In article <QW4yO.75355$MJMb.18398@fx43.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 10:57 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> > On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> >>>>>> suit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> >>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> >>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> >>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> >>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> >>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >>>>
> >>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>>
> >>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
> >>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >>
> >> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> >> should be.
> >
> > You watched what?
>
> He didn't watch a fucking thing. He's always claiming to have seen some TV
> broadcast, but it's always some event that was *not* broadcast, and anyway,
> Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell spends every waking minute posting to
> Usenet and doesn't have time to watch any TV. I'm not even convinced he has a TV.

I own you. You will speak when I tell you.

On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>
>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>
>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>
>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>> should be.
>>
>> You watched what?
>
> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.

You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
they vote.

In article <XnsB1D77FEC479C5629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:t2hhcjhhh4sl6ebt704j7rcqelh6djcu8o@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:08:06 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>news:8qcgcj5cfieo28q09j9e6dakff3nkohiuu@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "When they said it would take 11 months to reopen the port of
> >>> Baltimore, we got it done in 11 weeks." -- Wes Moore, Governor of
> >>> Maryland
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks to union workers.
> >>
> >
> >
> > DNC update: Lots of union support at the convention.
> >
> > Shawn Fain, President UAW: I want to say thank you to Joe Biden for
> > making history by walking the picket line with the UAW.
> >
> > This election comes down to one question: which side are you on? On
> > one side we have Kamala Harris and Tim Walz who have stood shoulder to
> > shoulder with the working class. On the other side, we have Trump and
> > Vance, two lap dogs for the billionaire class who only serve
> > themselves.
> >
> > Kamala Harris is one of us and Donald Trump is a scab. When our
> > workers went out on strike against GM for 40 days, Trump did nothing.
> > You know who rubbed shoulders with us in the picket line? Kamala
> > Harris.
> >
> > Fain wore a "TRUMP IS A SCAB" tshirt.
> >
> >
> > --
> > #NEVERtrump
> >
>
>
> Trump doen't just want his stuff
> made by union workers, he doesn't want
> his stuff made by AMERICANS.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Trump 2020 banners made in China during
> "Made in America" week
> July 27, 2018
> http://tinyurl.com/y9m3go4d
>
>
> Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
> March 8, 2016
> http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu
>
>
>
> Donald Trump Once Again Blasted for Having
> Products Made in China
> August 11, 2020
> https://tinyurl.com/3522ynfx
>
>
>
> Trump Is Selling New Merchandise Made in China
> Nov. 28, 2017
> https://tinyurl.com/232mru6f
>
>
>
> Donald Trump: I Never Disputed That Some of My
> Clothing Line Was Made in Mexico
> October 19, 2015
> http://tinyurl.com/jkf92lv
>
>
>
> Donald Trump's Menswear Line Is Made in Mexico
> Aug 24, 2015
> http://tinyurl.com/oos7nfo
>
>
>
> Donald Trump suits and ties are made in China
> March 8, 2016
> http://tinyurl.com/jdlk8eu
>
>
> Donald Trump shirts are made in Bangledesh
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYoOPgeTMQc
>
>
> Trump Inauguration hats made in Vietnam
> http://tinyurl.com/gkset93

You don't have much of a life do you?

In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> >>>>>>> suit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> >>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> >>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> >>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> >>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> >>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>>>
> >>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
> >>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >>>
> >>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> >>> should be.
> >>
> >> You watched what?
> >
> > The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>
> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
> they vote.

It was on the news this morning.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:12:30 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<0lghcjt2nicj8tlbti4762s2ffngv3ufg5@4ax.com>:

> On 23 Aug 2024 04:36:50 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 9:23:48?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> <3l3gcj1mb07s3dqmdtc1r524n5okdlbknm@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 22 Aug 2024 17:06:47 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> --
>>> #NEVERtrump
>>
>> I sometimes wonder if they know what they reveal with their comments.
>
> I don't think so. One of the reasons they dislike giving cites is because so
> often their cites prove them wrong. So, rather than actually read cites and
> use
> those which best suit their position, the whine and babble that they're right
> and don't need any proof.

Right. And then demand others prove THEIR points, even when the other does not
agree. Or make points and falsely attribute them to their victims and demand
they back THAT point.
>
> "As Ukrainian forces advance in the Kursk region, law and order in frontline
> Russian-held areas is reported to have collapsed completely. "Rampant looting"
> is said have broken out – being done by the Russians themselves – while local
> residents say they feel abandoned."
> <https://x.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1822953065940406661>
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:10:25 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<oighcj1100r6uvsuiqtc5dttuhi4srbksj@4ax.com>:

> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:14:51 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Person: Doesn't that blade of grass over there look like it's red?
>> Snit: Define red.
>> Person: Red, you know, like a fire engine.
>> Snit: Fire engines where I live are yellow.
>> Person: Ok, red like blood.
>> Snit: Blood isn't really red.
>> Person: Sigh, ok, red like a red rose.
>> Snit: What kind of rose?
>> Person: I don't know, a fucking red rose.
>> Snit: Why are you getting vulgar with me?
>> Person: Because you are an idiot.
>> Snit: You attack me because you have nothing to say.
>> Person: I've been trying to say something to you for two days now.
>> You don't listen.
>> Snit: Define something.
>> Person: Are you some kind of asshole?
>> Snit: Why are you attacking me.
>> Person: I'm tired of playing your idiotic game.
>> Snit: You ran away. I won.
>> Person: dead silence.
>
> Snit really *is* giving you a boner, isn't he?

Those who troll can't stand that they cannot quote me doing as they accuse and
I refuse to sink to their level.
>
> "Old Habits Die Hard – Russian Troops Loot Abandoned Villages in Kursk"
> <https://www.kyivpost.com/post/37323>
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:07:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>:

> On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
>> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
>> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
>>
>> There was a story about global cooling, but:
>> -----
>> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
>> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
>> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
>> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
>> questions."
>> ----
>> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
>> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
>>
>> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
>> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
>
> Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
> research was being done.

It was part of the research but never the mainstream concern. We knew we were
having detrimental impacts but were still investigating the overall system.
>
> The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
> byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
>
> Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.

We learned more over time. That is how science SHOULD work. Right. But there
was no consensus on cooling. That was a Fox lie he parroted.
>
> All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
> Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.

LOL! Good point.
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c8eed5$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:16:55 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <qtghcjhqsb1e0ka313ec4nn14uikbs3f06@4ax.com>:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2024 14:35:16 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55:19?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >> <0hcgcj9uh1cq2qhlre7ggm9p95onav4bqg@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> On 22 Aug 2024 18:33:23 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:37:52?AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>> <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You want to talk to a cameltoe?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> >>>>> are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> >>>>> What happened to this world?
> >>>>
> >>>> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> >>>> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> >>>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
> >>>>
> >>>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> >>>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> >>>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
> >>>
> >>> "Do things to actively harm others." That's MAGA in a nutshell.
> >>
> >> Right. They get off on it.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland: "I joined the Army when I was 17. In fact, I
> >>> was too young to sign the paperwork so my mom had to sign the paperwork for me
> >>> because I don't have bone spurs."
> >>
> >> Damn!
> >
> > It was the best party convention I've ever seen in my life. Lots of excitement
> > and enthusiasm. Smiling faces everywhere. They know their enemy is weak but
> > can be treacherous.
>
> I wish I had more time to be watching.
> >
> > "Ukraine Reportedly Digging Trenches in Kursk ? Here For the Long Haul?"
> > <https://www.kyivpost.com/post/37252>
> > --
> > #NEVERtrump

JOY JOY JOY

TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP

In article <66c8ee9a$0$1429089$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:12:30 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <0lghcjt2nicj8tlbti4762s2ffngv3ufg5@4ax.com>:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2024 04:36:50 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 9:23:48?PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >> <3l3gcj1mb07s3dqmdtc1r524n5okdlbknm@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> On 22 Aug 2024 17:06:47 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> #NEVERtrump
> >>
> >> I sometimes wonder if they know what they reveal with their comments.
> >
> > I don't think so. One of the reasons they dislike giving cites is because so
> > often their cites prove them wrong. So, rather than actually read cites and
> > use
> > those which best suit their position, the whine and babble that they're right
> > and don't need any proof.
>
> Right. And then demand others prove THEIR points, even when the other does not
> agree. Or make points and falsely attribute them to their victims and demand
> they back THAT point.
> >
"victims"

LOL You poor thing.

In article <66c8ef23$0$1428140$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:07:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>:
>
> > On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
> >> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
> >> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
> >>
> >> There was a story about global cooling, but:
> >> -----
> >> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
> >> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
> >> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
> >> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
> >> questions."
> >> ----
> >> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
> >> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
> >>
> >> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
> >> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
> >
> > Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
> > research was being done.
>
> It was part of the research but never the mainstream concern. We knew we were
> having detrimental impacts but were still investigating the overall system.
> >
> > The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
> > byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
> >
> > Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.
>
> We learned more over time. That is how science SHOULD work. Right. But there
> was no consensus on cooling. That was a Fox lie he parroted.

Fox wasn't around when that lie was told. Why are you ignoring the Ozone
hoax? I am right and that bothers you.
> >
> > All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
> > Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.
>
> LOL! Good point.
> >
> >
> > --
> > #NEVERtrump

On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>>>> should be.
>>>>
>>>> You watched what?
>>>
>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>>
>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
>> they vote.
>
> It was on the news this morning.

You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.

In article <vaatkq$120a2$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> >>>>>>>>> suit.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> >>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> >>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> >>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> >>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> >>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
> >>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> >>>>> should be.
> >>>>
> >>>> You watched what?
> >>>
> >>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
> >>
> >> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
> >> they vote.
> >
> > It was on the news this morning.
>
> You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
> citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.

That will change. So you support just anyone to be able to vote?

On 8/23/2024 2:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaatkq$120a2$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>>>>>> should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You watched what?
>>>>>
>>>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>>>>
>>>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
>>>> they vote.
>>>
>>> It was on the news this morning.
>>
>> You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
>> citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
>> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.
>
> That will change.

Maybe. Maybe not. My post stated the facts and you got the facts wrong.
The post had nothing to do with what I support.

On 8/23/2024 2:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <vaatkq$120a2$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>>>>>> should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You watched what?
>>>>>
>>>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>>>>
>>>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
>>>> they vote.
>>>
>>> It was on the news this morning.
>>
>> You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
>> citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
>> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.
>
> That will change. So you support just anyone to be able to vote?

No, and not implied by what he said.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

In article <vaauq5$120a2$3@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 2:20 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaatkq$120a2$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>
> >> On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
> >>>>>>>>>>> suit.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
> >>>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
> >>>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
> >>>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
> >>>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
> >>>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
> >>>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
> >>>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
> >>>>>>> should be.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You watched what?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
> >>>>
> >>>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
> >>>> they vote.
> >>>
> >>> It was on the news this morning.
> >>
> >> You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
> >> citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
> >> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.
> >
> > That will change.
>
> Maybe. Maybe not. My post stated the facts and you got the facts wrong.
> The post had nothing to do with what I support.

I don't care what you support. I know what I saw.

On 8/23/2024 3:37 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <uc7yO.699193$qO%5.226469@fx16.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 2:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <vaatkq$120a2$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>>>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>>>>>>>> should be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You watched what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
>>>>>> they vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was on the news this morning.
>>>>
>>>> You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
>>>> citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
>>>> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.
>>>
>>> That will change. So you support just anyone to be able to vote?
>>
>> No, and not implied by what he said.
>
> Yes and

No. He didn't say it, and he didn't imply it. You lied.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

Michael A Terrell wrote:
> You lied.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rudy Canoza wrote:

I might go to some swing state that is very close in the polls, and try
to become a mole saboteur in the Trump campaign. That sound like fun!

MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Walz
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
References: <v9ii37$ghmu$1@dont-email.me> <DS5vO.397441$ZhK.268492@fx14.iad>
<m8prbjhlq32o45jbu8h4iq7n830rpp001f@4ax.com>
<F4pvO.377409$loRc.34251@fx11.iad> <v9ldna$11k49$1@dont-email.me>
<hLrvO.40347$MJMb.16018@fx43.iad> <v9lhsh$122sj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Rudy Canoza <rc.@hendrie.con>
In-Reply-To: <v9lhsh$122sj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <tZrvO.40349$MJMb.29648@fx43.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:41:29 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price!
www.newshosting.com
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:41:28 -0700

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...adding in electoral fraud to your public death threats...

YOUR DEATH THREATS AGAINST TRUMP ARE WELL-DOCUMENTED:

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell/Al
Feldhauser/Malte Runz and a dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

On 8/23/2024 3:42 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <vaauq5$120a2$3@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2024 2:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>> In article <vaatkq$120a2$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 1:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>> In article <vaaphi$1184b$2@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 12:41 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>> In article <vaaihu$10dgt$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>> In article <vaacgp$v02v$6@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vaaaj5$v02v$4@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 8:31 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies::
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of citizenship to vote. It's about time. Now the rest need to follow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> SCOTUS allowed Arizona's law that requires proof of citizenship to
>>>>>>>>>>>> register to vote to remain in effect while the law is challenged in
>>>>>>>>>>>> court. At the same time, SCOTUS did not allow that part of the law which
>>>>>>>>>>>> requires proof of citizenship to vote to go into effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas would have allowed the entire law to remain in
>>>>>>>>>>>> effect. Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson and Barrett would have stopped the
>>>>>>>>>>>> entire law from going into effect. Roberts and Kavanaugh split the baby,
>>>>>>>>>>>> voting in the majority on both aspects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And again, none of this was a ruling on the merits.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ID proof or no vote. As it should be.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WTF is wrong with you? I just said Arizona is not allowed to enforce its
>>>>>>>>>> law that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They will be. I just watched it you moron. ID for all voters as it
>>>>>>>>> should be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You watched what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The story about what AZ is doing. Please try to keep up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You did not watch Arizona requiring people to prove citizenship before
>>>>>> they vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was on the news this morning.
>>>>
>>>> You did not watch closely. Repeating, Arizona can require proof of
>>>> citizenship when you *REGISTER* to vote. They may not require proof of
>>>> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote.
>>>
>>> That will change.
>>
>> Maybe. Maybe not. My post stated the facts and you got the facts wrong.
>> The post had nothing to do with what I support.
>
> I don't care what you support. I know what I saw.

You didn't see anything about the decision. Nothing was broadcast.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:19:06 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<t2hhcjhhh4sl6ebt704j7rcqelh6djcu8o@4ax.com>:

> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:08:06 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:8qcgcj5cfieo28q09j9e6dakff3nkohiuu@4ax.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "When they said it would take 11 months to reopen the port of
>>> Baltimore, we got it done in 11 weeks." -- Wes Moore, Governor of
>>> Maryland
>>
>>
>> Thanks to union workers.
>>
>
>
> DNC update: Lots of union support at the convention.
>
> Shawn Fain, President UAW: I want to say thank you to Joe Biden for making
> history by walking the picket line with the UAW.
>
> This election comes down to one question: which side are you on? On one side
> we
> have Kamala Harris and Tim Walz who have stood shoulder to shoulder with the
> working class. On the other side, we have Trump and Vance, two lap dogs for
> the
> billionaire class who only serve themselves.

Are you with America or with Trump. You cannot be for both. Well, not and be
informed.
>
> Kamala Harris is one of us and Donald Trump is a scab. When our workers went
> out on strike against GM for 40 days, Trump did nothing. You know who rubbed
> shoulders with us in the picket line? Kamala Harris.
>
> Fain wore a "TRUMP IS A SCAB" tshirt.
>
>
> --
> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 8/23/2024 3:42 PM, Skeeter wrote:

{snip}

> I don't care what you support. I know what I saw.

You did not see that Arizona is being allowed to require proof of
citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote. End of story.

On 8/23/2024 3:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> On 8/23/2024 3:42 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>
> {snip}
>
>> I don't care what you support. I know what I saw.
>
> You did not see that Arizona is being allowed to require proof of citizenship
> when you *ACTUALLY* vote. End of story.

He didn't see anything. He didn't read the decision and he didn't see any
discussion of it.
--
Every Republiscum/QAnon accusation is, in fact, a confession

On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:41:49 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c8c9b0$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
>>> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
>>> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
>>>
>>> There was a story about global cooling, but:
>>> -----
>>> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
>>> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
>>> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
>>> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
>>> questions."
>>> ----
>>> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
>>> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
>>>
>>> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
>>> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
>>
>> Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
>> research was being done.
>
> But the hoax was still there and no Fox.

Who spread the lie before Beck on Fox?

>>
>> The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
>> byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
>>
>> Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.
>
> What a joke.
>>
>> All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
>> Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.
>
> This is all the left has.

It is a valid point.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 23, 2024 at 1:29:39 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c8f133$0$2873005$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c8ef23$0$1428140$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2024 at 10:07:43 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> <baghcjl11g76kpto1448t5glli97aa1ui2@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 23 Aug 2024 15:07:51 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Glenn Beck, of Fox News, told the lie about Newsweek sharing a story in 1975
>>>> about a coming ice age and presented it as if this was the mainstream
>>>> scientific view (2 Sept 2009).
>>>>
>>>> There was a story about global cooling, but:
>>>> -----
>>>> the article did not state the cause of cooling; it stated that "what causes
>>>> the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery" and cited the NAS
>>>> conclusion that "not only are the basic scientific questions largely
>>>> unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key
>>>> questions."
>>>> ----
>>>> Even if they story had made other claims, this would not suggest it was
>>>> supported by any scientific consensus. Fox lied.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I know that is the origin of the lie. To say Fox did not exist when
>>>> Beck told that lie ON FOX NEWS is absurd.
>>>
>>> Global cooling was indeed an issue in the Seventies though briefly and little
>>> research was being done.
>>
>> It was part of the research but never the mainstream concern. We knew we were
>> having detrimental impacts but were still investigating the overall system.
>>>
>>> The concept was that sulphur, unburned hydrocarbons and other combustion
>>> byproducts were rising high in the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.
>>>
>>> Later, as the air became cleaner, the truth of warming began to be discovered.
>>
>> We learned more over time. That is how science SHOULD work. Right. But there
>> was no consensus on cooling. That was a Fox lie he parroted.
>
> Fox wasn't around when that lie was told.

So Beck told the lie on Fox but in your mind Fox was not around.

How does that work?

> Why are you ignoring the Ozone
> hoax? I am right and that bothers you.
>>>
>>> All the bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. So ... that must be why
>>> Republicans are always shitting their pants when they fly.
>>
>> LOL! Good point.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> #NEVERtrump

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> He didn't see anything.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rudy Canoza wrote:

I might go to some swing state that is very close in the polls, and try
to become a mole saboteur in the Trump campaign. That sound like fun!

MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Walz
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
References: <v9ii37$ghmu$1@dont-email.me> <DS5vO.397441$ZhK.268492@fx14.iad>
<m8prbjhlq32o45jbu8h4iq7n830rpp001f@4ax.com>
<F4pvO.377409$loRc.34251@fx11.iad> <v9ldna$11k49$1@dont-email.me>
<hLrvO.40347$MJMb.16018@fx43.iad> <v9lhsh$122sj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Rudy Canoza <rc.@hendrie.con>
In-Reply-To: <v9lhsh$122sj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <tZrvO.40349$MJMb.29648@fx43.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:41:29 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price!
www.newshosting.com
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:41:28 -0700

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...adding in electoral fraud to your public death threats...

YOUR DEATH THREATS AGAINST TRUMP ARE WELL-DOCUMENTED:

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell/Al
Feldhauser/Malte Runz and a dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

In article <vab42r$12knb$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
>
> On 8/23/2024 3:42 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>
> {snip}
>
> > I don't care what you support. I know what I saw.
>
> You did not see that Arizona is being allowed to require proof of
> citizenship when you *ACTUALLY* vote. End of story.

Speaking of AZ. Trump has a huge crowd and RFK is taking sides with him.