On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>
> Do you think yours is?
>

From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>

[quote]

I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.

I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:

“What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family?”

When I ask that question I get blank stares, “that’s a good question”
responses. “I don’t know, I just think the economy was better.”

All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
Period.

[/quote]

-hh

In article <vf5e9i$jsii$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
says...
>
> On 10/20/24 9:26 PM, pothead wrote:
> > On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <vf3sbi$iukn$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >> says...
> >>>
> >>> On 10/20/24 12:11 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> In article <67147f6a$2$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:06:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <6714658e$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <67145de2$0$212405$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:46:33 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <JpYQO.243587$1m96.51316@fx15.iad>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2024 at 1:35:02 PM MST, "-hh" wrote <vep81m$28g54$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 8:05 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 5:54 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2024 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that there's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex change
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were you "in the navy" Huntzy?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuz you are as gay as a swabbie with no shore leave.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll bet hh volunteered to take other sailors "night in the barrel", if you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get my drift.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pun intended.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, we certainly do: you know that you're mad because you can't dispute
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> facts on the topic, so you try to "Shoot the Messenger" instead. Lame.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mad?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I stopped getting mad when I was about 12 yo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's a waste of energy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So if you're denying that it is due to anger, then what *was* your
> >>>>>>>>>>> motivation to sling such a lame Ad Hominem? After all, you did choose
> >>>>>>>>>>> to post, so there must have been a reason. So if its not you being
> >>>>>>>>>>> upset & butthurt again, then just what was your motivation?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> He seems unaware of his own emotional states... unless you have a signifiant
> >>>>>>>>>> issue pretty much all people experience anger from time to time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to look up from my spreadsheet and observe what the world is is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> saying.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's something you seem unable to do.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary: I find that worldviews are expanded by using objective
> >>>>>>>>>>> data, and helps to reveal my own potential personal biases.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Where Pothead makes things up, such as his recent claims that I am somehow
> >>>>>>>>>> responsible for Carroll's flood bot.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can spin your numbers all day and night but the fact remains that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the number 1 issue with voters is the economy/inflation and the polls
> >>>>>>>>>>>> show that people blame Biden/Harris for the mess.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> And that is a fact.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And people are _never_ deceived? Or make a mountain out of a mole hill?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Case in point:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Initially Biden was trying to convince the people that Bidenomics was working.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So then, just what is the definition of "working" here?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Because if it is real wage increasing to catch up with inflation, we
> >>>>>>>>>>> know that it is already 98% of the way there by one metric, and is 102%
> >>>>>>>>>>> of the way there by another metric.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We are still struggling based on Reagan and his absurd trickle down. Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>> work to redistribute money to the very rich did not help. Nor did the
> >>>>>>>>>> pandemic. Nor the war in Ukraine.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ironically, the Russians think this has been a very bad year for them also.
> >>>>>>>>> They are going through some things.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The war they started is not going well for them. Turns out just tossing more
> >>>>>>>> people to die at a war is not always a winning strategy.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Amongst other nonfun things, the Russians have bombing their own people in
> >>>>>>>>> territories like Bilhorod.
> >>>>>>>>> For the past year.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The world should be harsher toward their aggression. Trump clearly would not
> >>>>>>>> be if he wins.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Bullshit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cite?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No wars when he was in office.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In April 2017, Trump ordered missile strikes on a Syrian airbase
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not a war.
> >>>>
> >>>> Additionally, Trump warned the Syrians not to use poison gas on their own citizens.
> >>>> They tested Trump and he delivered on his promise.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's the difference between Trump and Biden.
> >>>> Our ships are being fired upon in the Middle East and Biden does virtually nothing other than continue his weak policy of appeasement.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Trump ramped up military operations in Afghanistan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To end a war.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>> And Biden/Harris managed to botch that one as well.
> >>>
> >>> But since you pendants are using the "not a war" bit because Congress
> >>> never declared one, nothing about Afghanistan counts for Biden either.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -hh
> >>
> >> 13 dead soldiers.
>
> 1/5th as many casualties as Trump had during his tenure.

In article <vf5er9$jvce$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
says...
>
> On 10/20/24 8:32 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:38:01 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Says who? I never said I was poor liar.
> >
> > You said you weren't doing well.
> >
>
> "I couls afford to do stuff."
> Said that in context to your prior
> "I was better off when Trump was in office."
>
> Golly, isn't it amazing how they can't keep their own story straight?
>
> Its almost as if they have ... confirmation bias.
>
>
> -hh

You spun around what I said. That's the only way a libtard can win.
Right now your candidate is looking pretty sad. That bothers you.

In article <vf5fj2$jvce$2@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
says...
>
> On 10/20/24 6:38 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vf3sgd$iukn$2@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 10/20/24 11:36 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vf2mf0$cfh6$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/19/24 10:01 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vf02hi$3cf08$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/18/24 1:46 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <veu63e$3cbit$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 10/18/24 11:23 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vetsqo$3bg55$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>> Yet gas is still not 2x what it was before CoVid. Nor are groceries.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you admit prices are higher? Yes when Trump was in office i was
> >>>>>>>>> paying less than 2 bucks a gallon.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Not for most of Trump's tenure you didn't.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The only time that gas was under $2/gallon during Trump's tenure was for
> >>>>>>>> just 9 weeks during the biggest part of the CoVid shutdown, namely
> >>>>>>>> 4/6/20 to 6/1/20.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That's just 4% of Trump's time in office: the other 96% of the time you
> >>>>>>>> were paying more.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In some cases, more then than the equivalent dollar value today.
> >>>>>>>> Case in point, from my prior post:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 10/08/2018: $2.903 --> that's in 2018 dollars
> >>>>>>>> 10/07/2024: $3.136 --> that's in 2024 dollars.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As per the CPI calculator (here's the URL again):
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.usinflationcalculator.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...$1 in 2018 is worth $0.80 today, so (.80)*($3.136) = $2.51/gallon.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, what this means is that the real price of gas today is 13% lower
> >>>>>>>> than it was the same week back in 2018.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - -
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Plus since this is supposed to be about policy, not random chance of
> >>>>>>>> CoVid, do you remember what did Trump do when gas prices did plummet by
> >>>>>>>> 20% in one month from CoVid?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Why Trump flew to Saudi Arabia and demanded that OPEC cut production so
> >>>>>>>> as to raise oil prices:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/special-report-trump-told-saudi-cut-oil-supply-or-lose-us-military-support--idUSKBN22C1V3/>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Plus on future oil prices, Trump set the stage for those being higher
> >>>>>>>> too after his term, by expanding bans on domestic exploration drilling,
> >>>>>>>> calling himself a "great environmentalist":
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> <https://www.npr.org/2020/09/26/917309717/as-election-nears-trump-expands-moratorium-on-exploratory-drilling-in-atlantic>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Your claims have been debunked by the facts, and for you to try to blame
> >>>>>>>>>> the messenger instead of yourself for being wrong is pathetically lame.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Whatever. What you call facts is only bullshit put out there to make the
> >>>>>>>>> people happy. I do the shopping. I know what is going on.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It ain't bullshit to cite historical industry data. Especially data
> >>>>>>>> that's been collected & published weekly for literally decades.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It ain't bullshit to note that you've cherry-picked from the CoVid price
> >>>>>>>> crash, instead being honest on what prices were 90%+ of the time.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And it ain't bullshit to note that you've avoided correcting me on what
> >>>>>>>> I said about your statements:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [quote]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "I couls afford to do stuff."
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> which you said that in context to your prior
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "I was better off when Trump was in office."
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You're trying to imply that you could afford stuff when Trump was in
> >>>>>>>> office, but now you can't.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [/quote]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You've claimed that gas was 2x more expensive.
> >>>>>>>> That's been proven false.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You've also claimed food was 2x more expensive.
> >>>>>>>> That's been proven false too.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Got anything else you want to try to falsely blame?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You're playing word games again. The fact is prices are higher on
> >>>>>>> everything.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Except that I didn't dispute prices going up: I merely debunked your
> >>>>>> claim that gas & groceries had doubled in less than four years.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The lies about crime also. Crime is on the rise.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're still making an empty claim not supported with substantiation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I live here idiot. I know what I see.
> >>>>
> >>>> Confirmation bias is a devious thing. Do you have clippings from your
> >>>> hometown newspaper articles for the past ~decade where you've actually
> >>>> kept track of the rates?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> What is a "handful" of apartment buildings?
> >>
> >> Apartment buildings? What are you smoking?
> >
> > Try to keep up.
> >>
> >>
> >>>> If not, you merely have an opinion.
> >>>
> >>> I live here.
> >>
> >> Doesn't mean that you've actually kept track of what's happening.
> >
> > But I do so deal with it.
>
> Except that the evidence you've provided shows the exact opposite: no
> credible national cost metric has reported that gas has gone up by 2x,
> nor groceries either.
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> I can waste
> >>>>>>> time arguing with you woke freaks. You all parrot each other. Like
> >>>>>>> Kamalla did you just spin around the topics.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unfortunately for you, I've substantiated what I've said. You only have
> >>>>>> your knee-jerk emotions which are not based in factual reality.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I live here. Try getting out sometime.
> >>>>
> >>>> Was just out yesterday for dinner. Crab cakes!
> >>>> Didn't see a single criminal act. Now what, Batman?
> >>>>
> >>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I've already cite National statistics, whereas you've tried to claim
> >> that you know better than that because of your little microcosm.
> >
> > I don't trust any of that shit.
>
> How do you even trust your local grocery store to be truthful in
> pricing? After all, they could be jacking up prices on your community
> to increase their own profits above inflation .. or even just targeting
> higher prices at a few customers they don't particularly like (eg.
> you!): you don't have access to their accounting books, so on what
> basis do you have to blindly trust them?
>
>
> >>
> >> I've got my microcosm too, but I also know to look beyond that for
> >> trends: why aren't you able to?
> >
> > I know the truth. That works for me.
>
>
> No, what you have is nothing more than a case of confirmation bias.
>
> Its similar to have you have a case of recency bias when it comes to
> your inadequately done retirement budget (lack of financial) plan.
>
>
> -hh

In article <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
says...
>
> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
> >
> > Do you think yours is?
> >
>
> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>
>
> [quote]
>
> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.

That is how a liberal spins shit.
>
> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>
> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>
> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?

Bullshit. Tell us how it affected your life when he was in office. Tell
us how it will affect you if he wins. <watch him spin away>
>
> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
> Period.

Only your side brings up race.

You are desperate because she is failing.
>
> [/quote]
>
>
> -hh

On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:

> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>>
>> Do you think yours is?
>>
>
> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>
>
> [quote]
>
> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.

Pretty much.
>
> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>
> “What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family?”
>
> When I ask that question I get blank stares, “that’s a good question”
> responses. “I don’t know, I just think the economy was better.”
>
> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
> Period.

I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
and the like.
>
> [/quote]
>
>
> -hh

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>
> > On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
> >>
> >> Do you think yours is?
> >>
> >
> > From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
> >
> >
> > [quote]
> >
> > I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
> > voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
> > are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>
> Pretty much.
> >
> > I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
> >
> > ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
> >
> > When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
> > responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
> >
> > All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
> > Period.
>
> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
> and the like.
>

No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.

On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>>>>
>>>> Do you think yours is?
>>>>
>>>
>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>>>
>>>
>>> [quote]
>>>
>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>>
>> Pretty much.
>>>
>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>>>
>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>>>
>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>>>
>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>>> Period.
>>
>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>> and the like.
>>
>
> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.

OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
that, here are some examples:

1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
were “very fine people on both sides.” This was widely seen as equivocating
between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should “knock the
crap out of” protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
3. Calling for ‘liberation’ of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
2020, Trump tweeted to “LIBERATE” states like Michigan and Virginia, where
protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
..
4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for “incitement of
insurrection” following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to “fight like hell”
and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
the violence that ensued .

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>
> >>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you think yours is?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [quote]
> >>>
> >>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
> >>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
> >>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
> >>
> >> Pretty much.
> >>>
> >>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
> >>>
> >>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
> >>>
> >>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
> >>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
> >>>
> >>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
> >>> Period.
> >>
> >> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
> >> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
> >> and the like.
> >>
> >
> > No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>
> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
> that, here are some examples:
>
> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
> .
> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
> the violence that ensued .

I wont read your bullshit. Things were better. Kamala is failing and you
are desperate.

On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think yours is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [quote]
>>>>>
>>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>>>>
>>>> Pretty much.
>>>>>
>>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>>>>>
>>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>>>>>
>>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>>>>>
>>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>>>>> Period.
>>>>
>>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>>>> and the like.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>>
>> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
>> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
>> that, here are some examples:
>>
>> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
>> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
>> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
>> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
>> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
>> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
>> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
>> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
>> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
>> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
>> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
>> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
>> .
>> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
>> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
>> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
>> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
>> the violence that ensued .
>
> I wont read your bullshit.

In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
supremacy push you like.

> Things were better. Kamala is failing and you
> are desperate.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <671670a3$1$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Do you think yours is?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [quote]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
> >>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
> >>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Pretty much.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
> >>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
> >>>>> Period.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
> >>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
> >>>> and the like.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
> >>
> >> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
> >> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
> >> that, here are some examples:
> >>
> >> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
> >> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
> >> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
> >> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
> >> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
> >> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
> >> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
> >> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
> >> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
> >> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
> >> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
> >> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
> >> .
> >> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
> >> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
> >> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
> >> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
> >> the violence that ensued .
> >
> > I wont read your bullshit.
>
> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
> supremacy push you like.

Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.
>
> > Things were better. Kamala is failing and you
> > are desperate.

<crickets>

On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:39:18 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<6716758f$0$3825$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <671670a3$1$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you think yours is?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [quote]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>>>>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>>>>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pretty much.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>>>>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>>>>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>>>>>> and the like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>>>>
>>>> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
>>>> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
>>>> that, here are some examples:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
>>>> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
>>>> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
>>>> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
>>>> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
>>>> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
>>>> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
>>>> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
>>>> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
>>>> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
>>>> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
>>>> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
>>>> .
>>>> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
>>>> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
>>>> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
>>>> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
>>>> the violence that ensued .
>>>
>>> I wont read your bullshit.
>>
>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
>> supremacy push you like.
>
> Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.

You are a coward who runs from facts and do not let them "run" your thinking.
Sorta my point.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2024-10-21, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <671670a3$1$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Do you think yours is?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [quote]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>> >>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>> >>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Pretty much.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>> >>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>> >>>>> Period.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>> >>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>> >>>> and the like.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>> >>
>> >> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
>> >> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
>> >> that, here are some examples:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
>> >> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
>> >> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
>> >> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
>> >> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
>> >> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
>> >> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
>> >> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
>> >> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
>> >> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
>> >> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
>> >> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
>> >> .
>> >> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
>> >> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
>> >> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
>> >> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
>> >> the violence that ensued .
>> >
>> > I wont read your bullshit.
>>
>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
>> supremacy push you like.
>
> Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.

Meanwhile Trump has done more for the blacks during his 4 years
as POTUS while the democrats have been mostly lip service.

Snit just parrots the standard libby talking points.
He resorts to ChatGPT because he is unable to think for himself.
Being a parasite as well, snit gobbles up the freebies and loathes
people who actually work hard to become successful.

>> > Things were better. Kamala is failing and you
>> > are desperate.
>
><crickets>

What can he say?
Kamala came out of hiding, people got to see the real Kamala Harris
and they don't like what they see.

Groups, like some unions, that have traditionally been democrat supporters
refuse to endorse Kamala.
She's losing the black vote as well as Trump is siphoning some of them
as well.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On Oct 21, 2024 at 10:13:36 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<vf623v$11ajs$2@dont-email.me>:

> On 2024-10-21, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <671670a3$1$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>
>>>> In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you think yours is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [quote]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>>>>>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>>>>>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pretty much.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>>>>>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>>>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>>>>>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>>>>>>> and the like.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
>>>>> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
>>>>> that, here are some examples:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
>>>>> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
>>>>> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
>>>>> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
>>>>> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
>>>>> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
>>>>> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
>>>>> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
>>>>> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
>>>>> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
>>>>> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
>>>>> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
>>>>> .
>>>>> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
>>>>> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
>>>>> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
>>>>> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
>>>>> the violence that ensued .
>>>>
>>>> I wont read your bullshit.
>>>
>>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
>>> supremacy push you like.
>>
>> Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.
>
> Meanwhile Trump has done more for the blacks during his 4 years
> as POTUS while the democrats have been mostly lip service.

His support for white supremacy is not helping.

> Snit just parrots the standard libby talking points.

Interesting way to admit you have no counter.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <67168f27$2$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 21, 2024 at 10:13:36 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
> <vf623v$11ajs$2@dont-email.me>:
>
> > On 2024-10-21, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <671670a3$1$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>> <67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you think yours is?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [quote]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
> >>>>>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
> >>>>>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Pretty much.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
> >>>>>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
> >>>>>>>> Period.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
> >>>>>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
> >>>>>>> and the like.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
> >>>>> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
> >>>>> that, here are some examples:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
> >>>>> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
> >>>>> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
> >>>>> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
> >>>>> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
> >>>>> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
> >>>>> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
> >>>>> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
> >>>>> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
> >>>>> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
> >>>>> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
> >>>>> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
> >>>>> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
> >>>>> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
> >>>>> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
> >>>>> the violence that ensued .
> >>>>
> >>>> I wont read your bullshit.
> >>>
> >>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
> >>> supremacy push you like.
> >>
> >> Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.
> >
> > Meanwhile Trump has done more for the blacks during his 4 years
> > as POTUS while the democrats have been mostly lip service.
>
> His support for white supremacy is not helping.

Show us how he supports that.
>
> > Snit just parrots the standard libby talking points.
>
> Interesting way to admit you have no counter.

You have nothing to counter.

On 10/21/24 8:49 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vf5e9i$jsii$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> says...
>>
>> On 10/20/24 9:26 PM, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <vf3sbi$iukn$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/20/24 12:11 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <67147f6a$2$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:06:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <6714658e$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <67145de2$0$212405$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:46:33 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <JpYQO.243587$1m96.51316@fx15.iad>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2024 at 1:35:02 PM MST, "-hh" wrote <vep81m$28g54$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 8:05 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 5:54 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2024 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that there's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were you "in the navy" Huntzy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuz you are as gay as a swabbie with no shore leave.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll bet hh volunteered to take other sailors "night in the barrel", if you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get my drift.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pun intended.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, we certainly do: you know that you're mad because you can't dispute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facts on the topic, so you try to "Shoot the Messenger" instead. Lame.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mad?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I stopped getting mad when I was about 12 yo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a waste of energy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if you're denying that it is due to anger, then what *was* your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation to sling such a lame Ad Hominem? After all, you did choose
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to post, so there must have been a reason. So if its not you being
>>>>>>>>>>>>> upset & butthurt again, then just what was your motivation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He seems unaware of his own emotional states... unless you have a signifiant
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue pretty much all people experience anger from time to time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to look up from my spreadsheet and observe what the world is is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's something you seem unable to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary: I find that worldviews are expanded by using objective
>>>>>>>>>>>>> data, and helps to reveal my own potential personal biases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Where Pothead makes things up, such as his recent claims that I am somehow
>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for Carroll's flood bot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can spin your numbers all day and night but the fact remains that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number 1 issue with voters is the economy/inflation and the polls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show that people blame Biden/Harris for the mess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that is a fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And people are _never_ deceived? Or make a mountain out of a mole hill?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Case in point:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially Biden was trying to convince the people that Bidenomics was working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So then, just what is the definition of "working" here?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if it is real wage increasing to catch up with inflation, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is already 98% of the way there by one metric, and is 102%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the way there by another metric.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still struggling based on Reagan and his absurd trickle down. Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>> work to redistribute money to the very rich did not help. Nor did the
>>>>>>>>>>>> pandemic. Nor the war in Ukraine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ironically, the Russians think this has been a very bad year for them also.
>>>>>>>>>>> They are going through some things.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The war they started is not going well for them. Turns out just tossing more
>>>>>>>>>> people to die at a war is not always a winning strategy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Amongst other nonfun things, the Russians have bombing their own people in
>>>>>>>>>>> territories like Bilhorod.
>>>>>>>>>>> For the past year.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The world should be harsher toward their aggression. Trump clearly would not
>>>>>>>>>> be if he wins.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cite?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No wars when he was in office.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In April 2017, Trump ordered missile strikes on a Syrian airbase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not a war.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additionally, Trump warned the Syrians not to use poison gas on their own citizens.
>>>>>> They tested Trump and he delivered on his promise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the difference between Trump and Biden.
>>>>>> Our ships are being fired upon in the Middle East and Biden does virtually nothing other than continue his weak policy of appeasement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump ramped up military operations in Afghanistan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To end a war.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> And Biden/Harris managed to botch that one as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> But since you pendants are using the "not a war" bit because Congress
>>>>> never declared one, nothing about Afghanistan counts for Biden either.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>
>>>> 13 dead soldiers.
>>
>> 1/5th as many casualties as Trump had during his tenure.
>
> So that makes it ok? You idiot.

On Oct 21, 2024 at 12:16:55 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<6716a8a9$1$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

>>>>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
>>>>> supremacy push you like.
>>>>
>>>> Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile Trump has done more for the blacks during his 4 years
>>> as POTUS while the democrats have been mostly lip service.
>>
>> His support for white supremacy is not helping.
>
> Show us how he supports that.

You have recently said you pay attention. Thanks for admitting you do not.

Just some things you can look up:

Charlottesville where he said there were fine people on both sides, one side
being white supremacists. The "defense" of this was he meant a more broad
group of people denouncing blacks and not just the direct white supremacists.

In a debate where he asked the white supremacist group "Proud Boy" to "stand
by".

Trump repeatedly was asked about such groups and refused to denounce them
(though later did, under pressure).

Earned the support of David Duke and never denounced it.

Pushed openly racist immigration policies.

Ended diversity training.

Repeated use of bigoted language such as "China virus" and "Kung Flu"

Spoke of protecting "suburban housewives", a clear dog whistle.

On and on and on.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <6716c302$1$3620719$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 21, 2024 at 12:16:55 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <6716a8a9$1$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> >>>>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
> >>>>> supremacy push you like.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.
> >>>
> >>> Meanwhile Trump has done more for the blacks during his 4 years
> >>> as POTUS while the democrats have been mostly lip service.
> >>
> >> His support for white supremacy is not helping.
> >
> > Show us how he supports that.
>
> You have recently said you pay attention. Thanks for admitting you do not.

I answered you didn't I?
>
> Just some things you can look up:
>
> Charlottesville where he said there were fine people on both sides, one side
> being white supremacists. The "defense" of this was he meant a more broad
> group of people denouncing blacks and not just the direct white supremacists.
>
> In a debate where he asked the white supremacist group "Proud Boy" to "stand
> by".
>
> Trump repeatedly was asked about such groups and refused to denounce them
> (though later did, under pressure).
>
> Earned the support of David Duke and never denounced it.
>
> Pushed openly racist immigration policies.
>
> Ended diversity training.
>
> Repeated use of bigoted language such as "China virus" and "Kung Flu"
>
> Spoke of protecting "suburban housewives", a clear dog whistle.
>
> On and on and on.

Old news. Why were they booing her at her rally?

On 21 Oct 2024 01:05:39 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:17:41?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
><d65bhjpm6220b9joe669sugmv9bt0utpdh@4ax.com>:
>
>> On 20 Oct 2024 03:31:33 GMT, Snit wrote:
>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:35:57?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>> On 19 Oct 2024 18:01:32 GMT, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 8:18:36?AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>> On 18 Oct 2024 21:46:15 GMT, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> I wish we had something closer to equal representation. With the Senate and
>>>>>>> the Electoral College we are FAR from that. Even the House is pretty far from
>>>>>>> it. I think the US would be MUCH better off if we had one adult citizen = one
>>>>>>> vote, and each vote counted the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pure democracy? That would be untenable in a nation of more than 300,000,000
>>>>>> citizens.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, we would still have representatives... but something closer to equal
>>>>> representation. Not the nonsense now where some people have 20x the
>>>>> representational power of others.
>>>>
>>>> Where does that occur?
>>>
>>> Wyoming vs. California. Doing some research now.
>>>
>>> That was what I was thinking for the Senate... but it is MUCH worse than that
>>> there.
>>>
>>> In the Senate:
>>>
>>> Wyoming: 1 senator represents about 290,000 people.
>>> California: 1 senator represents about 20 million people.
>>>
>>> That means about a 1:69 representational inequality.
>>>
>>> In the House:
>>>
>>> Wyoming: 1 representative for ~580,000 people
>>> California: 1 representative for every ~770,000 people
>>
>> Then the solution is to send 200,000 Californians to Wyoming?
>
>A friend of mine has said he wants to see state lines redrawn every 10 years
>to keep roughly the same level of population in each state. Not sure I like
>your idea any better than his. LOL!
>>
>>> That means even in the house a about a 1:1.3 representational inequality.
>>>
>>> Wyoming has 3 electoral votes for about 580,000 people, or ~193,000 people per
>>> electoral vote.
>>> California has 55 electoral votes for nearly 40 million people, or ~727,000
>>> people per electoral vote.
>>>
>>> This means a 1:3.8 representational inequality
>>
>> I agree that in modern times the EC is not a good idea. However, the
>> representational issues you note are due to the fact that every state gets two
>> senators regardless of population.
>
>Right. But that leads to GROSSLY disproportionate representation, 5x worse
>than what we had at the start of the country.

You're wrong here.

Every state has always had two Senators.

This is why we have two legislative Houses. The House is the house of the
people (representation by population), the Senate is the house of the states
(each state gets an equal voice).

I have no problem with that system. I have no problem with the EC, as such. The
problem I have is with the winner take all system most states employ. Imo,
electors should be apportioned according to the distribution of votes among the
candidates. If Joe Schmo gets 60% of the votes, he should get 60% of the
electors, not all of them.
>>> And yet California citizens give, on average, about $5000 a year to the US
>>> government, and each Wyoming citizen GETS a bit under $7000.
>>>
>>> Those who have the least representation are giving the most. Those with the
>>> most representation are getting massive support from the Federal government.
>>
>> These things are all arguable.
>>
>> It would require a fundamental rewriting of the Constitution to change this.
>
>Right. I do not expect it to change. It is, though, key to many of the issues
>we have in this country, IMNSHO.

It does prevent the majority from riding roughshod over the minority, but it
also sometimes allows the minority to dictate to the majority.

>> Do
>> you really think that in such a divisive, highly partisan political environment
>> as we have today, that such a rewrite would be a good idea?
>
>Good idea or not, it would never pass.
>>
>> The problem is that, like most foreigners, you do not understand the "United
>> STATES of America". The US is not as singular a country as most, but is in
>> fact, an assemblage of separate countries, aka 'states'.
>>
>> The House represents the population of the US, the Senate represents the States
>> of the US.
>>
>> The population votes and each state votes.
>
>And this leads to many issues.
>>
>> It is the states, not the population, who ultimately select the POTUS.
>>
>> I find that a better solution than Britain's of allowing the Parliament
>> (Congress) to select the Prime Minister (POTUS) any time the PM (POTUS) no
>> longer has the support of a majority of the members of Parliament (Congress).
>
>I *wish* we had something closer to equal representation but I know we are not
>going to get it. Might lead to the downfall of the country.

Representation in Congress works fine. It's the two party system that's
bleeding us dry.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 01:17:33 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>Another one of those convienient friends that kind of come and go snit?
>Whatever happened to Jeremy the computer expert at Walmart?
>Larry Washington?
>The people in the canoe whose lives you saved because you had extra life vests?
>For someone who claims to be mostly home bound, you sure do get around.
>
>You are so FOS it's leaking down your legs and anyone who believes a word you spew is a total idiot.
>Just like you.

Why, Snit! I do believe you struck a nerve!

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 07:33:43 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>Only your side brings up race.

<laughs and points>

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On 21 Oct 2024 13:50:11 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43?AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>>>
>>> Do you think yours is?
>>
>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>>
>> [quote]
>>
>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>
>Pretty much.

+1

>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>>
>> “What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family?”
>>
>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, “that’s a good question”
>> responses. “I don’t know, I just think the economy was better.”
>>
>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>> Period.
>
>I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>and the like.

Peer pressure.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:12:20 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>> >>
>> >>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>> >>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Do you think yours is?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [quote]
>> >>>
>> >>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>> >>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>> >>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>> >>
>> >> Pretty much.
>> >>>
>> >>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>> >>>
>> >>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>> >>>
>> >>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>> >>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>> >>>
>> >>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>> >>> Period.
>> >>
>> >> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>> >> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>> >> and the like.
>> >>
>> >
>> > No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>>
>> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
>> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
>> that, here are some examples:
>>
>> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
>> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
>> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
>> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
>> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
>> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
>> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
>> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
>> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
>> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
>> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
>> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
>> .
>> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
>> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
>> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
>> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
>> the violence that ensued .
>
>I wont read your bullshit.

Run, little girl! RUN!

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:39:18 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <671670a3$1$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:12:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <67166f18$0$1428124$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <67166ea9$0$3830$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 21, 2024 at 7:09:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> <671660ac$0$2385536$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <67165c13$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2024 at 5:09:43 AM MST, "-hh" wrote <vf5ga7$ufks$1@dont-email.me>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 10/20/24 8:31 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:36:11 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Damn you're dumb. Do you think your little bubble is the whole country?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Do you think yours is?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> From: <https://x.com/PamKeithFL/status/1848126596663898590>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [quote]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I am learning while I knock doors that when people tell me they are
>> >>>>> voting for Trump because of the economy, they are really telling me they
>> >>>>> are voting for Trump because of white supremacy.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Pretty much.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I reach that conclusion because one follow up questions leaves them stumped:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ?What Trump policy has actually helped you or your family??
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> When I ask that question I get blank stares, ?that?s a good question?
>> >>>>> responses. ?I don?t know, I just think the economy was better.?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> All of it is bullshit. All of it. They are voting for white supremacy.
>> >>>>> Period.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I would also say some vote for Trump because those around them do and they do
>> >>>> not really look much into politics. Or they buy into the propaganda from Fox
>> >>>> and the like.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> No idiot. We live here. We see what's going on.
>> >>
>> >> OK, go on. Give clear policies of Trump you think are good and explain why
>> >> this overrides his push for division and violence. Before you deny he does
>> >> that, here are some examples:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Charlottesville, 2017: After the white supremacist rally in
>> >> Charlottesville, Virginia, where one person was killed, Trump stated there
>> >> were ?very fine people on both sides.? This was widely seen as equivocating
>> >> between white nationalists and those protesting against them .
>> >> 2. Encouraging violence at rallies: During his 2016 presidential
>> >> campaign, Trump made several comments at rallies that seemed to endorse
>> >> violence. For instance, he suggested to his supporters they should ?knock the
>> >> crap out of? protesters and offered to pay their legal fees .
>> >> 3. Calling for ?liberation? of states during COVID-19 lockdowns: In
>> >> 2020, Trump tweeted to ?LIBERATE? states like Michigan and Virginia, where
>> >> protesters, some armed, opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures. Many saw this as a
>> >> call to arms that fueled confrontations between protesters and law enforcement
>> >> .
>> >> 4. January 6 Capitol Riot, 2021: Trump was impeached for ?incitement of
>> >> insurrection? following the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. In a
>> >> speech just before the riot, Trump urged his followers to ?fight like hell?
>> >> and march to the Capitol. Critics argue this speech directly contributed to
>> >> the violence that ensued .
>> >
>> > I wont read your bullshit.
>>
>> In short: you run. Like a coward. You cannot defend Trump... it is his white
>> supremacy push you like.
>
>Unlike you I don't let shit like that run my thinking. You do.

By 'shit like that' you mean, facts?

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On 21 Oct 2024 17:28:07 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 21, 2024 at 10:13:36?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<snip>
>> Meanwhile Trump has done more for the blacks during his 4 years
>> as POTUS while the democrats have been mostly lip service.
>
>His support for white supremacy is not helping.
>
>> Snit just parrots the standard libby talking points.
>
>Interesting way to admit you have no counter.

What Trump has done for blacks is a myth.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"