In news:ipdRO.265547$EEm7.190005@fx16.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<rudy@phil.hendrie.con> typed:

> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>> In news:RbaQO.268839$kxD8.135219@fx11.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>> In news:XnsB20C545F2D905629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>> noemail@aol.com typed:
>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:

>>>>>> "She debated all her primary opponents"

>>>>> See aobve:[sic]

>>>>> In ".....all five of her elections"

>>>> Except this one.

>>> She didn't run in any primaries in the last presidential election cycle,...

>> Tru dat. She pulled out before the primaries in 2020.

>>> ...so she had no reason to debate any primary opponents.

>> Yet she did participate in the five debates before her withdrawal.

> There weren't any *primary* debates before her withdrawal...

Wrong, as usual, Cunt Flaps.

In news:XBdRO.249352$1m96.153956@fx15.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<rudy@phil.hendrie.con> typed:

> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>> In news:M6dRO.418757$FzW1.233864@fx14.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza, typed:
>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>> In news:5NdQO.410990$WOde.206416@fx09.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza, typed:
>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>>>> In news:XnsB20C53D3C84BB629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>> <noemail@aotyl.com> typed:
>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:670e6284$4$212420$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB20BD0725778B629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:670d5bac$1$2873011
>>>>>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB20B8096B80D629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB20A58A3A71FD629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB209CEFA07523629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB208DC8B5D74A629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holman noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB20850A48CF14629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holman noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, Max the Magnanimous typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB2077F6536748629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holman <noemail@aol.com> typed:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> She debated all her primary opponents,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did Kamalalala debate all her primary opponents in 2024?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala had no primary opponets to debate.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the Democrat challengers had no Kamalalala to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debate.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What "Democratic challengers"?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't remember the debate between Marianne Williamson and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dean Phillips in New Hampshire or the debate between Gabriel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cornejo, Stephen Lyons, Jason Palmer, and Frank Lozada last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> January?

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala was not running for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> president in January.

>>>>>>>>>>>> So she *didn't* debate all her primary opponents. I'm glad we
>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared that up.

>>>>>>>>>>> She had no primary opponents.

>>>>>>>>>> Why was that?

>>>>>>>>> Because she wasn't running for
>>>>>>>>> president in the primaries.

>>>>>>>>>>> Who was she supposed to debate?

>>>>>>>>> Well?

>>>>>>>> The point is they "put" her there.

>>>>>>> The point is you are slamming Kamala
>>>>>>> for not debating opponents who didn't exist.

>>>>>> Except they did.

>>>>> No, they didn't. When she withdrew from the race *before* any primaries,
>>>>> she no longer had any primary opponents.

>>>> We've already established that she never entered any primaries in 2024 from
>>>> which to withdraw.

>>> We were talking about 2020,...

>> Wrong again, Cunt Flaps. We're obviously talking about 2024. BTW, Kamalalala
>> participated in five debates in 2020..

> No, Your Grace. We were talking about 2020.

Start reading at the top and try (with your limited intellect) to determine
where you went wrong.

>>> ... Try to keep up.

>>>> You're wrong again, Cunt Flaps.

>>>>> I'm a fucking moron. You know this.

>>>> Everyone knows this.

And if they didn't before today, they do now.

On 10/20/2024 12:46 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
> *failed* — to bullshit:
>
>> In news:5NdQO.410990$WOde.206416@fx09.iad, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>> <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> typed:
>>
>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
>>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
>>> *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>> In news:XnsB20C53D3C84BB629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>> <noemail@aotyl.com> typed:
>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:670e6284$4$212420$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>> In article <XnsB20BD0725778B629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:670d5bac$1$2873011
>>>>>>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB20B8096B80D629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters
>>>>>>>>> at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch,
>>>>>>>>> tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB20A58A3A71FD629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters
>>>>>>>>>>> at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch,
>>>>>>>>>>> tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB209CEFA07523629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
>>>>>>>>>>>>> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB208DC8B5D74A629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holman noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB20850A48CF14629555@185.151.15.190, Mitchell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holman noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waters at the thought of his mommy's warm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XnsB2077F6536748629555@185.151.15.190,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <noemail@aol.com> typed:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      She debated all her primary opponents,
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did Kamalalala debate all her primary opponents in 2024?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      Kamala had no primary opponets to debate.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the Democrat challengers had no Kamalalala to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debate.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     What "Democratic challengers"?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't remember the debate between Marianne Williamson and
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dean Phillips in New Hampshire or the debate between Gabriel
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cornejo, Stephen Lyons, Jason Palmer, and Frank Lozada last
>>>>>>>>>>>> January?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Kamala was not running for
>>>>>>>>>>> president in January.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> So she *didn't* debate all her primary opponents. I'm glad we
>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>> that up.
>>
>>>>>>>>>       She had no primary opponents.
>>
>>>>>>>> Why was that?
>>
>>>>>>>         Because she wasn't running for
>>>>>>> president in the primaries.
>>
>>>>>>>>>       Who was she supposed to debate?
>>
>>>>>>>          Well?
>>
>>>>>> The point is they "put" her there.
>>
>>>>>      The point is you are slamming Kamala
>>>>> for not debating opponents who didn't exist.
>>
>>>> Except they did.
>>
>>> No, they didn't. When she withdrew from the race *before* any
>>> primaries, she
>>> no longer had any primary opponents.
>>
>> We've already established that she never entered any primaries in 2024
>
> We were talking about 2020,

The year of the stolen election. History will note this fact.