal freedoms.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> We need a seriously liberal
> president for a change. And not the
> Obama/Clinton "let's compromise

You want _more liberal_ than Obammunism?

You will burn in Hell for trying to kill off our nation, cornholer!

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> If you don't have anything to say
> about the topic why do you reply?

Maybe because virulent cornholing fascists like you must be put to rest.

On 2024-08-03, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>>I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>>about childless people.
>>
>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>> attacked "childless people".
>>
>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>> have children."
>>
>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>
> Because MSNBC told him so.
> I'll bet he's also a gold card member of "The View" as well.
>
> Oh, and BTW, where are all these feminists when men dressed as women invade their safe havens like
> showers, bathrooms and such?
>
> Where are these feminists when men who pretend to be women are beating the living shit out of
> biological females in the Olympics? Like boxing for example.
> Where are the legions of Hollywood feminists who attack some stupid statements made by Trump?
> Lastly, where are these feminists protesting how radical Muslims treat women, oh and LBGTQ as well,
> like animals and kill them for whatever minor reason?
>
> So where are they?
>

People actually watch and believe the tripe that gets shown on the news media and various talk
shows? They all suck and they all push their ideology as "news".
Traditional media is quickly dying.
And Hollywood is becoming irrelevant as well.

--
Nippy

On 2024-08-03, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> On 2024-08-02, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>>> about childless people.
>>>
>>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>>> attacked "childless people".
>>>
>>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>>> have children."
>>
>> That’s damage control.
>
> Wrong.
> That is explaining what he meant.
>
> Damage control is:
>
> 1. Govt Track scrubbing it's articles declaring Kamala Harris the most liberal Senator in history.
>
><https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/us-news/govtrack-scrubbed-its-rating-that-had-kamala-harris-as-most-
> liberal-senator-in-2019-after-biden-dropped-out/>
>
> 2. Attempting to explain away Joe Biden's major flubs. The latest being Joe Biden boarding the
> wrong plane yesterday.
>
> 3. The media in 4 short weeks going from reporting how Kamala is the worst of everything to all of
> a sudden her becoming the next Margaret Thatcher.
>
> 4. In a matter of days , Joe Biden going from sharp as a tack to a cognitive mess.
>
> The list is endless.
>
> If Trump can manage to stay focused on policy, he is going to absolutely destroy Kamala because her
> record is atrocious and so far left Bernie is like a modern day Reagan. And no matter how hard she
> tries to walk back policies like anti fracking, antil fossil fuel, anti ICE, pro defunding the
> police, setting up bail funds for BLM destroying cities and so forth, she cannot hide and the media
> despite trying their best cannot protect her.
>
>
>
>
>
>>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>
>> Which is merely a dog whistle statement of being opposed to women having
>> personal freedoms, including bodily autonomy.
>>
>> -hh
>
> Good luck with that narrative.
> People have had enough of Biden/Harris.
> And sending the abortion issue back to the states is not opposing women's personal freedoms.
>
>
You are just figuring this out?
The same media who told you the Russian dossier and Trump's Russian collusion was real while at the
same time telling you that the Hunter Biden laptop was fake are now telling you how Kamala, all of
a sudden, is a true stateswoman while Trump is Hitler incarnate.
It's what they do.
And single issue voters are the dumbest of the dumb.
There is no perfect candidate, there never is. The best we can do is pick the candidate that fits
most of one's beliefs.
For me, I'm sitting this one out. Both Trump and Harris suck. Just in different ways.
--
Nippy

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>>>>Kamila
>>>>
>>>> Do you really not know how to spell her name, Chris?
>>>
>>>Kamila, Kamala, Kameltoe, whatever.
>>
>>Well, sexism and fascism do go together, so congrats.
>
>Coming from you, those words are meaningless.

No I'm afraid that's insufficient, you said something that would
normally be written "camel toe" as a play on the vice president's name
because you disingenuously play the hard-right.

>OTOH, some kook in here claimed that Trump was Hitler reincarnated!
>What's worse? That, or "Kameltoe"?
>
>Your response will be deleted, unread.

I don't care.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 8/3/2024 3:15 PM, Joel wrote:
> you said something that would
> normally be written "camel toe" as a play on the vice president's name

And who are you, Miss Manners for the "our side is losing now - wah!" team?

citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:

>> you said something that would
>> normally be written "camel toe" as a play on the vice president's name
>
>And who are you, Miss Manners for the "our side is losing now - wah!" team?

I don't buy into the statements that one side or the other "is losing
now".

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:
> citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
>
>>> you said something that would
>>> normally be written "camel toe" as a play on the vice president's name
>>
>> And who are you, Miss Manners for the "our side is losing now - wah!" team?
>
>
> I don't buy into the statements that one side or the other "is losing
> now".
>
don't let this guy get you ,
i found 4 names he uses so far and ,
he ashamed to admit he's in europe

On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:54:27 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>>"Anti family" and "anti child"
>>>isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>>>some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>>
>> As in they downplay the importance of children and families. They
>> undermine the family.
>
>Indeed.
>The last 3.5 years have shown that and more.

It wasn't Democrats who, in rewriting the tax code in 2017, eliminated deductions for
children.

#nevertrump

On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 08:19:00 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Governor Swill wrote:
>
>>>It obviously does not insult them. "Anti family" and "anti child"
>>>isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>>>some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>>
>>Not as much as it takes to say what you actually mean, apparently.
>>
>>Have you not wondered why you guys have to go back after, and clean up misunderstandings
>>from what you said before?
>
>I don't wonder, because I already know why. There are lots of stupid,
>dishonest assholes in the world who are constantly looking to
>interpret what others say in the most uncharitable and insulting
>fashion, so that they can attack.

Or maybe it's because your candidate is constantly saying stupid, irresponsible SHIT that
you keep trying to explain away as something other than what he said.

If he means what you say he does, why doesn't he just say THAT.

#nevertrump

Why Trump is the RINO
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vtPUIKQhKdg>

On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:53:28 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Joel wrote:
>>
>>>>"This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>>>anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>>
>>> (gibberish snipped)
>>
>> It obviously does not insult them. "Anti family" and "anti child"
>> isn't saying that anyone hates children or families. I know it takes
>> some brain power to understand the difference, here.
>>
>The left ARE anti family, anti Western religion, anti morality and many other evil leaning
>ideologies.
>Look at their actions instead of their words.

The party of family values is being represented by a man with five kids by three baby
mommas every one of whom he cheated on.

#nevertrump

On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 14:04:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-02, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>>> about childless people.
>>>
>>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>>> attacked "childless people".
>>>
>>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>>> have children."
>>
>> That’s damage control.
>
>Wrong.
>That is explaining what he meant.
>
>Damage control is:
>
>1. Govt Track scrubbing it's articles declaring Kamala Harris the most liberal Senator in history.
>
><https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/us-news/govtrack-scrubbed-its-rating-that-had-kamala-harris-as-most-
>liberal-senator-in-2019-after-biden-dropped-out/>
>
>2. Attempting to explain away Joe Biden's major flubs. The latest being Joe Biden boarding the
>wrong plane yesterday.
>
>3. The media in 4 short weeks going from reporting how Kamala is the worst of everything to all of
>a sudden her becoming the next Margaret Thatcher.
>
>4. In a matter of days , Joe Biden going from sharp as a tack to a cognitive mess.
>
>The list is endless.
>
>If Trump can manage to stay focused on policy, he is going to absolutely destroy Kamala because her
>record is atrocious and so far left Bernie is like a modern day Reagan. And no matter how hard she
>tries to walk back policies like anti fracking, antil fossil fuel, anti ICE, pro defunding the
>police, setting up bail funds for BLM destroying cities and so forth, she cannot hide and the media
>despite trying their best cannot protect her.
>
>
>
>
>
>>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>
>> Which is merely a dog whistle statement of being opposed to women having
>> personal freedoms, including bodily autonomy.
>>
>> -hh
>
>Good luck with that narrative.
>People have had enough of Biden/Harris.
>And sending the abortion issue back to the states is not opposing women's personal freedoms.

And despite all that, she's erased Trump's lead in every swing state. Maybe Americans are
more liberal than you think.

#nevertrump

On 03 Aug 2024 16:24:14 GMT, Nippy <Nippy@byteme.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-03, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-08-02, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>>>> about childless people.
>>>>
>>>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>>>> attacked "childless people".
>>>>
>>>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>>>> have children."
>>>
>>> That’s damage control.
>>
>> Wrong.
>> That is explaining what he meant.
>>
>> Damage control is:
>>
>> 1. Govt Track scrubbing it's articles declaring Kamala Harris the most liberal Senator in history.
>>
>><https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/us-news/govtrack-scrubbed-its-rating-that-had-kamala-harris-as-most-
>> liberal-senator-in-2019-after-biden-dropped-out/>
>>
>> 2. Attempting to explain away Joe Biden's major flubs. The latest being Joe Biden boarding the
>> wrong plane yesterday.
>>
>> 3. The media in 4 short weeks going from reporting how Kamala is the worst of everything to all of
>> a sudden her becoming the next Margaret Thatcher.
>>
>> 4. In a matter of days , Joe Biden going from sharp as a tack to a cognitive mess.
>>
>> The list is endless.
>>
>> If Trump can manage to stay focused on policy, he is going to absolutely destroy Kamala because her
>> record is atrocious and so far left Bernie is like a modern day Reagan. And no matter how hard she
>> tries to walk back policies like anti fracking, antil fossil fuel, anti ICE, pro defunding the
>> police, setting up bail funds for BLM destroying cities and so forth, she cannot hide and the media
>> despite trying their best cannot protect her.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>>
>>> Which is merely a dog whistle statement of being opposed to women having
>>> personal freedoms, including bodily autonomy.
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>> Good luck with that narrative.
>> People have had enough of Biden/Harris.
>> And sending the abortion issue back to the states is not opposing women's personal freedoms.
>>
>>
>You are just figuring this out?
>The same media who told you the Russian dossier and Trump's Russian collusion was real while at the
>same time telling you that the Hunter Biden laptop was fake are now telling you how Kamala, all of
>a sudden, is a true stateswoman while Trump is Hitler incarnate.
>It's what they do.
>And single issue voters are the dumbest of the dumb.
>There is no perfect candidate, there never is. The best we can do is pick the candidate that fits
>most of one's beliefs.
>For me, I'm sitting this one out. Both Trump and Harris suck. Just in different ways.

What happened to Trump's swing state lead?

Why did Harris raise another $25M from small donors within 24 hours of his disastrous
performance at NABJ?

#nevertrump

On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:51:55 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>>I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and recently,
>>>about childless people.
>>
>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>> attacked "childless people".
>>
>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who don't
>> have children."
>>
>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>
>Because MSNBC told him so.
>I'll bet he's also a gold card member of "The View" as well.
>
>Oh, and BTW, where are all these feminists when men dressed as women invade their safe havens like
>showers, bathrooms and such?
>
>Where are these feminists when men who pretend to be women are beating the living shit out of
>biological females in the Olympics? Like boxing for example.
>Where are the legions of Hollywood feminists who attack some stupid statements made by Trump?
>Lastly, where are these feminists protesting how radical Muslims treat women, oh and LBGTQ as well,
>like animals and kill them for whatever minor reason?
>
>So where are they?

Donating to, volunteering with and voting for Kamala Harris.

Where are all the assholes?

Doing the same for Donald Trump.

#nevertrump

On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 15:22:11 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:

>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>news:v8lclr$3f2s5$7@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 2024-08-01, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>>I don't get why chrisv cannot see his quotes over the years, and
>>>>recently, about childless people.
>>>
>>> I don't get why you see his recent quotes and conclude that he
>>> attacked "childless people".
>>>
>>> Vance reiterated Friday that "it's not a criticism of people who
>>> don't have children."
>>>
>>> "This is about criticizing the Democratic Party for becoming
>>> anti-family and anti-child," he said.
>>>
>> Because MSNBC told him so.
>> I'll bet he's also a gold card member of "The View" as well.
>>
>> Oh, and BTW, where are all these feminists when men dressed as women
>> invade their safe havens like showers, bathrooms and such?
>>
>> Where are these feminists when men who pretend to be women are beating
>> the living shit out of biological females in the Olympics? Like boxing
>> for example. Where are the legions of Hollywood feminists who attack
>> some stupid statements made by Trump? Lastly, where are these
>> feminists protesting how radical Muslims treat women, oh and LBGTQ as
>> well, like animals and kill them for whatever minor reason?
>>
>> So where are they?
>
>
>
> Wow.
>
> In a thread about childless people
>you have pivoted to trans people, Trump,
>feminism, radical muslims, The View, and
>LGBTQ.
>
> If you don't have anything to say
>about the topic why do you reply?

Because Trumpy is getting his ass kicked and she knows it.

#nevertrump