On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>
>>> Very easy.
>>
>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>
> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.

Cite someone who said that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <66c772a6$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
>
> You want to talk to a cameltoe?

Evade and avoid. It's what you do best.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>> >> >
>> >> >How do you know?
>> >>
>> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>> >> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>> >
>> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>
>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>
>Very easy.

You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>
> >>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
> >>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How do you know?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >>>
> >>> Very easy.
> >>
> >> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
> >
> > Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>
> Cite someone who said that.

As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.

In article <n2tecj5fbtam8m8ue08hjrsb9fl795hqsu@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
> >> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
> >> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> >> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >How do you know?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> >> >> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> >> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> >> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
> >> >
> >> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
> >>
> >> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> >> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
> >
> >Very easy.
>
>
> You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.

So you admit I was right.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>But it's not that simple, if the police investigate the claim, and
>>>>find it false, the person won't have their gun taken. The question
>>>>boils down to whether you trust the police to do this. If not them,
>>>>who? This "due process" BS is just a way of saying everyone should
>>>>have guns, even violent people.
>>>
>>>No, it's not. We do not and should not have the power to go around arbitrarily
>>>relieving people of their property. No matter what due process is decided on,
>>>it must be followed. We are a nation of laws.
>>
>>If we were talking about something that isn't a lethal weapon, I'd be
>>more willing to talk about "due process", we need to start acting like
>>guns are what they are, instruments of human death. Are there valid
>>uses of guns, yes, including self-defense, but someone the police are
>>willing to assert is dangerous shouldn't possess them, even for a
>>little while. If we can't trust the police to judge this, at least
>>initially (there is always time to adjudicate), then we're just
>>enabling monsters to commit violent crime.
>
>I understand and empathize with your position but I find it rather extreme. The
>fifth and fourteenth amendments apply. Due process, sorry.

You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
regulated. "Due process" really could mean the police making a
judgment, at least initially.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:26:00 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<66c774a9$0$3068689$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very easy.
>>>>
>>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>>
>>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>>
>> Cite someone who said that.
>
> As soon as you cite who said you were going to lose all those rights.

All?

But why not learn what Trump and the Republicans are doing? Hell, Trump was
bragging about harming equal rights for women until he realized how much that
was coming back to bite him.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 8/22/2024 11:29 AM, Joel wrote:
> You have to realize that guns are not "property" in the same manner
> that a couch is, or something, they're tools of death, they're
> regulated.

Very much the same as automobiles and airplanes, true.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>>Go fuck yourself[, Klaus], boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>>You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>>supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>
>I just don't understand why people don't like you.

It's OK to hate me (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNImT0OqcI8), but
I'm still necessary, to keep the world running well.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:16:48?AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
><66c77277$0$1780$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> Why isn't cameltoe talking about hers?
>
>You want to talk to a cameltoe?

Isn't it amazing, how misogynist these lamers are? Even *women*, who
are MAGA, will say "he can grab my pussy any time he wants", and crap.
What happened to this world?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:72kecjd104vnjdvm1q8pi86jadqqvkuucs@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up to
>>> >> fraud,
>>> >
>>> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>
>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>
>>LOL What a fucking joke.
>
>
> It's not a joke.

Oh, you were serious?

That's even more of a joke then.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlmecjt9cmbu6jplr184iucao4jpgg6kgs@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it up
>>> >> >> to
>>> >> >> fraud,
>>> >> >
>>> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>> >>
>>> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's ballot,
>>> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>> >
>>> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>
>>> It's not a joke.
>>
>>It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>
>
> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.

Ok.. PROVE IT.

Further, it would seem to be your implication that election fraud is
perfectly acceptable and should be ignored UNTIL and UNLESS it can be PROVEN
to have altered election results.. IOW, we are suppose to take it as a
matter of faith that election fraud doesn't count unless you can PROVE it
made a difference.

Yep, according to Joel, commit all the election fraud you want, may the best
cheater win as long as they can avoid being caught....

Sounds like something you might find in some 3rd world country with a
corrupt government.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:o5oecj984n339rsldv12b3tekglth4ddgg@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened it
>>> >> >> >> up to
>>> >> >> >> fraud,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>>> >> >> ballot,
>>> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>>> >>
>>> >> It's not a joke.
>>> >
>>> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>
>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>
>>How do you know?
>
>
> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
> lie.

Excellent. Please present that information so that we can look at it and
determine exactly how much election fraud was committed and how it was
proven that there wasn't enough to change the outcome.

> There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.

And yet, we have cases of back dated post marks being applied to such
ballots.
Signatures that don't match.
The names of the signatures don't match the name of the person who the
ballot was made for.
Ballots being sent to people who were either long time dead, or totally
phony.
Multiple ballots being spend in by the same 'voter'
Ballot harvesting

But all that is meaningless according to Joel until and unless someone can
PROVE it altered the election.

So Joel, to be clear you're suggesting that the election should go to the
party that can cheat enough to change the outcome and not be caught at it?

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:66c76a9d$0$1784$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <o5oecj984n339rsldv12b3tekglth4ddgg@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened
>> >> >> >> >> it up to
>> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>> >> >> >> ballot,
>> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's not a joke.
>> >> >
>> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>> >>
>> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>> >
>> >How do you know?
>>
>>
>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>
> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.

Here's an interesting case:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/voter-fraud-california-man-finds-dozens-of-ballots-stacked-outside-home

But we're told this is 'unimportant' that evidence of mass fraud doesn't
count according to Joel until someone PROVES it alter the election.

Then of course, we have attempts like this, which we're told to ignore until
AFTER it has been shown to have changed an election.... and be PROVEN to
have done so.

https://abc13.com/texas-vote-by-mail-fraud-ken-paxton-in-ballot-gregg-county-commission-arrested/6544331/

Indeed, I wonder if Joel is aware that the BIGGEST case of election fraud in
US history was done by Democrats?

Heck, here's another one by Democrats that was so bad that it represented
about 10% of the ballots cast

https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/report/where-theres-smoke-theres-fire-100000-stolen-votes-chicago

But again.. according to Joel fraud even on this scale is immaterial and
nothing should be done about it unless it can be proven such fraud actually
changed the outcome.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened
>>> >> >> >> >> it up to
>>> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>>> >> >> >> ballot,
>>> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> It's not a joke.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>> >>
>>> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent voting
>>> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>> >
>>> >How do you know?
>>>
>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>
>>It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>
>
> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.

Actually, it's quite easy..

Case in point.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/voter-fraud-california-man-finds-dozens-of-ballots-stacked-outside-home

Then we have issues like this one from the 2020 election.

https://nationalfile.com/suspicious-late-night-va-ballot-drop-accounts-for-73-of-all-biden-votes-in-fairfax-county/

However, according to Joel, election fraud doesn't matter as long as you're
not caught.

"Snit" <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:66c772d3$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:15:38 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <66c77230$0$1785$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> In article <66c77026$0$5651$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2024 at 10:06:46 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <66c77027$0$212416$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>
>>>> In article <ehrecjhb5g9eb27fbhuh73dptf2lon9rmq@4ax.com>,
>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots opened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fraud,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone else's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ballot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL What a fucking joke.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not a joke.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent
>>>>>>>>> voting
>>>>>>>>> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you know?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>>>>>> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>>>>>> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>>>>>> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>>>
>>>> Very easy.
>>>
>>> Leave it to a right winger to know how to cheat.
>>
>> Leave it to a lefty loon to think it can't happen.
>
> Cite someone who said that.

Joel

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:n2tecj5fbtam8m8ue08hjrsb9fl795hqsu@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> Trump claimed that the massive use of mail-in ballots
>>> >> >> >> >> >> opened it up to
>>> >> >> >> >> >> fraud,
>>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >It does. Explain why it wouldn't.
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> Because it's not as simple as just filling out someone
>>> >> >> >> >> else's ballot,
>>> >> >> >> >> they verify them as they're processed and counted.
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >LOL What a fucking joke.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> It's not a joke.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >It is. You can't prove it is completely fraud free.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> "Completely", maybe not, but there certainly wasn't fraudulent
>>> >> >> voting
>>> >> >> going on to an extent that would change the outcome.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >How do you know?
>>> >>
>>> >> Because I actually look at information, instead of absorbing Trump's
>>> >> lie. There are protocols for handling a mailed ballot. It's a
>>> >> sensitive document, falsifying it is a crime. It's not that easy to
>>> >> have "millions of ballots" get fraudulently used.
>>> >
>>> >It is when you can't vet them all which you know doesn't happen.
>>>
>>> It does happen, dude, this is serious business, it's imaginary to
>>> think that it'd be easy, to exploit these ballots.
>>
>>Very easy.
>
>
> You are the botnet, I guess, just a drone of Trump's.

And just like that, Joel waves the white flag.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>>> you expose yourself as an NRA asshole, wanting to protect violent
>>>>>>>gun owners. Fuck your guns. Fuck violence. You're an ignorant,
>>>>>>>redneck CRACKER.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ROFLMAO
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You forgot ARMED redneck cracker. And you aren't.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not qualified to own a gun, I'm a diagnosed schizophrenic who's
>>>>>had a suicide attempt some time ago.
>>>>
>>>>Too bad. Your failure, I mean.
>>>
>>>Speaking of "failure",
>>
>>Yes, we were speaking of you. If you ever need any pointers on how to
>>get it right the next time, let me know.
>
>
>Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.

Pretty funny coming from the nutcase homo who thinks he's Jesus.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <pugecjhbjgf3ujvi0vllcvnatpum1087a0@4ax.com>,
>>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>>> you expose yourself as an NRA asshole, wanting to protect violent
>>> >>>>>>gun owners. Fuck your guns. Fuck violence. You're an ignorant,
>>> >>>>>>redneck CRACKER.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>ROFLMAO
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>You forgot ARMED redneck cracker. And you aren't.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>I'm not qualified to own a gun, I'm a diagnosed schizophrenic who's
>>> >>>>had a suicide attempt some time ago.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Too bad. Your failure, I mean.
>>> >>
>>> >>Speaking of "failure",
>>> >
>>> >Yes, we were speaking of you. If you ever need any pointers on how to
>>> >get it right the next time, let me know.
>>>
>>> Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>>> You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>>> supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>>
>>I love it when you get all upset. You stomp your feet and your racism
>>comes out.
>
>
>And yet you have nothing to say about Klaus's abusiveness, because
>you're not really interested in consistent critique, merely taking
>potshots.

ABUSIVENESS?!?!?!?!?!

ANd here I was just trying to help you out.

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> You really think Trump won't
> chicken out of yet another debate?

You misspelled Commiela.

Ya rancid cornholer.

Chips Loral <loralandclinton@invalid.co> wrote:

>> It's OK to hate me
>
>I think it may be mandatory.

But I'm doing something of major consequence. It makes up for my
faults, which I've begun to truly overcome, anyway, they're in the
past.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> How did Trump's "I will only appoint the best
> and the brightest" work out?

How does the Senior Executive Service still exist, cornholer?

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>"It’s actually much better, because everyone who gets the congressional Medal
>of Honor, that’s soldiers, they’re either in very bad shape because they’ve
>been hit so many times by bullets, or they’re dead."
>
>A few years ago that would have been enough to end a presidential bid. Trump
>does such things often. The Republicans do not care... their whole platform
>these days is "PWN THE LIBS"... do things to actively harm others.

The rules don't exist, for him, and yet he's proclaiming to be the
candidate of law and order, while running against a prosecuting
attorney, as a felon. Just wow.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>>You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>>supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>
>Pretty funny coming from the nutcase homo who thinks he's Jesus.

I don't think I am, I really am.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Go fuck yourself, boomer cracker asshole, psychotic gun owner, retard.
>>> You are a mistake of evolution, the self-evidence of white
>>> supremacy-ism's lie. You're the spawn of the devil.
>>
>> Pretty funny coming from the nutcase homo who thinks he's Jesus.
>
>
> I don't think I am, I really am.
>
you can't be because i'm god and i would know