'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic Plan'

<https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-editorial-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>

'The Washington Post‘s editorial board roasted Vice President Kamala
Harris for her newly announced economic plan.

In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that Harris
“squandered” the opportunity to announce a “substantial plan” to the
American public.

“Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high cost of
groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,” the editorial board wrote.
“While the inflation rate has cooled substantially since the 2022 peak,
an ostensible Biden-Harris administration accomplishment, prices remain
elevated relative to the Trump years”:

So it’s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle it
might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation spiked in
2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains, and that the
Federal Reserve’s policies, which the Biden-Harris administration
supported, are working to slow it. The vice president instead opted for
a less forthright route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go after
“price gouging” by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies
and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade
Commission enforce a vaguely defined “federal ban on price gouging.”

The piece from the outlet’s editorial board came after Harris vowed to
build three million new homes over the course of four years, go after
companies for price gouging, and give families a $6,000 child tax
credit.

While the outlet noted that Harris’s housing plan was “built on a
slightly firmer foundation,” it added that she had placed her finger on
the problem with the “housing-affordability problem,” which was having
an “insufficient supply.”

“She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,” the editorial
board wrote. “But her proposed $25,000 in down payment assistance for
first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side, which risks putting
upward pressure on prices. Such a measure might make sense if Ms. Harris
paid for it by eliminating other demand-side housing subsidies, such as
the mortgage interest education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain on
federal revenue that benefits many wealthy Americans — but she does
not.”

'Harris’s promise to build three million homes comes as almost 1.5
million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press release
from Zillow.

As Breitbart News reported, Harris’s promise “would actually mean
construction had” decreased by 50 percent.

“Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that she
would hold to President Joe Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on any
household earning $400,000 or less annually,” the editorial board added.

The editorial board added that Harris’s promise to not raise taxes on
families earning $400,000 or less each year did not include “80 percent
of taxable income, and does not take into account the recent surge in
families earning over $400,000.”

A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that
without a concrete plan to “raise revenue,” the policies proposed by
Harris would add “$1.7 trillion over a decade” to the federal deficit.

“The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through taxes on
corporations and high earners and that they support the revenue raisers
in the President’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget but has not put forward
specific offsets as part of their Agenda to Lower Costs for American
Families,” the report said.'

On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic Plan'
>
><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-editorial-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
>
> 'The Washington Post‘s editorial board roasted Vice President Kamala
> Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
>
> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that Harris
> “squandered” the opportunity to announce a “substantial plan” to the
> American public.
>
> “Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high cost of
> groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,” the editorial board wrote.
> “While the inflation rate has cooled substantially since the 2022 peak,
> an ostensible Biden-Harris administration accomplishment, prices remain
> elevated relative to the Trump years”:
>
> So it’s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle it
> might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation spiked in
> 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains, and that the
> Federal Reserve’s policies, which the Biden-Harris administration
> supported, are working to slow it. The vice president instead opted for
> a less forthright route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go after
> “price gouging” by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies
> and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade
> Commission enforce a vaguely defined “federal ban on price gouging.”
>
> The piece from the outlet’s editorial board came after Harris vowed to
> build three million new homes over the course of four years, go after
> companies for price gouging, and give families a $6,000 child tax
> credit.
>
> While the outlet noted that Harris’s housing plan was “built on a
> slightly firmer foundation,” it added that she had placed her finger on
> the problem with the “housing-affordability problem,” which was having
> an “insufficient supply.”
>
> “She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,” the editorial
> board wrote. “But her proposed $25,000 in down payment assistance for
> first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side, which risks putting
> upward pressure on prices. Such a measure might make sense if Ms. Harris
> paid for it by eliminating other demand-side housing subsidies, such as
> the mortgage interest education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain on
> federal revenue that benefits many wealthy Americans — but she does
> not.”
>
> 'Harris’s promise to build three million homes comes as almost 1.5
> million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press release
> from Zillow.
>
> As Breitbart News reported, Harris’s promise “would actually mean
> construction had” decreased by 50 percent.
>
> “Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that she
> would hold to President Joe Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on any
> household earning $400,000 or less annually,” the editorial board added.
>
> The editorial board added that Harris’s promise to not raise taxes on
> families earning $400,000 or less each year did not include “80 percent
> of taxable income, and does not take into account the recent surge in
> families earning over $400,000.”
>
> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that
> without a concrete plan to “raise revenue,” the policies proposed by
> Harris would add “$1.7 trillion over a decade” to the federal deficit.
>
> “The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through taxes on
> corporations and high earners and that they support the revenue raisers
> in the President’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget but has not put forward
> specific offsets as part of their Agenda to Lower Costs for American
> Families,” the report said.'

First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
That can't be good news for the democrats.

If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line with the rest, it will be
highly problematic for Kamala Harris.

I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris = Four More Years Of Obama.
Send Her To The Curb.
Vote snit "Kook Of the Decade".

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:

> On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic
>> Plan'
>>
>><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-editoria
>>l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
>>
>> 'The Washington Post‘s editorial board roasted Vice President Kamala
>> Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
>>
>> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
>> Harris “squandered” the opportunity to announce a “substantial
>> plan” to the American public.
>>
>> “Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high cost
>> of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,” the editorial board
>> wrote. “While the inflation rate has cooled substantially since the
>> 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris administration accomplishment,
>> prices remain elevated relative to the Trump years”:
>>
>> So it’s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle it
>> might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation spiked in
>> 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains, and that the
>> Federal Reserve’s policies, which the Biden-Harris administration
>> supported, are working to slow it. The vice president instead opted
>> for a less forthright route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go
>> after “price gouging” by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical
>> companies and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having the
>> Federal Trade Commission enforce a vaguely defined “federal ban on
>> price gouging.”
>>
>> The piece from the outlet’s editorial board came after Harris vowed
>> to build three million new homes over the course of four years, go
>> after companies for price gouging, and give families a $6,000 child
>> tax credit.
>>
>> While the outlet noted that Harris’s housing plan was “built on a
>> slightly firmer foundation,” it added that she had placed her finger
>> on the problem with the “housing-affordability problem,” which was
>> having an “insufficient supply.”
>>
>> “She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,” the
>> editorial board wrote. “But her proposed $25,000 in down payment
>> assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side,
>> which risks putting upward pressure on prices. Such a measure might
>> make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by eliminating other demand-side
>> housing subsidies, such as the mortgage interest education, a roughly
>> $30 billion annual drain on federal revenue that benefits many
>> wealthy Americans — but she does not.”
>>
>> 'Harris’s promise to build three million homes comes as almost 1.5
>> million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press release
>> from Zillow.
>>
>> As Breitbart News reported, Harris’s promise “would actually mean
>> construction had” decreased by 50 percent.
>>
>> “Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that she
>> would hold to President Joe Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on any
>> household earning $400,000 or less annually,” the editorial board
>> added.
>>
>> The editorial board added that Harris’s promise to not raise taxes
>> on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not include “80
>> percent of taxable income, and does not take into account the recent
>> surge in families earning over $400,000.”
>>
>> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found
>> that without a concrete plan to “raise revenue,” the policies
>> proposed by Harris would add “$1.7 trillion over a decade” to the
>> federal deficit.
>>
>> “The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through taxes
>> on corporations and high earners and that they support the revenue
>> raisers in the President’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget but has not
>> put forward specific offsets as part of their Agenda to Lower Costs
>> for American Families,” the report said.'
>
> First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
> That can't be good news for the democrats.
>
> If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line
> with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala Harris.
>
> I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
>

But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
with you?

In article <XnsB1D189364412B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic
> >> Plan'
> >>
> >><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-editoria
> >>l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
> >>
> >> 'The Washington PostÂ?s editorial board roasted Vice President Kamala
> >> Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
> >>
> >> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
> >> Harris Â?squanderedÂ? the opportunity to announce a Â?substantial
> >> planÂ? to the American public.
> >>
> >> Â?Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high cost
> >> of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,Â? the editorial board
> >> wrote. Â?While the inflation rate has cooled substantially since the
> >> 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris administration accomplishment,
> >> prices remain elevated relative to the Trump yearsÂ?:
> >>
> >> So itÂ?s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle it
> >> might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation spiked in
> >> 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains, and that the
> >> Federal ReserveÂ?s policies, which the Biden-Harris administration
> >> supported, are working to slow it. The vice president instead opted
> >> for a less forthright route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go
> >> after Â?price gougingÂ? by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical
> >> companies and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having the
> >> Federal Trade Commission enforce a vaguely defined Â?federal ban on
> >> price gouging.Â?
> >>
> >> The piece from the outletÂ?s editorial board came after Harris vowed
> >> to build three million new homes over the course of four years, go
> >> after companies for price gouging, and give families a $6,000 child
> >> tax credit.
> >>
> >> While the outlet noted that HarrisÂ?s housing plan was Â?built on a
> >> slightly firmer foundation,Â? it added that she had placed her finger
> >> on the problem with the Â?housing-affordability problem,Â? which was
> >> having an Â?insufficient supply.Â?
> >>
> >> Â?She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,Â? the
> >> editorial board wrote. Â?But her proposed $25,000 in down payment
> >> assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side,
> >> which risks putting upward pressure on prices. Such a measure might
> >> make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by eliminating other demand-side
> >> housing subsidies, such as the mortgage interest education, a roughly
> >> $30 billion annual drain on federal revenue that benefits many
> >> wealthy Americans Â? but she does not.Â?
> >>
> >> 'HarrisÂ?s promise to build three million homes comes as almost 1.5
> >> million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press release
> >> from Zillow.
> >>
> >> As Breitbart News reported, HarrisÂ?s promise Â?would actually mean
> >> construction hadÂ? decreased by 50 percent.
> >>
> >> Â?Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that she
> >> would hold to President Joe BidenÂ?s pledge not to raise taxes on any
> >> household earning $400,000 or less annually,Â? the editorial board
> >> added.
> >>
> >> The editorial board added that HarrisÂ?s promise to not raise taxes
> >> on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not include Â?80
> >> percent of taxable income, and does not take into account the recent
> >> surge in families earning over $400,000.Â?
> >>
> >> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found
> >> that without a concrete plan to Â?raise revenue,Â? the policies
> >> proposed by Harris would add Â?$1.7 trillion over a decadeÂ? to the
> >> federal deficit.
> >>
> >> Â?The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through taxes
> >> on corporations and high earners and that they support the revenue
> >> raisers in the PresidentÂ?s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget but has not
> >> put forward specific offsets as part of their Agenda to Lower Costs
> >> for American Families,Â? the report said.'
> >
> > First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
> > That can't be good news for the democrats.
> >
> > If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line
> > with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala Harris.
> >
> > I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
> >
>
>
> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
> with you?

Who is doing or saying that? Oh you did.

Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:

> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>with you?

I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
think some millions agree with me.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

>
> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>with you?
>
>
>
>

It is Dear Leaders wish and we must obey.

[Default] Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> typed:

> "Dictator from Day One!"

Cite that Trump said this.

Right here ----->

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66c0f0e1$0$1895491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D189364412B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:
>>
>> > On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic
>> >> Plan'
>> >>
>> >><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-edito
>> >>ria l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
>> >>
>> >> 'The Washington Post�?s editorial board roasted Vice President
>> >> Kamala Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
>> >>
>> >> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
>> >> Harris �?squandered�? the opportunity to announce a �?substantial
>> >> plan�? to the American public.
>> >>
>> >> �?Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high
>> >> cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,�? the
>> >> editorial board wrote. �?While the inflation rate has cooled
>> >> substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris
>> >> administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative to
>> >> the Trump years�?:
>> >>
>> >> So it�?s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle
>> >> it might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation
>> >> spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains,
>> >> and that the Federal Reserve�?s policies, which the Biden-Harris
>> >> administration supported, are working to slow it. The vice
>> >> president instead opted for a less forthright route: Blaming big
>> >> business. She vowed to go after �?price gouging�? by grocery
>> >> stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies and other supposed
>> >> corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade Commission
>> >> enforce a vaguely defined �?federal ban on price gouging.�?
>> >>
>> >> The piece from the outlet�?s editorial board came after Harris
>> >> vowed to build three million new homes over the course of four
>> >> years, go after companies for price gouging, and give families a
>> >> $6,000 child tax credit.
>> >>
>> >> While the outlet noted that Harris�?s housing plan was �?built on
>> >> a slightly firmer foundation,�? it added that she had placed her
>> >> finger on the problem with the �?housing-affordability problem,�?
>> >> which was having an �?insufficient supply.�?
>> >>
>> >> �?She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,�? the
>> >> editorial board wrote. �?But her proposed $25,000 in down payment
>> >> assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side,
>> >> which risks putting upward pressure on prices. Such a measure
>> >> might make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by eliminating other
>> >> demand-side housing subsidies, such as the mortgage interest
>> >> education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain on federal revenue
>> >> that benefits many wealthy Americans �? but she does not.�?
>> >>
>> >> 'Harris�?s promise to build three million homes comes as almost
>> >> 1.5 million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press
>> >> release from Zillow.
>> >>
>> >> As Breitbart News reported, Harris�?s promise �?would actually
>> >> mean construction had�? decreased by 50 percent.
>> >>
>> >> �?Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that
>> >> she would hold to President Joe Biden�?s pledge not to raise taxes
>> >> on any household earning $400,000 or less annually,�? the
>> >> editorial board added.
>> >>
>> >> The editorial board added that Harris�?s promise to not raise
>> >> taxes on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not
>> >> include �?80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into
>> >> account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000.�?
>> >>
>> >> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found
>> >> that without a concrete plan to �?raise revenue,�? the policies
>> >> proposed by Harris would add �?$1.7 trillion over a decade�? to
>> >> the federal deficit.
>> >>
>> >> �?The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through
>> >> taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support the
>> >> revenue raisers in the President�?s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget
>> >> but has not put forward specific offsets as part of their Agenda
>> >> to Lower Costs for American Families,�? the report said.'
>> >
>> > First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
>> > That can't be good news for the democrats.
>> >
>> > If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line
>> > with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala Harris.
>> >
>> > I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
>> >
>>
>>
>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>> with you?
>
> Who is doing or saying that? Oh you did.
>

Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
02/28/18

President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
rights.

"I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
man�s case that just took place in Florida ... to
go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
and gun violence.

"Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
Trump said.

http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv

In article <XnsB1D1D429B1CB7629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66c0f0e1$0$1895491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <XnsB1D189364412B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> >> news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:
> >>
> >> > On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic
> >> >> Plan'
> >> >>
> >> >><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-edito
> >> >>ria l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
> >> >>
> >> >> 'The Washington PostÂ?s editorial board roasted Vice President
> >> >> Kamala Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
> >> >>
> >> >> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
> >> >> Harris Â?squanderedÂ? the opportunity to announce a Â?substantial
> >> >> planÂ? to the American public.
> >> >>
> >> >> Â?Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high
> >> >> cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,Â? the
> >> >> editorial board wrote. Â?While the inflation rate has cooled
> >> >> substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris
> >> >> administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative to
> >> >> the Trump yearsÂ?:
> >> >>
> >> >> So itÂ?s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle
> >> >> it might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation
> >> >> spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains,
> >> >> and that the Federal ReserveÂ?s policies, which the Biden-Harris
> >> >> administration supported, are working to slow it. The vice
> >> >> president instead opted for a less forthright route: Blaming big
> >> >> business. She vowed to go after Â?price gougingÂ? by grocery
> >> >> stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies and other supposed
> >> >> corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade Commission
> >> >> enforce a vaguely defined Â?federal ban on price gouging.Â?
> >> >>
> >> >> The piece from the outletÂ?s editorial board came after Harris
> >> >> vowed to build three million new homes over the course of four
> >> >> years, go after companies for price gouging, and give families a
> >> >> $6,000 child tax credit.
> >> >>
> >> >> While the outlet noted that HarrisÂ?s housing plan was Â?built on
> >> >> a slightly firmer foundation,Â? it added that she had placed her
> >> >> finger on the problem with the Â?housing-affordability problem,Â?
> >> >> which was having an Â?insufficient supply.Â?
> >> >>
> >> >> Â?She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,Â? the
> >> >> editorial board wrote. Â?But her proposed $25,000 in down payment
> >> >> assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side,
> >> >> which risks putting upward pressure on prices. Such a measure
> >> >> might make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by eliminating other
> >> >> demand-side housing subsidies, such as the mortgage interest
> >> >> education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain on federal revenue
> >> >> that benefits many wealthy Americans Â? but she does not.Â?
> >> >>
> >> >> 'HarrisÂ?s promise to build three million homes comes as almost
> >> >> 1.5 million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press
> >> >> release from Zillow.
> >> >>
> >> >> As Breitbart News reported, HarrisÂ?s promise Â?would actually
> >> >> mean construction hadÂ? decreased by 50 percent.
> >> >>
> >> >> Â?Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that
> >> >> she would hold to President Joe BidenÂ?s pledge not to raise taxes
> >> >> on any household earning $400,000 or less annually,Â? the
> >> >> editorial board added.
> >> >>
> >> >> The editorial board added that HarrisÂ?s promise to not raise
> >> >> taxes on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not
> >> >> include Â?80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into
> >> >> account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000.Â?
> >> >>
> >> >> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found
> >> >> that without a concrete plan to Â?raise revenue,Â? the policies
> >> >> proposed by Harris would add Â?$1.7 trillion over a decadeÂ? to
> >> >> the federal deficit.
> >> >>
> >> >> Â?The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through
> >> >> taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support the
> >> >> revenue raisers in the PresidentÂ?s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget
> >> >> but has not put forward specific offsets as part of their Agenda
> >> >> to Lower Costs for American Families,Â? the report said.'
> >> >
> >> > First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
> >> > That can't be good news for the democrats.
> >> >
> >> > If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line
> >> > with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala Harris.
> >> >
> >> > I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
> >> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
> >> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
> >> with you?
> >
> > Who is doing or saying that? Oh you did.
> >
>
>
>
>
> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
> 02/28/18
>
> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
> rights.
>
> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
> man?s case that just took place in Florida ... to
> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
> and gun violence.
>
> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
> Trump said.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv

and Joe biden enacted the red flag act which means they can come take
your guns if someone thinks you are a threat.

On Aug 17, 2024 at 7:24:22 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c15b57$0$212415$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <XnsB1D1D429B1CB7629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:66c0f0e1$0$1895491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>> In article <XnsB1D189364412B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>> news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for Economic
>>>>>> Plan'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-editoria
>>>>>> l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'The Washington PostÂ?s editorial board roasted Vice President
>>>>>> Kamala Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
>>>>>> Harris Â?squanderedÂ? the opportunity to announce a Â?substantial
>>>>>> planÂ? to the American public.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Â?Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high
>>>>>> cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,Â? the
>>>>>> editorial board wrote. Â?While the inflation rate has cooled
>>>>>> substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris
>>>>>> administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative to
>>>>>> the Trump yearsÂ?:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So itÂ?s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle
>>>>>> it might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation
>>>>>> spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains,
>>>>>> and that the Federal ReserveÂ?s policies, which the Biden-Harris
>>>>>> administration supported, are working to slow it. The vice
>>>>>> president instead opted for a less forthright route: Blaming big
>>>>>> business. She vowed to go after Â?price gougingÂ? by grocery
>>>>>> stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies and other supposed
>>>>>> corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade Commission
>>>>>> enforce a vaguely defined Â?federal ban on price gouging.Â?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The piece from the outletÂ?s editorial board came after Harris
>>>>>> vowed to build three million new homes over the course of four
>>>>>> years, go after companies for price gouging, and give families a
>>>>>> $6,000 child tax credit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While the outlet noted that HarrisÂ?s housing plan was Â?built on
>>>>>> a slightly firmer foundation,Â? it added that she had placed her
>>>>>> finger on the problem with the Â?housing-affordability problem,Â?
>>>>>> which was having an Â?insufficient supply.Â?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Â?She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,Â? the
>>>>>> editorial board wrote. Â?But her proposed $25,000 in down payment
>>>>>> assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the demand side,
>>>>>> which risks putting upward pressure on prices. Such a measure
>>>>>> might make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by eliminating other
>>>>>> demand-side housing subsidies, such as the mortgage interest
>>>>>> education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain on federal revenue
>>>>>> that benefits many wealthy Americans Â? but she does not.Â?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'HarrisÂ?s promise to build three million homes comes as almost
>>>>>> 1.5 million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a press
>>>>>> release from Zillow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Breitbart News reported, HarrisÂ?s promise Â?would actually
>>>>>> mean construction hadÂ? decreased by 50 percent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Â?Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that
>>>>>> she would hold to President Joe BidenÂ?s pledge not to raise taxes
>>>>>> on any household earning $400,000 or less annually,Â? the
>>>>>> editorial board added.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The editorial board added that HarrisÂ?s promise to not raise
>>>>>> taxes on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not
>>>>>> include Â?80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into
>>>>>> account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000.Â?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found
>>>>>> that without a concrete plan to Â?raise revenue,Â? the policies
>>>>>> proposed by Harris would add Â?$1.7 trillion over a decadeÂ? to
>>>>>> the federal deficit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Â?The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through
>>>>>> taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support the
>>>>>> revenue raisers in the PresidentÂ?s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 budget
>>>>>> but has not put forward specific offsets as part of their Agenda
>>>>>> to Lower Costs for American Families,Â? the report said.'
>>>>>
>>>>> First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
>>>>> That can't be good news for the democrats.
>>>>>
>>>>> If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line
>>>>> with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala Harris.
>>>>>
>>>>> I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>>>> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>>>> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>>>> with you?
>>>
>>> Who is doing or saying that? Oh you did.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
>> 02/28/18
>>
>> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
>> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
>> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
>> rights.
>>
>> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
>> man?s case that just took place in Florida ... to
>> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
>> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
>> and gun violence.
>>
>> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
>> Trump said.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv
>
> and Joe biden enacted the red flag act which means they can come take
> your guns if someone thinks you are a threat.

If you are a threat with guns why should you have them?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 18:37:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:

>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote
<snip>
>> If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in line
>> with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala Harris.
>>
>> I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
>
> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>with you?

Good call!

#nevertrump

On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>>with you?
>
>
>I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
>an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
>to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
>think some millions agree with me.

This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican, Democrats
voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the middle.

Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many Republicans are
speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be assured of
getting all those votes.

Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for President
but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for President, but
down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such an asshole
on a Republican ticket.

We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while the other's
stays home.

#nevertrump

On Aug 17, 2024 at 10:18:19 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>:

> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>>> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>>> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>>> with you?
>>
>>
>> I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
>> an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
>> to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
>> think some millions agree with me.
>
> This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican,
> Democrats
> voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the
> middle.

I am an independent who hates both parties but I would vote for a dead skunk
over Trump.
>
> Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many
> Republicans are
> speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be
> assured of
> getting all those votes.

He is absolutely abhorrent.
>
> Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for
> President
> but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for
> President, but
> down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such
> an asshole
> on a Republican ticket.
>
> We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while
> the other's
> stays home.

Harris is generating excitement. I am happy to see that. Biden and Clinton did
not.
>
> #nevertrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c18078$0$1429359$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> > and Joe biden enacted the red flag act which means they can come take
> > your guns if someone thinks you are a threat.
>
> If you are a threat with guns why should you have them?
>

Who decides that?

In article <9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
> >>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
> >>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
> >>with you?
> >
> >
> >I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
> >an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
> >to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
> >think some millions agree with me.
>
> This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican, Democrats
> voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the middle.
>
> Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many Republicans are
> speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be assured of
> getting all those votes.
>
> Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for President
> but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for President, but
> down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such an asshole
> on a Republican ticket.
>
> We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while the other's
> stays home.
>
> #nevertrump

Cameltoes base can't even say why they would vote for her.

In article <66c18d7c$0$1784$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 17, 2024 at 10:18:19 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
> >>> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
> >>> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
> >>> with you?
> >>
> >>
> >> I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
> >> an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
> >> to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
> >> think some millions agree with me.
> >
> > This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican,
> > Democrats
> > voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the
> > middle.
>
> I am an independent who hates both parties but I would vote for a dead skunk
> over Trump.

I bet you would.
> >
> > Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many
> > Republicans are
> > speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be
> > assured of
> > getting all those votes.
>
> He is absolutely abhorrent.

How has he hurt you personally?
> >
> > Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for
> > President
> > but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for
> > President, but
> > down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such
> > an asshole
> > on a Republican ticket.
> >
> > We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while
> > the other's
> > stays home.
>
> Harris is generating excitement. I am happy to see that. Biden and Clinton did
> not.

The media is generating the excitement.
> >
> > #nevertrump

On Aug 18, 2024 at 2:25:01 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c1bdee$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>>>> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>>>> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>>>> with you?
>>>
>>>
>>> I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
>>> an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
>>> to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
>>> think some millions agree with me.
>>
>> This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican,
>> Democrats
>> voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the
>> middle.
>>
>> Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many
>> Republicans are
>> speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be
>> assured of
>> getting all those votes.
>>
>> Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for
>> President
>> but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for
>> President, but
>> down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such
>> an asshole
>> on a Republican ticket.
>>
>> We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while
>> the other's
>> stays home.
>>
>> #nevertrump
>
> Cameltoes base can't even say why they would vote for her.

You are basically an extremely sheltered teen boy who just figured out that
women have a different anatomy than you do.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66c15b57$0$212415$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D1D429B1CB7629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:66c0f0e1$0$1895491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > In article <XnsB1D189364412B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> >> news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:
>> >>
>> >> > On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for
>> >> >> Economic Plan'
>> >> >>
>> >> >><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-ed
>> >> >>ito ria l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 'The Washington Post�?s editorial board roasted Vice President
>> >> >> Kamala Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
>> >> >> Harris �?squandered�? the opportunity to announce a
>> >> >> �?substantial plan�? to the American public.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> �?Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high
>> >> >> cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,�? the
>> >> >> editorial board wrote. �?While the inflation rate has cooled
>> >> >> substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris
>> >> >> administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative
>> >> >> to the Trump years�?:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So it�?s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to
>> >> >> handle it might be to level with voters, telling them that
>> >> >> inflation spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled
>> >> >> supply chains, and that the Federal Reserve�?s policies, which
>> >> >> the Biden-Harris administration supported, are working to slow
>> >> >> it. The vice president instead opted for a less forthright
>> >> >> route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go after �?price
>> >> >> gouging�? by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical
>> >> >> companies and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having
>> >> >> the Federal Trade Commission enforce a vaguely defined
>> >> >> �?federal ban on price gouging.�?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The piece from the outlet�?s editorial board came after Harris
>> >> >> vowed to build three million new homes over the course of four
>> >> >> years, go after companies for price gouging, and give families
>> >> >> a $6,000 child tax credit.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> While the outlet noted that Harris�?s housing plan was �?built
>> >> >> on a slightly firmer foundation,�? it added that she had placed
>> >> >> her finger on the problem with the �?housing-affordability
>> >> >> problem,�? which was having an �?insufficient supply.�?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> �?She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,�?
>> >> >> the editorial board wrote. �?But her proposed $25,000 in down
>> >> >> payment assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the
>> >> >> demand side, which risks putting upward pressure on prices.
>> >> >> Such a measure might make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by
>> >> >> eliminating other demand-side housing subsidies, such as the
>> >> >> mortgage interest education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain
>> >> >> on federal revenue that benefits many wealthy Americans �? but
>> >> >> she does not.�?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 'Harris�?s promise to build three million homes comes as almost
>> >> >> 1.5 million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a
>> >> >> press release from Zillow.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As Breitbart News reported, Harris�?s promise �?would actually
>> >> >> mean construction had�? decreased by 50 percent.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> �?Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech
>> >> >> that she would hold to President Joe Biden�?s pledge not to
>> >> >> raise taxes on any household earning $400,000 or less
>> >> >> annually,�? the editorial board added.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The editorial board added that Harris�?s promise to not raise
>> >> >> taxes on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not
>> >> >> include �?80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into
>> >> >> account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000.�?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
>> >> >> found that without a concrete plan to �?raise revenue,�? the
>> >> >> policies proposed by Harris would add �?$1.7 trillion over a
>> >> >> decade�? to the federal deficit.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> �?The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through
>> >> >> taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support
>> >> >> the revenue raisers in the President�?s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025
>> >> >> budget but has not put forward specific offsets as part of
>> >> >> their Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families,�? the report
>> >> >> said.'
>> >> >
>> >> > First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
>> >> > That can't be good news for the democrats.
>> >> >
>> >> > If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in
>> >> > line with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala
>> >> > Harris.
>> >> >
>> >> > I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>> >> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>> >> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>> >> with you?
>> >
>> > Who is doing or saying that? Oh you did.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
>> 02/28/18
>>
>> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
>> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
>> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
>> rights.
>>
>> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
>> man?s case that just took place in Florida ... to
>> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
>> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
>> and gun violence.
>>
>> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
>> Trump said.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv
>
> and Joe biden

As you say, WHATABOUTISM!

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c1bd9e$0$3068685
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <66c18078$0$1429359$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> > and Joe biden enacted the red flag act which means they can come take
>> > your guns if someone thinks you are a threat.
>>
>> If you are a threat with guns why should you have them?
>>
>
> Who decides that?

According to the quote you deleted
the Trump government does.

Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
02/28/18

President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
rights.

"I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
man's case that just took place in Florida ... to
go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
and gun violence.

"Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
Trump said.

http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv

On 2024-08-18, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>> >>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>> >>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>> >>with you?
>> >
>> >
>> >I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
>> >an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
>> >to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
>> >think some millions agree with me.
>>
>> This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican, Democrats
>> voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the middle.
>>
>> Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many Republicans are
>> speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be assured of
>> getting all those votes.
>>
>> Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for President
>> but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for President, but
>> down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such an asshole
>> on a Republican ticket.
>>
>> We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while the other's
>> stays home.
>>
>> #nevertrump
>
> Cameltoes base can't even say why they would vote for her.

The usual answer is she's not Trump.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

In article <66c1d7b2$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 18, 2024 at 2:25:01 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c1bdee$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>,
> > governor.swill@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
> >>>> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
> >>>> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
> >>>> with you?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he was
> >>> an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation. If we're
> >>> to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I object, and I
> >>> think some millions agree with me.
> >>
> >> This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting Republican,
> >> Democrats
> >> voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for that slim cut of votes in the
> >> middle.
> >>
> >> Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many
> >> Republicans are
> >> speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in American politics - to be
> >> assured of
> >> getting all those votes.
> >>
> >> Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross over for
> >> President
> >> but continue to vote red down ballot and others will switch not only for
> >> President, but
> >> down ballot as well to punish the party for the embarrassment of running such
> >> an asshole
> >> on a Republican ticket.
> >>
> >> We all know what happens when one party turns out its base effectively while
> >> the other's
> >> stays home.
> >>
> >> #nevertrump
> >
> > Cameltoes base can't even say why they would vote for her.
>
> You are basically an extremely sheltered teen boy who just figured out that
> women have a different anatomy than you do.

What does that have to do with her fans not being able to say why they
are voting for her?

In article <XnsB1D2511525A38629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> news:66c15b57$0$212415$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <XnsB1D1D429B1CB7629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:66c0f0e1$0$1895491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>
> >> > In article <XnsB1D189364412B629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
> >> > says...
> >> >>
> >> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:v9qba6$1u9p0$3@dont-email.me:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On 2024-08-17, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> 'Washington Post Editorial Board Roasts Kamala Harris for
> >> >> >> Economic Plan'
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >><https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/16/washington-post-ed
> >> >> >>ito ria l-board-roasts-kamala-harris-economic-plan/>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 'The Washington PostÂ?s editorial board roasted Vice President
> >> >> >> Kamala Harris for her newly announced economic plan.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> In an editorial piece on Friday, the Washington Post noted that
> >> >> >> Harris Â?squanderedÂ? the opportunity to announce a
> >> >> >> Â?substantial planÂ? to the American public.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Â?Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high
> >> >> >> cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs,Â? the
> >> >> >> editorial board wrote. Â?While the inflation rate has cooled
> >> >> >> substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris
> >> >> >> administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative
> >> >> >> to the Trump yearsÂ?:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So itÂ?s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to
> >> >> >> handle it might be to level with voters, telling them that
> >> >> >> inflation spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled
> >> >> >> supply chains, and that the Federal ReserveÂ?s policies, which
> >> >> >> the Biden-Harris administration supported, are working to slow
> >> >> >> it. The vice president instead opted for a less forthright
> >> >> >> route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go after Â?price
> >> >> >> gougingÂ? by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical
> >> >> >> companies and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having
> >> >> >> the Federal Trade Commission enforce a vaguely defined
> >> >> >> Â?federal ban on price gouging.Â?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The piece from the outletÂ?s editorial board came after Harris
> >> >> >> vowed to build three million new homes over the course of four
> >> >> >> years, go after companies for price gouging, and give families
> >> >> >> a $6,000 child tax credit.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> While the outlet noted that HarrisÂ?s housing plan was Â?built
> >> >> >> on a slightly firmer foundation,Â? it added that she had placed
> >> >> >> her finger on the problem with the Â?housing-affordability
> >> >> >> problem,Â? which was having an Â?insufficient supply.Â?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Â?She offers clever tax incentives to help make it happen,Â?
> >> >> >> the editorial board wrote. Â?But her proposed $25,000 in down
> >> >> >> payment assistance for first-time home buyers stimulates the
> >> >> >> demand side, which risks putting upward pressure on prices.
> >> >> >> Such a measure might make sense if Ms. Harris paid for it by
> >> >> >> eliminating other demand-side housing subsidies, such as the
> >> >> >> mortgage interest education, a roughly $30 billion annual drain
> >> >> >> on federal revenue that benefits many wealthy Americans Â? but
> >> >> >> she does not.Â?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 'HarrisÂ?s promise to build three million homes comes as almost
> >> >> >> 1.5 million homes were built in 2023 alone, according to a
> >> >> >> press release from Zillow.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As Breitbart News reported, HarrisÂ?s promise Â?would actually
> >> >> >> mean construction hadÂ? decreased by 50 percent.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Â?Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech
> >> >> >> that she would hold to President Joe BidenÂ?s pledge not to
> >> >> >> raise taxes on any household earning $400,000 or less
> >> >> >> annually,Â? the editorial board added.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The editorial board added that HarrisÂ?s promise to not raise
> >> >> >> taxes on families earning $400,000 or less each year did not
> >> >> >> include Â?80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into
> >> >> >> account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000.Â?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
> >> >> >> found that without a concrete plan to Â?raise revenue,Â? the
> >> >> >> policies proposed by Harris would add Â?$1.7 trillion over a
> >> >> >> decadeÂ? to the federal deficit.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Â?The Harris campaign has said this would be paid for through
> >> >> >> taxes on corporations and high earners and that they support
> >> >> >> the revenue raisers in the PresidentÂ?s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025
> >> >> >> budget but has not put forward specific offsets as part of
> >> >> >> their Agenda to Lower Costs for American Families,Â? the report
> >> >> >> said.'
> >> >> >
> >> >> > First CNN and now WAPO are slamming Kamala's economic plan?
> >> >> > That can't be good news for the democrats.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If MSNBC, the ultimate radical, left wing septic tank falls in
> >> >> > line with the rest, it will be highly problematic for Kamala
> >> >> > Harris.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I doubt they will though because they are bat shit far left.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
> >> >> "Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
> >> >> One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
> >> >> with you?
> >> >
> >> > Who is doing or saying that? Oh you did.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
> >> 02/28/18
> >>
> >> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
> >> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
> >> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
> >> rights.
> >>
> >> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
> >> man?s case that just took place in Florida ... to
> >> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
> >> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
> >> and gun violence.
> >>
> >> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
> >> Trump said.
> >>
> >> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv
> >
> > and Joe biden
>
>
> As you say, WHATABOUTISM!

I learned from you.

In article <XnsB1D2514B7174E629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c1bd9e$0$3068685
> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>
> > In article <66c18078$0$1429359$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> > and Joe biden enacted the red flag act which means they can come take
> >> > your guns if someone thinks you are a threat.
> >>
> >> If you are a threat with guns why should you have them?
> >>
> >
> > Who decides that?
>
>
> According to the quote you deleted
> the Trump government does.
>
>
> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
> 02/28/18
>
> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
> rights.
>
> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
> man's case that just took place in Florida ... to
> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
> and gun violence.
>
> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
> Trump said.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv

But that's not happening is it? Taking them from felons and people who
don't pass. So what?

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66c20cd1$0$3620708$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D2514B7174E629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c1bd9e$0$3068685
>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>> > In article <66c18078$0$1429359$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >> > and Joe biden enacted the red flag act which means they can come
>> >> > take your guns if someone thinks you are a threat.
>> >>
>> >> If you are a threat with guns why should you have them?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Who decides that?
>>
>>
>> According to the quote you deleted
>> the Trump government does.
>>
>>
>> Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second
>> 02/28/18
>>
>> President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for
>> confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed
>> to be dangerous, even if it violates due process
>> rights.
>>
>> "I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy
>> man's case that just took place in Florida ... to
>> go to court would have taken a long time," Trump
>> said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety
>> and gun violence.
>>
>> "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
>> Trump said.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/y7ychvkv
>
> But that's not happening is it?

Because Trump isn't president.

> Taking them from felons

Like Trump.

> and people who
> don't pass.

People who don't pass.....what?

Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
news:66c20326$1$1784$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> On 2024-08-18, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <9n03cjpo2iut0gfrqf1nbl3b072tp64gp1@4ax.com>,
>> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:01:19 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> But bat shit far right - "mass deportations!"
>>> >>"Kill women who get abortions!" "Dictator from Day
>>> >>One!" Government confiscations of guns!" - are OK
>>> >>with you?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >I have no reason to trust Trump's agenda more than his record, he
>>> >was an irresponsible Republican, choosing deficit over taxation.
>>> >If we're to have a dictator whose first term emulated Reagan, I
>>> >object, and I think some millions agree with me.
>>>
>>> This isn't going to be the usual election with Republicans voting
>>> Republican, Democrats voting Democrat, and both parties fighting for
>>> that slim cut of votes in the middle.
>>>
>>> Trump can't even be assured of taking the entire GOP base. Too many
>>> Republicans are speaking out against him - a thing unheard of in
>>> American politics - to be assured of getting all those votes.
>>>
>>> Some may stay home, which will hurt the down ballot, some will cross
>>> over for President but continue to vote red down ballot and others
>>> will switch not only for President, but down ballot as well to
>>> punish the party for the embarrassment of running such an asshole
>>> on a Republican ticket.
>>>
>>> We all know what happens when one party turns out its base
>>> effectively while the other's stays home.
>>>
>>> #nevertrump
>>
>> Cameltoes base can't even say why they would vote for her.
>
> The usual answer is she's not Trump.

You make that sound like a negative.