"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:9tnl7jhu94jk9l5i18757dodm1rerhp650@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:33:53 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:8s3j7j5rq6fns67q2cfv7dtda5vq7iuast@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:01:33 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>news:s1pg7j1jd0rlsfcsb7ajm77k1h8jk5c92p@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:25:29 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Baxter" wrote in message news:v543qj$376qj$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:v5313l$30qr3$1@dont-
>>>>>>>email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Baxter" wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>>>>>>>>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc.
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their
>>>>>>>families.
>>>>>>>>>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Murdered? That's a load of horse shit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And how are you so sure of that?
>>>>>>>> Just another mainstream follower.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Where's YOUR evidence? Go ahead, post references to these killers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where's your thinking ability?
>>>>>
>>>>>Even the best thinking abilities require evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where's yours?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What do you mean where's mine?
>>>>Thinking leads to research. Research leads to evidence. There's plenty
>>>>out
>>>>there.
>>>
>>>That's a dodge. Thinking is useless without data so you have to research
>>>before you can
>>>think about it.
>>>
>>
>>Semantics
>
>You don't even know what that word means or you wouldn't have used it in
>this context.
>
>>>>>>>>>We here those conspiracy theories
>>>>>>>>>all the time,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> never question or research it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>They have been researched extensively.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, but not by sheep like you.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nor by sheep like you who buy every bit of drama you're fed because
>>>>>real
>>>>>investigation is
>>>>>too difficult, too time consuming, and takes too long. Conspiracy
>>>>>theories
>>>>>cannot stand
>>>>>the fact that sometimes we *can't* know the truth because there aren't
>>>>>enough facts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't post 'conspiracy theories'.
>>>
>>>You never stop. Just mentioning "secret societies" proves you're a
>>>conspiracy theorist.
>>>
>>
>>Secret societies are a reality. You think there are no secrets?
>
>You think they're responsible for everything?
>

I never said that.

>
>>>>Here's something you don't know - the CIA popularised the term as a
>>>>disinfo
>>>>campaign to cover up covert operations from the public.
>>>
>>>Really? Where is your evidence for that?
>>>
>>
>>It's well known by smart people.
>
>Then how did you find out?
>

Research

>
>>>>The fact that you chuck that term around like the others here shows your
>>>>ignorance.
>>>
>>>Shows yours. Conspiracy theories have always existed, just the name has
>>>changed.
>>>
>>
>>There are some conspiracy theories thrown around for fun but not half as
>>much as governments and the leftists that follow them claim. It's a cover
>>up.
>
>Which is, itself, a conspiracy theory.
>

Everything that sounds crazy to you leftists is just a "conspiracy theory"?

>
>Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
>

Yes but that's your main comfort position.

>
>>>>>>>>>never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's all they give. The fact free zones are the hard right and hard
>>>>>left.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hahahaha. You've fallen for the mass spread lies.
>>>
>>>That would be you. The truth is NEVER at the ends. It's ALWAYS
>>>somewhere
>>>in between the
>>>extremes.
>>>
>>
>>You are on an extreme but you don't know it.
>
>Talking to the mirror again?
>
>>>>>Alex Jones is as fact free as Wonkette. In a perfect world, neither
>>>>>would
>>>>>exist.
>>>>
>>>>Hahahaha
>>>
>>>Comment on the post, not your fantasies.
>>>
>>>>You obviously know nothing about the CIA and other corrupt agencies and
>>>>what
>>>>they have been doing for decades.
>>>
>>>Why do you keep bringing up the CIA? What is your obsession with them?
>>>
>>
>>The CIA is the biggest threat to democracy in American history.
>
>That is quite possibly the stupidest thing I've seen from you yet!
>

Says a geezer who thinks he knows nearly everything yet knows nothing about
the CIA and other agencies and corruption.

>
>>>>>>>What you call "facts" are bogus conspiracy theories - not actual
>>>>>>>facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>>You never looked into it so you can't claim that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Prove it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>How?
>>>
>>>So you can't prove it. Typical. If you believe it, if you know it, you
>>>also know the
>>>proof of it.
>>>
>>
>>You have to tell me how you want it proved.
>
>No, I don't. You have to present what you consider proof. The burden is
>on you to
>demonstrate your proofs, it is not on me to tell you what proofs to
>present.
>

Are you a legal representative or investigator? Show me your credentials
before demanding proof.

>
>>I consider and research things.
>
>No, you don't. You accept the pablum you're fed so you won't have to think
>for yourself.
>

That's your preconception.

>
>>You leftists believe things more strongly
>>than me.
>
>In Truth there is Strength.
>

Haha

>
>>>>>Prove that he's never done any of that research. Clearly you haven't.
>>>>
>>>>Give me your alt.atheism definition of research.
>>>
>>>Don't know about alt.atheism. I'm not posting from there. One
>>>definition
>>>of research
>>>would be reading about and/or experimenting with information to see what
>>>generates
>>>repeatable results in a controlled environment.
>>>
>>
>>That's just science in labs.
>
>The Scientific Method has broad applications. You'll find that
>investigators of any kind
>rely on its principles.
>

You only follow gov. grant brought scientists. They can only talk about what
they're told to.

>
>>>>>>You just repeat the
>>>>>>mainstream smear and disinformation campaign for the masses.
>>>>>
>>>>>While you just repeat the right wing smear and disinformation campaign
>>>>>for
>>>>>the masses.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>One must be right. You can't show that yours is.
>>>
>>>I disagree. Neither side is right but both have some piece of the
>>>puzzle.
>>>
>>>>You lot just smear the same stuff that the corporate MSM smears.
>>>
>>>Lol! Sunk into the darkest depths of suspicion and dread, you cannot see
>>>the light.
>
>I'm not the one dreading the morning.
>

Huh? Whatever.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site