On Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:50:01 -0400, Joel wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
>>And switch between them quite easily. Open-source developers see
>>themselves as cooperating, not competing, with each other.
>
> If only it were that simple.

Distro-hopping wouldn’t be commonplace if it were not.

On 8/7/2024 6:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:15:11 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 8/6/2024 2:09 PM, Joel wrote:
>>
>>> I'd try 1000 distros before I went back to Windows 11.
>>
>> Sadly, you CAN actually try 1000 Linux distros.
>
> And switch between them quite easily.

You should prove that to cola.

* no virtual machines - install only to bare metal

* you could use 8 GPT-formatted drives of 4TB each
125 partitions per drive
25GB per partition
one distro per partition of course
about $100 per 7200RPM drive

* grub/2 says there's no limit to the number of entries.

* allocate avg 1 hour per distro to download/burn to USB/boot/install

The whole project should cost less than $1000, and take you about 4
months working 8 hrs per day.

Looking forward to your YouTube vid. You'll actually become geek famous
if you pull it off.

> Open-source developers see themselves as cooperating, not competing, with each other.

Offer the winners money and they'll immediately abandon their
'cooperative' GuhNoo principles, label Stallman a communist, and rip
each others throats out.

On 2024-08-07 11:25 p.m., DFS wrote:
> On 8/7/2024 6:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

>> Open-source developers see themselves as cooperating, not competing,
>> with each other.
>
> Offer the winners money and they'll immediately abandon their
> 'cooperative' GuhNoo principles, label Stallman a communist, and rip
> each others throats out.

How does calling calling people who name their branches "master" and
"slave" "slaveowners" factor into the "cooperating not competing,"
Lawrence? How does banning them from aiding in development because they
are conservatives factor into the cooperation?

What we are learning is that going forward, Linux development will be
done be leftists who look between their legs and can't figure out what
gender they are, nigger and pajeets. Somehow, this is supposed to result
in robust, quality software. No thanks.

If a pajeet develops my software, I want him to have a university
education from a reputable school.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:15:11 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 8/6/2024 2:09 PM, Joel wrote:
>>
>>> I'd try 1000 distros before I went back to Windows 11.
>>
>> Sadly, you CAN actually try 1000 Linux distros.

From the Dude of 1000 (pointless) Trolls :-D

> And switch between them quite easily. Open-source developers see
> themselves as cooperating, not competing, with each other.

Glad you snipped Doof's shitty ditty.

--
Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you
nothing. It was here first.
-- Mark Twain

On 8/7/2024 1:53 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 8/6/2024 2:09 PM, Joel wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I detect a certain reticence in Windows users to upgrade from 10 to 11 :-)
>>>
>>> I'd try 1000 distros before I went back to Windows 11.
>>
>> Sadly, you CAN actually try 1000 Linux distros.
>>
>> I wrote a ditty about it years ago:
>>
>> D is for distro, a pile of crap code
>> They multiply like roaches and they're free to download
>> You can try one a day for the rest of your life
>> Some geeks prefer it to having a wife
>
>
> Yeah, well, back to reality, I'm doing fine with openSUSE.

You are not remotely acquainted with reality, Jesus Crump.

But what happened to your prized Mint install, such that you felt
compelled to switch to OpenSUSE?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I'm more than satisfied with Mint Cinnamon, I couldn't come up with a
better OS." Jan 2024

"Mint Cinnamon is the best desktop OS in history, IMO." Jan 2024

"Mint Cinnamon is so fantastic, giving me anything I could want out of
software, without M$'s involvement. I'm just over the moon." Jan 2024

"Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon." Jul 27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 2024-08-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-08-07 11:25 p.m., DFS wrote:
>> On 8/7/2024 6:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>>> Open-source developers see themselves as cooperating, not competing,
>>> with each other.
>>
>> Offer the winners money and they'll immediately abandon their
>> 'cooperative' GuhNoo principles, label Stallman a communist, and rip
>> each others throats out.

DuFuS is so full of shit it oozes out of his gill slits. Not everybody
is run by pure, undiluted greed. I think this is DuFuS's real problem with
Linux — he sees the potential to make a lot of money with a superior OS and
it galls him that Linux is open source and all that potential money is
slipping through his grasping talons.

> How does calling calling people who name their branches "master" and
> "slave" "slaveowners" factor into the "cooperating not competing,"
> Lawrence? How does banning them from aiding in development because they
> are conservatives factor into the cooperation?
>
> What we are learning is that going forward, Linux development will be
> done be leftists who look between their legs and can't figure out what
> gender they are, nigger and pajeets. Somehow, this is supposed to result
> in robust, quality software. No thanks.
>
> If a pajeet develops my software, I want him to have a university
> education from a reputable school.

What makes you think that the non-Woke will abandon Linux? What's their
options? To go with Woke Apple or Microsoft?

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

On 8/8/2024 9:15 AM, RonB wrote:
> On 2024-08-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-08-07 11:25 p.m., DFS wrote:
>>> On 8/7/2024 6:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>>> Open-source developers see themselves as cooperating, not competing,
>>>> with each other.
>>>
>>> Offer the winners money and they'll immediately abandon their
>>> 'cooperative' GuhNoo principles, label Stallman a communist, and rip
>>> each others throats out.
>
> DuFuS is so full of shit it oozes out of his gill slits. Not everybody
> is run by pure, undiluted greed.

Other side of your ignorant, forgetful piehole:

"Greed and stupidity. That should be the U.S. Motto now."

> I think this is DuFuS's real problem with
> Linux — he sees the potential to make a lot of money with a superior OS and
> it galls him that Linux is open source and all that potential money is
> slipping through his grasping talons.

What are you babbling about?

On 8/8/2024 12:45 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, well, back to reality, I'm doing fine with openSUSE.
>>
>> You are not remotely acquainted with reality, Jesus Crump.
>>
>> But what happened to your prized Mint install, such that you felt
>> compelled to switch to OpenSUSE?
>
>
> If you had actually read anything in the thread before replying, you'd
> know that I couldn't go to Mint 22,

I did read, but you didn't say much:

"I ran into snags trying to switch/upgrade to Mint 22.x"

"I had problems with in-place upgrade and with installing clean from a
USB media"

Seems you gave up on Mint 22.x pretty quickly.

> and you know me, I'm an early
> adopter. So that was unacceptable.
>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "I'm more than satisfied with Mint Cinnamon, I couldn't come up with a
>> better OS." Jan 2024
>>
>> "Mint Cinnamon is the best desktop OS in history, IMO." Jan 2024
>>
>> "Mint Cinnamon is so fantastic, giving me anything I could want out of
>> software, without M$'s involvement. I'm just over the moon." Jan 2024
>
>
> I would still say that if I could've installed 22, but there are other
> distros.
>
>
>> "Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon." Jul 27
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.

Why can't you face life without being drunk?

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>>> Yeah, well, back to reality, I'm doing fine with openSUSE.
>>>
>>> You are not remotely acquainted with reality, Jesus Crump.
>>>
>>> But what happened to your prized Mint install, such that you felt
>>> compelled to switch to OpenSUSE?
>>
>> If you had actually read anything in the thread before replying, you'd
>> know that I couldn't go to Mint 22,
>
>I did read, but you didn't say much:
>
>"I ran into snags trying to switch/upgrade to Mint 22.x"
>
>"I had problems with in-place upgrade and with installing clean from a
>USB media"
>
>
>Seems you gave up on Mint 22.x pretty quickly.

Read between the lines, man, the installer hung like that because they
wanted me to just keep my existing installation, the in-place upgrade
failing to work was locking me into keeping 21.x. I had no way to get
to 22 without a clean install, which they don't want to support, even
though I *have* donated money to them. So, that tells me to look
elsewhere, and I did. openSUSE isn't perfect, but I don't dislike it.

>> and you know me, I'm an early
>> adopter. So that was unacceptable.
>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> "I'm more than satisfied with Mint Cinnamon, I couldn't come up with a
>>> better OS." Jan 2024
>>>
>>> "Mint Cinnamon is the best desktop OS in history, IMO." Jan 2024
>>>
>>> "Mint Cinnamon is so fantastic, giving me anything I could want out of
>>> software, without M$'s involvement. I'm just over the moon." Jan 2024
>>
>> I would still say that if I could've installed 22, but there are other
>> distros.
>>
>>> "Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon." Jul 27
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.
>
>Why can't you face life without being drunk?

I can, but I like drinking sometimes.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-08-08 9:15 a.m., RonB wrote:
>
>< snip >
>
>>> How does calling calling people who name their branches "master" and
>>> "slave" "slaveowners" factor into the "cooperating not competing,"
>>> Lawrence? How does banning them from aiding in development because they
>>> are conservatives factor into the cooperation?
>>>
>>> What we are learning is that going forward, Linux development will be
>>> done be leftists who look between their legs and can't figure out what
>>> gender they are, nigger and pajeets. Somehow, this is supposed to result
>>> in robust, quality software. No thanks.
>>>
>>> If a pajeet develops my software, I want him to have a university
>>> education from a reputable school.
>>
>> What makes you think that the non-Woke will abandon Linux? What's their
>> options? To go with Woke Apple or Microsoft?
>
> I'm not saying that the non-woke will abandon Linux, I'm saying that I
> will abandon the idea of it considering how it has been taken over. If I
> have no choice but to use software made by woke companies, I will judge
> it by quality alone.

I'm already doing that. That's why I'm using Linux Mint.

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

Joel wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.
>>
>> Why can't you face life without being drunk?
>
>
> I can, but I like drinking sometimes.
>
>
Get a job, you lazy pillow biting mooch.

Casa de Masa <casademasa@noneya.invalid> wrote:

>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
>
>Joel wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.
>>>
>>> Why can't you face life without being drunk?
>>
>> I can, but I like drinking sometimes.
>>
>Get a job, you lazy pillow biting mooch.

You aren't even running the latest version of your unsupported OS,
retard, talk about "lazy". You're running Win8 without the updates?
Idiocy. Connected to the Internet with it.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-08-08 7:32 p.m., DFS wrote:
> On 8/8/2024 12:45 PM, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Yeah, well, back to reality, I'm doing fine with openSUSE.
>>>
>>> You are not remotely acquainted with reality, Jesus Crump.
>>>
>>> But what happened to your prized Mint install, such that you felt
>>> compelled to switch to OpenSUSE?
>>
>>
>> If you had actually read anything in the thread before replying, you'd
>> know that I couldn't go to Mint 22,
>
>
> I did read, but you didn't say much:
>
> "I ran into snags trying to switch/upgrade to Mint 22.x"
>
> "I had problems with in-place upgrade and with installing clean from a
> USB media"
>
>
> Seems you gave up on Mint 22.x pretty quickly.

He inevitably ended up facing some of the issues I had myself. We all
fall in love with the operating system until we commit to using it
exclusively for a long time.

>> and you know me, I'm an early
>> adopter.  So that was unacceptable.
>>
>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> "I'm more than satisfied with Mint Cinnamon, I couldn't come up with a
>>> better OS."  Jan 2024
>>>
>>> "Mint Cinnamon is the best desktop OS in history, IMO."  Jan 2024
>>>
>>> "Mint Cinnamon is so fantastic, giving me anything I could want out of
>>> software, without M$'s involvement.  I'm just over the moon."  Jan 2024
>>
>>
>> I would still say that if I could've installed 22, but there are other
>> distros.
>>
>>
>>> "Anyone clueful would be running Mint Cinnamon." Jul 27
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.
>
> Why can't you face life without being drunk?

Be honest with yourself: if you were Joel Crump, would you do anything
but drink?

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers

On 2024-08-08 8:13 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-08-08, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-08-08 9:15 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>>>> How does calling calling people who name their branches "master" and
>>>> "slave" "slaveowners" factor into the "cooperating not competing,"
>>>> Lawrence? How does banning them from aiding in development because they
>>>> are conservatives factor into the cooperation?
>>>>
>>>> What we are learning is that going forward, Linux development will be
>>>> done be leftists who look between their legs and can't figure out what
>>>> gender they are, nigger and pajeets. Somehow, this is supposed to result
>>>> in robust, quality software. No thanks.
>>>>
>>>> If a pajeet develops my software, I want him to have a university
>>>> education from a reputable school.
>>>
>>> What makes you think that the non-Woke will abandon Linux? What's their
>>> options? To go with Woke Apple or Microsoft?
>>
>> I'm not saying that the non-woke will abandon Linux, I'm saying that I
>> will abandon the idea of it considering how it has been taken over. If I
>> have no choice but to use software made by woke companies, I will judge
>> it by quality alone.
>
> I'm already doing that. That's why I'm using Linux Mint.

Then we simply come to a different conclusion as it relates to quality.
We are mostly looking for the same thing otherwise.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers

Joel wrote:
> Casa de Masa <casademasa@noneya.invalid> wrote:
>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
>>
>> Joel wrote:
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> Pretty sure I was drunk when I wrote that.
>>>>
>>>> Why can't you face life without being drunk?
>>>
>>> I can, but I like drinking sometimes.
>>>
>> Get a job, you lazy pillow biting mooch.
>
>
> You aren't even running the latest version of your unsupported OS,
> retard, talk about "lazy". You're running Win8 without the updates?
> Idiocy. Connected to the Internet with it.
>
>
I'm not running Win8, dimbulb.

On 8/8/2024 7:47 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:15:11 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/6/2024 2:09 PM, Joel wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd try 1000 distros before I went back to Windows 11.
>>>
>>> Sadly, you CAN actually try 1000 Linux distros.
>
> From the Dude of 1000 (pointless) Trolls :-D

54,000 hard-hitting masterpieces.

>> And switch between them quite easily. Open-source developers see
>> themselves as cooperating, not competing, with each other.
>
> Glad you snipped Doof's shitty ditty.

Your wife snipped your testes the day you got married.

On 8/6/2024 6:41 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-08-05 7:59 p.m., DFS wrote:
>>>> On 8/5/2024 12:46 PM, Joel Crump wrote:
>>>>> On 8/4/24 22:46, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I ran into snags trying to switch/upgrade to Mint 22.x ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Mint wants you to do a fresh install with each new version, they
>>>>>> don’t support upgrading in-place as such.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had problems with in-place upgrade and with installing clean from a
>>>>> USB media, so I decided to go to another distro.
>>>>
>>>> Windows 11?
>>>
>>> Oh look, he has admitted to having a problem some of us have been
>>> warning he would have for years. Distro hopping won't accomplish
>>> anything, Jesus Crump. It only gives you false hope that things might be
>>> greener on the neighbour's lawn.
>>
>> You'd be wrong, doofus, I am liking openSUSE. If I were just giving
>> up, I'd keep running Mint 21.x. I am not doing that, though, I am
>> winning, by learning something new and trying something different.
>
> Better than being stuck on Windows:

eh? You desperately "stuck" with Windows most of your career, because
of fear and greed.

On 2024-08-09 11:32 a.m., DFS wrote:
> On 8/8/2024 7:47 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:15:11 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/6/2024 2:09 PM, Joel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd try 1000 distros before I went back to Windows 11.
>>>>
>>>> Sadly, you CAN actually try 1000 Linux distros.
>>
>>  From the Dude of 1000 (pointless) Trolls :-D
>
> 54,000 hard-hitting masterpieces.
>
>
>>> And switch between them quite easily. Open-source developers see
>>> themselves as cooperating, not competing, with each other.
>>
>> Glad you snipped Doof's shitty ditty.
>
>
> Your wife snipped your testes the day you got married.

I'd believe that snipping them was a condition for marriage, to be honest.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers

Casa de Masa <casademasa@noneya.invalid> wrote:

>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
>
>Joel wrote:
>> Casa de Masa <casademasa@noneya.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
>>>
>>> Get a job, you lazy pillow biting mooch.
>>
>> You aren't even running the latest version of your unsupported OS,
>> retard, talk about "lazy". You're running Win8 without the updates?
>> Idiocy. Connected to the Internet with it.
>>
>I'm not running Win8, dimbulb.

Then why does your header say so, idiot?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 08-08-2024, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
> On 8/7/2024 6:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:15:11 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/6/2024 2:09 PM, Joel wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd try 1000 distros before I went back to Windows 11.
>>>
>>> Sadly, you CAN actually try 1000 Linux distros.

I don't know how both of you can find 1000 distros.

So first, how do you count the distros? For example, if you consider ubuntu,
kubuntu and lubuntu as three distinct distros, that's because you are a
Windows fanboy. But it's only 1 distro with different default settings.
You just have to install one of them with the three WM to see that. And
with Ubuntu, you have a lot of flavours looking like different distros,
but they are not.

And even if you are able to find 1000 distro, it's useless to test them
all, it would be only a waste of time. Except for Alpine which is not
using glibc, all other distro have only two differences:
- the init system,
- the package manager.
The number of init system is very limited, and the number of package
manager is not much bigger.
So, you don't have to test that many distro to know what best suits you.

>> And switch between them quite easily.
>
> You should prove that to cola.

It would takes time, but it would be easy.

> * no virtual machines - install only to bare metal

Why? The virtual machine is a good way to try other distros.

> The whole project should cost less than $1000, and take you about 4
> months working 8 hrs per day.

Nope. It would be way more longer. If he does that, he'll test
unimportant things. Like the default Window Manager, which is useless
because he could test as many Window Manager as he want with is current
distro more efficiently.

The installing part is more or less difficult depending on the distros.
But it's not important. Once you distro is installed you keep it that
way for years. So, the only thing important in the install part is to
know if it's too difficult for someone when he's a beginner.

As I said the real differences are:
- the init system, so it takes time to understand it and see which one
you prefer.
- the package manager, so it takes time to see how well the upgrades or
managed. To see if you need to have up to date softwares or not and
things like that.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On Thu, 08 Aug 2024 12:41:38 -0400, Joel wrote:

> ... it's just that there are big differences that can
> be hard to take into account without trying several distros.

Still, Linux makes it so much easier than any other platform you can name.
Even the BSDs, with their small handful of variants, are far more
balkanized than the Linux world is.

On 09 Aug 2024 18:42:47 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> ... all other distro have only two differences:
> - the init system,
> - the package manager.

Look at Debian versus Ubuntu, which have both these things in common, and
yet see how different they are. So you see, there is a lot more to it than
that.

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

>> ... it's just that there are big differences that can
>> be hard to take into account without trying several distros.
>
>Still, Linux makes it so much easier than any other platform you can name.
>Even the BSDs, with their small handful of variants, are far more
>balkanized than the Linux world is.

Well, when it comes to the basics, I agree. It's the kind of
environment where you have interoperability and mutual support. But
in terms of moment to moment experience, the choice of distro matters.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 10-08-2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit :
> On 09 Aug 2024 18:42:47 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> ... all other distro have only two differences:
>> - the init system,
>> - the package manager.
>
> Look at Debian versus Ubuntu, which have both these things in common, and
> yet see how different they are. So you see, there is a lot more to it than
> that.

The real big difference between them is snap. Which is a package manager.
You can adapt one to act like the other. You can change some config to
switch from ubuntu to debian.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 09 Aug 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:bdgcbjtta5h3ev2q34f7d279ndkpjkvlat@4ax.com:

> Casa de Masa <casademasa@noneya.invalid> wrote:
>
>>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0)
>>Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
>>
>>Joel wrote:
>>> Casa de Masa <casademasa@noneya.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0)
>>>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
>>>>
>>>> Get a job, you lazy pillow biting mooch.
>>>
>>> You aren't even running the latest version of your unsupported OS,
>>> retard, talk about "lazy". You're running Win8 without the updates?
>>> Idiocy. Connected to the Internet with it.
>>>
>>I'm not running Win8, dimbulb.
>
>
> Then why does your header say so, idiot?

If it's not broke don't fix it.