On 10/11/24 11:35 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> [Default] Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>
>>> In that order.
>>
>> What a bitter man.
>
> Says the child molester

Sounds like you don't know that there's been surgeries like this which
have been going on for ~90 years: 20th Century advancements in medicine
resulted in babies being born with genetic anomalies undergoing
'corrective' surgery, sometimes even without the parent's knowledge.

Similarly, sometimes the child was never told of their medical history,
even after they became an adult: these got buried as 'family secrets'.

"In the United States genital reconstructive surgery was pioneered
between 1930 and 1960 by urologist Hugh Hampton Young and other surgeons
at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and other major university
centers.[11] Understanding of intersex conditions was relatively
primitive, based on identifying the type of gonad(s) by palpation or by
surgery. Since ability to determine even the type of gonads in infancy
was limited, sex of assignment and rearing were determined mainly by the
appearance of the external genitalia."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_intersex_surgery#Surgical_pioneering_and_constructed_gender>

So the real question here is ... is this something actually new?

Or is it merely a lame alarmist report of the status quo of an ongoing
medical practice which has literally existed for longer than you've been
alive, even if you've never personally heard of it?

-hh

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:15:40 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>[GAC] Surgery shouldn't be required to be trans[gender], but it should be available
>>>to people over 16 or 18 [depending on their level of transition].
>>
>>Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>
>>In that order.
>
>
>Idiot, phobe.

I agree with him.

If we can't trust young people to drink before 21, how can we trust them to make
such a drastic elective surgery decision?

--

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 24 days.

42) On January 13th, 2021, Trump became the only president
ever to be impeached twice. This time, he was charged with
incitement of insurrection. It was a bipartisan vote.
The majority of senators, 57 out of 100, voted to convict Trump,
including seven Republican senators.

43) Trump publicly sided with Putin over the U.S. intelligence
community in denying Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:15:40 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>[GAC] Surgery shouldn't be required to be trans[gender], but it should be available
>>>>to people over 16 or 18 [depending on their level of transition].
>>>
>>>Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>
>>>In that order.
>>
>>Idiot, phobe.
>
>I agree with him.
>
>If we can't trust young people to drink before 21, how can we trust them to make
>such a drastic elective surgery decision?

The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional, it should
be 18 or even 16.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional, it should
>be 18 or even 16.

Well, no, it's not.

But I can understand why a pedophile such as yourself would like to
give drugs to children.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional, it should
>>>be 18 or even 16.
>>
>>Well, no, it's not.
>>
>>But I can understand why a pedophile such as yourself would like to
>>give drugs to children.
>
>
>I can understand that

Yeah, it's no brainier with you people.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

<snip cowardly altering of quoting>

*PLONK* Goodbye, lame old boomer retard. Drop dead.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:01:53 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>> Are you sure?
>>>> You libbys don't seem to be able to tell the difference between a man and a
>>>> woman.
>>> And you consistently fail to do so.
>> These idiots think gender is a black and white. Sure, generally it is easy
>> to say "He's a man", "She's a woman." But they are congenitally unable to
>> grok:
>
>And just simple *freedom*. And pursuit of happiness. If it makes
>you happy to live as a woman, who am I to interfere?
>
>> - Guevedoces
>> - Hermaphroditism
>> - Intersex
>> - More?
>>
>> But sure, they love some woman-on-woman action:-D
>
>They wear out that spot on their _Hot Fuzz_ VHS tapes.

Why don't more straight guys go to see Scissor Sisters shows?

--

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 23 days.

44) In a likely obstruction of justice, Trump pressured
then-FBI Director James Comey to stop the FBI's investigation
into Trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn.
This was documented in the Mueller report.

45) When Comey didn't bend to Trump's will, Trump fired him.

On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:59:41 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this post; take it under advisement:
>
>> [Default] Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this post; take it under advisement:
>>>
>>>> [Default] Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In that order.
>>>>>
>>>>>What a bitter man.
>>>>
>>>> Says the child molester
>>>
>>>What? No.
>>
>> Hey, it's OK, man!
>>
>> Your love for exploiting defenseless children is common knowledge,
>> really.
>>
>> But I predict a wood chipper in your future unless you keep those
>> feelings to yourself.
>
>Idiot.

Klaus isn't an idiot.

He's an asshole.

--

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 23 days.

44) In a likely obstruction of justice, Trump pressured
then-FBI Director James Comey to stop the FBI's investigation
into Trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn.
This was documented in the Mueller report.

45) When Comey didn't bend to Trump's will, Trump fired him.

Governor Swill wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 06:59:41 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this post; take it under advisement:
>>
>>> [Default] Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this post; take it under advisement:
>>>>
>>>>> [Default] Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>>>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In that order.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What a bitter man.
>>>>>
>>>>> Says the child molester
>>>>
>>>>What? No.
>>>
>>> Hey, it's OK, man!
>>>
>>> Your love for exploiting defenseless children is common knowledge,
>>> really.
>>>
>>> But I predict a wood chipper in your future unless you keep those
>>> feelings to yourself.
>>
>>Idiot.
>
> Klaus isn't an idiot.
>
> He's an asshole.

He's two <clap>, two <clap>, two jerks in one <clap>.

He's what I refer to as a "Tar-Baby troll"... They tar you with an insidious
accusation that is so bad the victim is motivated to respond. But doing so adds
to more tarring. And, at least earlier, it would appear in Google searches,
perhaps besmirching a person of good repute.

--
Zero Mostel: That's it baby! When you got it, flaunt it! Flaunt it!
-- Mel Brooks, "The Producers"

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6oqigjh43gusqpq3lfaen1lilrfqk1og81@4ax.com...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>[GAC] Surgery shouldn't be required to be trans[gender], but it should be
>>>available
>>>to people over 16 or 18 [depending on their level of transition].
>>
>>Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>
>>In that order.
>
>
> Idiot, phobe.

Love your new signature.. but you seem to have skipped a response.

"Chris Ahlstrom" <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in message
news:veca8k$3qts7$7@dont-email.me...
> Siri Cruise wrote this post; take it under advisement:
>
>> pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-11, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>> royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>>
>>>>> In that order.
>>>>
>>>> What a bitter man.
>>>
>>> Are you sure?
>>> You libbys don't seem to be able to tell the difference between a man
>>> and a
>>> woman.
>>
>> And you consistently fail to do so.
>
> These idiots think gender is a black and white. Sure, generally it is easy
> to say "He's a man", "She's a woman." But they are congenitally unable to
> grok:
>
> - Guevedoces
> - Hermaphroditism
> - Intersex
> - More?

Ok.. we limit such gender surgeries only to such type.

Those that are clearly male or female shall be unable to have such surgery.

Now, everyone's happy.

oh, but that's right you are not talking about these rare genetic anomalies,
but the regular occurrence of males and females with mental issues about
their gender.

"Chris Ahlstrom" <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in message
news:vecafc$3qts7$8@dont-email.me...
> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this post; take it under advisement:
>
>> [Default] Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>
>>>> In that order.
>>>
>>>What a bitter man.
>>
>> Says the child molester
>
> What? No. The only people I "molest" are bigots like you. You cretin.
> You puke. You ... dumbass! :-D

Tell me how does proving you are a bigot, make it right for you to attack
another you assert is a bigot?

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:s9gogj1b4ftb8roiutslnnh29no61mhrik@4ax.com...
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:15:40 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>[GAC] Surgery shouldn't be required to be trans[gender], but it should
>>>>>be available
>>>>>to people over 16 or 18 [depending on their level of transition].
>>>>
>>>>Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>>performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>
>>>>In that order.
>>>
>>>Idiot, phobe.
>>
>>I agree with him.
>>
>>If we can't trust young people to drink before 21, how can we trust them
>>to make
>>such a drastic elective surgery decision?
>
>
> The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional

Cite

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dbpogjhl62tdati61sm2ak96hktfl0m5ll@4ax.com...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional, it should
>>>be 18 or even 16.
>>
>>Well, no, it's not.
>>
>>But I can understand why a pedophile such as yourself would like to
>>give drugs to children.
>
>
> I can understand that you're retarded so you think a 20 year-old is a
> "child". Retard.

In a few states, they are... legally

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
><snip cowardly altering of quoting>

And Joel runs away again, upset that he was revealed as a supporter of
child abuse and molestation.

I thought Jesus was supposed to be forgiving 'n' shit?

ROFLMAO!!!!

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:dbpogjhl62tdati61sm2ak96hktfl0m5ll@4ax.com...
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional, it should
>>>>be 18 or even 16.
>>>
>>>Well, no, it's not.
>>>
>>>But I can understand why a pedophile such as yourself would like to
>>>give drugs to children.
>>
>>
>> I can understand that you're retarded so you think a 20 year-old is a
>> "child". Retard.
>
>In a few states, they are... legally
>

Funny how he skips over the aforementioned 16 year olds.....

Le 2024-10-14 à 12 h 40, KlausSchadenfreude a écrit :
> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> <snip cowardly altering of quoting>
>
> And Joel runs away again, upset that he was revealed as a supporter of
> child abuse and molestation.
>
> I thought Jesus was supposed to be forgiving 'n' shit?
>
> ROFLMAO!!!!

I feel terrible for the blind child who didn't run away at first sight
of Joel.

--
CrudeSausage
Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.

On 10/13/24 5:09 PM, Hugh Huntzinger, at 1 Harmony Lane in Denville, New Jersey,
wrote:
> On 10/11/24 11:35 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> [Default]  Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>
>>>> In that order.
>>>
>>> What a bitter man.
>>
>> Says the child molester
>
> Sounds like you don't know that there's been surgeries like this which have been
> going on for ~90 years:  20th Century advancements in medicine resulted in
> babies being born with genetic anomalies undergoing 'corrective' surgery,
> sometimes even without the parent's knowledge.
>
> Similarly, sometimes the child was never told of their medical history, even
> after they became an adult: these got buried as 'family secrets'.
>
> "In the United States genital reconstructive surgery was pioneered between 1930
> and 1960 by urologist Hugh Hampton Young and other surgeons at Johns Hopkins
> Hospital in Baltimore and other major university centers.[11] Understanding of
> intersex conditions was relatively primitive, based on identifying the type of
> gonad(s) by palpation or by surgery. Since ability to determine even the type of
> gonads in infancy was limited, sex of assignment and rearing were determined
> mainly by the appearance of the external genitalia."
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> History_of_intersex_surgery#Surgical_pioneering_and_constructed_gender>
>
>
> So the real question here is ... is this something actually new?

Yes. Faggots like you seeking to groom normal and healthy young boys
into having their genitals cut off while still under the age of 18 is
a new thing.

Scout wrote:
>> These idiots think gender is a black and white. Sure, generally
>> it is easy
>> to say "He's a man", "She's a woman." But they are congenitally
>> unable to
>> grok:
>>
>>    -   Guevedoces
>>    -   Hermaphroditism
>>    -   Intersex
>>    -   More?
>
> Ok.. we limit such gender surgeries only to such type.
>
> Those that are clearly male or female shall be unable to have such
> surgery.

We start with an X and X or Y. If that initial pair are mutated,
they will be mutated in every cell. Any cell can be male or female
independent of every other cell. People can have genitalia and
brains of different sex.

> Now, everyone's happy.
>
> oh, but that's right you are not talking about these rare genetic
> anomalies, but the regular occurrence of males and females with
> mental issues about their gender.

Reopen Bedlam. Start with back talking women who are clearly
hysterical.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[Default] Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> typed:

>Reopen Bedlam. Start with back talking women who are clearly
>hysterical.

So you're turning yourself in, then?

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:9ciqgjhkd85v68f62vrnbl9q52v07m79p3@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
>
>>
>>
>>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:dbpogjhl62tdati61sm2ak96hktfl0m5ll@4ax.com...
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>The alcohol/tobacco/cannabis age of 21 is unconstitutional, it should
>>>>>be 18 or even 16.
>>>>
>>>>Well, no, it's not.
>>>>
>>>>But I can understand why a pedophile such as yourself would like to
>>>>give drugs to children.
>>>
>>>
>>> I can understand that you're retarded so you think a 20 year-old is a
>>> "child". Retard.
>>
>>In a few states, they are... legally
>>
>
> Funny how he skips over the aforementioned 16 year olds.....

Not really, you just have to remember his delusions and dishonesty.

I mean he even lies to himself.. so how can he be honest with anyone else?

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klausschadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:49iqgj1165ihq7s9g1l6knorj3d1cf6iri@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>><snip cowardly altering of quoting>
>
> And Joel runs away again, upset that he was revealed as a supporter of
> child abuse and molestation.
>
> I thought Jesus was supposed to be forgiving 'n' shit?
>
> ROFLMAO!!!!

Probably pissed because his parents didn't cut off his dick and then screw
him in the ass.

On 10/14/24 9:40 PM, Arrest Gays wrote:
> On 10/13/24 5:09 PM, -hh wrote:
>> On 10/11/24 11:35 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> [Default]  Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> typed:
>>>
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>> royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> Wrong. It should be outlawed until AFTER 21 years of age-- any doctors
>>>>> performing it should be executed, tried, and convicted.
>>>>>
>>>>> In that order.
>>>>
>>>> What a bitter man.
>>>
>>> Says the child molester
>>
>> Sounds like you don't know that there's been surgeries like this which
>> have been going on for ~90 years:  20th Century advancements in
>> medicine resulted in babies being born with genetic anomalies
>> undergoing 'corrective' surgery, sometimes even without the parent's
>> knowledge.
>>
>> Similarly, sometimes the child was never told of their medical
>> history, even after they became an adult: these got buried as 'family
>> secrets'.
>>
>> "In the United States genital reconstructive surgery was pioneered
>> between 1930 and 1960 by urologist Hugh Hampton Young and other
>> surgeons at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore and other major
>> university centers.[11] Understanding of intersex conditions was
>> relatively primitive, based on identifying the type of gonad(s) by
>> palpation or by surgery. Since ability to determine even the type of
>> gonads in infancy was limited, sex of assignment and rearing were
>> determined mainly by the appearance of the external genitalia."
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
>> History_of_intersex_surgery#Surgical_pioneering_and_constructed_gender>
>>
>>
>> So the real question here is ... is this something actually new?
>
> Yes. Faggots like you seeking to groom normal and healthy young boys
> into having their genitals cut off while still under the age of 18 is
> a new thing.

No, that's that's not at all what I said.

What I said was that sexual assignment surgery has been a thing for
nearly 100 years, and the general practice thereof was to take a genetic
abnormality and to try to make them appear to be normal.

You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that there's
adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex change
operations.

As a first start to defining what you're offended by, that statement is
fine: but the next part is: "got actual data, instead of an opinion?"

Note that whatever statistics you come up with will need to subtract out
the above surgeries which correct genetic abnormalities.

That's your homework assignment. Get to work on it & report back.

-hh

On 10/15/2024 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:
> You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that there's
> adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex change
> operations.

Were you "in the navy" Huntzy?

https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievs

Cuz you are as gay as a swabbie with no shore leave.

On 10/15/24 3:39 PM, citizen winston smith wrote:
> On 10/15/2024 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:
>> You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that
>> there's adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex
>> change operations.
>
> Were you "in the navy" Huntzy?

Nope. Troll, troll again.

In the meantime, there's 3.66 million babies born in the USA per year.

Likewise, it appears that the natural incidence rate of some degree of
intersex as per the Anne Fausto-Sterling estimate is 1.7%."

1.7% of 3.66M kids/year = ~62,220 kids/year.

What percentage of them need some sort of medical correction? I have no
idea. But these are abnormalities which have been routinely treated by
the medical profession, including surgical procedures as I'd mentioned.

Now because the study was over a five year period, the birth rate over
that timeframe is 5x, and thus, the 1.7% portion of it is 5x too. As
such, there's potentially 5 * 62,220 = 311,100M kids who are potentially
applicable to the ones that they found in their study.

Now the study said they found 13,994 instances where some intervention
was done ... But 14K out of 311K is just 4.5% of the total applicable
vulnerable population in steady state (and just 0.08% of all kids).

I'd venture to say that this is actually a good news story, because 4.5%
is a pretty small number of this applicable vulnerable population, who
itself is less than 2% of the general population.

Because we do know that there's standards of medical practice that have
been ongoing for 90+ years to intercede on abnormalities, we know that
some of these (up to potentially "all") are simply normal medical
practice. So where's the clear evidence that there's "experimental
pediatric gender medicine" occurring? Let alone to any significant degree?

-hh