NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18. This isn't a
>>>>>>>>>>>>real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Citations please?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I know what I'm talking about, I was referring to within the U.S.,
>>>>>>>>>>though, it should be noted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So you can't support your claim??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I defy you to refute it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Refute what? You've made an unsupported claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't do the homework of liberals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In other words, you can't hear a wise person when you see one.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, in other words, I don't do the homework of those who won't support
>>>>>their clams.
>>>>
>>>>So, *you* won't do "the homework" of checking it out for yourself, you
>>>>want me to prove something I already know to be true. Fuck off and
>>>>die, burn in hell.
>>>
>>>Typical liberal - expect someone else to support or disprove their
>>>claim for them because they're too lazy to appear credible by doing it
>>>themselves.
>>>
>>>Finish with a hateful remark and get the perfect lib.
>>
>>I'll tell you why what I wrote is that of a "typical liberal" -
>>because it was correct, based in knowledge. You demanding evidence of
>>something, you can easily verify yourself, is hypocrisy from the
>>"typical right-winger" who would never ask right-wing figures for
>>evidence, of their outlandish bullshit. You're a joke.
>
>Your a ridiculous individual who thinks someone else should verify
>your claims for you. You are also incorrect in your use of
>hypocritical. If I make a claim I will back it up if asked. I don't
>stomp my feet and act like a child.
>
>In short, you can't be taken seriously.

I stand by what I asserted. They don't cut tits or cocks off of
people under 16.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.