https://apnews.com/article/vermont-climate-change-superfund-oil-companies-
8509341725ec00d26cf74d56588178ab

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) � The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas
industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that
fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several
decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont
from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the
first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic
summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is
working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1,
1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the
state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that
the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating
�against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy
companies located outside of Vermont.�

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum
Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate
change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual
sources, they argue it is impossible to measure �accurately and fairly�
the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location
over decades.

�Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years
for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the
Clean Air Act,� said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy
chief counsel of the Chamber�s litigation center. �That is unlawful and
violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution � one state can�t try to
regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont�s
penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across
the country.�

A spokesman for the state�s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not
been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law
Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry�s way of �trying
to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in
Vermont and beyond.�

�More states are following Vermont�s lead holding Big Oil accountable for
the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by
climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to
foot the entire bill time and time again,� Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the
Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the
total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse
gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at
the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic
development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to
determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a
fossil fuel company.

It�s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or
business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to
more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the
time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as
improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and
railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants;
and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private
buildings. It�s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup
program.

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states,
including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill
in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse
gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant
to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters
of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.

--
November 5, 2024 - Congratulations President Donald Trump. We look
forward to America being great again.

The disease known as Kamala Harris has been effectively treated and
eradicated.

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

In <lnsB25D8B6B956B06F089P2473@0.0.0.1> Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
>
> https://apnews.com/article/vermont-climate-change-superfund-oil-companies-
> 8509341725ec00d26cf74d56588178ab
>
> MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas
> industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that
> fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several
> decades by climate change.
>
> The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont
> from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the
> first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic
> summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is
> working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1,
> 1995.
>
> The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the
> state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that
> the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating
> “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy
> companies located outside of Vermont.”
>
> The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum
> Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate
> change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual
> sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly”
> the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location
> over decades.
>
> “Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years
> for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the
> Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy
> chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and
> violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to
> regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s
> penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across
> the country.”
>
>
> A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not
> been formally served with this lawsuit.
>
> Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law
> Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying
> to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in
> Vermont and beyond.”
>
> “More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for
> the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by
> climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to
> foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.
>
> Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the
> Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the
> total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse
> gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at
> the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic
> development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to
> determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a
> fossil fuel company.
>
> It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or
> business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to
> more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the
> time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as
> improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and
> railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants;
> and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private
> buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup
> program.
>
> The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states,
> including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill
> in December.
>
> The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse
> gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant
> to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters
> of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.

It's very simple.

Exercise corporate fiscal responsibility to maintain profitability.

Raise fuel costs for any state engaging in this kind of silliness in direct proportion to fines plus 10%.

Vermont is run by idiots anyway.