"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vhl38j$67d7$1@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont-email.me...
>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>dismissal, nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity
>>>>acknowedging the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as
>>>>charged.
>>>
>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing
>>> delayed. you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left
>>> media announsement.
>>>
>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-dona
>>> ld
>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>
>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>> trial completely Constitutional.
>
> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of
> the law.
>
The jury looked at the evidence presented by both sides and found him
guilty. End of story.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>
> Bullshit.
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>> announsement.
>>>>
>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>
>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>> completely Constitutional.
>>
>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>> law.
>
> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
> application of the law was impeccable.

Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
which he was performing a coverup of?

We all watch as Rudy rants, rages and eventually slinks off because he has
nothing.

Scout wrote:
> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty
> of for which he was performing a coverup of?
>
> We all watch as Rudy rants, rages and eventually slinks off
> because he has nothing.
>

Ask the jury. Your approval is unnecessary.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:vhm7vo$c69j$2@dont-email.me...
>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>> news:vhl38j$67d7$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA>
>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope.  tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be
>>>>>> delayed
>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>>> dismissal, nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are
>>>>>> imclicity
>>>>>> acknowedging the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump
>>>>>> guilty as
>>>>>> charged.
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing
>>>>> delayed. you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left
>>>>> media announsement.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his
>>>>> hush money
>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will
>>>>> still fight
>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-dona
>>>>>
>>>>> ld
>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He's still a criminal.  It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>>>> trial completely Constitutional.
>>>
>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false
>>> application of
>>> the law.
>>>
>> The jury looked at the evidence presented by both sides and
>> found him
>> guilty.  End of story.
>
> What crime was he found guilty of that he was trying to cover up?
>
>
>

Ask the jury.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

NoBody wrote:
>>> What crime was he found guilty of that he was trying to cover up?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ask the jury.
> It should be public record. If one is going to make a claim like
> this, they should be able to answer a basic question about it.

The jury answerred all the questions the judge put to them.

You should have filed a friend of the court when you had a chance.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

On 2024-11-23, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
><me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>
>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>
>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>>>> law.
>>>
>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>
>>Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>>which he was performing a coverup of?
>
> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
> crimes.
>
> Cause that's the way liberals operate.
>

There is so much wrong with that trial that it will surely be tossed out.
And that is before the SC ruling.

At this point Judge Merchan and AG Bragg are just trying to save their
own asses and exit quietly without actually admitting they screwed up.

Same for Jack Smith as well along with Fanni and that incompetent team.

>>We all watch as Rudy rants, rages and eventually slinks off because he has
>>nothing.
>>
>
> Let me know when he does. It's tempting to remove him and his socks
> from my killfile to watch but...nah.

+1
Rudy is a waste of bandwidth.

--
pothead

"Ding Dong The Witch Is Gone"
"Which Old Witch?"
"The Kamala Harris Witch. Of Course!"

On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>
>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>
>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>>>> law.
>>>
>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>
>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>
> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
> crimes.

The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed crimes...because they didn't
have to. Because Trump didn't have to be the one who *committed* the concealed
crimes. All the jurors had to do was find that one or more of the concealed
crimes had occurred, and that cooking the books was done to conceal them. That's
what they found. It is a just verdict.

On 11/23/2024 7:15 AM, pothead wrote:
> On 2024-11-23, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>>>>> law.
>>>>
>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>
>>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>>
>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>> crimes.
>>
>> Cause that's the way liberals operate.
>>
>
> There is so much wrong with that trial

There was nothing wrong with that trial.

"NoBody" <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:p9n3kjhvtg5sbbgbsaj7ete4h1vpbr93ec@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>
>>> Bullshit.
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>>>> dismissal,
>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity
>>>>>>> acknowedging
>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>
>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>>>>> trial
>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>
>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of
>>>> the
>>>> law.
>>>
>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>
>>Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>>which he was performing a coverup of?
>
> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
> crimes.

Exactly, a total reversal of American jurisprudence. Convict him of a
cover-up yet can't prove there was a crime to cover-up.

> Cause that's the way liberals operate.

Of course, if they dealt with facts, they wouldn't be liberals.

>>We all watch as Rudy rants, rages and eventually slinks off because he has
>>nothing.
>>
>
> Let me know when he does. It's tempting to remove him and his socks
> from my killfile to watch but...nah.

Oh, not to worry, he will roll out a new sock puppet and pretend he's never
been shown to be wrong.

"John Smyth" <smythlejen2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%yo0P.43639$IFic.21972@fx12.iad...
> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>>>>> dismissal,
>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity
>>>>>>>> acknowedging
>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing
>>>>>>> delayed.
>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>>>>>> trial
>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of
>>>>> the
>>>>> law.
>>>>
>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>
>>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of
>>> for
>>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>>
>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>> crimes.
>
> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed crimes...because they
> didn't have to.

If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he cover them up?

>Because Trump didn't have to be the one who *committed* the concealed
>crimes.

Except that is what the prosecution claimed. Are you claiming the
prosecution lied?

However, let's say he covered up a crime for someone else. Who was convicted
of committing that crime?

I mean you can't have a cover-up without a crime, and you can't show the
crime occurred without a conviction.

>All the jurors had to do was find that one or more of the concealed crimes
>had occurred,

Except they didn't. Of all 3 crimes presented to them. The jury did not find
ANYONE guilty of having committed the crime which the prosecution asserted
was being covered up.

Can't have a cover-up until you show the crime was committed. The
prosecution claimed that Trump committed those 3 crimes and each time the
jury returned a verdict of "Not Guilty".

You can't prove a coverup without a crime to coverup.

> and that cooking the books was done to conceal them. That's what they
> found. It is a just verdict.

Concealed what? What crime was Trump found guilty to show he attempted to
cover it up?

I know.. let's convict Biden of a coverup of his illegal families business
activities.. and the fact we can't show anyone actually committed such
crimes is no longer necessary because the legal BS artist Rudy has spoken.

"NoBody" <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6en3kjh87d242obvjcri6pm5502u38ef4v@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:44:52 -0800, Siri Cruise
> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:vhm7vo$c69j$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>> news:vhl38j$67d7$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA>
>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be
>>>>>>>> delayed
>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>>>>> dismissal, nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are
>>>>>>>> imclicity
>>>>>>>> acknowedging the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump
>>>>>>>> guilty as
>>>>>>>> charged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing
>>>>>>> delayed. you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left
>>>>>>> media announsement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his
>>>>>>> hush money
>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will
>>>>>>> still fight
>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-dona
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ld
>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>>>>>> trial completely Constitutional.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false
>>>>> application of
>>>>> the law.
>>>>>
>>>> The jury looked at the evidence presented by both sides and
>>>> found him
>>>> guilty. End of story.
>>>
>>> What crime was he found guilty of that he was trying to cover up?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Ask the jury.

So, even Siri doesn't know.. and for that matter neither did the jury as
they didn't return a guilty verdict for any of the 3 crimes the prosecution
asserted might have been what Trump was attempting to cover-up

IOW.. the prosecution asserted there was a cover-up but they can't actually
show it occurred because they have no idea of what the crime was much less
found anyone guilty of committing it.

> It should be public record. If one is going to make a claim like
> this, they should be able to answer a basic question about it.

For that matter those that claim there was a coverup of a crime should be
able to prove that a crime was committed and who committed it, I mean you
can't perform a coverup until there is a crime to coverup.

.....or are they saying Trump is so smart that he outsmarted everyone?

[Default] An incel dwarf typed:

>Why are you working so hard

Come to the Jolly Kone Parking Lot where *I* will do all the work!

If you are a right wing nut
Or you're a leftist hippy
If your cock's infected bad
With lots of sores and drippy
Rudy's waiting at the Jolly Kone
To make your dreams come true
Just come by, pull your pants right down
And get into the queue!
'Cause sucking cock is what I do
My talent's unsurpassed!
And all in California know
My blow jobs are first class!

[Default] An incel dwarf typed:

><crickets>

That's all you'll hear at the Jolly Kone Parking Lot.

Besides the slurping noises I make.

If there is a cock to suck
Then Rudy is your guy
He may past retirement age
But still he's pretty spry
He has no trouble getting down
Upon his bony knees
And sucking on your schwanzstucker
With practiced skill and ease
Don't hesitate to get your nut
Into his soft white mouth
'Cuz he's the best no matter where
East, west, north, or south!
So come down to the Jolly Kone
You know he knows the owner!
And let him do his magic
On your incredible stiff boner!

[Default] An incel dwarf typed typed:

>They didn't have to be proved.

Not if you're talking about which dwarf gives the best blow jobs. I've
already proved that!

If there is a cock to suck
Then Rudy is your guy
He may past retirement age
But still he's pretty spry
He has no trouble getting down
Upon his bony knees
And sucking on your schwanzstucker
With practiced skill and ease
Don't hesitate to get your nut
Into his soft white mouth
'Cuz he's the best no matter where
East, west, north, or south!
So come down to the Jolly Kone
You know he knows the owner!
And let him do his magic
On your incredible stiff boner!

[Default] An incel dwarf typed typed:

>> Really?
>
>Yes, scooter: really.

I missed the question.

Was it "Dues Rudy Canoza give the best blow jobs?"

If you're feeling down and out
If you're feeling glum
You should know that I'll be glad
To take it up the bum!
Blow jobs aren't the only thing
I happily provide
I'll lift my skirt to offer you
A hole to cum inside!
Please ignore the sores and pus
I've had a little issue
I'm sure that it'll wipe right off
And I'll give you a tissue!
So meet me at the Jolly Kone!
Two holes and there's no waiting!
You know that I'm the best there is
On that there's no debating!

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:53J1P.210507$Oi5e.23745@fx15.iad...
> On 11/25/2024 8:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>
>>
>>
>> "John Smyth" <smythlejen2@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:
>> %yo0P.43639$IFic.21972@fx12.iad...
>>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, scooter, the drunken Virginia
>>>> camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy,
>>>> lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>>>>>>> dismissal,
>>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity
>>>>>>>>>> acknowedging
>>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing
>>>>>>>>> delayed.
>>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush
>>>>>>>>> money
>>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still
>>>>>>>>> fight
>>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>>>>>>>> trial
>>>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of
>>>>> for
>>>>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>>>>
>>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>>>> crimes.
>>>
>>> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed crimes...because they
>>> didn't have to.
>>
>> If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he cover them
>> up?
>
> The law only requires that Trump *intended* to commit them or get someone
> else to commit them, scooter.

Yet.. no proof of such intent was ever established in court.

Please note also this is Bragg’s legal theory. One which has very little
support within American jurisprudence. Because intent is never enough, you
have to show they actively worked to carry out such intent. None of that was
ever established in court, and 3 separate times the jury found such intent
did not exist in the particular cases they were asked to look at. Seem while
it's nice to claim there was intent.. you have to establish as a matter of
legal fact actions that established such intent. The prosecution failed to
do so 3 separate times. It was only when the prosecution with the active
support of the judge decided that they didn't have to prove any specific
instance (as required for every other case that has ever existed under
American law) it was enough that if they jury could feel that they could
agree he intended to do so even though they could not establish any specific
example where such intent could be legally established according to the law.

It would be like a driver who almost hit 3 pedestrians but they could never
establish he actually meant to hit any of them.. was actually guilty because
5 of them though he tried to hit the first person. 4 felt it was the 2nd
person he was after and 3 felt it was the 3rd person..

So even though they legally could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt
for any specific case. well he had to be trying to hit SOMEONE... has no
legal basis but that is how the jury was instructed.

based on that criteria EVERYONE is guilty.. because all I have to assert is
you meant to commit SOME crime and I don't even have to prove that.

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:m3J1P.210508$Oi5e.163209@fx15.iad...
> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for
>>>>>>>> dismissal,
>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity
>>>>>>>> acknowedging
>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing
>>>>>>> delayed.
>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's still a criminal. It was a jury that convicted him, and his
>>>>>> trial
>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of
>>>>> the
>>>>> law.
>>>>
>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>
>>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of
>>> for
>>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>>
>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>> crimes.
>
> They didn't have to be proved. In fact, they didn't even have to be crimes
> intended or committed by Trump. If Trump was cooking his books to conceal
> crimes committed by others on Trump's behalf — and he *did* — that is
> enough to raise the business records falsification to felonies.

Except they never proved that.

All they 'proved' was they could sling enough shit to make 12 people think
he might have done so for someone, somewhere at sometime even though we
can't agree one who, where or when.

That makes everyone a felon.

We don't even have to know what the felony is... it's enough that we agree
there was one.. even though it can't be proven..

On 11/27/2024 10:34 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:m3J1P.210508$Oi5e.163209@fx15.iad...
>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope.  tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's still a criminal.  It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>>>>>> law.
>>>>>
>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>>
>>>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>>>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>>>
>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>>> crimes.
>>
>> They didn't have to be proved. In fact, they didn't even have to be crimes
>> intended or committed by Trump. If Trump was cooking his books to conceal
>> crimes committed by others on Trump's behalf — and he *did* — that is enough
>> to raise the business records falsification to felonies.
>
> Except they never proved that.

Trump cooked his books. That *absolutely* was proved, scooter. The jury *did not
have* to prove that Trump committed any other crime, scooter. You may not like
that feature of New York state law, but that *is* the law, scooter. Justice
Merchan *correctly* instructed the jury on the law, scooter.

[Default] An incel dwarf typed:

>Trump cooked his books.

I'd like to book your cock-- at the Jolly Kone Parking Lot!

In the Parking Lot of the Jolly Kone
Is where I’ll suck on your hard bone
Fellatio done with your consent
It won’t cost you one red cent
I gobble cock all day for free!
Why, you can even sodomize me!
I’ll make you scream like a banshee
‘Cause cock-sucking is my specialty!
You’ll find me there 'most every night
And don’t you worry- I won’t bite!
Feeling horny? Got lots of stress?
Look for the dwarf that’s wearing a dress!

©2024 Rudy Canoza Cock Sucking Services

On 11/27/2024 10:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:53J1P.210507$Oi5e.23745@fx15.iad...
>> On 11/25/2024 8:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Smyth" <smythlejen2@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:
>>> %yo0P.43639$IFic.21972@fx12.iad...
>>>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper
>>>>> and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.  tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's still a criminal.  It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>>>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really?

Yes, really, scooter.

>>>>>> The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>>>>>> which he was performing a coverup of?

Asked and answered, scooter. You're running in circles, scooter.

>>>>>
>>>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>>>>> crimes.
>>>>
>>>> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed crimes...because they
>>>> didn't have to.
>>>
>>> If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he cover them up?
>>
>> The law only requires that Trump *intended* to commit them or get someone else
>> to commit them, scooter.
>
> Yet.. no proof of such intent was ever established in court.
That's a lie, scooter. The intent being established is *exactly why* the jury
convicted Trump of 34 counts of violating §175.10 (felony) rather than §175.05
(misdemeanor). The jury was properly instructed in the law, scooter, and they
found Trump guilty of 34 counts of §175.10 beyond a reasonable doubt. It's just
too bad for you, scooter, that you don't "like" the verdict. Actually, scooter,
the more I think about it, I am ecstatic that you don't like the verdict. I
*like* when extremist Nazi shitbags like you are unhappy. You don't deserve to
be happy about anything, scooter.

[Default] An incel dwarf typed:

>>>>>>> Really?
>
>Yes, really, scooter.

Yes, I really give the best blow jobs!

If you are a right wing nut
Or you're a leftist hippy
If your cock's infected bad
With lots of sores and drippy
Rudy's waiting at the Jolly Kone
To make your dreams come true
Just come by, pull your pants right down
And get into the queue!
'Cause sucking cock is what I do
My talent's unsurpassed!
And all in California know
My blow jobs are first class!

On 11/27/2024 10:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:53J1P.210507$Oi5e.23745@fx15.iad...
>> On 11/25/2024 8:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "John Smyth" <smythlejen2@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:
>>> %yo0P.43639$IFic.21972@fx12.iad...
>>>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper
>>>>> and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <katt@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:5qq%O.175332$Oi5e.88903@fx15.iad...
>>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
>>>>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:0jarjj932g7o4fll3kou0c7sb607v1nr28@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>>>>> <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:065qjjp0qmnrnrfuk22a1491tig0sia5vk@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.  tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to be delayed
>>>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking for dismissal,
>>>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity acknowedging
>>>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as charged.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the sentencing delayed.
>>>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left media
>>>>>>>>>> announsement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his hush money
>>>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will still fight
>>>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-to-delay-donald
>>>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-AA1unHTg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's still a criminal.  It was a jury that convicted him, and his trial
>>>>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false application of the
>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the judge's
>>>>>>> application of the law was impeccable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really? The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of for
>>>>>> which he was performing a coverup of?
>>>>>
>>>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>>>>> crimes.
>>>>
>>>> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed crimes...because they
>>>> didn't have to.
>>>
>>> If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he cover them up?
>>
>> The law only requires that Trump *intended* to commit them or get someone else
>> to commit them, scooter.
>
> Yet.. no proof of such intent was ever established in court.

Not according to the jury, scooter. The jurors were persuaded beyond reasonable
doubt.

>
> Please note also this is Bragg’s legal theory. One which has very little support
> within American jurisprudence.

That's not a sentence, scooter. You don't have a subject and predicate there,
scooter.

But in fact, scooter, you're full of shit. The excellent authors at the
"Lawfare" legal analysis site showed *numerous* convictions in New York for
first degree business records falsification, aka §175.10 of the New York state
penal code.

[Default] An incel dwarf typed:

>That's not a sentence, scooter.

I won't check your grammar at the Jolly Kone Parking Lot!

If there is a cock to suck
Then Rudy is your guy
He may past retirement age
But still he's pretty spry
He has no trouble getting down
Upon his bony knees
And sucking on your schwanzstucker
With practiced skill and ease
Don't hesitate to get your nut
Into his soft white mouth
'Cuz he's the best no matter where
East, west, north, or south!
So come down to the Jolly Kone
You know he knows the owner!
And let him do his magic
On your incredible stiff boner!

On 11/27/2024 1:39 PM, pothead wrote:
> On 2024-11-27, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Scout wrote:
>>> A total dereliction of duty.
>>
>> Tough shit.
>>
>> I am not registerred in New York, so I do not get to vote for or
>> against judges. If I choose to do business and live there, tough
>> shit, I still have to obey their laws.
>
> Unless you are an illegal migrant and then you don't.
No, "pothole," that's a lie.

pothead wrote:
> On 2024-11-27, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Scout wrote:
>>> A total dereliction of duty.
>>
>> Tough shit.
>>
>> I am not registerred in New York, so I do not get to vote for or
>> against judges. If I choose to do business and live there, tough
>> shit, I still have to obey their laws.
>
> Unless you are an illegal migrant and then you don't.

Your next excuse is Don Fatso is an illegal migrant.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed