Gronk wrote:
> Anonymous wrote:
>> Gronk wrote:
>>> Anonymous wrote:
>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>> Jonathan David Ball wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 9:27 PM, Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> <https://xkcd.com/2962/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Harris is NOT eligible, and Randall Munroe is a faggot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How is Harris NOT eligble?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has to do with argument about the meaning of "natural born citizen."
>>>>>>> Right-wingnut extremists (shitbag Nazis, one and all) claim that a
>>>>>>> natural born citizen is *only* someone who is born in the US to two
>>>>>>> citizen parents (either natural-born themselves or naturalized). One or
>>>>>>> both of Harris's parents were not yet citizens when she was born, so the
>>>>>>> right-wingnut extremists (shitbag Nazis, one and all) claim she is not a
>>>>>>> natural born citizen and thus ineligible to be president.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Despite "natural born citizen" being *mentioned* in the Constitution, in
>>>>>>> the statement of eligibility for the office of president, there is no
>>>>>>> *definition* of the term in the Constitution or in any other foundational
>>>>>>> documents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's implicit in the specific exemption granted to persons who were
>>>>>> citizens at the time the Constitution was adopted. Those persons did
>>>>>> not have parents able to confer U.S. citizenship upon them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Psst. Harris was born in 1964. That's some time after
>>>>> when the "Constitution was adopted". Need help with the
>>>>> math?
>>>>
>>>> "...or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
>>>> Constitution" means that the Kamala bitch is only eligible to be President
>>>> with mere "soil citizenship" if she was born over 236 years ago.
>>>
>>> Say, #FelonDon wasn't alive back "at the time of
>>> adoption", so he's ineligible too!
>>>
>>> https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/full-text
>>>
>>
>> BOTH of Trump's parents were citizens at the time of his birth, retard.
>
>
> https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/full-text
>
> 14th Amendment
> Section 1
> All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
> and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens
> of the United States and of the State wherein they
> reside.
>
> Doesn't say anything about parents, magat. IN fact the
> word is not even mentioned in the Constitution.

Does 'natural born citizen' occur ANYWHERE in the 14th Amendment? NO.

> https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen
> A natural born citizen refers to someone who was
> a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go
> through a naturalization proceeding later in life.
> Under the 14th Amendment's Naturalization Clause
> and the Supreme Court case of United States v.
> Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S.
> soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural
> born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship.
> This type of citizenship is referred to as
> birthright citizenship.
>
> "birthright citizenship"

The Wong Kim Ark decision is wrong. When Xi or Putin send women over here to
shit out kids, enjoy rule by China or Russia.

On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:11:36 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:

>When Xi or Putin send women over here to
>shit out kids, enjoy rule by China or Russia.

If Trump wins the White House, you can expect to do the same.

#nevertrump

Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 23:11:36 -0400, Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>
>> When Xi or Putin send women over here to
>> shit out kids, enjoy rule by China or Russia.
>
> If Trump wins the White House, you can expect to do the same.

Trump is a straight white male. Straight white males don't betray their
nations like faggots have historically done.

Anonymous wrote:
> Gronk wrote:
>> Anonymous wrote:
>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>> Anonymous wrote:
>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>> Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>> Jonathan David Ball wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/22/2024 9:27 PM, Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://xkcd.com/2962/>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Harris is NOT eligible, and Randall Munroe is a faggot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How is Harris NOT eligble?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It has to do with argument about the meaning of "natural born
>>>>>>>> citizen." Right-wingnut extremists (shitbag Nazis, one and all)
>>>>>>>> claim that a natural born citizen is *only* someone who is born
>>>>>>>> in the US to two citizen parents (either natural-born themselves
>>>>>>>> or naturalized). One or both of Harris's parents were not yet
>>>>>>>> citizens when she was born, so the right-wingnut extremists
>>>>>>>> (shitbag Nazis, one and all) claim she is not a natural born
>>>>>>>> citizen and thus ineligible to be president.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Despite "natural born citizen" being *mentioned* in the
>>>>>>>> Constitution, in the statement of eligibility for the office of
>>>>>>>> president, there is no *definition* of the term in the
>>>>>>>> Constitution or in any other foundational documents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's implicit in the specific exemption granted to persons who were
>>>>>>> citizens at the time the Constitution was adopted. Those persons did
>>>>>>> not have parents able to confer U.S. citizenship upon them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Psst. Harris was born in 1964. That's some time after
>>>>>> when the "Constitution was adopted". Need help with the
>>>>>> math?
>>>>>
>>>>> "...or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption
>>>>> of this
>>>>> Constitution" means that the Kamala bitch is only eligible to be
>>>>> President
>>>>> with mere "soil citizenship" if she was born over 236 years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Say, #FelonDon wasn't alive back "at the time of
>>>> adoption", so he's ineligible too!
>>>>
>>>> https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/full-text
>>>>
>>>
>>> BOTH of Trump's parents were citizens at the time of his birth, retard.
>>
>>
>> https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/full-text
>>
>> 14th Amendment
>> Section 1
>> All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
>> and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens
>> of the United States and of the State wherein they
>> reside.
>>
>> Doesn't say anything about parents, magat. IN fact the
>> word is not even mentioned in the Constitution.
>
> Does 'natural born citizen' occur ANYWHERE in the 14th Amendment? NO.

So, what is your beef anyways?

>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen
>> A natural born citizen refers to someone who was
>> a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go
>> through a naturalization proceeding later in life.
>> Under the 14th Amendment's Naturalization Clause
>> and the Supreme Court case of United States v.
>> Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S.
>> soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural
>> born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship.
>> This type of citizenship is referred to as
>> birthright citizenship.
>>
>> "birthright citizenship"
>
> The Wong Kim Ark decision is wrong. When Xi or Putin send women over
> here to
> shit out kids, enjoy rule by China or Russia.

Well, just get your little ol' self to court and
over turn it...