[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>>>You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>>>supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>>
>>Pretty funny coming from the nutcase homo who thinks he's Jesus.
>
>
>I don't think I am, I really am.

Prove it
In the Parking Lot of the Jolly Kone
Is where I’ll suck on your hard bone
Fellatio done with your consent
It won’t cost you one red cent
I gobble cock all day for free!
Why, you can even sodomize me!
I’ll make you scream like a banshee
‘Cause cock-sucking is my specialty!
You’ll find me there 'most every night
And don’t you worry- I won’t bite!
Feeling horny? Got lots of stress?
Look for the dwarf that’s wearing a dress!

©2024 Rudy Canoza Cock Sucking Services

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>>>> You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>>>> supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>>>
>>> Pretty funny coming from the nutcase homo who thinks he's Jesus.
>>
>>
>> I don't think I am, I really am.
>
> Prove it
> In the Parking Lot of the Jolly Kone
> Is where I’ll suck on your hard bone
> Fellatio done with your consent
> It won’t cost you one red cent
> I gobble cock all day for free!
> Why, you can even sodomize me!
> I’ll make you scream like a banshee
> ‘Cause cock-sucking is my specialty!
> You’ll find me there 'most every night
> And don’t you worry- I won’t bite!
> Feeling horny? Got lots of stress?
> Look for the dwarf that’s wearing a dress!
>
> ©2024 Rudy Canoza Cock Sucking Services
>
hi gerk

On 8/22/2024 11:51 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:n2tecj5fbtam8m8ue08hjrsb9fl795hqsu@4ax.com...
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> opened it up to
>>>> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>>>> >> >> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>> >> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone >> >> >>
>>>> >> else's ballot,
>>>> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>> >> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >> >LOL  What a fucking joke.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent >> >>
>>>> voting
>>>> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >How do you know?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>> >> lie.  There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot.  It's a
>>>> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime.  It's not that easy to
>>>> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>> >
>>>> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>
>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>
>>> Very easy.
>>
>>
>> You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.
>
> And just like that,

Another scooterism: empty wheeze.

scooterisms:

"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]

He does these *all the fucking time*

On 8/22/2024 11:50 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com...
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened >>
>>>> >> >> >> it up to
>>>> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>>>> >> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's >> >>
>>>> >> ballot,
>>>> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >LOL  What a fucking joke.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> It's not a joke.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>> >
>>>> >How do you know?
>>>>
>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>> lie.  There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot.  It's a
>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime.  It's not that easy to
>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>
>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>
>>
>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>
> Actually,

Another scooterism: empty wheeze.

scooterisms:

"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]

He does these *all the fucking time*

On 8/22/2024 11:24 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
>
> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hlmecjt9cmbu6jplr184iucao4jpgg6kgs@4ax.com...
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up >>
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> >> fraud,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>> >
>>>> >LOL  What a fucking joke.
>>>>
>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>
>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>
>>
>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>
> Ok.. PROVE IT.

No, scooter, that's not how it works. You are the one claiming there was
election-changing fraud. *Prove it*

>
> Further,

Another scooterism: empty wheeze.

scooterisms:

"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]

He does these *all the fucking time*

On 8/22/2024 11:30 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:

>
> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o5oecj984n339rsldv12b3tekglth4ddgg@4ax.com...
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it >>
>>>> >> >> up to
>>>> >> >> >> fraud,
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's >> >>
>>>> ballot,
>>>> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >LOL  What a fucking joke.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It's not a joke.
>>>> >
>>>> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>
>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>
>>> How do you know?
>>
>>
>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>> lie.
>
> Excellent.
>> There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot.  It's a
>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime.  It's not that easy to
>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>
> And yet,

Another scooterism!

"Actually..." [empty padding]
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding]
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"; "creditability" is not a word]

He does these *all the fucking time*

> we have cases of back dated post marks being applied to such ballots.

No, we don't.

> Signatures that don't match.

Those ballots were "cured."

> The names of the signatures don't match the name of the person who the ballot
> was made for.

Lie.

> Ballots being sent to people who were either long time dead, or totally phony.

Lie.

> Multiple ballots being spend in by the same 'voter'

Lie.

> Ballot harvesting

Lie.

Nothing but lies from scooter.

In article <ahuecj1pp2bioihk03mevvvqqamfusmvit@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >> >> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >How do you know?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >> >> >> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >> >> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >> >> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >> >>
> >> >> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >> >> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >> >
> >> >Very easy.
> >>
> >> You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.
> >
> >So you admit I was right.
>
>
> No, I'm saying that you swallow his imaginary evidence, to beLIEve
> that the votes could be fraudulent on that scale.

They can be very easily.

In article <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>have guns, even violent people.
> >>>
> >>>No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>
> >>If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >
> >I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme. The
> >fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>
>
> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> judgment, at least initially.

Nope. The judge has to make a warrant.

In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>
> > Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
> >>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
> >>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
> >>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
> >>>>> have guns, even violent people.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
> >>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
> >>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
> >>>
> >>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
> >>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
> >>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
> >>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
> >>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
> >>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
> >>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
> >>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
> >>
> >> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
> >> The
> >> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
> >
> >
> > You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> > that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> > regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
> > judgment, at least initially.
>
> "A well regulated militia".

Meaning the people.

Al Feldhauser wrote:
> He does these

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell and
a dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In article <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> ><66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >
> >> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >
> >You want to talk to a cameltoe?
>
>
> Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> What happened to this world?

Drag queens in the schools, men in womens sports, easy on crime
policies, etc...

AlleyCat forgery wrote:
> He does these

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell and
a dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In article <66c78473$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:37:52 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <4ptecjpsd52lh2d7oid4huic4lb3l0nnpt@4ax.com>:
>
> > Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
> >>
> >> You want to talk to a cameltoe?
> >
> >
> > Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
> > are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
> > What happened to this world?
>
> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
>
> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.

Walz lied. Fake valor.

Alan Bond wrote:
> He does these

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell and
a dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In article <404fcj5ii7qpfot9103qb61qhg5hrtkpcj@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
> >of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
> >been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
> >
> >A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
> >does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
> >these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
>
>
> The rules don't exist, for him, and yet he's proclaiming to be the
> candidate of law and order, while running against a prosecuting
> attorney, as a felon. Just wow.

Being an attorney doesn't mean they are honest.

Fani Willis comes to mind.

In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Very easy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >>>
> >>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
> >>
> >> Cite someone who said that.
> >
> > As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>
> All?
>
> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
> was coming back to bite him.

You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
rights. Tell us how you know that.

In article <XnsB1D68A1CD2A5F629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:va7hji$f7q9$1@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <kjgecjlcm4imt9o11lpd8vpl5n4svf8spv@4ax.com>,
> >> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>
> >>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:03:42 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>So you are against the police and law and order?
> >>> >>
> >>> >>No, and neither is Harris and Walz, Trump doesn't get to claim
> >>> >>ownership of that while *he* is the one having multiple felony
> >>> >>cases against him.
> >>> >
> >>> >Harris, as a prosecutor, took on everybody from transnational gangs
> >>> >to the big banks.
> >>> >
> >>> >Trump is scared shitless of her.
> >>> >
> >>> >Several Republicans spoke at the DNC.
> >>> >Jeff Duncan, former Georgia Lieutenant Governor "I am a
> >>> >Republican, but today I stand here as an American." "We had armed
> >>> >officers outside our house protecting us from OTHER REPUBLICANS."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And people can't see what's before their very eyes, yes, they keep
> >>> defending Trump.
> >>
> >> I watched for the last 3 days what's about to come. It's scary.
> >>
> >>
> >> DNC = TRUMP
> >
> > It's frightening.
> > And notice how the demons attack Trump's character, personality, age,
> > etc, Anything but talking about Trump's "failed policies". That's
> > because they can't.
>
>
>
> How did Trump's "and Mexico will pay for it"
> policy work out?
>
>
> How did Trump's "I will eliminate the entire
> national debt" work out?
>
>
> How did Trump's "I will only appoint the best
> and the brightest" work out?

Maybe if the left didn't stand in his way the whole time.

In article <XnsB1D68BC64B1E6629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:va7o94$g5f1$3@dont-email.me:
>
>
> > 1. Trump needs to destroy Kamala in the debates which we all know will
> > be biased in favor of Kamala.
>
>
> You really think Trump won't
> chicken out of yet another debate?
>
>
>
> 2. Trump needs to hammer home the mess
> > 3.5 years of Biden/Kamala have made.
>
>
> You mean the rising stock market,
> the millions of new jobs created, the
> "help wanted" signs everywhere, the
> falling unemployment, the growers and
> construction firm begging illegals NOT
> to leave?
>
818.000 jobs that didn't exist. They lied.
>
>
> Republicans Urge Immigrants to Stay in Florida
> Jun 05, 2023
>
> https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-urge-immigrants-stay-florida-fearing-
> new-laws-impact-1804640
>
>
>
>
>
> Florida GOP lawmaker says the anti-
> immigration law he backed is causing
> a 'major problem' as migrant families
> are leaving the state
> Jun 6, 2023
>
> https://www.businessinsider.com/florida-gop-lawmaker-urges-immigrants-stay-
> voted-anti-immigration-bill-2023-6

On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <66c76a8d$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 8:31:04 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c759b9$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> > In article <66c74a1b$0$5642$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:28:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >> <66c704d1$0$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> In article <66c69fdc$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 6:10:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>> <66c6900e$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> In article <66c68703$1$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 4:21:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>>>> <66c6766b$0$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> In article <66c66885$0$3620717$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 3:04:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> >>>>>>>> <66c66465$0$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In article <aaiccjt4ugtqv8uurlbq6sld1bbsn6afe8@4ax.com>,
>> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "due process" while they shoot someone.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take them away.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree with Trump, and not Klaus, good, I'm with you.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> No American agrees there should be no due process.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> It's one thing if they appeal and show they aren't violent, and get
>> >>>>>>>>>> their guns back, but if there's a reasonable suspicion of violent
>> >>>>>>>>>> intent, with a gun owner, law enforcement shouldn't be burdened with
>> >>>>>>>>>> "due process", while the guns are still there to be shot at someone.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Only if he/she is a threat. I don't like the red light law because your
>> >>>>>>>>> neighbor can decide he doesn't like you and make a call.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> You fear you will come across as not stable enough. Understandable in your
>> >>>>>>>> case.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Well you can't refute so I guess I win this right?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I agree you might not come across as stable enough.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You can't refute it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I do not refute the fact you might not come across as stable enough to own a
>> >>>> weapon. We have reached agreement.
>> >>
>> >> You ignored this and tried to push conflict.
>>
>> Oops you did it again.
>
> Do you always respond to yourself?

He does.
Especially when snit mixes up a bad batch of jenkem.
He really goes off the rails when that happens.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

In article <va89ih$inr6$7@dont-email.me>, pothead@snakebite.com says...
>
> On 2024-08-22, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <66c76a8d$0$4027808$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 8:31:04 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c759b9$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >> > In article <66c74a1b$0$5642$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 2:28:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >> <66c704d1$0$2873017$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>
> >> >>> In article <66c69fdc$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 6:10:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >>>> <66c6900e$0$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> In article <66c68703$1$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 4:21:23 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >>>>>> <66c6766b$0$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> In article <66c66885$0$3620717$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 3:04:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> >>>>>>>> <66c66465$0$1895509$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> In article <aaiccjt4ugtqv8uurlbq6sld1bbsn6afe8@4ax.com>,
> >> >>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who among us said a crazy person should have a gun?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about ones who already *do* have gun(s), whether they should have
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "due process" while they shoot someone.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and?
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Take them away.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree with Trump, and not Klaus, good, I'm with you.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> No American agrees there should be no due process.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> It's one thing if they appeal and show they aren't violent, and get
> >> >>>>>>>>>> their guns back, but if there's a reasonable suspicion of violent
> >> >>>>>>>>>> intent, with a gun owner, law enforcement shouldn't be burdened with
> >> >>>>>>>>>> "due process", while the guns are still there to be shot at someone.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Only if he/she is a threat. I don't like the red light law because your
> >> >>>>>>>>> neighbor can decide he doesn't like you and make a call.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> You fear you will come across as not stable enough. Understandable in your
> >> >>>>>>>> case.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Well you can't refute so I guess I win this right?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I agree you might not come across as stable enough.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> You can't refute it.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I do not refute the fact you might not come across as stable enough to own a
> >> >>>> weapon. We have reached agreement.
> >> >>
> >> >> You ignored this and tried to push conflict.
> >>
> >> Oops you did it again.
> >
> > Do you always respond to yourself?
>
> He does.
> Especially when snit mixes up a bad batch of jenkem.
> He really goes off the rails when that happens.

Had to look it up. That's sick. I bet he's hooked on Kratom too.

On 8/22/2024 2:14 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <7ONxO.808464$MC82.765094@fx17.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 8/22/2024 1:37 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <404fcj5ii7qpfot9103qb61qhg5hrtkpcj@4ax.com>,
>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "It?s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
>>>>> of Honor, that?s soldiers, they?re either in very bad shape because they?ve
>>>>> been hit so many times by bullets, or they?re dead."
>>>>>
>>>>> A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
>>>>> does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
>>>>> these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The rules don't exist, for him, and yet he's proclaiming to be the
>>>> candidate of law and order, while running against a prosecuting
>>>> attorney, as a felon. Just wow.
>>>
>>> Being an attorney doesn't mean they are honest.
>>
>> Being an attorney is not what makes Kamala Harris honest. Being of high
>> character is what makes her honest.
>>
>>>
>>> Fani Willis comes to mind.
>>
>> She's honest.
>
> Already proved

Yes.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 8/22/2024 3:04 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <8xOxO.660027$qO%5.11234@fx16.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 8/22/2024 2:08 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <gfLxO.68609$ACMd.16789@fx05.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/22/2024 10:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <d8KxO.682684$ZhK.114592@fx14.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/22/2024 2:31 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>>>>>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <66c6a0ab$0$3620714$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2024 at 7:04:58 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>>>> <h17dcj518cvrmd0eps0b1p5kkkfbt93e1h@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:66c6648d$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <50eccj1fpek2tlb8dmd3t404caoq7ab61n@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your analysis is valid, I believe. Trump has to be able to overcome
>>>>>>>>>>>> the larger base we have, as 2020 showed,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean the fake ballots?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What fake ballots?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>> fraud, but that right there shows how he operates and thinks, he says
>>>>>>>>> things that are stupid and ridiculous *but* that people will believe,
>>>>>>>>> if he says it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is also insane given how much of the military votes by mail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The military is a very small portion of the vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He creates a false narrative, on all kinds of things,
>>>>>>>>> when it serves his purposes. And dumbshit Skeeter, here, eats it up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As does Carroll. He just repeats what Fox and Trump and the like says and
>>>>>>>> shows no understanding.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What makes you think your sources are telling thee truth?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Their historical reputation for telling the truth. Your sources are shit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that's funny
>>>>
>>>> No, it's the truth.
>>>
>>> That was funny too.
>>
>> No, it's the truth. The news media that you stupidly deride as "MSM" are the
>> true reputable media.
>
> How do you know?

I'm the kind of person who just knows.

>>
>>> I saw your sig that you can't prove.
>>
>> It is self-evident that your posts are content-free. I don't have to prove it.
>
> How about the rest of the sig liar?

It's all accurate.

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On 8/22/2024 3:04 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:

> In article <ByOxO.660028$qO%5.295679@fx16.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 8/22/2024 2:08 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>
>>> In article <AhLxO.68610$ACMd.34195@fx05.iad>,
>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/22/2024 10:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <v8KxO.682685$ZhK.92529@fx14.iad>,
>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/22/2024 2:29 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
>>>>>> molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <h17dcj518cvrmd0eps0b1p5kkkfbt93e1h@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:66c6648d$0$1895508$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <50eccj1fpek2tlb8dmd3t404caoq7ab61n@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your analysis is valid, I believe. Trump has to be able to overcome
>>>>>>>>>>> the larger base we have, as 2020 showed,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You mean the fake ballots?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What fake ballots?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It does.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't and it didn't. There was no "massive fraud."
>>>>>
>>>>> Were you there?
>>>>
>>>> We know there was no "massive fraud."
>>>
>>> Were you there?
>>
>> Stupid content-free question.
>
> Yet here you are.

Yes, here I am, ignoring your content-free question.

>>
>> We know there was no "massive fraud." I don't need to be at any "there" to know
>> that there was no massive fraud. We all know it.

Yes, there is "we."

--
Another content-free post from Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing

On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:41:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c7a287$0$3068679$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c784f1$0$5641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>>>
>>>> Cite someone who said that.
>>>
>>> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.
>>
>> All?
>>
>> But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
>> bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
>> was coming back to bite him.
>
> You're running again. You said if Trump won you would lose all those
> rights. Tell us how you know that.

You made that up.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 1:30:20 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c79fdd$0$3068685$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c784ba$1$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:29:42 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> <k8tecjt24kh23eg19blqsuoi8aoe5h835u@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>>>> find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>>>> boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>>>> who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>>>> have guns, even violent people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>>>> relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>>>> it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>>>> more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>>>> guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>>>> uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>>>> willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>>>> little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>>>> initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>>>> enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>>>>
>>>> I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme.
>>>> The
>>>> fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
>>> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
>>> regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
>>> judgment, at least initially.
>>
>> "A well regulated militia".
>
> Meaning the people.

How are the people "well regulated"?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.