The Cases Against Trump: A Guide

Thirty-four felony convictions. Charges of fraud, election subversion, and
obstruction. One place to keep track of the presidential candidate�s legal
troubles.
By David A. Graham
Arrows pointing at Donald Trump
Illustration by The Atlantic. Source: Brendan McDermid / Getty.
September 13, 2024

Sign up for The Decision, a newsletter featuring our 2024 election
coverage.

Donald Trump�s luck in the courts has turned.

Trump became the first former president to be convicted of a felony when a
jury in Manhattan found him guilty of 34 counts in May. That followed
decisive and costly losses in civil cases: Trump was fined more than half a
billion dollars when courts found that he had defamed the writer E. Jean
Carroll and committed financial fraud in his business.

Enjoy a year of unlimited access to The Atlantic�including every story on
our site and app, subscriber newsletters, and more.
Become a Subscriber

Since then, Trump has won a string of victories, and the three remaining
criminal cases against him seem deeply bogged down. A Supreme Court
decision on July 1 threw into limbo the federal case against him for
attempting to subvert the 2020 election. The justices ruled that a
president is immune from prosecution for any �official� actions, and found
that some of the allegations concerned official actions. Special Counsel
Jack Smith has now refiled charges.

Two weeks later, Trump won another long-shot victory when Judge Aileen
Cannon, a Trump appointee, dismissed charges against him for hoarding
classified documents in his residence at Mar-a-Lago. She concluded that
Smith�s appointment was not constitutional. The decision has been appealed.

Meanwhile, three criminal charges against Trump related to election
subversion in Fulton County, Georgia, have been tossed by a judge, and the
rest are indefinitely delayed amid litigation over whether Fani Willis, the
prosecutor in that case, should be removed

All of this means that Trump heads toward the election as a convicted felon
and with three serious cases hanging over his head, but it also means that
he will not go on trial again before the election. That spares him time in
court and deprives voters of a chance to know whether he committed many
grave crimes. If Trump wins, many anticipate that he will direct the
Justice Department to dismiss the federal charges against him.

Here�s a summary of the major legal cases against Trump, including key
dates, assessments of the gravity of the charges, and expectations about
how they could turn out. This guide will be updated regularly as the cases
proceed.

Don�t miss what matters. Sign up for The Atlantic Daily newsletter.
Email Address

Your newsletter subscriptions are subject to The Atlantic's Privacy Policy
and Terms and Conditions.
New York State: Fraud

In the fall of 2022, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a civil
suit against Trump, his adult sons, and his former aide Allen Weisselberg,
alleging a years-long scheme in which Trump fraudulently reported the value
of properties in order to either lower his tax bill or improve the terms of
his loans, all with an eye toward inflating his net worth.
Recommended Reading

The Many Faces of the �Wine Mom�
Ashley Fetters

How Online Shopping Makes Suckers of Us All
Jerry Useem
The Controversial Kid ASMR Community
Anna Lockhart

When?
Justice Arthur Engoron ruled on February 16 that Trump must pay $355
million plus interest, the calculated size of his ill-gotten gains from
fraud. The judge had previously ruled against Trump and his co-defendants
in late September 2023, concluding that many of the defendants� claims were
�clearly� fraudulent�so clearly that he didn�t need a trial to hear them.

How grave was the allegation?
Fraud is fraud, and in this case, the sum of the fraud stretched into the
hundreds of millions�but compared with some of the other legal matters in
which Trump is embroiled, this is a little pedestrian. The case was also
civil rather than criminal. But although the stakes are lower for the
nation, they remain high for Trump: The size of the penalty appears to be
larger than Trump can easily pay, and he also faces a three-year ban on
operating his company.

What happens now?
Trump has appealed the case. On March 25, the day he was supposed to post
bond, an appeals court reduced the amount he must post from more than $464
million to $175 million. A hearing on his appeal been scheduled for
September 26.
Manhattan: Defamation and Sexual Assault

Although these other cases are all brought by government entities, Trump
also faced a pair of defamation suits from the writer E. Jean Carroll, who
said that Trump sexually assaulted her in a department-store dressing room
in the 1990s. When he denied it, she sued him for defamation and later
added a battery claim.

Make your inbox more interesting with newsletters from your favorite
Atlantic writers.
Browse Newsletters

When?
In May 2023, a jury concluded that Trump had sexually assaulted and defamed
Carroll, and awarded her $5 million. A second defamation case produced an
$83.3 million judgment in January 2024.

How grave was the allegation?
Although these cases didn�t directly connect to the same fundamental issues
of rule of law and democratic governance that some of the criminal cases
do, they were a serious matter, and a federal judge�s blunt statement that
Trump raped Carroll has gone underappreciated.

What happens now?
Trump has appealed both cases, and he posted bond for the $83.3 million in
March. During the second trial, he also continued to insult Carroll, which
may have courted additional defamation suits.
Manhattan: Hush Money

In March 2023, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg became the first
prosecutor to bring felony charges against Trump, alleging that the former
president falsified business records as part of a scheme to pay hush money
to women who said they�d had sexual relationships with Trump.

When?
The trial began on April 15 and ended with a May 30 conviction. A judge is
scheduled to rule September 16 on whether the U.S. Supreme Court�s decision
on presidential immunity invalidates the case. On September 6, he announced
that he was postponing sentencing to avoid interfering with the election.

How grave was the allegation?
Many people have analogized this case to Al Capone�s conviction on tax
evasion: It�s not that he didn�t deserve it, but it wasn�t really why he
was an infamous villain. Trump did deserve it, and he�s now a convicted
felon. Moreover, although the charges were about falsifying records, those
records were falsified to keep information from the public as it voted in
the 2016 election. It was among the first of Trump�s many attacks on fair
elections. (His two impeachments were also for efforts to undermine the
electoral process.) If at times this case felt more minor compared with the
election-subversion or classified-documents cases, it�s because those other
cases have set a grossly high standard for what constitutes gravity.

What happens now?
The next major step is sentencing on November 26.
Department of Justice: Mar-a-Lago Documents

Special Counsel Jack Smith charged Trump with 37 felonies in connection
with his removal of documents from the White House when he left office, but
Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the case, finding that Smith�s
appointment was not constitutional. Smith has appealed. The charges
included willful retention of national-security information, obstruction of
justice, withholding of documents, and false statements. Trump took boxes
of documents to properties, where they were stored haphazardly, but the
indictment centered on his refusal to give them back to the government
despite repeated requests.

David A. Graham: This indictment is different

When?
Smith filed charges in June 2023. On July 15, 2024, Cannon dismissed the
charges. Smith appealed that dismissal on August 26. He faces a de facto
deadline of January 20, 2025, at which point Trump, if reelected, would
likely shut down a case.

How grave is the allegation?
These are, I have written, the stupidest crimes imaginable, but they are
nevertheless very serious. Protecting the nation�s secrets is one of the
greatest responsibilities of any public official with classified clearance,
and not only did Trump put these documents at risk, but he also (allegedly)
refused to comply with a subpoena, tried to hide the documents, and lied to
the government through his attorneys.

How plausible is a guilty verdict?
That will depend on both the appeals court and the election. This once
looked to be the most open-and-shut case: The facts and legal theory here
are pretty straightforward. But Smith drew a short straw when he was
randomly assigned Cannon, a Trump appointee who repeatedly ruled favorably
for Trump and bogged the case down in endless pretrial arguments. Even
before her dismissal of the case, some legal commentators accused her of
�sabotaging� it.
Fulton County: Election Subversion

In Fulton County, Georgia, which includes most of Atlanta, District
Attorney Fani Willis brought a huge racketeering case against Trump and 18
others, alleging a conspiracy that spread across weeks and states with the
aim of stealing the 2020 election.

On 10/5/2024 9:32 AM, alf beer wrote:
> The Cases Against Trump: A Guide
>
> Thirty-four felony convictions. Charges of fraud, election subversion, and
> obstruction. One place to keep track of the presidential candidate’s legal
> troubles.
> By David A. Graham
> Arrows pointing at Donald Trump
> Illustration by The Atlantic. Source: Brendan McDermid / Getty.
> September 13, 2024

The *only* reason Trump is running is to try to stay out of prison. He *knows*
the cases against him are extremely wrong and convictions are all but
guaranteed. Trump has *admitted* it.

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1842374094941004072

>
> Sign up for The Decision, a newsletter featuring our 2024 election
> coverage.
>
> Donald Trump’s luck in the courts has turned.
>
> Trump became the first former president to be convicted of a felony when a
> jury in Manhattan found him guilty of 34 counts in May. That followed
> decisive and costly losses in civil cases: Trump was fined more than half a
> billion dollars when courts found that he had defamed the writer E. Jean
> Carroll and committed financial fraud in his business.
>
> Enjoy a year of unlimited access to The Atlantic—including every story on
> our site and app, subscriber newsletters, and more.
> Become a Subscriber
>
> Since then, Trump has won a string of victories, and the three remaining
> criminal cases against him seem deeply bogged down. A Supreme Court
> decision on July 1 threw into limbo the federal case against him for
> attempting to subvert the 2020 election. The justices ruled that a
> president is immune from prosecution for any “official” actions, and found
> that some of the allegations concerned official actions. Special Counsel
> Jack Smith has now refiled charges.
>
> Two weeks later, Trump won another long-shot victory when Judge Aileen
> Cannon, a Trump appointee, dismissed charges against him for hoarding
> classified documents in his residence at Mar-a-Lago. She concluded that
> Smith’s appointment was not constitutional. The decision has been appealed.
>
> Meanwhile, three criminal charges against Trump related to election
> subversion in Fulton County, Georgia, have been tossed by a judge, and the
> rest are indefinitely delayed amid litigation over whether Fani Willis, the
> prosecutor in that case, should be removed
>
> All of this means that Trump heads toward the election as a convicted felon
> and with three serious cases hanging over his head, but it also means that
> he will not go on trial again before the election. That spares him time in
> court and deprives voters of a chance to know whether he committed many
> grave crimes. If Trump wins, many anticipate that he will direct the
> Justice Department to dismiss the federal charges against him.
>
> Here’s a summary of the major legal cases against Trump, including key
> dates, assessments of the gravity of the charges, and expectations about
> how they could turn out. This guide will be updated regularly as the cases
> proceed.
>
> Don’t miss what matters. Sign up for The Atlantic Daily newsletter.
> Email Address
>
> Your newsletter subscriptions are subject to The Atlantic's Privacy Policy
> and Terms and Conditions.
> New York State: Fraud
>
> In the fall of 2022, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a civil
> suit against Trump, his adult sons, and his former aide Allen Weisselberg,
> alleging a years-long scheme in which Trump fraudulently reported the value
> of properties in order to either lower his tax bill or improve the terms of
> his loans, all with an eye toward inflating his net worth.
> Recommended Reading
>
> The Many Faces of the ‘Wine Mom’
> Ashley Fetters
>
> How Online Shopping Makes Suckers of Us All
> Jerry Useem
> The Controversial Kid ASMR Community
> Anna Lockhart
>
> When?
> Justice Arthur Engoron ruled on February 16 that Trump must pay $355
> million plus interest, the calculated size of his ill-gotten gains from
> fraud. The judge had previously ruled against Trump and his co-defendants
> in late September 2023, concluding that many of the defendants’ claims were
> “clearly” fraudulent—so clearly that he didn’t need a trial to hear them.
>
> How grave was the allegation?
> Fraud is fraud, and in this case, the sum of the fraud stretched into the
> hundreds of millions—but compared with some of the other legal matters in
> which Trump is embroiled, this is a little pedestrian. The case was also
> civil rather than criminal. But although the stakes are lower for the
> nation, they remain high for Trump: The size of the penalty appears to be
> larger than Trump can easily pay, and he also faces a three-year ban on
> operating his company.
>
> What happens now?
> Trump has appealed the case. On March 25, the day he was supposed to post
> bond, an appeals court reduced the amount he must post from more than $464
> million to $175 million. A hearing on his appeal been scheduled for
> September 26.
> Manhattan: Defamation and Sexual Assault
>
> Although these other cases are all brought by government entities, Trump
> also faced a pair of defamation suits from the writer E. Jean Carroll, who
> said that Trump sexually assaulted her in a department-store dressing room
> in the 1990s. When he denied it, she sued him for defamation and later
> added a battery claim.
>
> Make your inbox more interesting with newsletters from your favorite
> Atlantic writers.
> Browse Newsletters
>
> When?
> In May 2023, a jury concluded that Trump had sexually assaulted and defamed
> Carroll, and awarded her $5 million. A second defamation case produced an
> $83.3 million judgment in January 2024.
>
> How grave was the allegation?
> Although these cases didn’t directly connect to the same fundamental issues
> of rule of law and democratic governance that some of the criminal cases
> do, they were a serious matter, and a federal judge’s blunt statement that
> Trump raped Carroll has gone underappreciated.
>
> What happens now?
> Trump has appealed both cases, and he posted bond for the $83.3 million in
> March. During the second trial, he also continued to insult Carroll, which
> may have courted additional defamation suits.
> Manhattan: Hush Money
>
> In March 2023, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg became the first
> prosecutor to bring felony charges against Trump, alleging that the former
> president falsified business records as part of a scheme to pay hush money
> to women who said they’d had sexual relationships with Trump.
>
> When?
> The trial began on April 15 and ended with a May 30 conviction. A judge is
> scheduled to rule September 16 on whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision
> on presidential immunity invalidates the case. On September 6, he announced
> that he was postponing sentencing to avoid interfering with the election.
>
> How grave was the allegation?
> Many people have analogized this case to Al Capone’s conviction on tax
> evasion: It’s not that he didn’t deserve it, but it wasn’t really why he
> was an infamous villain. Trump did deserve it, and he’s now a convicted
> felon. Moreover, although the charges were about falsifying records, those
> records were falsified to keep information from the public as it voted in
> the 2016 election. It was among the first of Trump’s many attacks on fair
> elections. (His two impeachments were also for efforts to undermine the
> electoral process.) If at times this case felt more minor compared with the
> election-subversion or classified-documents cases, it’s because those other
> cases have set a grossly high standard for what constitutes gravity.
>
> What happens now?
> The next major step is sentencing on November 26.
> Department of Justice: Mar-a-Lago Documents
>
> Special Counsel Jack Smith charged Trump with 37 felonies in connection
> with his removal of documents from the White House when he left office, but
> Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the case, finding that Smith’s
> appointment was not constitutional. Smith has appealed. The charges
> included willful retention of national-security information, obstruction of
> justice, withholding of documents, and false statements. Trump took boxes
> of documents to properties, where they were stored haphazardly, but the
> indictment centered on his refusal to give them back to the government
> despite repeated requests.
>
> David A. Graham: This indictment is different
>
> When?
> Smith filed charges in June 2023. On July 15, 2024, Cannon dismissed the
> charges. Smith appealed that dismissal on August 26. He faces a de facto
> deadline of January 20, 2025, at which point Trump, if reelected, would
> likely shut down a case.
>
> How grave is the allegation?
> These are, I have written, the stupidest crimes imaginable, but they are
> nevertheless very serious. Protecting the nation’s secrets is one of the
> greatest responsibilities of any public official with classified clearance,
> and not only did Trump put these documents at risk, but he also (allegedly)
> refused to comply with a subpoena, tried to hide the documents, and lied to
> the government through his attorneys.
>
> How plausible is a guilty verdict?
> That will depend on both the appeals court and the election. This once
> looked to be the most open-and-shut case: The facts and legal theory here
> are pretty straightforward. But Smith drew a short straw when he was
> randomly assigned Cannon, a Trump appointee who repeatedly ruled favorably
> for Trump and bogged the case down in endless pretrial arguments. Even
> before her dismissal of the case, some legal commentators accused her of
> “sabotaging” it.
> Fulton County: Election Subversion
>
> In Fulton County, Georgia, which includes most of Atlanta, District
> Attorney Fani Willis brought a huge racketeering case against Trump and 18
> others, alleging a conspiracy that spread across weeks and states with the
> aim of stealing the 2020 election.
>
> When?
> Willis obtained the indictment in August 2023. The number of people charged
> makes the case unwieldy and difficult to track. Several of them, including
> Kenneth Chesebro, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis, struck plea deals in the
> fall. Because a challenge to Willis’s presence on the case isn’t going to
> be heard until December, the case will not begin before the election.
>
> How grave is the allegation?
> More than any other case, this one attempts to reckon with the full breadth
> of the assault on democracy following the 2020 election.
>
> How plausible is a guilty verdict?
> Expert views differ. This is a huge case for a local prosecutor, even in a
> county as large as Fulton, to bring. The racketeering law allows Willis to
> sweep in a great deal of material, and she has some strong evidence—such as
> a call in which Trump asked Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger
> to “find” some 11,000 votes. Three major plea deals from co-defendants may
> also ease Willis’s path, but getting a jury to convict Trump will still be
> a challenge. A judge on September 12 tossed three counts as outside state
> jurisdiction, and dismissed several other but said the state can refile
> them with more detail. The case has also been hurt by the revelation of a
> romantic relationship between Willis and an attorney she hired as a special
> prosecutor. On March 15, Judge Scott McAfee declined to throw out the
> indictment, but he sharply castigated Willis.
> Department of Justice: Election Subversion
>
> Special Counsel Smith has also charged Trump with four federal felonies in
> connection with his attempt to remain in power after losing the 2020
> election. This case is in court in Washington, D.C.
>
> When?
> A grand jury indicted Trump on August 1, 2023. The trial was originally
> scheduled for March but was frozen while the Supreme Court mulled whether
> the former president should be immune to prosecution. On July 1, 2024, the
> justices ruled that a president is immune from prosecution for official but
> not unofficial acts, finding that some of Trump’s postelection actions were
> official and sending the case back to the trial court to determine others.
> Smith obtained a new indictment on August 27, which retains the same four
> felony charges but omits references to corrupting the Justice Department.
> As with the other DOJ case, time is of the essence for Smith, because
> Trump, if reelected, could shut down a case upon taking office in January
> 2025.
>
> David A. Graham: Trump attempted a brazen, dead-serious attack on American
> democracy
>
> How grave is the allegation?
> This case rivals the Fulton County one in importance. It is narrower,
> focusing just on Trump and a few key elements of the paperwork coup, but
> the symbolic weight of the U.S. Justice Department prosecuting an attempt
> to subvert the American election system is heavy.
>
> How plausible is a guilty verdict?
> It’s very hard to say. Smith avoided some of the more unconventional
> potential charges, including aiding insurrection, and everyone watched much
> of the alleged crime unfold in public in real time, but no precedent exists
> for a case like this, with a defendant like this.
> Additionally …
>
> In more than 30 states, cases were filed over whether Trump should be
> thrown off the 2024 ballot under a novel legal theory about the Fourteenth
> Amendment. Proponents, including J. Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe in
> The Atlantic, argued that the former president is ineligible to serve again
> under a clause that disqualifies anyone who took an oath defending the
> Constitution and then subsequently participated in a rebellion or an
> insurrection. They said that Trump’s attempt to steal the 2020 election and
> his incitement of the January 6 riot meet the criteria.
>
> When?
> Authorities in several states ruled that Trump should be removed from the
> ballot, and the former president appealed to the Supreme Court. The
> justices ruled unanimously on March 4 that states could not remove Trump
> from the ballot. The conservative majority (over strenuous liberal
> objections) also closed the door on a postelection disqualification by
> Congress without specific legislation.
>
> How grave is the allegation?
> In a sense, the claim made here was even graver than the criminal election-
> subversion cases filed against Trump by the U.S. Department of Justice and
> in Fulton County, Georgia, because neither of those cases alleges
> insurrection or rebellion. But the stakes were also much different—rather
> than criminal conviction, they concern the ability to serve as president.
>
> What happens next?
> The question of disqualification seems to now be closed, with Trump set to
> appear on the ballot in every state.

A man wanted for felony sexual contact with two minors was arrested Thursday and later charged with two counts of rape in Sioux Falls.

Joel Adams, 27, of North Mankato, Minnesota, was arrested Thursday on warrants for felony criminal sexual conduct. Police said Adams was arrested around 10:30 a.m. Thursday at a motel in the 1500 block of North Kiwanis Avenue. A 15-year-old girl was found in the motel with him but she initially denied having sexual contact with Adams, according to Sam Clemens, police spokesperson.

At approximately 3:30 p.m. Thursday a second girl, this time a 14-year-old and her parents, reported Adams had sex with the minor. She also claimed he gave her marijuana and tobacco products. Later, detectives talked to the 15-year-old and she also admitted to having sex with Adams, according to police.

https://www.argusleader.com/gcdn/presto/2020/10/30/PSIF/e6b81418-3c8c-4e58-8aa7-1db37d42722b-ADAMS_JOEL_-_20-14242.jpg?width=300&height=400&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
Joel Adams was arrested for two counts of rape Thursday - Minnehaha County.

Adams was originally charged with two counts of felony sexual contact with a minor in Minnesota. His new charges include two counts of rape, five counts of sexual contact with a child less than 16, contributing to the delinquency of a minor and maintaining a place where drugs were kept. Police say the girls were under the impression that Adams was a 17 or 18 year old. He contacted the girls through Snapchat.

Police said they don’t have an exact timeframe of Adams' activity yet but know it’s been going on for a “few weeks.” So far police only know of the two victims that reported Adams after his arrest, Clemens said.

https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/crime/2020/10/30/man-arrested-warrants-found-minor-motel/6086097002/