On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:03:40 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>news:7nad7jpucn20n9fustdcv0ap5no5cl40cv@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:39:21 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>news:gpu87jlguffarccvvnag9mcdu52fhf9t2a@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:04:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>>>>>news:7cg67jt9mh7lo1jjd7i1k9r654teon4d60@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
>>>>>>>> meetings with governments?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
>>>>>>>Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
>>>>>>having taken place?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You mean so ~you~ don't have to do any research or investigation and can
>>>>>just take it easy and be shown everything?
>>>>
>>>>No. How often do I need to spell it out for you? How fucking dense are
>>>>you? When I ask that question I already know the answer. I ask it
>>>>because I want to expose you guys. Just for the fun of it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>So you think you already know everything in the world ...
>>
>>Strawman.
>>
>
>Really? ...

Yes.

> ... You can't see your own behaviour.

Where have I said that I "already know everything"?

>>> ... and just want to have
>>>fun like a spoiled kid.
>>
>>Exposing your BS is rather fun.
>>
>
>You just made my case again.

Yes, I did. I ADMIT that I'm having fun here, and I don't see the
problem. Again, what we do here has no impact in the real world.
Whether I'm doing this for the fun of it, or like you, think that I'm
fighting wind mil... the Deep State Cabal, it is of no consequence
whatsoever.

>>>>>You will never learn any truths.
>>>>
>>>>Have you found that secret subterranean alien base outside of Sidney
>>>>yet? No? Any news? 'What are the drums saying, Mike?'
>>>>
>>>
>>>You mean Sydney?
>>>There is plenty of insider information on non human civilisations living
>>>below the earth, oceans and in this solar system. You just don't know
>>>anything about it.
>>
>>And every time we ask you to cite a source or two you run like hell
>>and blame me for not having tried to find it myself.
>>
>
>Because you only accept mainstream sources, ones that align with your
>limited beliefs and prejudice.

And that's your excuse for not providing evidence. Stop the charade.
We know you have no 'specialist insider advanced scientist' you could
name.

>And as for running, you keep running back to the quick and satisfying
>mainstream.

I should only cite youtubers, twitter posters, Rumblers, and Rumor
Millers?

>>>News? Yes. They are systematically removing the scumbags, like the ones
>>>you
>>>follow.
>>
>>Who are "they" in this case?
>>>
>
>Clueless as usual.

"They" is a very generic term in you circles. Could be anyone.

>>>>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
>>>>>>>Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Three exclamation [marks]. I guess it must be true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>But the mainstream media stuff ~is~ true?
>>>>
>>>>Why don't you find out for yourself?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Why don't you?
>>
>>You're the one constantly fixating on 'MSM'.
>>>
>
>The propaganda MSM happens to be the greatest threat to democracy and
>freedom/free speech.

You regard FOX as MSM, right?

>>>>(snip)
>>>>
>>>>>>"Psychic abilities are real" What a fucking moron...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Again you just totally ignore all the above mentioned experienced
>>>>>researchers, investigators and prominent people ...
>>>>
>>>>Ignore? I just went through (most of) the material posted as evidence.
>>>>I didn't buy any of it, and I made it clear that I didn't.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You didn't buy it? You haven't done any research on it. ...
>>
>>There is nothing substantial to research.
>>
>
>Bahahaha. Ok Mr tunnel vision.

I could set up a very simple remote viewing experiment that would
convince me on the spot if it worked. Two rooms, one 'Beamer', one
'Medium', one deck of cards. Do you know anyone who would like to
participate?

>>Finding youtubers repeating
>>the claims is not researching anything.
>>
>
>Youtube is just a starting point for newbies. You failed the test ages ago.

Should I graduate to 8Chan? Rumble? Twitter? Listen, if you have
better and more reliable sources why don't you list them?

'You just want me to do all the work for you! I'm just here to give
you information! You must learn to do your own research!'

>>>You think this is all just about believe or not believe. You're just an
>>>armchair critic. Very immature.
>>
>>One cannot choose what to believe.
>>
>
>Huh? Belief is a choice.

No, it's not. Could you choose to believe the Earth is flat? No, you
know it's a sphere because of the 'data' you have accepted as true.
Your belief in a spherical Earth is a result of that.

>Maybe you just can't choose not to believe establishment's claims.

Non-belief is not a choice either.

>>>>I've seen
>>>>and read a lot about the subject. That's why I know it's BS.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You read a bunch of stuff to look for some laughing material. ...
>>
>>It turned out that way.
>>
>
>That's all you do. Your type need lots of entertainment for some reason.
>But there's serious stuff going on in the world.

And I deal with that in a serious way. Your beliefs in space aliens
and remote viewing is not serious stuff.

>>> ... Wow.
>>>And you somehow just magically know what's true and what's BS.
>>
>>I formed an opinion based on what I learned.
>>
>
>You learned lopsided and don't know it.

Yeah, I should have listened more closely when they taught 'Earth's
vibrational energy 1.01'

>>>>> ... who are far smarter and
>>>>>knowledgeable than you. You just sling mud all the time. ...
>>>>
>>>>And my aim is no less than spectacular!
>>>>
>>>
>>>You just gave away your big ego again.
>>
>>And you just showed us again that you can't spot irony.
>>
>
>I can, ...

Yet to be proven.

> ... but you don't qualify for relying on irony for your responses. You
>overstep your true position.

Come again?

>>>>> ... You're a smart
>>>>>arse.
>>>>
>>>>Deep State makes me do it, remember! I'm the real victim here.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Until recently you never even heard the term deep state. ...
>>
>>How do you know when I first heard about the term?
>>
>
>If you did you would have investigated it before forming a stone hard
>opinion.

'Deep State' is just a new name for the same 'bogeyman'. 'Knights
Templar', 'Illuminati', 'The Freemasons', 'Bilderberg', and of course
'The Jews'. A nefarious group, a secret society, that controls the
world. Nothing new there.

>Your opinions and preconceptions are like that of religious zealots. You
>hear it, you like it, it's "fact".

Let's have a specific example of that behavior.

>>In any case, the
>>term is not the important part. It's the concept. 'They' have always
>>been part of the conspiracy lore.
>>
>
>And you know little to nothing about it.

You're the specialist. You've spent decades researching it. So... can
you name a person who is part of the deep state?
>
>
>>
>>> ... Yet somehow you
>>>just know it's all BS. Because it sounds crazy - to your narrow immature
>>>mind.
>>
>>I'm a classic rationalist.
>>
>
>You're not a rationalist. Rationalists do far more to find out truths and
>are not so biased and prejudiced, sticking like glue to only one mainstream
>side of a story.

You have an obsession, in case you didn't know.

--
Malte Runz