On 9/21/2024 6:18 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:35:58 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:46:38 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>> Sherman) wrote:
>>
>>> Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:11:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>> Kremlin Girl <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> When "scientists" endorse political candidates they lose their
>>>>>> credibility.
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> What a nonsensical claim! When politicians like Trump
>>>>> and RFK, Jr. take profoundly anti-science positions, it
>>>>> is incumbent on *all* rational people to denounce them.
>>>>
>>>> "Many critics on X reacted to the endorsement, with one medical
>>>> journalist highlighting the "danger" of the scientific community
>>>> choosing political sides.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> The best rebuttal Kremlin Girl could produce is an *unnamed*
>>> "medical journalist" from lying Fox News.
>>>
>>> You can't make this shit up!
>>>
>>> --bks
>>
>> And yet it's always good enough for you when you post.
>> Go figure.
>>
>> But hey here ya go:
>>
>> ""There’s no doubt science is political," said medical writer Liz
>> Highleyman.
>>
>> "Political decisions affect science funding & scientific data
>> influences public policy. But there’s a real danger in the perception
>> that science ‘belongs’ to one side in the political & culture wars.""
>>
>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/scientific-american-magazine-faces-criticism-after-kamala-harris-endorsement-very-problematic
>>
>>
>> Had you read the original cite (no paywall no excuse) you would have
>> seen similar.
>
> And Bradley abandons yet another thread.

Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness petulantly and childishly whines again that
she's being ignored by her intellectual superiors.

Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness sees *every one* of these.