On 6/19/2024 4:35 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:50:16 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6/19/2024 2:43 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:58:55 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>> "The real truth", eh? Like space aliens from Orion holding secret
>>>>> meetings with governments?
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/ItRiw2HwvF0
>>>> Aliens are here, and they're not our friends, John Lear says
>>>
>>> Does your video contain any kind of hard evidence of those meetings
>>> having taken place?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Baby-blood drink Hollywood elites?
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/YhM5LtOkgXA
>>>> Hollywood PANICS as Mel Gibson EXPOSES Them All!!!
>>>
>>> Three exclamation points. I guess it must be true.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Remote viewing? Perpetual motion technology? Real truths like that?
>>>>
>>>> Yep, just like that:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgwdgnEf3ws
>>>> Two physicists working for the government discover psychic abilities are
>>>> real and are then silenced.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_cLp15CaPE
>>>>
>>>> Russell Targ is an author, physicist - and once upon a time, a
>>>> psychic-spy for the Army. He discusses his new book, "Third Eye Spies",
>>>> and describes how research at SRI & Stargate may help all of us unlock
>>>> our hidden inner potential.
>>>>
>>>> Russell Targ is a physicist, author, and pioneer in the development of
>>>> the laser and cofounder of the remote viewing laboratory at Stanford
>>>> Research Institute, which investigated psychic abilities in the 1970s
>>>> and ‘80s. His work in the psychic area has been published in Nature,
>>>> The Proceedings of the Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers
>>>> (IEEE)., and the Proceedings of the American Association in the
>>>> Advancement of Science (AAAS).
>>>>
>>>> Targ is the author or co-author of nine books dealing with the
>>>> scientific investigation of psychic abilities and Buddhist approaches to
>>>> the transformation of consciousness. As a senior staff scientist at
>>>> Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, Targ developed airborne laser
>>>> systems for the detection of wind shear and air turbulence. Having
>>>> retired in 1997, he now writes books of psychic research and teaches
>>>> remote viewing worldwide.
>>>>
>>> Andrew! I'll be dipped... You've got a soul mate here! Loran turns out
>>> to be as gullible and idiotic as yourself.
>>
>> You never heard of the program?
>
> Oh yes, I've heard about it. Kooks always parade it as 'proooooooof!'.
> Funny thing though, nothing ever came of it.

It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?

> 'That's only what They want you to believe. The Deep State is using it
> on all of us... to control us!'
>
> Am I close?

Uh...the remote viewing?

Not sure.

>> I trust official government docs will suffice:
>
> Trusting the enemy??? Never!!!

Paperwork beats guesswork.

>>
>> https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf
>
> Maybe I should. Let's have a look...
> Will you look at that! Page four (I bet you never read that far. You
> Gish Gallopers never do):
>
> "Conclusions
> The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against
> continuation of the program within the intelligence community. ..."
>
> Still there? Your nightmare continues:
>
> "Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in
> the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a
> paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated."
>
> And doesn't getter any better for you.
>
> "The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the sources
> or origins of the phenomenon, nor do they address an important
> methodological issue of inter-judge reliability."

It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?

>
>
>>
>> https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/sa/sa_jan02srm01.html
>> Clairvoyant Remote Viewing: The US Sponsored Psychic Spying
>> M. Srinivasan * , Former Associate Director, BARC
>>
>>
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>> ’Remote Viewing,’ popularly known as Extra Sensory Perception (ESP) is
>> the ability of human being to perceive information and imagery of remote
>> geographical targets. Advanced practitioners of the Indian Yoga system
>> were well acquainted with ‘Divya Drishti.’
>>
>> This paper deals with experiments conducted in USA in which certain
>> individuals were trained to acquire such ‘Remote Viewing’ capabilities
>> for collecting military intelligence.
>>
>>
>>
>> Introduction
>>
>> During the Cold War years, the USA and Soviet Union are known to have
>> been spying on each other using the services of psychic ‘remote
>> viewers’, with the specific objective of gathering intelligence
>> information of military significance. In simple terms ‘remote viewing’
>> is ‘the ability of human participants to acquire information about
>> spatially (and temporally) remote geographical targets otherwise
>> inaccessible by any known sensory means’.
>>
>> There were two complementary components to the US Remote Viewing programme:
>>
>> (a) A research programme on ‘Anomalous Cognition (AC)’ directed
>> initially by physicists Hal Putoff and Russell Targ at the laboratories
>> of Stanford Research International (SRI) at Menlo Park, California which
>> was shifted in 1988 to Science Applications International Corporation
>> (SAIC), under the direction of Edwin May. The findings of their early
>> studies have been reported in prestigious scientific journals during the
>> 1970s. 1-3
>>
>> (b) Mission-oriented operational assignments overseen by various
>> intelligence agencies of the US Government, code-named Project STARGATE.
>>
>> Information regarding this top-secret programme was partly declassified
>> by the CIA in July 1995 following the thaw in the Cold War. Since then,
>> several research articles 4 and many books 5-10 have been published by
>> some of the persons who were closely associated with this programme.
>> These authors have however expressed regret that they had not been
>> permitted to reveal much of the ‘sensitive’ details of the programme.
>> The present brief account is based on the published sources of information.
>>
>>
>>
>> Background to Remote Viewing Faculty
>>
>> The faculty of Remote Viewing is popularly also known as Extra Sensory
>> Perception (or ESP for short), a term coined by the pioneering
>> parapsychology researcher J.B. Rhine in 1934. Students of Indian Yogic
>> lore are however well acquainted with it. Aphorism 3.26 of Patanjali’s
>> classic work Yoga Sutras (400 B.C.) describes the first of the
>> ashta-siddhis (or psychic powers) that a serious practitioner of Yoga
>> can acquire as ‘obtaining knowledge of the small, the hidden or distant
>> by directing the light of superphysical faculty’. Russell Targ, has
>> commented that the techniques used by the US viewers for ‘looking into
>> the distance and the future’ are ‘strikingly similar to the detailed
>> instructions given in the Yoga Sutra!’
>>
>> Most ancient civilisations appear to have been acquainted with the
>> knowledge of this particular faculty of the human mind. ...
>
> According to an interesting article I just read on Rumor Mill News,
> Andrew W's favorite news site, the ancient civilizations didn't have
> road or airports. No, they had a "High-tech electric plasma portal."
> First, you remote view the place you want to go to. Then you zap
> yourself there! Definitely gonna get me one of those!
>
>> ... In both Indian
>> and Chinese scriptures there are instances of the clairvoyant skills of
>> people being used as a tool for obtaining relevant military information
>> in the battle-ground.
>>
>> It is learnt that the US Government authorities started paying serious
>> attention to investigating the possible applicability of ‘remote
>> viewing’ techniques for military purposes only when a book titled
>> Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain, authored by Sheila
>> Ostrander and Lynn Schroeder, was published in 1970 11 . This book
>> appears to have jolted the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) into
>> action, triggering what one journalist has dubbed as the ‘Race for Inner
>> Space’! Hal Puthoff, the founder and first Director of the SRI Studies
>> has given a graphic account of how it all began in his recollections of
>> the programme. 6
>>
>>
>>
>> Laboratory Investigations of Remote Viewing
>>
>> Systematic scientific investigation of telepathy and ESP had been
>> carried out 12 in the US by J.B. Rhine and his associates during the
>> 1930s and the 1940s at Dukes University, using a set of five ‘Zener
>> Cards’ containing symbols such as square, circle, star, plus sign, and a
>> wavy pattern. One of these cards selected at random would be kept open
>> in one room and a ‘transmitting agent’ would focus his mental attention
>> and concentration on the same. A ‘receiver’ or ‘viewer’ sitting in an
>> adjacent room would try to guess which card is open. The success rate in
>> such ‘card guessing’ tests would be recorded. If the experimental hit
>> rate was statistically more significant than the ‘chance expectation’
>> rate of one in five (or 20 per cent) it would be interpreted as evidence
>> of a telepathic or ESP mode of information transfer.
>>
>> Unfortunately, to obtain statistically significant results the
>> experiment had to be repeated thousands of times and this led to
>> ‘decline effects’ due to boredom (or tiredness) on the part of the
>> remote viewer. To overcome this problem, parapsychology researchers at
>> SRI started using a set of pictures taken from the National Geographic
>> magazine instead of the zener cards. A ‘rank order’ method of
>> quantifying the success rate was developed for this.
>>
>> The focus of research then shifted to assessing the success rate in
>> ‘test bed’ or field trials where a remote viewer was asked to sense and
>> describe a natural scene or a military site where an ‘agent’ or ‘beacon’
>> was located. Both the ‘transmitting agent’ at the site and the ‘viewer’
>> or ‘receiver’ sitting in the lab would be asked to fill out an identical
>> 30 point questionnaire with a yes (’1’) or no (’0’) marking. This method
>> of assessment was first developed by Princeton University researchers in
>> their Engineering Anomalies Research Programme 13 while investigating
>> ‘Precognitive Remote Perception’. Using advanced mathematical methods
>> developed in the field of artificial intelligence and pattern
>> recognition, the degree of success of the remote viewer was quantified.
>>
>> In the next stage of research simulating military spying missions, the
>> presence of the transmitting ‘agent’ at the target site was dispensed
>> with and the remote viewer was encouraged to view relevant military
>> targets within the US, given only the latitude and longitude of the
>> target site. A brief summary of the outcome of the research on
>> ‘anomalous cognition’ sponsored by the US Government is available in
>> Edwin May’s website <www.lfr.org>. Dr. May was the Director of this
>> research at SAIC when the programme was officially terminated in 1995.
>>
>>
>>> Now, I'll leave the two of you to go play with your turds. I've got
>>> grown-up stuff to do.
>>>
>>> "Psychic abilities are real" What a fucking moron...
>>
>> Examples of Some “Test Bed” Trials
>>
>> In the course of their investigations the SRI researchers identified at
>> least six ‘star performers’ with an extraordinary inborn remote viewing
>> talent. While the names of some of them have been revealed, others are
>> only identified by a code number. Those revealed are briefly mentioned
>> below:
>>
>> (a) Remote Viewing of a High Technology Site (May 7, 1987)
>>
>> Viewer: Receiver # R-372 (Now known to be Joe McMoneagle)
>>
>> Primary Target Site: Electron Accelerator at The Lawrence Livermore
>> National Laboratory (LLNL).
>>
>> Cue Supplied: Name and Social Security Number of an Intelligence Officer
>> (’target person’) unknown to the remote viewer or others stationed at
>> SRI Labs.
>>
>> Assignment: Describe the target person’s movements and the ambience of
>> his surroundings at eight-hour intervals during a span of 24 hours.
>>
>> Target Person’s Actual Movements: Besides moving in the LLNL site, the
>> target person also visited the windmill farm just outside the LLNL
>> premises at 4 P.M.
>>
>> Results: “Fuzzy Set Analysis” of the various descriptions provided by
>> the receiver showed that the overall accuracy of the remote viewing was
>> 77 per cent and overall reliability 78 per cent. The reliability of the
>> description of the windmill farm was 100 per cent (accuracy is defined
>> as the ‘percentage of target elements described correctly by the viewer’
>> and reliability as ‘percentage of receivers response that is correct’.)
>>
>> (b) Swimming Pool Complex at Rinconada Park, Palo Alto (1974)
>>
>> This viewing was carried out by Pat Price who was described by Russell
>> Targ as one of their ‘psychic treasures’. The target was selected
>> randomly from out of a ‘target pool’ of sites, unknown to Pat Price and
>> Russell Targ who were stationed inside a ‘Faraday Cage’ in the Radio
>> Physics Building of SRI International Labs. Hal Puthoff and an associate
>> Bart drove off to the target site, which was five miles away. After the
>> alloted time of 30 minutes, Pat Price was asked to view and describe the
>> target site.
>>
>> Pat said he saw ‘a circular pool of water about a hundred feet in
>> diameter’ (it was actually 110 ft); he also saw ‘a rectangular pool 60
>> ft by 80 ft’ (it was actually 75’ by 100’); he went on to describe a
>> concrete block house which was also at the site. He drew a diagram of
>> the complex. Pat said that the site seemed to be a water purification
>> plant and drew two water storage tanks and some rotating machinery such
>> as pumps etc.
>>
>> After completing the drawing and description, all of them drove to the
>> site to assess the accuracy of Pat’s viewing. Everything was remarkably
>> accurate except for the two water tanks and the water purification
>> plant, which were absent.
>>
>> Pat Price’s inclusion of the non-existent tanks remained a puzzle for 21
>> years. However, the mystery was unexpectedly solved in March 1995 when,
>> as part of the ‘centennial celebrations’ of the city of Palo Alto, a
>> commemorative volume was published. This brochure carried a picture of
>> the Rinconada Park site taken in 1913 on the occasion of the
>> inauguration of the city’s new water works showing two water tanks
>> exactly at the location indicated by Pat Price in his 1974 viewing!
>>
>> This amazing example brings out one of the remarkable features of remote
>> viewing, namely the ability of consciousness to access the past. In RV
>> literature it is referred to as ‘retro cognition’ while in ancient
>> Indian texts it is described as accessing the ‘akashic records’!
>>
>> (c) Discovery of Rings around Planet Jupiter
>>
>> Ingo Swann6 the famous psychic who was in fact responsible for getting
>> Hal Puthoff and his colleagues at SRI Labs interested in ‘investigating
>> the boundary between the animate and inanimate’ in 1972, suggested
>> carrying out an experiment to remote-view the planet Jupiter before the
>> upcoming NASA Pioneer-10 flyby. Much to the “chagrin of Ingo Swann and
>> the SRI researchers, he found a ring around Jupiter and wondered if
>> perhaps he had remote-viewed the planet Saturn by mistake”. But when the
>> Pioneer-10 flyby did take place it confirmed the existence of rings
>> around Jupiter.
>>
>> (Interestingly, a Pune based medical doctor by the name of Dr.
>> P.V.Vartak has contacted this writer and sent newspaper clippings
>> describing his astral visits to the Moon, Mars and Jupiter.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Examples of Operational Assignments
>>
>> The following are brief summaries of some very interesting operational
>> assignments as reported in the declassified remote viewing literature.
>>
>> (a) Radio Listening Post: Urals (1974)
>>
>> A ‘receiver’ volunteered to ‘scan’ the Soviet Union for a radio
>> listening post and claimed to have found one located at Latitude
>> 65-degrees, 0-minutes, 57-seconds (North) and Longitude 59-degrees,
>> 59-minutes, 59-seconds (East) (note the astonishing precision in
>> pinpointing the geographical coordinates!). The receiver then described
>> the detailed geographical features of the surroundings of the site as
>> follows:
>>
>> “Elevation, 6200 ft. Scrubby brush, tundra-type ground hummocks, rocky
>> outcroppings, mountains with fairly steep slopes. Facing north for about
>> 60 miles, ground slopes to marshland. A mountain chain runs off to the
>> right, about 35-degrees east of north. Facing south, mountains run
>> fairly north and south. Facing west, mountains drop down to foothills
>> for 60 miles or so: some rivers running roughly north. Facing east,
>> mountains are rather abrupt, dropping to rolling hills and to flat land.
>> Area site underground, reinforced concrete, doorways of steel of the
>> roll-up type. Unusually high ratio of women to men, at least at night. I
>> see some helipads, concrete. Light rail tracks run from pads to another
>> set of rails that parallel the doors into the mountain. 30 miles north
>> (5-degrees west of north) of the site is a radar installation with one
>> large (165 ft) dish and 10 small fast-track dishes.”
>>
>> The above report was verified by personnel in the sponsor organisation
>> as being substantially correct.
>>
>> (b) Nuclear Research Centre at Semipalatinsk, in the former Soviet Union
>> (July 1974)
>>
>> This was CIA’s very first operational viewing assignment. The viewer was
>> Pat Price. Pat was asked to describe what was located at a suspected
>> underground nuclear testing site in the former Soviet Union known by the
>> code name PNUTS. CIA indicated that it was of great interest to them.
>> They had in their possession a spy satellite photograph of the site.
>>
>> The viewer was given only the geographical coordinates of the site in
>> degrees, minutes and seconds (This type of viewing has been referred to
>> as ‘Coordinate Remote Viewing’). Pat was also told that the site was an
>> R&D test facility. The government’s representative decided that if the
>> viewer described either the known multi-story crane or odd structures
>> resembling oil well derricks, then they would continue.
>>
>> Pat’s description of this remote site in his own words was, “I am lying
>> on my back on the roof of a two or three storeyed brick building. It’s a
>> sunny day. The sun feels good. There’s this most amazing thing. There is
>> a giagantic crane moving back and forth over my head . . . As I drift up
>> in the air and look down, it seems to be riding on a track with one rail
>> on each side of the building. I’ve never seen anything like that”. This
>> viewing assignment continued for a couple weeks during which he drew
>> pictures of the gigantic gantry crane and many other items at the site
>> such as “a cluster of compressed gas cylinders” which were also visible
>> in the satellite pictures. The gantry crane was moving on eight large
>> wheels, two on each of the four legs. This unique feature was confirmed
>> by the satellite photos. (The remarkable similarity of his drawing of
>> the crane and the satellite photo can be seen in Ed May’s website
>> <www.lfr.org>).
>>
>> In later sessions, Pat described the activities in the interior of the
>> building on top of which he was lying earlier. He explained that “people
>> were assembling a giant 60 ft diameter metal sphere using thick metal
>> ‘gores’ like sections of an orange peel, but the workmen were having
>> trouble welding it all together as the pieces were warping; they were
>> therefore looking for a lower temperature welding material”.
>>
>> SRI researchers were later told that the site was the super-secret
>> Soviet atomic bomb laboratory at Semipalatisk. They also learnt three
>> years later from a news item published in Aviation Week magazine that
>> “the sphere which was about 58 feet in diameter was intended to capture
>> and store energy from nuclear driven explosives or pulse power
>> generators”. (Russell Targ has commented that ‘the accuracy of Price’s
>> drawing is the sort of thing that I as a physicist would never have
>> believed, if I had not seen it for myself.)
>>
>> (c) A Spectacular Example of Precognitive Remote Viewing
>>
>> (Carried out by Joe McMoneagle in September 1979)
>>
>> Mission: Spy satellite photographs had shown suspicious heavy
>> construction activity around a building located 100 meters from a large
>> body of water, somewhere in northern Russia. The National Security
>> Council (NSC) wanted to know what was going on there.
>>
>> Assignment: Joe was given only the geographical coordinates (latitude
>> and longitude) and asked to describe the site.
>>
>> When Joe said it was a “cold location, near a body of water with large
>> buildings and smoke stacks etc”, NSC was satisfied that he was probably
>> at the right site. They then showed him the satellite photograph in
>> their possession and asked him to find out what was going on inside the
>> building. Joe said, “The interior is very large and noisy; active
>> working area, full of scaffolding, girders and blue flashes probably arc
>> welding.” He took a break and continued in another session, ”Probably a
>> huge submarine under construction (Draws a sketch with dimensions, etc).
>> A long flat deck; strangely angled missile tubes, about 18 to 20 in
>> number. A new type of mechanism to drive the submarine (nuclear
>> powered?); a double hull.”
>>
>> At this point the NSC representatives figured that Joe must be wrong
>> because if what he said was true, it would be the world’s biggest
>> submarine! No US intelligence agency had ever heard of it. The US did
>> not possess a submarine this large. Besides, who would build a submarine
>> in a building so far from water? How would they launch it? But since Joe
>> had acquired the reputation of being very accurate, NSC asked him to
>> ‘view the future’ and find out when it would be launched!
>>
>> Joe ‘scanned the future month by month’ and said the Russians would
>> blast a channel to connect the building with the body of water and
>> launch the submarine in four months.
>>
>> Confirmation : In January 1980, exactly as predicted by Joe, spy
>> satellite pictures confirmed the launching of the world’s biggest
>> submarine after construction of an artificlal channel connecting the
>> building to the water. It had 20 missile tubes, a large flat deck etc
>> exactly as described by Joe!
>>
>> (This example brings out spectacularly the ‘non local nature of
>> consciousness’ not only in space but also in time, even into the future!)
>>
>> (d) Location of hostage being held in Lebanon (February 1988)
>>
>> The US Defense Intelligence Agency asked where Marine Col.William
>> Higgins was being held as hostage in Lebanon. A viewer said Higgins was
>> in a specific building in a specific South Lebanon village. A released
>> hostage later confirmed that Higgins had probably been in that building
>> at that time.
>>
>> (c)Another example of Precognitive Remote Viewing (1989)
>>
>> Pentagon asked a viewer about possible Libyan response to U.S. criticism
>> of chemical weapons work at Rabta.
>>
>> The viewer’s response: A ship named ‘Patua’ or ‘Potua’ would arrive in
>> Tripoli to transport chemicals to an eastern Libyan port.
>>
>> Verification: A ship named ‘Batato’ in fact arrived in Tripoli and
>> loaded undetermined cargo, which was transported to an eastern Libyan port.
>
> A ship with a funny name arrived with some kind of cargo in Tripoli
> heading to another Libyan port. What are the odds!!! I'm convinced
> now.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Implications and Conclusions:
>>
>> The intelligence community in the US clearly seems to value RV data
>> whenever it is available, as a very useful additional input,
>> complementing information gathered through various other means and
>> methods. For example, in the present war against terrorism there is
>> every reason to speculate that the agencies involved in tracking down
>> Osama Bin Laden must have sought the help of some of their reputed
>> ‘remote viewers’ for whatever value it may be.
>>
>> However, the more important implication of the findings of RV research
>> to humanity as a whole perhaps is that it serves to validate the age-old
>> concept of many Eastern wisdom-traditions that have always emphasised
>> the non-local nature of human ‘consciousness’. Thus it serves to provide
>> some degree of scientific validity to various forms of spiritual and
>> distant healing practices as emphasised by Russell Targ himself in his
>> 1997 book titled Miracles of Mind. 9
>>
>> Another very important aspect emerging from RV research is the question
>> of precognition and its implications. It again seems to give a measure
>> of ‘scientific credence’ to various stunning but anecdotal stories of
>> premonitions and remarkably successful ‘predictions’ such as that of
>> Edgar Casey. Princeton University’s PEAR group and others have discussed
>> these implications in depth. 13 Precognition touches on some very
>> fundamental philosophical questions regarding free will and causality.
>>
>> In view of the importance and implications of the subject of Remote
>> Viewing to our understanding of Consciousness and considering that
>> Remote Viewing had already been discussed in considerable depth in our
>> ancient scriptures, ...
>
> Ancient scriptures. Best source of information out there.
>
>> ... it is high time that the subject be taken up for
>> systematic evaluation at some reputed academic institution(s) in India.
>
> Yes, indeed. High time.
> It has now been 22 years since Mr. Srinivasan urged the intelligentsia
> of India to take up the subject of the ancient knowledge of remote
> viewing.
>
>
>> In particular, it would be of great interest to verify if appropriate
>> yogic/meditation/or other training practices can help to train subjects
>> in developing Remote Viewing skills as claimed by some yoga scholars in
>> India. 15
>
> Sri'... dude... my man... bro... It ain't never going to happen.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Endnotes
>>
>> Note *: Dr. M. Srinivasan was formerly Associate Director, Physics
>> Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai. He is an experimental
>> Physicist who has specialized in fast breeder reactor physics and Cold
>> Fusion. Since retirement, he has been studying anomalous phenomena not
>> explainable currently by Science. Back.
>>
>> Note 1: R.Targ & H.E.Puthoff,”Information Transmission Under
>> Conditions of Sensory Shielding, Nature Vol. 252 (1974) pp. 602-607. Back.
>>
>> Note 2: H.E.Puthoff & R.Targ, “A Perpetual Channel for Information
>> Transfer Over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent
>> Research”, Proc IEEE, Vol. 64,(1976) pp. 329-354. Back.
>>
>> Note 3: C.T. Tart, H.E. Puthoff and R.Targ (Eds) “ Mind at Large: IEEE
>> Symposium on the Nature of Extra Sensory Perception” New Yok (1979)
>> Praeger Special Studies. Back.
>>
>> Note 4: Reports on Government Sponsored Remote Viewing Programs, A set
>> of seven papers in the Journal of Sci. Exploration, Vol. 10, No. 1,
>> (1996). Back.
>>
>> Note 5: H.E.Puthoff & R.Targ, Mind-Reach 1977, Delacorte, New York
>> (1977). Back.
>>
>> Note 6: Ingo Swann, Natural ESP, 1987, Bantum, New York (1987). Back.
>>
>> Note 7: Dean Radin, The Conscious Universe, 1997, Harper Edge
>> Publishers (1997). Back.
>>
>> Note 8: Jim Schnabel, Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America’s
>> Psychic Spies, 1997, Dell Books, New York. Back.
>>
>> Note 9: Russell Targ & Jane Katra, Miracles of Mind: Exploring
>> Non-Local Consciousness, 1999, New Word Library. Back.
>>
>> Note 10: Joe McMoneagle, “Remote Viewing Secrets: A Handbook” (May
>> 2000). Back.
>>
>> Note 11: S. Ostrander & L.Schroeder, Psychic Discoveries Behind the
>> Iron Curtain, 1970 Prentice Hall. Back.
>>
>> Note 12: K.R. Rao, Basic Experiments in Parapsychology, McFarland,
>> Jefferson, North Carolina. Back.
>>
>> Note 13: R.G. Jahn & B.J. Dunne, Margins of Reality: The Role of
>> Consciousness in the Physical World, 1987, Harcourt Brace & Co, Florida.
>> Back.
>>
>> Note 14: Courtney Brown, “Cosmic Explorers: Scientific Remote Viewing,
>> Extra Terrestrials and a Message to Mankind” (Aug 2000). Back.
>>
>> Note 15: B.J. Rao, Practice of Telepathy Made Easy: Harnessing Extra
>> Sensory Perception, 1992, Occult Publishers, Guntur, India. Back.
>>
>>
>
> Sure... But I think I trust the conclusions from that 'official
> government doc' you so generously supplied.

It was top secret, you think they'd reveal the actual results to us?

> If you really want to impress me, tell me what's hanging on the wall
> in my living room.
>
> [elevator music]
>
> Sigh... You may go and join AndreWoo and Moran at their favorite pass
> time now.
>
> I guess I'll skip brunch today.
>
No I remote viewed you snacking, you lie.