A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
their repeated attacks

Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
left-leaning pages

Written by Kayla Gogarty & Spencer Silva

Research contributions from Carly Evans

A new nine-month Media Matters study of Facebook pages that regularly post
about American political news looked at two different measures of
performance and found that right-leaning pages outperformed left-leaning
pages or performed similarly to them. Right-leaning pages consistently
earned more average weekly interactions than left-leaning pages, while both
types of pages earned similar engagement rates -- a measure of performance
that accounts for interactions as well as numbers of page likes and posts.

Key findings include:

Right-leaning pages earned more interactions than left-leaning and
nonaligned pages. Between January 1 and September 30, right-leaning
Facebook pages tallied more than 6 billion interactions (reactions,
comments, shares), or 43% of total interactions earned by pages posting
about American political news, despite accounting for only 26% of posts.
Pages without a political alignment drew fewer interactions even though
they created the most total posts. Our group of nonaligned pages, many of
them from traditional media outlets, posted more than 3.2 million times --
roughly 59% of total posts -- yet accounted for just 30% of total
interactions.
Left-leaning pages were less active than right-leaning or nonaligned
pages. These pages posted the least, had the fewest number of page likes,
and earned the fewest interactions.
Right-leaning and left-leaning pages had similar interaction rates, a
performance metric that measures engagement of a Facebook page in relation
to the number of page likes and how frequently it shares posts. In other
words, although right-leaning pages drew more interactions overall, they
had similar performance to left-leaning pages when accounting for left-
leaning pages' fewer page likes and posts.

Jump to section...

Without any evidence, conservatives repeatedly claim that they are
being censored

For years, right-wing media and conservative politicians have claimed
that social media and tech companies are biased against them and censor
their content, despite copious data proving otherwise. In a new study,
Media Matters again found no evidence of this alleged censorship. In fact,
we found that right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions than
left-leaning or ideologically nonaligned pages.

One recent example of how right-wing media deploy these censorship
claims came on October 14, when Twitter and Facebook limited the
circulation of a controversial and unverified New York Post story about
Hunter Biden (son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden) that was
ostensibly reported from hacked materials. President Donald Trump,
Republican lawmakers, and right-wing pundits immediately started alleging
that social media companies were showing systematic bias against them by
limiting their ability to share the story.

The argument isn�t new. For years, conservatives have claimed that
Facebook scrubs right-leaning content from its site and that its algorithm
directs traffic away from pages with a conservative bent. As Media Matters
and others have demonstrated again and again, no such bias exists.

In fact, recent reporting suggests the opposite might be true.
Facebook�s algorithm is known to amplify content that evokes an emotional
response, reward sensational and partisan content, and contribute to
polarization. When Facebook tweaked its algorithm to reduce partisan
content in 2017, the platform reportedly throttled traffic away from
progressive news sites like Mother Jones while explicitly avoiding taking
similar actions against conservative outlets like The Daily Wire and other
�right-wing �junk sites.��
New study finds that right-leaning pages are actually outperforming
left-leaning and nonaligned pages in terms of average weekly interactions

In this latest study, Media Matters used CrowdTangle data to compile
and analyze millions of posts from right-leaning, left-leaning, and
ideologically nonaligned Facebook pages that were posted between January 1,
2020, and September 30, 2020. All the pages in this study regularly post
about American political news.

The study found that right-leaning pages and left-leaning pages
consistently outperformed ideologically nonaligned pages in terms of
average weekly interactions. Right-leaning pages consistently earned more
average weekly interactions than either left-leaning or ideologically
nonaligned pages. These findings are consistent with findings from previous
Media Matters studies that analyzed the performance of Facebook pages that
post about American political news.
Right-leaning pages earned more total interactions than left-leaning or
nonaligned pages, despite accounting for only a quarter of posts

Between January 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020, right-leaning pages
earned over 6 billion interactions, which is 43% of all engagement on posts
from the Facebook pages in our study. In comparison, left-leaning Facebook
pages earned over 3.5 billion interactions, and nonaligned pages earned
over 4.2 billion interactions.

Total interactions earned on posts from Facebook pages that post about
U.S. political news

Even though right-leaning pages garner consistently high engagement on
posts, they do not post nearly as much content as nonaligned pages. Right-
leaning pages shared over 1.4 million posts, or almost 26% of all posts
from Facebook pages posting about U.S. politics in our study. Nonaligned
pages shared over 3.2 million or nearly 60% of all posts.

Left-leaning pages are less active than either right-leaning or
nonaligned pages. Posts from left-leaning pages accounted for less than 16%
of posts from the pages in our study and earned only 26% of all
interactions.

Engagement data on posts from Facebook pages that post about U.S.
political news

The discrepancy in average weekly interactions � with right-leaning
pages higher than left-leaning and nonaligned pages � was consistent over
the nine-month study period, with the exception of five weeks in which
nonaligned pages narrowly earned more interactions. Nonaligned pages also
generally earned more average interactions each week compared to left-
leaning pages.

Average weekly interactions on Facebook pages that post about U.S.
political news
Right-leaning and left-leaning pages consistently had higher
interaction rates than nonaligned pages

Interaction rate is a performance metric that measures engagement of a
Facebook page in relation to the number of page likes and how frequently it
shares posts. Between January 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020, right-
leaning pages had an average interaction rate of 0.64%. Left-leaning pages
had a slightly higher rate of 0.75%, but this higher interaction rate was
not maintained over the full nine-month period. A likely explanation for
this higher rate is the smaller overall size and activity level of left-
leaning pages relative to the dominance of their right-leaning
counterparts.

These interaction rates for ideologically aligned pages are three times
higher than the average interaction rate (0.21%) of nonaligned pages over
the same time period. The disparity between average interaction rates for
partisan and nonpartisan pages was consistent throughout the studied time
period, with right-leaning and left-leaning pages maintaining similar
weekly average interaction rates while nonaligned pages had much lower
rates.
Methodology

Using CrowdTangle, Media Matters compiled a list of 1,773 Facebook
pages that frequently posted about U.S. politics from January 1, 2020, to
August 25, 2020.

For an explanation of how we compiled pages and identified them as
right-leaning, left-leaning, or ideologically nonaligned, see the
methodology here.

The resulting list consisted of 771 right-leaning pages, 497
ideologically nonaligned pages, and 505 left-leaning pages.

Using CrowdTangle, Media Matters compiled weekly leaderboard data for
the largest 400 pages for each ideology for a nine-month period that
started on January 1, 2020, and ended on September 30, 2020.

We reviewed the data for these 1,200 pages, including total
interactions (reactions, comments, and shares), total posts, pages likes,
and interaction rate. CrowdTangle calculates the interaction rate of a
group of pages by dividing the total number of interactions (reactions,
comments, and shares) earned on all posts from the pages by the total
number of posts from the pages, and then dividing by average page likes for
the pages. For this calculation, average page likes is based on the page
likes for each page at the end of the time frame.

In article <vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team>, bork@bork.net says...
>
> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
> their repeated attacks
>
> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
> left-leaning pages
>
> Written by Kayla Gogarty & Spencer Silva
>
> Research contributions from Carly Evans
>
>
>
> A new nine-month Media Matters study of Facebook pages that regularly post
> about American political news looked at two different measures of
> performance and found that right-leaning pages outperformed left-leaning
> pages or performed similarly to them. Right-leaning pages consistently
> earned more average weekly interactions than left-leaning pages, while both
> types of pages earned similar engagement rates -- a measure of performance
> that accounts for interactions as well as numbers of page likes and posts.
>
> Key findings include:
>
> Right-leaning pages earned more interactions than left-leaning and
> nonaligned pages. Between January 1 and September 30, right-leaning
> Facebook pages tallied more than 6 billion interactions (reactions,
> comments, shares), or 43% of total interactions earned by pages posting
> about American political news, despite accounting for only 26% of posts.
> Pages without a political alignment drew fewer interactions even though
> they created the most total posts. Our group of nonaligned pages, many of
> them from traditional media outlets, posted more than 3.2 million times --
> roughly 59% of total posts -- yet accounted for just 30% of total
> interactions.
> Left-leaning pages were less active than right-leaning or nonaligned
> pages. These pages posted the least, had the fewest number of page likes,
> and earned the fewest interactions.
> Right-leaning and left-leaning pages had similar interaction rates, a
> performance metric that measures engagement of a Facebook page in relation
> to the number of page likes and how frequently it shares posts. In other
> words, although right-leaning pages drew more interactions overall, they
> had similar performance to left-leaning pages when accounting for left-
> leaning pages' fewer page likes and posts.
>
> Jump to section...
>
> Without any evidence, conservatives repeatedly claim that they are
> being censored
>
> For years, right-wing media and conservative politicians have claimed
> that social media and tech companies are biased against them and censor
> their content, despite copious data proving otherwise. In a new study,
> Media Matters again found no evidence of this alleged censorship. In fact,
> we found that right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions than
> left-leaning or ideologically nonaligned pages.
>
> One recent example of how right-wing media deploy these censorship
> claims came on October 14, when Twitter and Facebook limited the
> circulation of a controversial and unverified New York Post story about
> Hunter Biden (son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden) that was
> ostensibly reported from hacked materials. President Donald Trump,
> Republican lawmakers, and right-wing pundits immediately started alleging
> that social media companies were showing systematic bias against them by
> limiting their ability to share the story.
>
> The argument isn?t new. For years, conservatives have claimed that
> Facebook scrubs right-leaning content from its site and that its algorithm
> directs traffic away from pages with a conservative bent. As Media Matters
> and others have demonstrated again and again, no such bias exists.
>
> In fact, recent reporting suggests the opposite might be true.
> Facebook?s algorithm is known to amplify content that evokes an emotional
> response, reward sensational and partisan content, and contribute to
> polarization. When Facebook tweaked its algorithm to reduce partisan
> content in 2017, the platform reportedly throttled traffic away from
> progressive news sites like Mother Jones while explicitly avoiding taking
> similar actions against conservative outlets like The Daily Wire and other
> ?right-wing ?junk sites.??
> New study finds that right-leaning pages are actually outperforming
> left-leaning and nonaligned pages in terms of average weekly interactions
>
> In this latest study, Media Matters used CrowdTangle data to compile
> and analyze millions of posts from right-leaning, left-leaning, and
> ideologically nonaligned Facebook pages that were posted between January 1,
> 2020, and September 30, 2020. All the pages in this study regularly post
> about American political news.
>
> The study found that right-leaning pages and left-leaning pages
> consistently outperformed ideologically nonaligned pages in terms of
> average weekly interactions. Right-leaning pages consistently earned more
> average weekly interactions than either left-leaning or ideologically
> nonaligned pages. These findings are consistent with findings from previous
> Media Matters studies that analyzed the performance of Facebook pages that
> post about American political news.
> Right-leaning pages earned more total interactions than left-leaning or
> nonaligned pages, despite accounting for only a quarter of posts
>
> Between January 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020, right-leaning pages
> earned over 6 billion interactions, which is 43% of all engagement on posts
> from the Facebook pages in our study. In comparison, left-leaning Facebook
> pages earned over 3.5 billion interactions, and nonaligned pages earned
> over 4.2 billion interactions.
>
> Total interactions earned on posts from Facebook pages that post about
> U.S. political news
>
> Even though right-leaning pages garner consistently high engagement on
> posts, they do not post nearly as much content as nonaligned pages. Right-
> leaning pages shared over 1.4 million posts, or almost 26% of all posts
> from Facebook pages posting about U.S. politics in our study. Nonaligned
> pages shared over 3.2 million or nearly 60% of all posts.
>
> Left-leaning pages are less active than either right-leaning or
> nonaligned pages. Posts from left-leaning pages accounted for less than 16%
> of posts from the pages in our study and earned only 26% of all
> interactions.
>
> Engagement data on posts from Facebook pages that post about U.S.
> political news
>
> The discrepancy in average weekly interactions ? with right-leaning
> pages higher than left-leaning and nonaligned pages ? was consistent over
> the nine-month study period, with the exception of five weeks in which
> nonaligned pages narrowly earned more interactions. Nonaligned pages also
> generally earned more average interactions each week compared to left-
> leaning pages.
>
> Average weekly interactions on Facebook pages that post about U.S.
> political news
> Right-leaning and left-leaning pages consistently had higher
> interaction rates than nonaligned pages
>
> Interaction rate is a performance metric that measures engagement of a
> Facebook page in relation to the number of page likes and how frequently it
> shares posts. Between January 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020, right-
> leaning pages had an average interaction rate of 0.64%. Left-leaning pages
> had a slightly higher rate of 0.75%, but this higher interaction rate was
> not maintained over the full nine-month period. A likely explanation for
> this higher rate is the smaller overall size and activity level of left-
> leaning pages relative to the dominance of their right-leaning
> counterparts.
>
> These interaction rates for ideologically aligned pages are three times
> higher than the average interaction rate (0.21%) of nonaligned pages over
> the same time period. The disparity between average interaction rates for
> partisan and nonpartisan pages was consistent throughout the studied time
> period, with right-leaning and left-leaning pages maintaining similar
> weekly average interaction rates while nonaligned pages had much lower
> rates.
> Methodology
>
> Using CrowdTangle, Media Matters compiled a list of 1,773 Facebook
> pages that frequently posted about U.S. politics from January 1, 2020, to
> August 25, 2020.
>
> For an explanation of how we compiled pages and identified them as
> right-leaning, left-leaning, or ideologically nonaligned, see the
> methodology here.
>
> The resulting list consisted of 771 right-leaning pages, 497
> ideologically nonaligned pages, and 505 left-leaning pages.
>
> Using CrowdTangle, Media Matters compiled weekly leaderboard data for
> the largest 400 pages for each ideology for a nine-month period that
> started on January 1, 2020, and ended on September 30, 2020.
>
> We reviewed the data for these 1,200 pages, including total
> interactions (reactions, comments, and shares), total posts, pages likes,
> and interaction rate. CrowdTangle calculates the interaction rate of a
> group of pages by dividing the total number of interactions (reactions,
> comments, and shares) earned on all posts from the pages by the total
> number of posts from the pages, and then dividing by average page likes for
> the pages. For this calculation, average page likes is based on the page
> likes for each page at the end of the time frame.

[Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> typed:

>Max Headroom bitch-slapped "Cunt Flaps" Canoza when he typed:
>
>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>
>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>> their repeated attacks
>>
>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
>>> left-leaning pages...
>>
>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>"Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives, but I do continue to think
>about my Mom's oozing scarlet red maxipad and my mouth
>waters at the thought of my mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).

It's a known fact that Facebook was censoring conservatives, "Cunt
Flaps."

Obama told Zuck to get rid of any information he didn't like.

Facebook apologizes after labeling part of Declaration of Independence
‘hate speech’
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/facebook-post-hate-speech-delete-declaration-of-independence-mistake/index.html

>https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/facebook-post-hate-speech-delete-d
>
>

One day shooting right wingers will be an Olympic sport. They have
inferior intelligence and character, they don't belong.

>It's a known fact that Facebook was censoring conservatives

That's because all Conservatives do is lie.

If you don't fucking like it, tough shit.

Why are you avoiding Trump Social? Too shitty? No activity?

It's almost bankrupt.
Typical Trump enterprise.

Give him 4 more years and he'll bankrupt the country too.

In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe <bork@bork.net> typed:

> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
> their repeated attacks

> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
> left-leaning pages...

.... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives

[Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:

======================================
Fake Skeeter's
Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
repaired and restored.
======================================

>
>>https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/facebook-post-hate-speech-delete-d
>
>>
>>
>
>One day shooting right wingers will be an Olympic sport. They have
>inferior intelligence and character, they don't belong.

Except you morons (a) don't have any guns and (b) what guns you CAN
scrape together you don't know how to use, otherwise you would have
got Trump.

[chuckle]

In article <c4dRO.418660$FzW1.75806@fx14.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
says...
>
> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
> his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>
> > In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe <bork@bork.net> typed:
> >
> >> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
> >> their repeated attacks
> >
> >> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
> >> left-leaning pages...
> >
> > ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose
> mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).

They shadow ban them.

On 10/20/2024 2:45 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <c4dRO.418660$FzW1.75806@fx14.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
> says...
>>
>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
>> his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>>
>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>
>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>>> their repeated attacks
>>>
>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>
>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose
>> mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).
>
> They shadow ban them.
That's a lie. What they do is take down lies, all of which are posted by
neo-Nazi right-wingnuts like you. They are within their rights to do so.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

In article <2jpahjph2u0fqris9mupjdeg57dp4vpmk5
@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com>,
klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com says...
>
> [Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:
>
> ======================================
> Fake Skeeter's
> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
> repaired and restored.
> ======================================
>
>
> >
> >>https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/facebook-post-hate-speech-delete-d
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >One day shooting right wingers will be an Olympic sport. They have
> >inferior intelligence and character, they don't belong.
>
> Except you morons (a) don't have any guns and (b) what guns you CAN
> scrape together you don't know how to use, otherwise you would have
> got Trump.
>
> [chuckle]

Is Rudy forging me again?

Skeeter wrote:
> In article <2jpahjph2u0fqris9mupjdeg57dp4vpmk5
> @Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com>,
> klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com says...
>>
>> [Default] Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> typed:
>>
>> ======================================
>> Fake Skeeter's
>> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
>> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
>> repaired and restored.
>> ======================================
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/05/politics/facebook-post-hate-speech-delete-d
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> One day shooting right wingers will be an Olympic sport. They have
>>> inferior intelligence and character, they don't belong.
>>
>> Except you morons (a) don't have any guns and (b) what guns you CAN
>> scrape together you don't know how to use, otherwise you would have
>> got Trump.
>>
>> [chuckle]
>
> Is Rudy forging me again?
>
you and everybody else

On 10/20/2024 3:29 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <OUeRO.1906$rdS6.1473@fx02.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 10/20/2024 2:45 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <c4dRO.418660$FzW1.75806@fx14.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the thought of
>>>> his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried ? and *failed* ? to bullshit:
>>>>
>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>>>>> their repeated attacks
>>>>>
>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>
>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives, o oozing scarlet red maxipad (whose
>>>> mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch).
>>>
>>> They shadow ban them.
>> That's a lie. What they do is take down lies, all of which are posted by
>> neo-Nazi right-wingnuts like you. They are within their rights to do so.
>
> They are biased.

They're biased in favor of the truth.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

WILLMAR — A Willmar man charged in a 2021 sexual assault is free on bond and is next scheduled to appear Oct. 8 in Kandiyohi County District Court.

Charges were filed in August 2023 against Mohamed Abullahi Mohamed, 25, for allegedly sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in 2021. He was 22 years old at the time of the alleged assault, according to the filed criminal complaint.

Mohamed is charged with three felony counts of criminal sexual conduct, all alleging sexual penetration. One count in the first degree alleges fear of bodily harm. The two others are third-degree criminal sexual conduct, one of them alleging force or coercion.

https://cdn.forumcomm.com/dims4/default/b8280c1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/140x187+5+0/resize/330x440!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fforum-communications-production-web.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F88%2Fcb%2Ff94ecfbf4d5fbfe67a770a1f9922%2Fmohamed-mohamed-abdulahi.jpg
Mohamed Abdulahi Mohamed Contributed / Kandiyohi County Sheriff's Office

He was arrested on a warrant July 30 and appeared the next day.

Unconditional bail was set at $200,000 and bail with conditions at $100,000. He posted a $100,000 bond on Aug. 1. Conditions for Mohamed include turning over his passport within 24 hours after his release, having no contact with the alleged victim, and being barred from having unsupervised contact with minors under 18.

According to the criminal complaint, a Willmar police officer was dispatched to CentraCare — Rice Memorial Hospital in Willmar during the evening of Sept. 9, 2021, on a report of sexual assault.

The officer met with a nurse who disclosed what a 14-year-old female patient had told her. The nurse also indicated she had completed a sexual assault evidence collection kit.

Accompanied by a sexual assault advocate and a guardian, the female patient told the officer that she and another girl were at a gas station on South First Street in Willmar. When she came back outside from buying a beverage, the other girl was talking to a man.

According to the complaint, the girl recalled she did not want a ride from the male, as he seemed suspicious, but the two girls ended up getting a ride from him.

The girl told the officer about the driver making phone calls and driving around several areas in Willmar, eventually picking up another man identified as Mohamed.

She said she was sitting in the backseat of the vehicle while the other girl was sitting in the front passenger seat. Mohamed sat next to her in the backseat.

They later parked, and the other girl got out.

She said another vehicle then pulled in behind them, the driver turned off the vehicle and got in the backseat with her and Mohamed. Two other males from the vehicle behind them got into their vehicle.

According to the complaint, one male entered the passenger side of the vehicle and held her arms as another male entered the driver side and tried to hold her legs. The girl told the officer that at one point Mohamed asked her if she wanted to have sex and she replied no.

As they were exiting the car, the girl said Mohamed allegedly told everyone to hold up before he got close to her and pulled down her pants.

The girl said she screamed and the two males who had entered the car fled. She said Mohamed sexually assaulted her for approximately five to 10 minutes, and the driver then sexually assaulted her for approximately the same amount of time.

According to the complaint, Mohamed and the girl's friend returned to the car, and the girl said the four of them drove to Marshall as if nothing had happened.

The girl was able to identify Mohamed for the officer using social media, and officers used surveillance video at the gas station to identify a car linked to Mohamed, according to the complaint.

When Mohamed was interviewed by law enforcement at his residence in Willmar in November of 2021, he said he did not know the two girls but had let them use his phone to find a ride and later gave them a ride to Marshall himself after he picked up a male friend, according to the complaint.

Mohamed denied asking either girl for sex and said he had not been given anything in exchange for the ride.

In June of 2022, according to the complaint, DNA analysis provided by the state crime lab confirmed a match between a known sample from Mohamed and DNA on a swab collected from the 14-year-old girl.

https://www.wctrib.com/news/local/willmar-minnesota-man-charged-in-alleged-sexual-assault-reported-in-2021

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/republicaneagle.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/8/7a/87a506c9-4d27-5f28-9a62-eb1234cd91f4/608c8cfa57d32.image.jpg?resize=540%2C405
Caesar J. Moore

A New Richmond man is facing felony charges of sexual assault and intimidation of a victim stemming from an alleged May 6 incident at the Riverfront Inn in New Richmond.

According to the criminal complaint, the female victim was raped by Caesar J. Moore, her daughter’s boyfriend, at the hotel at about 9:15 a.m.

The woman, who is a long-term resident at the hotel, was scheduled to have surgery on her arm later in the day, and she text messaged her daughter and her daughter’s boyfriend to request their assistance afterward at her residence, according to the complaint.

Moore then entered the woman’s hotel room through the patio, violently forced himself on her and engaged in nonconsensual sexual intercourse, according to the complaint. Afterward, he washed himself in the bathroom sink and threatened to kill the woman’s daughter if she reported the incident to authorities. He then exited through the patio door.

Moore was later taken into custody without incident at a residence in the 600 block of West Eighth Street in New Richmond where he lives with the woman’s daughter. Because of the alleged death threat to the woman’s daughter and the knowledge that Moore owned firearms, police set up a perimeter around the home and advised Moore to give himself up.

The woman’s daughter was taken to Westfields Hospital for a possible exam of visible bruises and the allegation that Moore battered her, but she refused to cooperate with officers.

St. Croix County Circuit Court Judge Scott Needham set a cash bond at $10,000 at Moore’s initial court appearance on Wednesday, May 7.

Moore was scheduled to appear in court again on Tuesday, May 13 for a preliminary hearing.

https://www.republicaneagle.com/news/public_safety/local-man-charged-in-hotel-rape/article_07455325-2f70-5479-b528-bbecaa7b2d70.html

https://arc.stimg.co/startribunemedia/WHCY6NZ2VJITWJAP3H5ISJG5IM.jpg?&w=712
Johnson (The Minnesota Star Tribune)

A 29-year-old predatory offender dragged a woman from her Minneapolis front porch nearly a quarter-mile to a church parking lot and raped her, according to charges in the latest of several violent allegations against the man dating back to his mid-teens.

Tyree Terrell Johnson, of Crystal, was charged Friday in Hennepin County District Court with first-degree criminal sexual conduct in connection with the assault on June 24 that sent her to the hospital with facial injuries. Johnson was arrested Thursday and has a court appearance scheduled for Monday afternoon.

At the time of the alleged rape, Johnson was under intensive court-supervised release and registered with the state as a predatory offender following his conviction in Hennepin County adult court for a rape when he was 15 years old. He was sentenced to a nearly 16-year term, a length above state guidelines and served more than 10 years in prison.

In December 2018, Johnson was charged with murder in the shooting that October of 54-year-old Darren P. Watkins in a north Minneapolis alley. However, Johnson was acquitted in July 2019 of second-degree murder and two related misdemeanor counts.

In December 2019, Johnson was accused of domestic assault by strangulation. He was charged with a felony and two misdemeanor counts. He was acquitted in April of the felony but found guilty of misdemeanor domestic assault.

Paul Walsh • 612-673-4482

https://www.startribune.com/charge-predatory-offender-grabs-minneapolis-woman-off-porch-rapes-her-outside-church/571834451

On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
> *failed* — to bullshit:
>
>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>
>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>> their repeated attacks
>>
>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
>>> left-leaning pages...
>>
>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,

Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals <ear@slurp.biz>
wrote:

>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
>> *failed* — to bullshit:
>>
>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>
>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>>> their repeated attacks
>>>
>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>
>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>
>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.

Somebody has to do it.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
><ear@slurp.biz>
>wrote:
>
>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
>>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
>>> *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>
>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>
>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>>>> their repeated attacks
>>>>
>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook
>>>>> than
>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>
>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>
>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
>
>Somebody has to do it.
>

So you're against free speech.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:vf6vt5$161ik$1@dont-email.me:

> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
>><ear@slurp.biz>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at
>>>> the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried —
>>>> and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>
>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives
>>>>>> despite their repeated attacks
>>>>>
>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on
>>>>>> Facebook than
>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>
>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>>
>>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
>>
>>Somebody has to do it.
>>
>
> So you're against free speech.
>
>

So you are against private enterprise.

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB212D63B7DFB4629555@185.151.15.190...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>news:vf6vt5$161ik$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
>>><ear@slurp.biz>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at
>>>>> the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried —
>>>>> and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives
>>>>>>> despite their repeated attacks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on
>>>>>>> Facebook than
>>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>>>
>>>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
>>>
>>>Somebody has to do it.
>>>
>>
>> So you're against free speech.
>>
>>
>
> So you are against private enterprise.
>

This is not about private enterprise. The government told Twitter, Facebook,
Youtube etc. to suppress and delete accounts.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 10/21/2024 6:41 PM, Andrea W, lying trolling HIV-oozing Nazi whore, lied:

> "Governor Swill"  wrote in message
> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>>
>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals <ear@slurp.biz>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at the
>>>> thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and
>>>> *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>
>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives despite
>>>>>> their repeated attacks
>>>>>
>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on Facebook than
>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>
>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring conservatives
>>>>>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>>
>>> Yes they do.

No, spammy, you seditious little cunt, they don't.

>>>  One of their engineers just admitted it.

No, spammy, you seditious little cunt, he or she did not.

>>
>> Somebody has to do it.
>>
>
> So you're against free speech.

Facebook doesn't have to leave your lies up, Andrea, you HIV-oozing Nazi troll
whore. If you post inflammatory lies and Facebook takes them down, your free
speech rights have not been violated. You have a right to say whatever you want,
Andrea, you HIV-oozing Nazi troll whore, but Facebook doesn't have to carry your
speech.

"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:vf71jv$16boq$1@dont-email.me:

> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:XnsB212D63B7DFB4629555@185.151.15.190...
>>
>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>news:vf6vt5$161ik$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
>>>><ear@slurp.biz>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at
>>>>>> the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried
>>>>>> — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives
>>>>>>>> despite their repeated attacks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on
>>>>>>>> Facebook than
>>>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring
>>>>>>> conservatives
>>>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
>>>>
>>>>Somebody has to do it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So you're against free speech.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So you are against private enterprise.
>>
>
> This is not about private enterprise. The government told Twitter,
> Facebook, Youtube etc. to suppress and delete accounts.
>
>

PRove it.

In article <XnsB2134FCDC5A14629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
> news:vf71jv$16boq$1@dont-email.me:
>
> > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> > news:XnsB212D63B7DFB4629555@185.151.15.190...
> >>
> >>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
> >>news:vf6vt5$161ik$1@dont-email.me:
> >>
> >>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
> >>> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
> >>>><ear@slurp.biz>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at
> >>>>>> the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried
> >>>>>> � and *failed* � to bullshit:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
> >>>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives
> >>>>>>>> despite their repeated attacks
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on
> >>>>>>>> Facebook than
> >>>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring
> >>>>>>> conservatives
> >>>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
> >>>>
> >>>>Somebody has to do it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> So you're against free speech.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> So you are against private enterprise.
> >>
> >
> > This is not about private enterprise. The government told Twitter,
> > Facebook, Youtube etc. to suppress and delete accounts.
> >
> >
>
> PRove it.

You know it's true. Stop trolling.

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB2134FCDC5A14629555@185.151.15.190...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>news:vf71jv$16boq$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsB212D63B7DFB4629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>news:vf6vt5$161ik$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
>>>>><ear@slurp.biz>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at
>>>>>>> the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried
>>>>>>> — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives
>>>>>>>>> despite their repeated attacks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on
>>>>>>>>> Facebook than
>>>>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring
>>>>>>>> conservatives
>>>>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Somebody has to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you're against free speech.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So you are against private enterprise.
>>>
>>
>> This is not about private enterprise. The government told Twitter,
>> Facebook, Youtube etc. to suppress and delete accounts.
>>
>>
>
> PRove it.
>

The usual ignorant troll response.

https://reason.com/2023/09/11/the-5th-circuit-agrees-that-federal-officials-unconstitutionally-coerced-or-encouraged-online-censorship/
A federal appeals court on Friday upheld key parts of a preliminary
injunction against federal interference with content moderation on social
media platforms. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
5th Circuit unanimously agreed that the White House, Surgeon General Vivek
Murthy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI
had "coerced" or "significantly encouraged" the platforms, "in violation of
the First Amendment," to suppress speech that federal officials viewed as
dangerously inaccurate or misleading.

Why do you only follow left authorities and their convenient mass media like
CNN and MSNBC?
Which particular ones do you prefer?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB2134FCDC5A14629555@185.151.15.190...
>
>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>news:vf71jv$16boq$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsB212D63B7DFB4629555@185.151.15.190...
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>news:vf6vt5$161ik$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> news:dqtdhjdoq822o0o9br7l3ldd9p9q8ps7an@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:41:44 -0700, espinoza abortion rentals
>>>>><ear@slurp.biz>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 10/20/2024 12:44 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad, whose mouth waters at
>>>>>>> the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried
>>>>>>> — and *failed* — to bullshit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In news:vf3fln$27b5r$1@paganini.bofh.team, James O'Keefe
>>>>>>>> <bork@bork.net> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A new study finds that Facebook is not censoring conservatives
>>>>>>>>> despite their repeated attacks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Right-leaning pages consistently earn more interactions on
>>>>>>>>> Facebook than
>>>>>>>>> left-leaning pages...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... which has nothing to do with Fscebook censoring
>>>>>>>> conservatives
>>>>>>> "Fscebook" does not "censor" conservatives,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes they do. One of their engineers just admitted it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Somebody has to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you're against free speech.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So you are against private enterprise.
>>>
>>
>> This is not about private enterprise. The government told Twitter,
>> Facebook, Youtube etc. to suppress and delete accounts.
>>
>>
>
> PRove it.
>

Republicans were right: Zuckerberg admits Biden administration censored your
Facebook feed
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/28/facebook-censorship-covid-biden-harris-social-media/74966270007/

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site