In article <48nhijhk5j7l6gsg27uq8q108nhg1s6hcf@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >LOL, You of all people trying to act tough.
> >> >>
> >> >> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with
> >> >> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
> >> >
> >> >I have seen you. You couldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag.
> >>
> >> You have seen nothing, retard. If you think my weight is the issue,
> >> you don't even know it, and you'd be wrong anyway, you're a fucking
> >> dumbshit pothead loser. I would mop the fucking floor with you, bring
> >> it on whenever, faggot. I double-dog dare your white ass.
> >
> >You talk tough behind that screen. But we all know what a poofter you
> >are.
>
>
> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
> bitch.

Poofter. You admitted it.

In article <fbphij5hi2fos7iac051ek0d6sp3cd6bsj@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Rich <rich@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
> >> bitch.
> >>
> >You're a wimpy little faggot with a big mouth, Joleen.
>
>
> Then do something about it and get wrecked, pussy. I'd slap you and
> knock you out, don't make me laugh, retard.

Poofter.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> >I have seen you. You couldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag.
>> >>
>> >> You have seen nothing, retard. If you think my weight is the issue,
>> >> you don't even know it, and you'd be wrong anyway, you're a fucking
>> >> dumbshit pothead loser. I would mop the fucking floor with you, bring
>> >> it on whenever, faggot. I double-dog dare your white ass.
>> >
>> >You talk tough behind that screen. But we all know what a poofter you
>> >are.
>>
>> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
>> bitch.
>
>Poofter. You admitted it.

You'd get your ass kicked by a "poofter", you're admitting it by
continuing to talk shit, instead of proving your claim, dipfuck.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

ROFLMAO

Looks like poor Joel's boyfriend ain't giving him any.

In article <ft3iijttv1hbhfk6bra7nseekj94m399p9@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Rich <rich@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> >> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
> >> >> bitch.
> >> >>
> >> >You're a wimpy little faggot with a big mouth, Joleen.
> >>
> >> Then do something about it and get wrecked, pussy. I'd slap you and
> >> knock you out, don't make me laugh, retard.
> >>
> >You look like my dick after I'm done fucking, Joleen, you
> >sissy ass bitch.
>
>
> So you're not going to do anything, what a surprise, pussy. I laugh
> at your Down Syndrome mother getting raped to create you. What's it
> like having been born to that, you pathetic waste of flesh? Anyway,
> that's enough of you wasting my time, you're just a "keyboard tough
> guy", so fuck off and die. You're killfiled.

Says the poofter as he runs away.

[Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:

>In article <74qhijd2fqt3639poqeqkteulbo3ep4n31@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >I have seen you. You couldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You have seen nothing, retard. If you think my weight is the issue,
>> >> >> you don't even know it, and you'd be wrong anyway, you're a fucking
>> >> >> dumbshit pothead loser. I would mop the fucking floor with you, bring
>> >> >> it on whenever, faggot. I double-dog dare your white ass.
>> >> >
>> >> >You talk tough behind that screen. But we all know what a poofter you
>> >> >are.
>> >>
>> >> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
>> >> bitch.
>> >
>> >Poofter. You admitted it.
>>
>>
>> You'd get your ass kicked by a "poofter", you're admitting it by
>> continuing to talk shit, instead of proving your claim, dipfuck.
>
>Poofter says what?

Joel The Destroyer
https://i.imgur.com/RgAqETe.jpg

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Rich <rich@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> >> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
>>> >> bitch.
>>> >>
>>> >You're a wimpy little faggot with a big mouth, Joleen.
>>>
>>> Then do something about it
>>>
>>I am, I'm laughing at your keyboard tough guy act, you scrawny
>>little sissy.
>
>
>Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

Here's a picture of Joel The Destroyer, if you're thinking of taking
him on.

https://i.imgur.com/RgAqETe.jpg

On 2024-11-03, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> On 2024-11-03 12:59:54 +0000, pothead said:
>
>> On 2024-11-03, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>>
>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>> the office.
>>>
>>> I'm predicting a Harris win, because I'm a pessimist.
>>>
>>
>> Either Harris squeaks out a win or Trump wins in a landslide.
>
> No way, Trump has a hard ceiling of no more than 46% and change even on
> his best day.
>
> This isn't 2016 when a lot of people didn't know who he was and the
> outrageous behavior he's capable of.
>
> In 2020 he only did .7% better.
>
However, Harris now has a record to run on and there is a reason she rarely
mentions it.
That's because it's a disaster.
And people know it.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 2024-11-04, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 03 Nov 2024 00:13:18 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>><qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>> mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>> the office.
>>>>
>>>>I fear you might be correct.
>>>
>>>The so-called governor is talking out of his ass, we don't know who's
>>>going to win, that's the truth. That's why I haven't made such a
>>>bold, unsupported prediction. My prediction is that whoever wins the
>>>electoral vote, will win. That could be either of them. Get over it,
>>>just vote, just encourage people to vote, accept and face reality,
>>>Swill.
>>
>>I've voted and mailed in my ballot.
>>
>>I have no confidence in Harris' ability to attract voters undecided this late in
>>the game.
>>
>>I'm not talking out of my ass. I'm observing her and the polls and comparing to
>>Trump and the polls.
>>
>>Imo, the Republicans are going to pull this out for Trump via the EC and if they
>>don't, expect the election to be up in the air for weeks if not months with
>>Trump's legal actions and election crimes committed by Trump motivated local
>>election officials muddying the waters.
>>
>>Sorry, I have no confidence that Harris will get a clean win. I wish she would,
>>I'd love to see her take PA and GA and NC and AZ but I'm not betting the farm on
>>it.
>
>
> I will look more closely at the polls but I'm not expecting them to,
> in all honesty, reveal the winner. National polls are a dead heat,
> but I will examine the state-by-state ones.
>

After 2016 and the midterms in 2023 I have zero faith in polls.

As far as undecided voters, they have to be morons to have not chosen
a candidate by now.
Sure Harris came in late however she is just more of the same Biden
policies as she was involved directly in most if not all of them.

As for Trump he is consistent, for the most part.
He has compromised on abortion however he is mostly a what you see
is what you get candidate.
Love him or hate him.

Kamala?
She changes her platform by the day.
What happened to happy, happy joy, joy?
All of a sudden she has become a combative attack dog.

She almost never talks policy.
All she talks is platitudes and anti Trump rhetoric.
IOW she is a box of rocks.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 2024-11-04, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>And if Harris wins they will attribute it to 'educated' suburban women coming out
>>to vote for abortion rights.
>
>
> As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
> that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
> undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>

You do realize that even Ruth Bader Ginsberg is on record claiming the
Roe v Wade decision was wrong.
Don't you?

<https://time.com/5354490/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade/>

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 2024-11-04, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <vpbhijhu06dgi8hkostpl4aocggfmg4muk@4ax.com>,
>>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >And if Harris wins they will attribute it to 'educated' suburban women coming out
>>> >to vote for abortion rights.
>>>
>>> As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
>>> that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
>>> undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>>
>>LOL, You of all people trying to act tough.
>
>
> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with
> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>
I would.
I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
or less.
And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.

Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
As should you be as well.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

pothead wrote:
> You do realize that even Ruth Bader Ginsberg is on record claiming the
> Roe v Wade decision was wrong.

The farthest left secular eugenicist ever on the Supreme Court said that?!?!

Well knock me over with a feather.

:-\

On 2024-11-04, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <53hhijp03tm8p8p18uk1d8u3d68f32tbem@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >In article <vpbhijhu06dgi8hkostpl4aocggfmg4muk@4ax.com>,
>> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >And if Harris wins they will attribute it to 'educated' suburban women coming out
>> >> >to vote for abortion rights.
>> >>
>> >> As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
>> >> that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
>> >> undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>> >
>> >LOL, You of all people trying to act tough.
>>
>>
>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with
>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>
> I have seen you. You couldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag.

Indeed!
Maybe if super high on meth?
Otherwise........ No way.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>>>And if Harris wins they will attribute it to 'educated' suburban women coming out
>>>to vote for abortion rights.
>>
>> As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
>> that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
>> undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>
>You do realize that even Ruth Bader Ginsberg is on record claiming the
>Roe v Wade decision was wrong.
>Don't you?
>
><https://time.com/5354490/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade/>

Read the entire link *you* posted, derp.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:
> Read the entire link

Rudence is due for a HUGE ass-kicking!

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/D.Ray/Henry Bodkin/Dawn Flood and a dozen other
forged socks of living and dead posters wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>> a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>> mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

People find pleasure where they do. I do not have understand, just
wish them well. I am sad that we keep sacrificing intimate acts of
sharing and love to political brutal.

Imagine a boot forever stamping your tender nethers.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with[out]
>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>
>I would.
>I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
>license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
>huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
>or less.
>And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.
>
>Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
>are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
>As should you be as well.

I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
by default. Enjoy it.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <1kkiij1aaesvol1b00eiennfbftph7aael@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
> >> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with[out]
> >> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
> >>
> >I would.
> >I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
> >license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
> >huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
> >or less.
> >And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.
> >
> >Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
> >are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
> >As should you be as well.
>
>
> I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
> pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
> by default. Enjoy it.

All you won is the keyboard warrior faggot participation award.

Siri Cruise wrote:
>
> Imagine a boot forever stamping your tender nethers.

Is that a demonstration your ill-claimed "empathy", meth whore?

Joel wrote:
> I've posted my images, name and location

Bullshit lie.

[Default] Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>>> a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>>> mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

>>Here's a picture of Joel The Destroyer, if you're thinking of taking
>>him on.
>>
>>https://i.imgur.com/RgAqETe.jpg

>People find pleasure where they do. I do not have understand, just
>wish them well. I am sad that we keep sacrificing intimate acts of
>sharing and love to political brutal.
>
>Imagine a boot forever stamping your tender nethers.

Nah, I'd just shoot them.

NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>>>As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
>>>>that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
>>>>undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>>>
>>>Yet it is the Democrats who have talked about oing court packing. How
>>>do libs get everything so backwards?
>>
>>You're a fucking idiot, that's the MSNBC-watching clowns, who think
>>that would work, it didn't happen, it never will happen, we will take
>>back the court by winning elections, it's a long road. Trump and
>>McConnell already *DID THIS* by cheating Obama and Biden out of
>>nominations, FUCK OFF, with your lying garbage, right-wing ape. Drop
>>dead.
>
>Uh huh.
>
>"During a forum in New Hampshire in May of 2020, a moderator asked
>Harris how she felt about adding as many as four seats to the Supreme
>Court. The then-senator from California said she was “open to this
>conversation.”
>
>Harris also signaled a desire to place restrictions on the amount of
>justices a president can appoint to the Court, and to end lifetime
>appointments for justices. These reforms and others would restore the
>Court’s legitimacy in the eyes of voters, she suggested."
>
>https://truthout.org/articles/harris-has-expressed-being-open-to-supreme-court-expansion/
>
>
>"
>
>Democrats are calling for the Supreme Court to be expanded after its
>conservative majority ruled that former presidents have broad immunity
>from prosecution."
>
>https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-move-expand-supreme-court-trump-ruling-1919976

Meanwhile, none of that is anything but vaporware, whereas the Gorsuch
and Barrett appointments were stolen. Have a nice day, when Trump
loses, with "Roevember".

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <n57kijpqfujq244tei2lqj6ligmf3d927p@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
> >>>>that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
> >>>>undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
> >>>
> >>>Yet it is the Democrats who have talked about oing court packing. How
> >>>do libs get everything so backwards?
> >>
> >>You're a fucking idiot, that's the MSNBC-watching clowns, who think
> >>that would work, it didn't happen, it never will happen, we will take
> >>back the court by winning elections, it's a long road. Trump and
> >>McConnell already *DID THIS* by cheating Obama and Biden out of
> >>nominations, FUCK OFF, with your lying garbage, right-wing ape. Drop
> >>dead.
> >
> >Uh huh.
> >
> >"During a forum in New Hampshire in May of 2020, a moderator asked
> >Harris how she felt about adding as many as four seats to the Supreme
> >Court. The then-senator from California said she was ?open to this
> >conversation.?
> >
> >Harris also signaled a desire to place restrictions on the amount of
> >justices a president can appoint to the Court, and to end lifetime
> >appointments for justices. These reforms and others would restore the
> >Court?s legitimacy in the eyes of voters, she suggested."
> >
> >https://truthout.org/articles/harris-has-expressed-being-open-to-supreme-court-expansion/
> >
> >
> >"
> >
> >Democrats are calling for the Supreme Court to be expanded after its
> >conservative majority ruled that former presidents have broad immunity
> >from prosecution."
> >
> >https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-move-expand-supreme-court-trump-ruling-1919976
>
>
> Meanwhile, none of that is anything but vaporware, whereas the Gorsuch
> and Barrett appointments were stolen. Have a nice day, when Trump
> loses, with "Roevember".

Poofter.

On 2024-11-04, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with[out]
>>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>>
>>I would.
>>I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
>>license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
>>huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
>>or less.
>>And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.
>>
>>Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
>>are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
>>As should you be as well.
>
>
> I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
> pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
> by default. Enjoy it.
>
It's not my fault you are stupid as well.
BTW, I'm not threatening anyone. I'm a libertarian and believe in free speech.
I can't however control people who make stupid decisions.
Like you for example.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 11/5/2024 4:03 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 06:59:29 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 06:26:49 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And if Harris wins they will attribute it to 'educated' suburban women coming out
>>>>> to vote for abortion rights.
>>>>
>>>> As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
>>>> that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
>>>> undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>>>
>>> Yet it is the Democrats who have talked about oing court packing. How
>>> do libs get everything so backwards?
>>
>>
>> You're a fucking idiot, that's the MSNBC-watching clowns, who think
>> that would work, it didn't happen, it never will happen, we will take
>> back the court by winning elections, it's a long road. Trump and
>> McConnell already *DID THIS* by cheating Obama and Biden out of
>> nominations, FUCK OFF, with your lying garbage, right-wing ape. Drop
>> dead.
>
> Uh huh.
>
> "During a forum in New Hampshire in May of 2020, a moderator asked
> Harris how she felt about adding as many as four seats to the Supreme
> Court. The then-senator from California said she was “open to this
> conversation.”

She should be.