On Aug 22, 2024 at 12:24:14 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<404fcj5ii7qpfot9103qb61qhg5hrtkpcj@4ax.com>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "It’s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
>> of Honor, that’s soldiers, they’re either in very bad shape because they’ve
>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they’re dead."
>>
>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
>
>
> The rules don't exist, for him, and yet he's proclaiming to be the
> candidate of law and order, while running against a prosecuting
> attorney, as a felon. Just wow.

It is like the writers of the sitcom have gotten lazy.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:50:43 AM MST, ""Scout"" wrote
<va81r1$hpqt$12@dont-email.me>:

>
>
> "Snit" <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent
>>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>
>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>
>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>
>> Cite someone who said that.
>
> Joel
>
>

Message ID?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>
> >>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>> The
> >>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>
> >> "A well regulated militia".
> >
> > Meaning the people.
>
> How are the people "well regulated"?

Fuck with us and find out.

In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>
> >>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>
> >> All?
> >>
> >> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >> was coming back to bite him.
> >
> > You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> > rights. Tell us how you know that.
>
> You made that up.

I knew you would run.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>>>
>>>> "A well regulated militia".
>>>
>>> Meaning the people.
>>
>> How are the people "well regulated"?
>
> Fuck with us and find out.

Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
with you.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>>>
>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>>>
>>>> All?
>>>>
>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>>>> was coming back to bite him.
>>>
>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
>>
>> You made that up.
>
> I knew you would run.

You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.

But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
me. Why?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>>>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>>>
> >>>> "A well regulated militia".
> >>>
> >>> Meaning the people.
> >>
> >> How are the people "well regulated"?
> >
> > Fuck with us and find out.
>
> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
> with you.

Huh?

In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>>>
> >>>> All?
> >>>>
> >>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >>>> was coming back to bite him.
> >>>
> >>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> >>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
> >>
> >> You made that up.
> >
> > I knew you would run.
>
> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
>
> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
> me. Why?

Hey, I'm trying to be like you.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:40:15 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7cc61$0$1895504$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>>>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>>>>>> was coming back to bite him.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
>>>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
>>>>
>>>> You made that up.
>>>
>>> I knew you would run.
>>
>> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
>>
>> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
>> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
>> me. Why?
>
> Hey, I'm trying to be like you.

You are failing.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:39:34 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7cc38$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "A well regulated militia".
>>>>>
>>>>> Meaning the people.
>>>>
>>>> How are the people "well regulated"?
>>>
>>> Fuck with us and find out.
>>
>> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
>> with you.
>
> Huh?

You admitted I never have...

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c7cca3$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:40:15 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7cc61$0$1895504$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >>>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >>>>>> was coming back to bite him.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> >>>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
> >>>>
> >>>> You made that up.
> >>>
> >>> I knew you would run.
> >>
> >> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
> >>
> >> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
> >> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
> >> me. Why?
> >
> > Hey, I'm trying to be like you.
>
> You are failing.

I guess I'm just not that stupid.

In article <66c7ccb4$0$1895492$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:39:34 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7cc38$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "A well regulated militia".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Meaning the people.
> >>>>
> >>>> How are the people "well regulated"?
> >>>
> >>> Fuck with us and find out.
> >>
> >> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
> >> with you.
> >
> > Huh?
>
> You admitted I never have...

Huh?

On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>> >>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>> >>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>> >>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>> >>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>> >>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Very easy.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>> >>>
>> >>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>> >>
>> >> Cite someone who said that.
>> >
>> > As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>
>> All?
>>
>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>> was coming back to bite him.
>
> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> rights. Tell us how you know that.

He can't.
He also cannot explain how 3 weeks ago Harris was against fracking, against offshore oil drilling,
against ICE and so forth and now all of a sudden she flip flops. All within a couple of weeks.

Are the demons really this ignorant?

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <va89ih$inr6$7@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> > In article <66c76a8d$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 8:31:04 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> <66c759b9$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <66c74a1b$0$5642$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:28:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> >> <66c704d1$0$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> In article <66c69fdc$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 6:10:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> >>>> <66c6900e$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>> In article <66c68703$1$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 4:21:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> >>>>>> <66c6766b$0$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> In article <66c66885$0$3620717$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 3:04:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> >>>>>>>> <66c66465$0$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> In article <aaiccjt4ugtqv8uurlbq6sld1bbsn6afe8@4ax.com>,
>> >> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "due process" while they shoot someone.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and?
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take them away.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree with Trump, and not Klaus, good, I'm with you.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> No American agrees there should be no due process.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> It's one thing if they appeal and show they aren't violent, and get
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> their guns back, but if there's a reasonable suspicion of violent
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> intent, with a gun owner, law enforcement shouldn't be burdened with
>> >> >>>>>>>>>> "due process", while the guns are still there to be shot at someone.
>> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> Only if he/she is a threat. I don't like the red light law because your
>> >> >>>>>>>>> neighbor can decide he doesn't like you and make a call.
>> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> You fear you will come across as not stable enough. Understandable in your
>> >> >>>>>>>> case.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Well you can't refute so I guess I win this right?
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> I agree you might not come across as stable enough.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> You can't refute it.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I do not refute the fact you might not come across as stable enough to own a
>> >> >>>> weapon. We have reached agreement.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You ignored this and tried to push conflict.
>> >>
>> >> Oops you did it again.
>> >
>> > Do you always respond to yourself?
>>
>> He does.
>> Especially when snit mixes up a bad batch of jenkem.
>> He really goes off the rails when that happens.
>
> Had to look it up. That's sick. I bet he's hooked on Kratom too.

When I first saw it I too had to look it up.
Wow, how disgusting.
As snit is already on record requesting online how to make prescription cocktails, nothing would
surprise me.
Snit is a very sick person.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

On Aug 22, 2024 at 5:20:02 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<va8kji$jq1g$15@dont-email.me>:

> On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>
>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>>
>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>>
>>> All?
>>>
>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>>> was coming back to bite him.
>>
>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
>
> He can't.
> He also cannot explain how 3 weeks ago Harris was against fracking, against
> offshore oil drilling,
> against ICE and so forth and now all of a sudden she flip flops. All within a
> couple of weeks.

Cite.

>
> Are the demons really this ignorant?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:48:22 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7ce46$0$3068676$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7ccb4$0$1895492$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:39:34 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7cc38$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>>>>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>>>>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>>>>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "A well regulated militia".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meaning the people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How are the people "well regulated"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Fuck with us and find out.
>>>>
>>>> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
>>>> with you.
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>
>> You admitted I never have...
>
> Huh?

See above.

Fuck with us and find out.

You admitted you have not been fucked with.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:47:46 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7ce22$0$2385542$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c7cca3$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:40:15 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c7cc61$0$1895504$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>>>>>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>>>>>>>> was coming back to bite him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
>>>>>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You made that up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I knew you would run.
>>>>
>>>> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
>>>>
>>>> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
>>>> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
>>>> me. Why?
>>>
>>> Hey, I'm trying to be like you.
>>
>> You are failing.
>
> I guess I'm just not that stupid.

You are far lower than that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in news:66c7a2d8$0$3068683
$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <XnsB1D68A1CD2A5F629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
> says...
>>
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>> news:va7hji$f7q9$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>> > On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <kjgecjlcm4imt9o11lpd8vpl5n4svf8spv@4ax.com>,
>> >> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>>
>> >>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>So you are against the police and law and order?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
>> >>> >>ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony
>> >>> >>cases against him.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational
gangs
>> >>> >to the big banks.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Trump is scared shitless of her.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
>> >>> >Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a
>> >>> >Republican, but today I stand here as an American." "We had
armed
>> >>> >officers outside our house protecting us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
>> >>> defending Trump.
>> >>
>> >> I watched for the last 3 days what's about to come. It's scary.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> DNC = TRUMP
>> >
>> > It's frightening.
>> > And notice how the demons attack Trump's character, personality,
age,
>> > etc, Anything but talking about Trump's "failed policies". That's
>> > because they can't.
>>
>>
>>
>> How did Trump's "and Mexico will pay for it"
>> policy work out?
>>
>>
>> How did Trump's "I will eliminate the entire
>> national debt" work out?
>>
>>
>> How did Trump's "I will only appoint the best
>> and the brightest" work out?
>
> Maybe if the left didn't stand in his way the whole time.
>

The entire first half of Trump's term
was spent with his party controlling THE
ENTIRE GOVERNMENT.

Where were the balanced budgets?

Where was the "big beautiful wall"?

Where was the "reduced government spending"?

In article <66c7d972$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 5:20:02 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
> <va8kji$jq1g$15@dont-email.me>:
>
> > On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>>
> >>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>>
> >>> All?
> >>>
> >>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >>> was coming back to bite him.
> >>
> >> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> >> rights. Tell us how you know that.
> >
> > He can't.
> > He also cannot explain how 3 weeks ago Harris was against fracking, against
> > offshore oil drilling,
> > against ICE and so forth and now all of a sudden she flip flops. All within a
> > couple of weeks.
>
> Cite.

Where is that proof that Trump will take away your rights?
>
> >
> > Are the demons really this ignorant?

In article <66c7d9b1$0$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:48:22 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7ce46$0$3068676$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7ccb4$0$1895492$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:39:34 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7cc38$0$1895503$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c7ca9c$4$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:56 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c7c97d$0$2385540$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c7c65d$1$1427964$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>>>>>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>>>>>>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>>>>>>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>>>>>>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>>>>>>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>>>>>>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>>>>>>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>>>>>>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> >>>>>>>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> >>>>>>>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> >>>>>>>>> judgment, at least initially.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "A well regulated militia".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Meaning the people.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How are the people "well regulated"?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fuck with us and find out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Good for you to admit that contrary to your many claims I have never "fucked"
> >>>> with you.
> >>>
> >>> Huh?
> >>
> >> You admitted I never have...
> >
> > Huh?
>
> See above.
>
> Fuck with us and find out.
>
> You admitted you have not been fucked with.

Tell to the wife of the last guy that fucked with us.

In article <66c7d9e8$0$3620721$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:47:46 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c7ce22$0$2385542$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c7cca3$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:40:15 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c7cc61$0$1895504$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c7cadb$1$1895496$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 4:27:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c7c95e$0$2385537$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <66c7c656$1$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>> <66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cite someone who said that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> All?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> >>>>>>>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> >>>>>>>> was coming back to bite him.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> >>>>>>> rights. Tell us how you know that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You made that up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I knew you would run.
> >>>>
> >>>> You "know" many things that are not true. It is one of your many challenges.
> >>>>
> >>>> But let us get back to the topic: you fabricated a story about how if Trump
> >>>> won we would lose all "those" rights, and then you falsely attributed it to
> >>>> me. Why?
> >>>
> >>> Hey, I'm trying to be like you.
> >>
> >> You are failing.
> >
> > I guess I'm just not that stupid.
>
> You are far lower than that.

I keep you on a leash.

"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:va81qu$hpqt$8@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hlmecjt9cmbu6jplr184iucao4jpgg6kgs@4ax.com...
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened
>>>> >> >> it up to
>>>> >> >> fraud,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>>>> >> ballot, they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>> >
>>>> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>
>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>
>>>It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>
>>
>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>
> Ok.. PROVE IT.

Actually it is YOUR burden to prove
election fraud changed the outcome of an
election.

>
> Further, it would seem to be your implication that election fraud is
> perfectly acceptable and should be ignored UNTIL and UNLESS it can be
> PROVEN to have altered election results.. IOW, we are suppose to take
> it as a matter of faith that election fraud doesn't count unless you
> can PROVE it made a difference.

That's right.

If election fraud exists prove it.

We don't throw out all elections
because election fraud can't be disproven.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:50:43?AM MST, ""Scout"" wrote
><va81r1$hpqt$12@dont-email.me>:
>> "Snit" <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>
>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>
>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>
>> Joel
>
>Message ID?

He wants me to prove a negative. :)

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 7:37:32 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<jdtfcjhl70fcnj8rdm11a1qt01848sadqq@4ax.com>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 11:50:43?AM MST, ""Scout"" wrote
>> <va81r1$hpqt$12@dont-email.me>:
>>> "Snit" <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>
>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>
>>> Joel
>>
>> Message ID?
>
>
> He wants me to prove a negative. :)

His grasp on logic is clearly very weak.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 22 Aug 2024 16:43:19 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 22, 2024 at 8:30:33?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
><66c7599a$0$3068695$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> In article <66c74a0c$0$1428140$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:31:29 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <66c70572$0$2873008$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>
>>>> In article <66c6a0ab$0$3620714$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 7:04:58 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>> <h17dcj518cvrmd0eps0b1p5kkkfbt93e1h@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:66c6648d$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>> In article <50eccj1fpek2tlb8dmd3t404caoq7ab61n@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your analysis is valid, I believe. Trump has to be able to overcome
>>>>>>>>> the larger base we have, as 2020 showed,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean the fake ballots?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What fake ballots?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>> fraud, but that right there shows how he operates and thinks, he says
>>>>>> things that are stupid and ridiculous *but* that people will believe,
>>>>>> if he says it.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is also insane given how much of the military votes by mail.
>>>>
>>>> The military is a very small portion of the vote.
>>>
>>> And thus does not matter to Trump?
>>
>> Who said that? Oh you did.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> He creates a false narrative, on all kinds of things,
>>>>>> when it serves his purposes. And dumbshit Skeeter, here, eats it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> As does Carroll. He just repeats what Fox and Trump and the like says and
>>>>> shows no understanding.
>>>>
>>>> What makes you think your sources are telling thee truth?
>>>
>>> I think it is extremely unlikely that multiple sources are using the same deep
>>> fakes when they show Trump and NOBODY catches them.
>>
>> That didn't answer the question.

Any Republican allegation is, in fact, a confession.

>For people with brains it did.

When the same fake appears in place after place, the lie is easily exposed.

The right often accuses the left of cooperatively spreading disinformation
despite all evidence to the contrary.

Any Republican allegation is, in fact, a confession.

Example: Some schmuck posted in here that Engeron had repeatedly molested his
daughter. Intensively searching with multiple engines turned up only three
mentions online.

1) A Gateway Pundit article without cites or sources.
2) The same article posted word for word to Twitter but *not* attributed to GP.
3) Another Twitter account posting a reworded version of the article citing GP
as the source.

Stumbled onto this:
"Who is Arthur Engoron? Judge weighing future of Donald Trump empire is Ivy
League-educated ex-cabbie"
<https://apnews.com/article/trump-engoron-letitia-james-fraud-new-york-9bd42690d327f6f63c9eb31c046f8426>

I find it fascinating that Trump's judge was working class.

--
#NEVERtrump