On 10/9/2024 4:45 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/W37XW3z.png
>>>>
>>>> No More Lonely Nights for Joel. You've got a friend in CoPilot.
>>>
>>> I have a GF.
>>
>> No you don't.
>>
>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>
>
> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
> just a computer?

He IS a man. There's no "somehow" about it.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>>> I have a GF.
>>>
>>> No you don't.
>>>
>>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>>
>> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
>> just a computer?
>
>He IS a man. There's no "somehow" about it.

And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
you don't? How weird ...

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:26:43 -0400, Joel wrote:

> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
> you don't? How weird ...

Did he spend any time in a confessional?

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>> you don't? How weird ...
>
>Did he spend any time in a confessional?

How am I supposed to know?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 10/13/2024 11:26 AM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> I have a GF.
>>>>
>>>> No you don't.
>>>>
>>>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>>>
>>> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
>>> just a computer?
>>
>> He IS a man. There's no "somehow" about it.
>
>
> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
> you don't? How weird ...

He went in a dress, and they accepted him (whatever that means).

They're being nice to him, rather than telling the truth.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>>>>> I have a GF.
>>>>>
>>>>> No you don't.
>>>>>
>>>>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>>>>
>>>> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
>>>> just a computer?
>>>
>>> He IS a man. There's no "somehow" about it.
>>
>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>> you don't? How weird ...
>
>He went in a dress, and they accepted him (whatever that means).
>
>They're being nice to him, rather than telling the truth.

They're not "being nice", they're recognizing that Jesus didn't come
to condemn people his Father created. If even the fucking *RCC* can
do that, why can't atheist phobes?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:11:46 -0400, Joel wrote:

> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>
>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>
>>Did he spend any time in a confessional?
>
>
> How am I supposed to know?

Going to a Catholic church in drag and not getting thrown out is one thing
being accepted into full communion is something else again. Or maybe not.
I haven't been in a Catholic church for a long while but I do understand
they ain't what they used to be.

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>>
>>>Did he spend any time in a confessional?
>>
>> How am I supposed to know?
>
>Going to a Catholic church in drag and not getting thrown out is one thing
>being accepted into full communion is something else again. Or maybe not.
>I haven't been in a Catholic church for a long while but I do understand
>they ain't what they used to be.

As far as I know, she has been transparent with her clergy, about her
identity.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 21:30:32 -0400, Joel wrote:

> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her,
>>>>> but you don't? How weird ...
>>>>
>>>>Did he spend any time in a confessional?
>>>
>>> How am I supposed to know?
>>
>>Going to a Catholic church in drag and not getting thrown out is one
>>thing being accepted into full communion is something else again. Or
>>maybe not. I haven't been in a Catholic church for a long while but I do
>>understand they ain't what they used to be.
>
>
> As far as I know, she has been transparent with her clergy, about her
> identity.

I'll leave them to work out the intrinsic disorder.

Le 2024-10-13 à 20 h 56, rbowman a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:11:46 -0400, Joel wrote:
>
>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>>
>>> Did he spend any time in a confessional?
>>
>>
>> How am I supposed to know?
>
> Going to a Catholic church in drag and not getting thrown out is one thing
> being accepted into full communion is something else again. Or maybe not.
> I haven't been in a Catholic church for a long while but I do understand
> they ain't what they used to be.

The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.

--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
>Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.

Satan pretends to be Jesus. But I really am Jesus.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:03:10 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
> Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.

The Icke thing? I thought that died about 10 years ago.

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:41:38 -0400, Joel wrote:

> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
>>Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.
>
>
> Satan pretends to be Jesus. But I really am Jesus.

Right Haysoos,

On 2024-10-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Le 2024-10-13 à 20 h 56, rbowman a écrit :
>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:11:46 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>
>>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>>>
>>>> Did he spend any time in a confessional?
>>>
>>>
>>> How am I supposed to know?
>>
>> Going to a Catholic church in drag and not getting thrown out is one thing
>> being accepted into full communion is something else again. Or maybe not.
>> I haven't been in a Catholic church for a long while but I do understand
>> they ain't what they used to be.
>
> The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
> Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.

I'm not fan of Pope Francis, but I completely doubt he ever said anything
like this.

Out of curiosity, who is "The People's Voice TV"? — never heard of them. I
would be curious about who started it and what their agenda is.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-10-14, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:03:10 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>
>> The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
>> Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.
>
> The Icke thing? I thought that died about 10 years ago.

Oh, okay. According to Wikipedia here is some of what Icke believes...

Icke contends that the universe consists of "vibrational" energy and
infinite dimensions sharing the same space.[14][15][16] He claims that
there is an inter-dimensional race of reptilian beings, the Archons or
Anunnaki, which have hijacked the Earth. Further, a genetically modified
human–Archon hybrid race of reptilian shape-shifters – the Babylonian
Brotherhood, Illuminati or "elite" – manipulate events to keep humans in
fear, so that the Archons can feed off the resulting "negative energy"

So a modern-day L. Ron Hubbard?

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:41:38 -0400, Joel wrote:
>
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>>The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
>>>Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.
>>
>>
>> Satan pretends to be Jesus. But I really am Jesus.
>
> Right Haysoos,

Pronunciatio issue. I was watching a Premiere League game where the (Irish)
announcer pronounced Gabriel Jesus name as "Gee Zuss". The co-commentator
said it right.

Jesus himslef would wonder who the hell "Gee Zuss" is. He'd also wonder why
people think he looks like Jeffrey Hunter.

--
See store for details.

Le 2024-10-14 à 19 h 05, RonB a écrit :
> On 2024-10-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> Le 2024-10-13 à 20 h 56, rbowman a écrit :
>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:11:46 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>>
>>>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>>>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Did he spend any time in a confessional?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How am I supposed to know?
>>>
>>> Going to a Catholic church in drag and not getting thrown out is one thing
>>> being accepted into full communion is something else again. Or maybe not.
>>> I haven't been in a Catholic church for a long while but I do understand
>>> they ain't what they used to be.
>>
>> The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
>> Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.
>
> I'm not fan of Pope Francis, but I completely doubt he ever said anything
> like this.
>
> Out of curiosity, who is "The People's Voice TV"? — never heard of them. I
> would be curious about who started it and what their agenda is.

Admittedly, I didn't put much weight in what they said either. They seem
to have an agenda. I notice that when it comes to coverage of
international news, one of the best sources is RT.

--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>I notice that when it comes to coverage of
>international news, one of the best sources is RT.

I'm sure Alexander Litvinenko would concur with that opinion, dipshit.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:09:18 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Admittedly, I didn't put much weight in what they said either. They seem
> to have an agenda. I notice that when it comes to coverage of
> international news, one of the best sources is RT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People's_Voice_(website)

Oh, THAT People's Voice...

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/

Quite a few of the articles did not seem to be fakes. I'm not sure about
the greatest hits links on the righthand side of the page.

"Rumors Grow That Syrian President Assad Has Suffered Fatal Stroke"

January 30, 2017

They took the bait but apparently the root of the Satan thing is the
Exsulet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEs4d3cCX9s

It's long but the final verse starts at 10:22

Flammas eius lucifer matutinus inventiat:
Ille, inquam, lucifer, qui nescit occasum:
Christus Filius tuuse, qui regressus ab inferis,
humano generi serenus illuxit,
et vivit et renat in saecula saeculorum.

OMG! He's praying to Lucifer!

On 2024-10-15, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:09:18 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>> Admittedly, I didn't put much weight in what they said either. They seem
>> to have an agenda. I notice that when it comes to coverage of
>> international news, one of the best sources is RT.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People's_Voice_(website)
>
> Oh, THAT People's Voice...
>
> https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/
>
> Quite a few of the articles did not seem to be fakes. I'm not sure about
> the greatest hits links on the righthand side of the page.
>
> "Rumors Grow That Syrian President Assad Has Suffered Fatal Stroke"
>
> January 30, 2017
>
> They took the bait but apparently the root of the Satan thing is the
> Exsulet.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEs4d3cCX9s
>
> It's long but the final verse starts at 10:22
>
> Flammas eius lucifer matutinus inventiat:
> Ille, inquam, lucifer, qui nescit occasum:
> Christus Filius tuuse, qui regressus ab inferis,
> humano generi serenus illuxit,
> et vivit et renat in saecula saeculorum.
>
> OMG! He's praying to Lucifer!

These guys sound like they're at the level of Chic Publications. For those
of us who don't speak Latin (me)...

"lucifer" in Latin means "bringing light" or the "morning star." "lux" =
light, "ferre" = to bring. In this passage it's being applied to Jesus as
the "Morning Star" not to satan.

English translation as published by the Catholic Church...

May this flame be found still burning by the Morning Star:
the one Morning Star who never sets,
Christ your Son, who, coming back from death's domain,
has shed his peaceful light on humanity,
and lives and reigns for ever and ever.

Note, "lucifer" is not capitalized as if it were a name in the Latin.

"This flame" is the paschal candle, which the priest is preparing and will
light as this song ends (the part quoted is just end the of the song).

The name Lucifer was given to satan indirectly. Lucifer was originally
applied to the planet Venus, the "morning star" when it appeared in the
morning skies. It was applied to the fallen King of Babylon by Isaiah...

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art
thou cut down to the ground which didst weaken the nations!

Only later did Christians apply this passage to satan.

Tertullian and Gregory the Great understood this passage of Isaiah in
reference to the fall of Satan; in consequence of which the name Lucifer
has since been applied to Satan.

So, I guess, some idiot saw the word "lucifer" in Latin and assumeed that
meant the Catholics were praising satan.

You would think they would investigate a little further before proclaiming
it to the world, putting their ignorance on display.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

Le 2024-10-14 à 21 h 55, rbowman a écrit :
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:09:18 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>> Admittedly, I didn't put much weight in what they said either. They seem
>> to have an agenda. I notice that when it comes to coverage of
>> international news, one of the best sources is RT.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People's_Voice_(website)
>
> Oh, THAT People's Voice...
>
> https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/
>
> Quite a few of the articles did not seem to be fakes. I'm not sure about
> the greatest hits links on the righthand side of the page.
>
> "Rumors Grow That Syrian President Assad Has Suffered Fatal Stroke"
>
> January 30, 2017
>
> They took the bait but apparently the root of the Satan thing is the
> Exsulet.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEs4d3cCX9s
>
> It's long but the final verse starts at 10:22
>
> Flammas eius lucifer matutinus inventiat:
> Ille, inquam, lucifer, qui nescit occasum:
> Christus Filius tuuse, qui regressus ab inferis,
> humano generi serenus illuxit,
> et vivit et renat in saecula saeculorum.
>
> OMG! He's praying to Lucifer!

Yeah, I kind of figured that it was bullshit. Unfortunately, people on
Gab appear to believe that it is true and posted the video as fact
unless I missed something. I've gotten to the point where I don't
believe a source unless its native language isn't English.

--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.

Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>> The People's Voice TV is saying that Pope Francis believes that Jesus
>> Christ is Satan, so who knows anymore.
>
>
> Satan pretends to be Jesus. But I really am Jesus.
>
>
you look more like a punk faggot

https://postimg.cc/BtsKm5hG

On 10/13/2024 3:27 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> I have a GF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No you don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
>>>>> just a computer?
>>>>
>>>> He IS a man. There's no "somehow" about it.
>>>
>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>
>> He went in a dress, and they accepted him (whatever that means).
>>
>> They're being nice to him, rather than telling the truth.
>
>
> They're not "being nice", they're recognizing that Jesus didn't come
> to condemn people his Father created.

You condemn Whites often, you wigger demon.

> If even the fucking *RCC* can
> do that, why can't atheist phobes?

Mentally ill men calling themselves women - and those who support such
lunacy - MUST be condemned.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>> I have a GF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No you don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
>>>>>> just a computer?
>>>>>
>>>>> He IS a man. There's no "somehow" about it.
>>>>
>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>>> you don't? How weird ...
>>>
>>> He went in a dress, and they accepted him (whatever that means).
>>>
>>> They're being nice to him, rather than telling the truth.
>>
>> They're not "being nice", they're recognizing that Jesus didn't come
>> to condemn people his Father created.
>
>You condemn Whites often, you wigger demon.

Rhetorically I say anti-white things, sure, it doesn't mean I really
think all crackers are devils or evil. You're OK, in my book, despite
your issues with race. You don't seem to be violent in any respect.

>> If even the fucking *RCC* can
>> do that, why can't atheist phobes?
>
>Mentally ill men calling themselves women - and those who support such
>lunacy - MUST be condemned.

But what is the big deal, even if you're so sure it's "mentally-ill
lunacy"?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 2024-10-15 à 10 h 48, DFS a écrit :
> On 10/13/2024 3:27 PM, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> I have a GF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No you don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A computer is as much a female as your boyfriend is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if you consider her a man, somehow, is that not a partner, not
>>>>>> just a computer?
>>>>>
>>>>> He IS a man.  There's no "somehow" about it.
>>>>
>>>> And yet she went to a Catholic church in a dress, they accept her, but
>>>> you don't?  How weird ...
>>>
>>> He went in a dress, and they accepted him (whatever that means).
>>>
>>> They're being nice to him, rather than telling the truth.
>>
>>
>> They're not "being nice", they're recognizing that Jesus didn't come
>> to condemn people his Father created.
>
> You condemn Whites often, you wigger demon.

Calling him a demon would be too kind. If anything, he's a demon's foot
stool.

>> If even the fucking *RCC* can
>> do that, why can't atheist phobes?
>
>
> Mentally ill men calling themselves women - and those who support such
> lunacy - MUST be condemned.

I'd go farther and just hang them. I don't see any point in wasting any
time with them at all. If they stare at their dick and can't figure out
what sex they are, they might as well be liquidated. If the fear of
being hanged is enough for them to stop questioning themselves, so be it.

--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.