[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:

>>>And you want the death penalty for said "crimes".
>>
>> It's good that you accepted my schooling you that these are, indeed,
>> criminals. Moving on....
>>
>> Baxter will now run-- screaming, with his skirt pulled up over his
>> head-- as he desperately searches for any post where I made this
>> claim.
>>
>> [crickets.wav]

[crickets.wav]
>>> BTW, they get a
>>>hearing in Court for said "crime". Whatever happend to "who is
>>>without sin cast the first stone"?
>>
>> I have never crossed a border illegally.
>
>But you've broken one or more of those other laws. YOU are a criminal -
>even if you've not been caught and procecuted.

Baxter will now run-- screaming, with his skirt pulled up over his
head-- as he desperately searches for any proof where I broke one or
more of these other laws.

[sad_lonely_cricket.wav]

>>>Are you going to advocated for everyone who
>>>commits such "crimes" to be deported?
>>
>> Yes. And they can never return
>
>So you want to strip people of their citizenship!!!

No, you stupid fuck. I want illegal aliens arrested and deported.

How fucking stupid are you?

>>> Whether or not they have their day in Court?
>>
>> Is that what you want?
>>
>> It's preferable to PREVENT them from crossing the border illegally in
>> the first place. Of course, you are against this, aren't you?
>>
>>
>If prefention is preferable, why do you support tRump and those Repugs
>that voted against such measures?

Baxter will now run-- screaming, with his skirt pulled up over his
head-- as he desperately searches for any post where I supported Trump
and Republicans that voted against "such measures."

[sad_lonely_tired_cricket.wav]

On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:46:44 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:

>https://www.citizen.org/article/military-industrial-complex-contributions-report/
>
>JULY 7, 2022
>
>Military-Industrial Complex Clinches Nearly 450,000% Return on Investment
>After Industry Gives $10 Million to Congressional Defense Committee
>Members, DOD Receives Potential $45 Billion Spending Increase

Why should anybody believe them? They can't even do basic math.

45,000,000,000 is 4,500 % of 10,000,000 not 450,000%.

When a publication makes that big an error, especially in an important headline and then
doesn't correct it, you know nothing they write is credible.

And of course even that ROI figure is wrong. That spending increase isn't pure profit.
Considering the defense industries run off margins of less than 10%, they actually got
less that half of their "bribe" money back.

Maybe 'citizen.org' should hire a third grade teacher to review their math from now on.

Swill
NP: Carole King - Corazón

On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:17:57 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:

>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
>news:0l197j1842rael2umg10pjsfchdmim96d1@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:59:43 -0600, CaLaVeRa <cv@invalid.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/17/2024 1:11 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>>> The US economy is the envy of the world.
>>>> Bigger, stronger, and more robust than any other major player.
>>>
>>>Military industrial complex.
>>
>>https://tinyurl.com/2vdpmzf4
>>***
>>US Defense Industry Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts
>>(2024 - 2032)
>>
>>The US Defense Market is Segmented by Armed Forces (Army, Navy, and
>>Air Force) and Type (Fixed-Wing Aircraft, Rotorcraft, Ground Vehicles,
>>Naval Vessels, C4isr, Weapons and Ammunition, Protection and Training
>>Equipment, and Unmanned Systems). The Report Offers Market Size and
>>Forecast for all the Above Segments in Value (USD).
>>
>>Market Size (2024): USD 309.77 Billion
>>***
>>
>>https://tinyurl.com/3hex9y8m
>>***
>>US arms exports hit record high in fiscal 2023
>>WASHINGTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Sales of U.S. military equipment to
>>foreign governments in 2023 rose 16% to a record $238 billion, the
>>U.S. State Department said on Monday, as countries sought to replenish
>>stocks sent to Ukraine and prepare for major conflicts.
>>***
>>
>>https://tinyurl.com/35hdmats
>>Estimated size of US GDP in 2024: 28,781.08 billion.
>>
>>IOW the "Military Industrial Complex' counts for just under 2% of the
>>US GDP.
>>
>
>Ever heard of black budgets and covert appropriations, Mr mainstream?

Yes.

Jimmy Carter axed the B-1 not because he wanted to save money, but because his
administration had become convinced by the Skunkworks project that stealth was a better
technology to invest in than size or airspeed. I bet you didn't read THAT in the NYT back
in the day!

Yes, that's right, it was Jimmy Carter's decision to complete development of what would
become the F-117 Nighthawk.

2024 defense budget: 825,000,000,000
2023 US GDP: 27,360,000,000,000

This works out to the defense budget accounting for 3% of US GDP using the most recent
figures available to me. Statista's GDP figure is a trillion or so off from the one I
used.

Swill

On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 11:15:23 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:17:57 +1000, "Andrew W" wrote:
>>"Malte Runz" wrote in message
<snip>
>>>IOW the "Military Industrial Complex' counts for just under 2% of the
>>>US GDP.
>>Ever heard of black budgets and covert appropriations, Mr mainstream?
>
>I'm sure this is another example of you having access to superduper
>top secret hush hush evidence of enormous amounts of dollars that are
>spent in the most evil ways possible by the cabal.

Andrew, if you don't believe the US defense dept is spending 825B this year, how much do
you believe they're spending and what are your sources for that information?

Swill
NP: Pablo Cruise - Atlanta June

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:50:22 -0000 (UTC), Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote:

>Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
>news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>
>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>> > Baxter wrote:
>>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
>>>> >> that comedic?
>>>> >
>>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>>>>
>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
>>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
>>>
>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>>>
>>
>> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to apply
>> for asylum.
>
>You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
>
>https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum

Perhaps you missed this sentence in your cite:

"You may only file this application if you are physically present in the United States,
and you are not a U.S. citizen."

Swill

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:54:40 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:

>Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
>@news.mixmin.net:
>
>> Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
>> news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>> > Baxter wrote:
>>>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
>>>>> >> that comedic?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
>>>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
>>>>
>>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to apply
>>> for asylum.
>>
>> You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
>>
>> https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
>>
>
>Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.

It reinforces it.

"You may only file this application if you are physically present in the United States,
and you are not a U.S. citizen."

Swill

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:32:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>So you approve of the current situation at the border? You are ok with
>other countries letting there criminals come here? It doesn't bother you
>in the last 3 years more people from China and the Middle East have just
>walked in?

It's called brain drain. We're getting their best and brightest. They're seeking
opportunity in the United States that they can't get in their own far inferior countries.
Just as what happened in the mass migrations from Europe in the late 19th to mid 20th
centuries (escaping constant war and lack of economic opportunity).

These people are coming here to work. Are there bad apples? Yes, of course there are
just as there were in the folks migrating in the seventeenth through twentieth centuries.
The west wasn't wild because everybody was so pleasant and law abiding. There were plenty
of crims.

But the fact remains that these are people with the determination and willingness to
sacrifice everything they know to come here, be Americans and build America no less than
our ancestors who came here a century ago.

I welcome them and rather than allow only legal immigrants, I say we save ourselves some
time and effort and just legalize the immigrants we're already getting.

Swill
NP: Gino Vanelli - People Gotta Move (sometimes the song is just the right one!)

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:23:06 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Criminals. Like most brain damaged leftists, you don't know what a
>crime is.
>
>CRIME: an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be
>prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law.
>
>CRIMINAL: a person who has committed a crime.

Crime is relative. I wouldn't let an armed robber or rapist in but the crime of a hungry
family looking for work isn't a problem. C'mon in! I'll make you some sandwiches and
send you on your way to town where I'm sure you can find work.

Swill

In article <pv0h7j1ot72t139r6ov39svjsl85u07fpc@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:54:40 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
> >Nikos Aliagas <nospam@oui.fr> wrote in news:v55s7d$3gdlk$5
> >@news.mixmin.net:
> >
> >> Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
> >> news:v55ddp$3if4b$6@dont-email.me:
> >>
> >>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
> >>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
> >>>>> > Baxter wrote:
> >>>>> >> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
> >>>>> >> that comedic?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > How is leaving our borders open for invaders
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
> >>>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
> >>>>
> >>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> So what?! The LAW says, that if you're here you are allowed to apply
> >>> for asylum.
> >>
> >> You've never read the law or you wouldn't have written that.
> >>
> >> https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum
> >>
> >
> >Nothing in that reference contradicts what I wrote.
>
> It reinforces it.
>
> "You may only file this application if you are physically present in the United States,
> and you are not a U.S. citizen."
>
> Swill

But if you break the law getting in you should be deported.

In article <o11h7jh3cbfpj0ms8qvcfo233j8of2j0ft@4ax.com>,
governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:32:59 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >So you approve of the current situation at the border? You are ok with
> >other countries letting there criminals come here? It doesn't bother you
> >in the last 3 years more people from China and the Middle East have just
> >walked in?
>
> It's called brain drain. We're getting their best and brightest. They're seeking
> opportunity in the United States that they can't get in their own far inferior countries.
> Just as what happened in the mass migrations from Europe in the late 19th to mid 20th
> centuries (escaping constant war and lack of economic opportunity).

You really are that dumb.
>
> These people are coming here to work. Are there bad apples? Yes, of course there are
> just as there were in the folks migrating in the seventeenth through twentieth centuries.
> The west wasn't wild because everybody was so pleasant and law abiding. There were plenty
> of crims.

More now than ever. You would rather allow that then do the right thing.
>
> But the fact remains that these are people with the determination and willingness to
> sacrifice everything they know to come here, be Americans and build America no less than
> our ancestors who came here a century ago.

Are those the ones raping 13 year old girls after being deported many
times?
>
> I welcome them and rather than allow only legal immigrants, I say we save ourselves some
> time and effort and just legalize the immigrants we're already getting.

You approve of them breaking the law.
>
> Swill
> NP: Gino Vanelli - People Gotta Move (sometimes the song is just the right one!)

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:t5og7j9rp0m3f7ldol3m4t1p6gqao24l4e@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:08:22 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:ku9c7j9diqmhbjue83fb8afqs95hbmebsa@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:50:33 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>news:c1g97jt0aeq0unru7nnh4qb9n1ifq6j980@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>It was worse under Obama and his predecessors. It was on the way down
>>>>>>under
>>>>>>Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's mind boggling to see how much of Trump's candy you suck on.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Candy? Like the MSM kool aid?
>>>
>>>I ignore the MSM, as you call it. There are too many other ways of
>>>getting
>>>information.
>>>
>>
>>Really? Funny how you badmouth Trump like the MSM.
>
>Yeah, I do. That's because his status as a criminal asshole white
>supremacist isn't mere
>MSM propaganda, but is my opinion based on multiple reports across the
>entire political
>spectrum including what his own sycophants have to say about him.
>
>I don't agree with leftists because they're left any more than I disagree
>with rightists
>just because they're on the right. I listen to both, corroborate what I
>can and make up
>my own mind. I have no handlers telling me what to think.
>

Yeah yeah. You are influenced. It's the political hate factor undercurrent.
You've allowed yourself to be caught up.
There is no real evidence that Trump has done anything more illegal than any
other New York businessman. None are fully honest.

He was originally indicted on misdemeanours, and the left Dem prosecutors
sneakily changed them to felonies because they can't jail him otherwise.
They want to take him down.
Why? Because Trump is a system buster who called out the real crooked left
and now they're taking revenge. It's so obvious it's not funny.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:jkog7jt69hru914uhl9qnpemvr7ie2hgtu@4ax.com...
>
>On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:36:26 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:
>
>>You guys should get rid of the DOJ entirely. Just get a 'medium' or
>>what ever you call them, and let them tell you who did it.
>
>Why are you even responding to some conspiracist idiot who believes in ESP?
>

The CIA created your mentality. They've been flogging the 'conspiracy
theory' meme in the media for decades.
Alt.atheism is a ship of blind ignorant materialist fools.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:fmog7jtsu626nke590rfa1jvaa4kj6ujpo@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:19:48 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:r3ac7jlmtrmte93vnhts5em88gkdqbthc7@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:57:59 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Discrediting sources is the government's number one tactic for burying
>>>>information that they don't
>>>>approve of.
>>>
>>>The *government's* number one tactic?
>>>
>>>BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>>>
>>
>>You call yourself Governor but obviously know nothing about governments,
>>except what they portray to the public. It's fake.
>>Like Michael Jackson said, they don't care about us.
>
>Your reading comprehension is lacking. I don't mean to say that government
>doesn't use
>that tactic, but that it's hardly a government exclusive. Partisans, left
>and right do it
>all the time. Not that it isn't appropriate in some cases. When a fool
>come in here
>trying to use WND or GP as source for a story, the only appropriate actions
>are to laugh
>them out of the room or improve the gene poll by shooting them dead.
>

I use 'government' as a broad term. It's the present controlling
establishments and corporations I refer to. Yes corporations influence
governments quite heavily. Also lobby groups, the rich and secret societies.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> wrote
in
news:amug7jpu0lvnmje67s5a4mm47et0n4tabd@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:

> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>>>>And you want the death penalty for said "crimes".
>>>
>>> It's good that you accepted my schooling you that these are, indeed,
>>> criminals. Moving on....
>>>
>>> Baxter will now run-- screaming, with his skirt pulled up over his
>>> head-- as he desperately searches for any post where I made this
>>> claim.
>>>
>>> [crickets.wav]
>
> [crickets.wav]
>
>>>> BTW, they get a
>>>>hearing in Court for said "crime". Whatever happend to "who is
>>>>without sin cast the first stone"?
>>>
>>> I have never crossed a border illegally.
>>
>>But you've broken one or more of those other laws. YOU are a criminal
-
>>even if you've not been caught and procecuted.
>
> Baxter will now run-- screaming, with his skirt pulled up over his
> head-- as he desperately searches for any proof where I broke one or
> more of these other laws.
>
> [sad_lonely_cricket.wav]

KKKlaun will again never answer why someone just walking across an
imaginary line is such a threat.

>
>>>>Are you going to advocated for everyone who
>>>>commits such "crimes" to be deported?
>>>
>>> Yes. And they can never return
>>
>>So you want to strip people of their citizenship!!!
>
> No, you stupid fuck. I want illegal aliens arrested and deported.
>
> How fucking stupid are you?

Why? How does someone whose only "crime" is walking across an imaginary
line affect you or your life?

>
>>>> Whether or not they have their day in Court?
>>>
>>> Is that what you want?
>>>
>>> It's preferable to PREVENT them from crossing the border illegally in
>>> the first place. Of course, you are against this, aren't you?
>>>
>>>
>>If prefention is preferable, why do you support tRump and those Repugs
>>that voted against such measures?
>
> Baxter will now run-- screaming, with his skirt pulled up over his
> head-- as he desperately searches for any post where I supported Trump
> and Republicans that voted against "such measures."
>
> [sad_lonely_tired_cricket.wav]
>

KKKlaun will again never answer why someone just walking across an
imaginary line is such a threat.

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:9tog7jphipr1epi3904fpdlv638qn77bmv@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:27:46 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
><snip>
>>Your type only accept convenient mainstream stuff.
>
>That's because much if not most of what we get from the far left and far
>right is
>bullshit.
>
>The facts and the truth are both found much closer to the middle.
>

You think you're middle?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:o11h7jh3cbfpj0ms8qvcfo233j8of2j0ft@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:32:59 -0600, Skeeter
> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>So you approve of the current situation at the border? You are ok with
>>other countries letting there criminals come here? It doesn't bother
>>you in the last 3 years more people from China and the Middle East
>>have just walked in?
>
> It's called brain drain. We're getting their best and brightest.
> They're seeking opportunity in the United States that they can't get
> in their own far inferior countries. Just as what happened in the mass
> migrations from Europe in the late 19th to mid 20th centuries
> (escaping constant war and lack of economic opportunity).
>
> These people are coming here to work. Are there bad apples? Yes, of
> course there are just as there were in the folks migrating in the
> seventeenth through twentieth centuries. The west wasn't wild because
> everybody was so pleasant and law abiding. There were plenty of
> crims.
>
> But the fact remains that these are people with the determination and
> willingness to sacrifice everything they know to come here, be
> Americans and build America no less than our ancestors who came here a
> century ago.
>
> I welcome them and rather than allow only legal immigrants, I say we
> save ourselves some time and effort and just legalize the immigrants
> we're already getting.
>
> Swill
> NP: Gino Vanelli - People Gotta Move (sometimes the song is just the
> right one!)
>

Well said.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
news:66789491$0$2873006$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

> In article <o11h7jh3cbfpj0ms8qvcfo233j8of2j0ft@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:32:59 -0600, Skeeter
>> <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >So you approve of the current situation at the border? You are ok
>> >with other countries letting there criminals come here? It doesn't
>> >bother you in the last 3 years more people from China and the Middle
>> >East have just walked in?
>>
>> It's called brain drain. We're getting their best and brightest.
>> They're seeking opportunity in the United States that they can't get
>> in their own far inferior countries. Just as what happened in the
>> mass migrations from Europe in the late 19th to mid 20th centuries
>> (escaping constant war and lack of economic opportunity).
>
>
> You really are that dumb.
>>
>> These people are coming here to work. Are there bad apples? Yes, of
>> course there are just as there were in the folks migrating in the
>> seventeenth through twentieth centuries. The west wasn't wild because
>> everybody was so pleasant and law abiding. There were plenty of
>> crims.
>
> More now than ever. You would rather allow that then do the right
> thing.
>>
>> But the fact remains that these are people with the determination and
>> willingness to sacrifice everything they know to come here, be
>> Americans and build America no less than our ancestors who came here
>> a century ago.
>
> Are those the ones raping 13 year old girls after being deported many
> times?
>>
>> I welcome them and rather than allow only legal immigrants, I say we
>> save ourselves some time and effort and just legalize the immigrants
>> we're already getting.
>
> You approve of them breaking the law.

And how many laws have you broken? It's guaranteed you've broken laws
more serious than walking across an imaginary line looking for work and
safety.

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:16:40 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
wrote:

>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>news:jkog7jt69hru914uhl9qnpemvr7ie2hgtu@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:36:26 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:
>>
>>>You guys should get rid of the DOJ entirely. Just get a 'medium' or
>>>what ever you call them, and let them tell you who did it.
>>
>>Why are you even responding to some conspiracist idiot who believes in ESP?
>>
>
>The CIA created your mentality. ...

That's a conspiracy theory.

> ... They've been flogging the 'conspiracy
>theory' meme in the media for decades.

The concept is far older than the CIA.

>Alt.atheism is a ship of blind ignorant materialist fools.

And your job is to give us information about what really goes on,
correct?

--
Malte Runz

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:s1pg7j1jd0rlsfcsb7ajm77k1h8jk5c92p@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:25:29 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>"Baxter" wrote in message news:v543qj$376qj$3@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in news:v5313l$30qr3$1@dont-
>>>email.me:
>>>
>>>> "Baxter" wrote in message news:v52rc2$2vlkp$5@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:v52pf4$2vibu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>>>>> In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
>>>>>> come forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their
>>>families.
>>>>>> Many have been murdered as a result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Murdered? That's a load of horse shit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And how are you so sure of that?
>>>> Just another mainstream follower.
>>>
>>>Where's YOUR evidence? Go ahead, post references to these killers
>>>>
>>
>>Where's your thinking ability?
>
>Even the best thinking abilities require evidence.
>
>Where's yours?
>

What do you mean where's mine?
Thinking leads to research. Research leads to evidence. There's plenty out
there.

>
>>>>>We here those conspiracy theories
>>>>>all the time,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
>>>> never question or research it.
>>>
>>>They have been researched extensively.
>>>
>>
>>Yes, but not by sheep like you.
>
>Nor by sheep like you who buy every bit of drama you're fed because real
>investigation is
>too difficult, too time consuming, and takes too long. Conspiracy theories
>cannot stand
>the fact that sometimes we *can't* know the truth because there aren't
>enough facts.
>

I don't post 'conspiracy theories'.
Here's something you don't know - the CIA popularised the term as a disinfo
campaign to cover up covert operations from the public.
The fact that you chuck that term around like the others here shows your
ignorance.

>
>>>>>never any facts to back them. Vince Foster anyong?
>
>>>> The MSM that you follow doesn't give any facts.
>
>That's all they give. The fact free zones are the hard right and hard
>left.
>

Hahahaha. You've fallen for the mass spread lies.

>
>Alex Jones is as fact free as Wonkette. In a perfect world, neither would
>exist.
>

Hahahaha
You obviously know nothing about the CIA and other corrupt agencies and what
they have been doing for decades.

>
>>>What you call "facts" are bogus conspiracy theories - not actual facts.
>
>>You never looked into it so you can't claim that.
>
>Prove it.
>

How?

>
>Prove that he's never done any of that research. Clearly you haven't.
>

Give me your alt.atheism definition of research.

>
>>You just repeat the
>>mainstream smear and disinformation campaign for the masses.
>
>While you just repeat the right wing smear and disinformation campaign for
>the masses.
>

One must be right. You can't show that yours is.
You lot just smear the same stuff that the corporate MSM smears.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

On 6/22/2024 7:57 AM, Baxter wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
> in
> news:cq8d7jhdbsv86uqvfemm0urqn9lgqb2pgp@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
> ing.dwarf.com:
>
>> [Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:6675da81$0$212411$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <v54fot$38mfs$11@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:38 AM, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>> Baxter wrote:
>>>>>>> Now the video starts with Biden triping on a sandbag - how is
> that
>>>>>>> comedic?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is leaving our borders open for invaders
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no "invaders," spammy, you stupid blowjob and feckless
>>>>> cunt, and the borders are not open. Fuck off, cocksucker.
>>>>
>>>> So all those crossing are doing it legally?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So what?!
>>
>> Baxter's confusion is typical of brain-damaged leftists. He doesn't
>> care if criminals are crossing the border.
>>
>> Criminals should not get asylum.

Aliens seeking asylum have a right to enter the U.S. to present their asylum
applications.

>
> Criminals?! It's a misdemeaner - a $50 fine. It's a man, wife and
> couple of kids.

Unlawful entry is nonetheless a crime. First offenses were rarely prosecuted
until Asshole Trump decided to to so as a means of punishing the children. But
it is a crime, and you ought not to pooh-pooh it as unimportant.

"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:ogpg7j50drp6mbt4nfi7r5bm0hi7kttla0@4ax.com...
>
>On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:30:04 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote
>>>On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:55:11 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The MSM and gov. keep claiming they're only conspiracy theories and you
>>>>never question or research it.
>>>
>>>Yeah, we do and yes, they are.
>>>
>>
>>Pretend research on Google is not research. Do you know who controls
>>Google
>>and other large info/media corporations?
>
>So to you, anything presented by anybody with power or influence is a lie?
>

Usually but not always because power is usually from a place of ego.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:bfdh7jp32p6q7en0edq2gvuqfuki6iarer@4ax.com...
>
>On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:16:40 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>wrote:
>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:jkog7jt69hru914uhl9qnpemvr7ie2hgtu@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:36:26 +0200, Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote:
>>>
>>>>You guys should get rid of the DOJ entirely. Just get a 'medium' or
>>>>what ever you call them, and let them tell you who did it.
>>>
>>>Why are you even responding to some conspiracist idiot who believes in
>>>ESP?
>>>
>>
>>The CIA created your mentality. ...
>
>That's a conspiracy theory.
>

Haha! Ignorant lazy fool.

>
>> ... They've been flogging the 'conspiracy
>>theory' meme in the media for decades.
>
>The concept is far older than the CIA.
>

Ok whatever.

>
>>Alt.atheism is a ship of blind ignorant materialist fools.
>
>And your job is to give us information about what really goes on,
>correct?
>

Just a heads up. Nothing more is needed for a smart person.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"El Kabong" wrote in message
news:to9f7jhhruakmgrabff5h4mh20n5oka8et@4ax.com...
>
>Andrew W wrote:
>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>> >On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:44:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>> >>In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have come
>> >>forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families. Many
>> >>have
>> >>been murdered as a result.
>> >
>> >You can't prove any of that either.
>>
>> There's no need to prove it. Just start using your brain and look into
>> things.
>> Only the lazy and ignorant demand proof for everything, except for what
>> establishments claim.
>
>Right. Only gullible, lazy sheep read the MSM.
>

Correct

>
>But the
>ambitious and tireless researcher will believe anything
>Andrew says, because, you know, corruption and follow the
>money.
>

Dead wrong. You are stuck on the word 'believe'. Mere belief is not the
pursuit. That's religion.

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

"Malte Runz" wrote in message
news:i8mf7j5o85hekb41ak3u9kqv6rajofn5f2@4ax.com...
>
>On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:44:33 -0700, El Kabong <twang@the.noodle>
>wrote:
>
>>Andrew W wrote:
>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>> >On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:44:31 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>It's not the same people who are talking about it, dummy. Geez.
>>> >>In some cases people who no longer work for gov. and CIA etc. have
>>> >>come
>>> >>forward about it, at great risk to themselves and their families. Many
>>> >>have
>>> >>been murdered as a result.
>>> >
>>> >You can't prove any of that either.
>>>
>>> There's no need to prove it. Just start using your brain and look into
>>> things.
>>> Only the lazy and ignorant demand proof for everything, except for what
>>> establishments claim.
>>
>>Right. Only gullible, lazy sheep read the MSM. But the
>>ambitious and tireless researcher will believe anything
>>Andrew says, because, you know, corruption and follow the
>>money.
>
>And absolutely no fact checking needed. Just open your mind.
>

"Fact checking" is for the lazy. Can you trust fact checker orgs and look no
further? You obviously do. Who are they affiliated with, dope?

--
Definition of an idiot/ignoramus: Someone who gets their information from
the mainstream media and calls it facts and evidence.

http://www.rumormillnews.com - The best alternative news site

In article <v5abtq$igu7$4@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
>
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:o11h7jh3cbfpj0ms8qvcfo233j8of2j0ft@4ax.com:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:32:59 -0600, Skeeter
> > <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>So you approve of the current situation at the border? You are ok with
> >>other countries letting there criminals come here? It doesn't bother
> >>you in the last 3 years more people from China and the Middle East
> >>have just walked in?
> >
> > It's called brain drain. We're getting their best and brightest.
> > They're seeking opportunity in the United States that they can't get
> > in their own far inferior countries. Just as what happened in the mass
> > migrations from Europe in the late 19th to mid 20th centuries
> > (escaping constant war and lack of economic opportunity).
> >
> > These people are coming here to work. Are there bad apples? Yes, of
> > course there are just as there were in the folks migrating in the
> > seventeenth through twentieth centuries. The west wasn't wild because
> > everybody was so pleasant and law abiding. There were plenty of
> > crims.
> >
> > But the fact remains that these are people with the determination and
> > willingness to sacrifice everything they know to come here, be
> > Americans and build America no less than our ancestors who came here a
> > century ago.
> >
> > I welcome them and rather than allow only legal immigrants, I say we
> > save ourselves some time and effort and just legalize the immigrants
> > we're already getting.
> >
> > Swill
> > NP: Gino Vanelli - People Gotta Move (sometimes the song is just the
> > right one!)
> >
>
> Well said.

and fuck the homeless vets.