Thusly if in the past @ TETRA #35, I undertook an optimal COGITO
referencing action relative to the noumenon where an information
exchange took place, then it ought to be still viable within this
present reality where the referencing reoccurs.

In point of fact, we do have a pertinent example of such action as a
letter dated 27 MAY 2024 comprising 153 pages and delivered the
following day, which states: "It ought to be manifestly apparent from
the regrettably numerous GRAMMAR anomalies (ie. now rectified in this
electronic form) conveyed within our initial 8 page response dated 21
MAY 2024, that our primary concern of that action, was to meet the
temporal window (ie. by necessity of a postal delivery occurring prior
to the end of the business working week) so that the concluding
paragraph statement would have some continuing gravitas thereafter, namely:

As it is unlikely that you will be able to resolve (ie. MAKE AN
IMMEDIATE AND URGENT RETRACTION OF YOUR UNINFORMED AND PREJUDICED
ACTIONS) this matter by SUNDAY 26 MAY 2024, and the consequence will be
FAIT ACCOMPLI (ie. set in stone). It is therefore an appropriate action
to provide this letter as INSTRUCTIONS to LEGAL COUNSEL (JEWISH
HERITAGE) and pursue a legal recourse for DISCRIMINATION IN THE
PROVISION OF GOODS AND SERVICES due to RACIAL SLANDER consequential to
an ANZAC HERITAGE (IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM) JINGOIST CAUSE
("HIJACKING THE WORLD WAR ONE CENTENNIAL / EVASION OF PARADIGM
EQUIVALENCE TO GERMAN NAZISM") OF SEDITION occasioning a determined
breach of any former OATH of duty to either the sovereign, COMMONWEALTH
or its peoples.

With respects to the assertion of "PRACTICE ETHOS" which is claimed by
your letter, it is not immediately self apparent by the PARTNERS OF THE
PRACTICE usage of a cross on a red square 🟥 for its logo, whether this
as an absurdity thereby constitutes a conformity to the Chinese notion:
gōu (鉤): to hook; shí (十): ten; zì (字): a symbol; a work of calligraphy.
If so what then is implied by an interpretation of it as a religious
symbol in being an #92 = [#14, #51, #27] as [#80, #8, #4] = pachad
(H6343): *OBJECT* *OF* *DREAD* as an immutable foreboding to continually
remind us of ROMAN DOMINION by its capacity whether ORGANISATIONALLY or
by NEOPHYTE AGENCY to compel a CORPORAL or CAPITAL PUNISHMENT, and if so
what is the nature of any Christian association as organizational ethos?
WOULD YOU BE SO KIND AS TO CLARIFY THE EXACT MEANING OF SUCH A GROTESQUE
MANIFESTO  in accordance with your MISSION STATEMENT: "to treat
patients courteously and with respect to their individual needs and make
every effort to provide this service in a friendly, caring and
professional environment."

"THAT I MAY NOT SEEM AS IF I WOULD TERRIFY YOU BY LETTERS. FOR [HIS]
LETTERS, SAY THEY, [ARE] WEIGHTY AND POWERFUL; BUT [HIS] BODILY PRESENCE
[IS] WEAK, AND [HIS] SPEECH *CONTEMPTIBLE*-G1848... FOR WE DARE NOT MAKE
OURSELVES OF THE NUMBER, OR COMPARE OURSELVES WITH SOME THAT COMMEND
THEMSELVES: BUT THEY MEASURING THEMSELVES BY THEMSELVES, AND COMPARING
THEMSELVES AMONG THEMSELVES, ARE NOT WISE." [2 Corinthians 10:10-12]

#814 as [#5, #60, #70, #400, #9, #5, #50, #5, #10, #200] = exouthenéō
(G1848): {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to make of no account, despise
utterly;

Whilst the correspondence received from the PRACTICE MANAGER stated that
"WE DO NOT ACCEPT THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH YOU USE AND THE GENERALISATION
OF A WHOLE CULTURE. THE TONE OF YOUR LETTER IS BELLIGERENT AND
OFFENSIVE." But I perceived that this is entirely a GENOCIDAL CULTURAL
CONTEMPT (ie. TREATING AS ANATHEMA OR FACILITATING THE EXCLUSION OR
ELIMINATION OF A CLASS OF PERSONS WHETHER BY RACIAL, RELIGION OR SOME
OTHER IDENTITY FROM THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH DOESN'T CONFORM TO
YOUR REPUBLICAN ATROCITY AS #216 - OBSTRUCTION / NON-CONFORMING
GOVERNANCE IN OUR COMMONWEALTH WITH A DOOMED MONARCHY) in which the
MEDICAL PRACTICE has without pause of any reasoned thought so fervently
engaged, as being a disregard for "MY 400 YEARS HISTORY RELATIVE TO THIS
COUNTRY AND ASIA GENERALLY WHERE SOME ASIANS (BUT NOT LIMITED TO)
CONSIDER ME AS A SECOND CLASS CITIZEN DUE TO THE LIFE OPPORTUNITY THIS
COUNTRY HAS PROVIDED THEM."

This cultural generalisation is a PROVEN CLAIM involving documented and
photographed actions over a period of now 7 years as then SUBSTANTIATION
that our legal matters are concerned with an unlawful and treasonous
nature of predominantly an IRISH / CATHOLIC REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST (IRA)
CAUSE involving BOER WAR MEMORIAL shenanigans as the conjured and
normalised RITUALISED CONDUCT being a self aggrandising (ie. haven't you
noticed there is war on our streets by domestic terrorism, knife or gun
slaughter and incendiary events as lawlessness) faction within the
RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) the AXIS MUNDI grounding for the
"HIJACKING THE WORLD WAR ONE CENTENNIAL / EVASION OF EQUIVALENCE TO
GERMAN NAZISM" which by COMMON PARADIGM USAGE AND EQUIVALENT mórphōsis
(G3446) / metáthesis (G3331) DEPLOYMENT is then NON DIFFERENTIATED FROM
NAZISM in possessing a surreptitious intention to bring about both a
DOOMED MONARCHY / DEMISE OF PROTESTANT REFORMATION as REPUBLIC and
determined act of SEDITION occasioning a breach to any former OATH of
duty to either the sovereign, COMMONWEALTH or its peoples.

Within our initial 8 page response dated 21 MAY 2024, where our primary
concern was to meet the temporal window (ie. a postal delivery prior to
the end of the working week) so that the assertion made to SALE POLICE @
1355 HOURS ON 17 MAY 2024 that "SINCE THE SALE HORSE RACING COINCIDES
WITH PENTECOST SUNDAY ON 19 MAY 2024 AS FUSION OF ACTION WITH THE SATOR
/ TENET / ROTAS CYCLE WE ARE NOT EXPECTING ANY FIDELITY TO BOER WAR
MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY 26 MAY 2024" as eluded to within the
concluding paragraph statement, would thereafter have some continuing
gravitas.

Such action might be more properly considered a GENOCIDAL CULTURAL
CONTEMPT since it involves a historical revisionism as a perverse
depravity (ie. FITZSIMONS DILEMMA: being freudian for a HEROISM
syndrome) a MENTAL ABERRATION of ANZAC "ATLANTIS PHANTASM" JINGOISM as
#249 (SATOR) - IRISH REPUBLICANISM perpetuated against BRITISH RULE with
the aim of establishing an INDEPENDENT REPUBLIC which is actually A
PRIORI grounded to the COGITO: #28 (#161 - ROTAS) - 24 to 29 APRIL 1916
as an event occurring whilst WORLD WAR I (28 JULY 1914 – 11 NOVEMBER
1918) was being prosecuted. And actively treats as anathema, facilitates
the exclusion or elimination of a class of persons whether by racial,
religion or some other identity from the social consciousness which
doesn't conform to their REPUBLICAN ATROCITY as #216 - OBSTRUCTION /
NON-CONFORMING GOVERNANCE IN OUR COMMONWEALTH WITH A DOOMED MONARCHY.

Furthermore, I did actually provide my SPECIALIST DOCTOR a copy of the
rare book titled THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSÜAN CHING)
published in 4 BCE (English translation 1993) as the IMPERIAL CHINESE
TEXT and the basis for ASIAN IDENTITY which is actually referenced
within my letter to yourselves.

THE URL ADDRESS TO THAT RESEARCHED OPINION:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery>

He is cognisant of my natural disposition which exhibits some measure of
SAVANT (ie. a phenomenon where someone demonstrates exceptional aptitude
within a domain of faculty knowledge such as gnosis ex machina
consciousness instantiation without the encumbrance of any neurological
disorder or compensation for another impairment) CAPABILITIES as an
informal research case study documented in a chapter titled "DALEK
PRODUCTION LINE CONSCIOUSNESS: ON ART AND THE AESTHETIC OF AWE -- IS IT
IMITATION (mimesis) OR SUCCEEDING (diádochos)?" as perhaps being
consistent with THOMAS METZINGER's consideration of tonic alertness (ie.
process of intrinsic arousal that varies by minutes to hours which we
understand as noumenon resonance / temporal heuristic), and the
phenomenology of “pure” consciousness, usually as understood by research
is related to individual episodes of MPE (ie. minimal phenomenal
experience) being cases of consciousness-as-such could be instantiations
of an abstract pattern, perhaps even of an universal or at least
strongly prototypical feature.

As demonstrating the capability to view a YOUTUBE "DOCTOR WHO DEVIOUS
DALEK PRODUCTION LINE" video and subsequently within a viable 5 minute
temporal slot window, then by intuition accessed the corresponding
GRAPPLE TEMPORAL HEURISTIC in obtaining reasonable (ie. we discarded the
first selection as too focused on extermination rather than production)
IDEA FORMATIVE CATEGORIES matching the correct neural linguist pragma
exhibiting a cohesion of teleological MALE / FEME and ONTIC / DEME
noumenon redaction which further substantiates the claim that creative
genius, like human consciousness, is a product of the hypostasis.

When my SPECIALIST DOCTOR was shown such technologized document, in
being surprised by the INFORMAL RESEARCH as SELF EDUCATED activity, he
then asked if I could read CHINESE?

To which I responded in the negative, as I didn't need to since the
LEXICON and PINYIN dictionaries were readily available online and
especially given the rare book attests, it is a DISTINGUISHED SCHOLARLY
OPINION by PROFESSOR MICHAEL NYLAN, to which I have integrated #451 -
PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY COEFFICIENT / COGITO ARRAYS keyed to HEBREW /
GREEK LEXICON as IDEA concepts and validated by my capacity to redact a
number of languages to its NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA (NOUMENON RESONANCE,
MALE, FEME, ONTIC, DEME, TELEOLOGICAL) as a singular SAPIENT TECHNOLOGY
conception of MIND (ie. PROPOSITION OF SEMANTICAL VARIANCE TO THE
META-DESCRIPTOR NOMENCLATURE AND THE COGITO ARRAY AS THE MEAN FOR
CONSCIOUSNESS) which were conceptions entirely unknown to the PROFESSOR,
but nonetheless devised from her PUNCTILIOUS LINGUISTIC / CULTURAL
RESEARCH, as to then respond to the assertion: "THAT THERE MAY HAVE BEEN
CROSS-CULTURAL BORROWINGS GOES WITHOUT SAYING. BUT THE DIRECTION OF
BORROWING IS NOT ALWAYS CLEAR, NOR CAN SUCH BORROWINGS BE PROVEN,

SINCE MANY IDEAS ARE INDEPENDENTLY DEVELOPED IN DIFFERENT CULTURES."

And my SPECIALIST DOCTOR was GOBSMACKED by the PROFESSOR's assertion of
"AGGRESSION BEING THEN CAUSE FOR DISCONTINUING DIALOG" as response to my
POSTERING VIVID DEPICTIONS: #65 - INNER (NEI) - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE
OF MATERIALITY / [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] in putting forth the notion
that there was an ACADEMIC #27 - DUTY to discharge an accountability for
the literary work titled T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY)
which was translated with commentary in 1993 that by the unrefuted
evidence, was responsible for World War II as the deadliest military
conflict in history. An estimated total of 70–85 million people perished.

Accordingly an expectation to have a further discussion with my
SPECIALIST DOCTOR upon the propositional INTELLECTUAL consideration of
the obtuse question as to the "POSSIBILITY OF AN AGENT PROVOCATEUR TO
HAVE FACILITATED THE COVID DISEASE SPREAD WITH THE INTENTION TO EFFECT A
#216 - DESTABILISING OR OVERTHROW OF GOVERNMENT?" which were matters of
a potential for a LINGUISTIC BASIS as schema for action as an INFORMAL
RESEARCH discussion occurring during 9 JANUARY 2024 and 3 MAY 2024
medical appointments with that SPECIALIST.

As being consistent with the conclusion readily drawn by others,
involving a process of NORMALISING AND PRESERVING THE CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY PUBLISHED IN 4 BCE which for the time being was a public
accessible HTML DOCUMENT obtained on 8 JANUARY 2024, that several
troublesome GLYPH ANOMALIES were identified (ie. granted I am not a
linguistic expert and there is a need to peer review assertions
predicated upon the PROFESSORS translation and consideration of #451 -
PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY COEFFICIENT / COGITO ARRAYS keyed to HEBREW /
GREEK LEXICON as IDEA concepts) which exhibit an an interconnectedness
to our local BEERSHEBA SCENARIO [#68 - qì (氣): to heave a sigh, #74 -
xíng (型): model, #3, #9, #20, #27, #80, #32 - yùn (孕): to be pregnant,
#81 - jì (覬): to long for, #23 - tì (揥): get rid of] involving both the
SAINT PATRICK'S DAY 17 MARCH 2017 unveiling of the MARY MAGDALENE (ie.
IRISH CATHOLIC #298 - WASHER #449 - WOMAN WITH NAKED CHILD) #808 -
GENOCIDE STATUE both a TROJAN / BESIEGEMENT in the ADVANCING AN IRISH
CATHOLIC REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST (IRA) CAUSE ("HIJACKING THE WORLD WAR ONE
CENTENNIAL / EVASION OF PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO GERMAN NAZISM").

For instance, there also existed locally a zoonotic disease analogy
dated 28 APRIL 2018 promulgated by IRISH CATHOLIC (KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
ATLANTIS RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE FACTION) REPUBLICAN ACTIVISM (IRA)
bearing a semblance to idiosyncratic modes of IRISH REPUBLICAN MURALS
which have played a significant role in expressing political sentiments.
These murals, especially in Northern Ireland, depict various themes
related to Irish nationalism, identity, and historical events. They
often feature iconic figures, symbols, and slogans associated with
republicanism and resistance.

We ought to then reasonably question any individual ALTRUISM relative to
the EMPEROR'S POWER OVER THE WORLD (權禦天下): [#10 - #511 @SUM(TETRAD
MENTIONS OF [rì (日): *SUN*; #111 / #666]: , #71 - DOMINION, #2 (#453 =
hamartía (G266): *VIOLATION* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *LAW* *IN* *THOUGHT*
*OR* *IN* *ACT*) , #33 - TENET (#205)] IMPERATIVE, and prudently
consider on the basis of a confederacy (ie. a union of people or groups
formed for an illicit purpose) that the IDENTIFIED ACTION OF FUSION
(#308 = #136 + #172) AS MODUS OPERANDI has a reasonable perspective upon
the timeline of the first COVID-19 cases which remains an unanswered
question. The first declared case of COVID-19 worldwide was dated on 8
DECEMBER 2019, in Wuhan, China. In Europe, although local transmission
was only identified in the second half of FEBRUARY in most countries,
there is accumulated evidence that SARS-CoV-2 circulated before this and
possibly before the first cases identified in Wuhan.

wǔ (武): 1. martial; military, 2. a battle; (military) force, 3. martial
arts, 4. a footstep; a footprint; half a step, 5. a fighter; a warrior;
a soldier, 6. half a step, 7. Wu; Sacrificial odes of Zhou, 8. Wu, 9.
*WARLIKE*; *FIERCE*; *VALIANT*; *VIOLENT*, 10. to continue; to succeed

yí (夷): 1. ancient barbarian tribes, 2. Yi [people], 3. foreign peoples,
4. smooth; level, 5. to demolish; to raze, 6. *TO* *EXTERMINATE*, 7.
safety, 8. calm; joyful, 9. uncouth, 10. flatland, 11. worn away;
deteriorated, 12. a hoe, 13. a wound, 14. faint; invisible, 15. to sit
with splayed legs, 16. *ARROGANT*; *RUDE*; *DISRESPECTFUL*, 17.
something ordinary, 18. same generation/ a similar kind, 19. to falter,
20. Yi, 21. to hoe; to cut grass, 22. to display

MARIA CHANG commented that since the overthrow of the Qin dynasty,
"Millenarian movements had exerted a profound impact on the course of
Chinese history", culminating in the Chinese Revolutions of 1949, which
brought the Chinese Communists to power.  PATSY RAHN (2002) describes a
paradigm of conflict [wǔ (武) --> hàn (漢) v's yí (夷): NON-HAN PEOPLE
ESPECIALLY TO THE EAST OF CHINA] between Chinese sectarian groups and
the rulers who they often challenge.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:氣>

[#68]

qì (氣): 1. to heave a sigh

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:型>

[#74]

xíng (型): 1. model

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:扶>

[#3, #9, #20, #27, #80]

fú (扶): 1. to assist; to help, 2. to escort; to accompany, 3. Fu, 4. to
protect, 5. to hold on; to rely on, 6. to support with a hand, 7. to be
beside; to go along with

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:孕>

[#32]

yùn (孕): 1. to be pregnant, 2. to train; to groom, 3. to contain; to
include

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:覬>

[#81]

jì (覬): 1. to covet; to long for

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:揥>

[#23]

tì (揥): 1. get rid of; ivory hairpin

[#68, #74, #3, #9, #20, #27, #80, #32, #81, #23]

{@10: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#507); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#417)}

TELOS TOTAL: #417 as [#6, #400, #5, #6] = tôhûw (H8414): {UMBRA: #411 %
#41 = #1} 1) formlessness, confusion, unreality, emptiness; 1a)
formlessness (of primeval earth); 1a1) nothingness, empty space; 1b)
that which is *EMPTY* *OR* *UNREAL* (*OF* *IDOLS*) (fig); 1c) wasteland,
wilderness (of solitary places); 1d) *PLACE* *OF* *CHAOS*; 1e) vanity;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136

#951 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #507 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #5, #20, #100,
#400, #40, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = apokrýptō (G613): {UMBRA: #1851 %
#41 = #6} 1) to hide; 2) concealing, *KEEPING* *SECRET*;

#1469 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #507 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #20, #1, #30,
#400, #80, #300, #5, #300, #1, #10] = katakalýptō (G2619): {UMBRA: #1953
% #41 = #26} 1) to cover up; 2) *TO* *VEIL* *OR* *COVER* *ONE'S* *SELF*;

#621 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #507 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4,
#70, #50, #300, #1] = paradídōmi (G3860): {UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25} 1)
to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power
or use; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care of,
manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) *TO* *DELIVER* *UP*
*TREACHEROUSLY*; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 2d) to commit, to commend; 2e) to
deliver verbally; 2e1) commands, rites; 2e2) to deliver by narrating, to
report; 2f) to permit allow; 2f1) when the fruit will allow that is when
its ripeness permits; 2f2) gives itself up, presents itself;

#1713 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #417 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #80, #300,
#800, #40, #1, #300, #10] = paráptōma (G3900): {UMBRA: #1403 % #41 = #9}
1) to fall beside or near something; 2) *A* *LAPSE* *OR* *DEVIATION*
*FROM* *TRUTH* *AND* *UPRIGHTNESS*; 2a) a sin, misdeed;

#1146 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #417 as [#80, #50, #5, #400, #40, #1, #300,
#70, #200] = pneûma (G4151): {UMBRA: #576 % #41 = #2} 1) the third
person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the
Father and the Son; 1a) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises
his personality and character (the 'Holy' Spirit); 1b) sometimes
referred to in a way which emphasises his work and power (the Spirit of
'Truth'); 1c) never referred to as a depersonalised force; 2) the
spirit, i.e. the vital principal by which the body is animated; 2a) the
rational spirit, the power by which the human being feels, thinks,
decides; 2b) the soul; 3) a spirit, i.e. a simple essence, devoid of all
or at least all grosser matter, and possessed of the power of knowing,
desiring, deciding, and acting; 3a) a life giving spirit; 3b) a human
soul that has left the body; 3c) a spirit higher than man but lower than
God, i.e. an angel; 3c1) used of demons, or evil spirits, who were
conceived as inhabiting the bodies of men; 3c2) the spiritual nature of
Christ, higher than the highest angels and equal to God, the divine
nature of Christ; 3d) *THE* *DISPOSITION* *OR* *INFLUENCE* *WHICH*
*FILLS* *AND* *GOVERNS* *THE* *SOUL* *OF* *ANY* *ONE*; 3d1) *THE*
*EFFICIENT* *SOURCE* *OF* *ANY* *POWER*, *AFFECTION*, *EMOTION*,
*DESIRE*, etc.; 3e) a movement of air (a gentle blast); 3e1) of the
wind, hence the wind itself; 3e2) breath of nostrils or mouth;

#1470 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #417 as [#200, #400, #40, #40, #70, #100,
#500, #70, #50] = sýmmorphos (G4832): {UMBRA: #1620 % #41 = #21} 1)
*HAVING* *THE* *SAME* *FORM* *AS* *ANOTHER*, similar, conformed to;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:507&feme:417&ontic:136&idea:417>

HAVING THE *SAME* 3x3 *LOCUS* AS SUGGESTING AN ACT OF FUSION (#308 =
#136 + #172) BETWEEN MATRICES #308 - COELUM AS MEDIEVAL LATIN AND NEW
LATIN SPELLING OF CAELUM (“SKY, HEAVEN”) WITHIN ROMAN MYTHOLOGY CAELUS
IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF THE SKY AND HEAVENS AS HUSBAND OF TERRA

LUO SHU SQUARE PROTOTYPE #TWO (#114)

#29 #74 #11
#20 #38 #56
#65 #2 #47

#2
#31
#87
#98
#136
#201
#221
#268
#342

COURSE OF NATURE (#108)

#26 #27 #28
#35 #36 #37
#44 #45 #46

#45
#71
#108 – AETHER / SPIRIT / CONSCIOUSNESS
#136
#172
#216 - *POLITICAL* *INSTABILITY* / DANGERS OF A PHANTOM GOVERNMENT
#251
#297
#324

#78 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136 as [#30, #8, #30, #10] = chŏlîy
(H2483): {UMBRA: #48 % #41 = #7} 1) *SICKNESS*;

#260 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136 as [#100, #30, #100, #30] = qâlal
(H7043): {UMBRA: #160 % #41 = #37} 1) to be slight, be swift, be
trifling, be of little account, be light; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be slight,
be abated (of water); 1a2) to be swift; 1a3) to be trifling, be of
little account; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be swift, show oneself swift; 1b2)
to appear trifling, be too trifling, be insignificant; 1b3) to be
lightly esteemed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make despicable; 1c2) to curse;
1d) (Pual) to be cursed; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make light, lighten; 1e2)
*TO* *TREAT* *WITH* *CONTEMPT*, *BRING* *CONTEMPT* *OR* *DISHONOUR*; 1f)
(Pilpel); 1f1) to shake; 1f2) to *WHET*; 1g) (Hithpalpel) to shake
oneself, be moved to and fro;

#230 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #8, #7, #10, #200] = chăzîyr
(H2386): {UMBRA: #225 % #41 = #20} 1) hog, swine, boar; 1a) *SWINE*
(*AS* *FORBIDDEN* *FOOD*); 1b) wild boar;

Is that causality process of foreseeing in conformity with temporality
either supernatural or supra-natural?

On 17/6/2024 08:48, dolf wrote:
> We haven't yet entered a suitable frame of mind whereby we'll begin our
> coding tasks...  This is partially due to distractions as the
> disruptions by others then necessitating substantial administrative
> actions and the need to some further formative thinking.
>
> For instance in the example of the OATH / PLEDGE as a meta descriptive
> concept, the GRUMBLE dialectic as plausible rule was obtained by using
> the NEURAL LINGUISTIC PARADIGM as our own INFORMAL RESEARCH whereby we
> made a logical premise on the xiān jiàn zhī míng (先見之明): *FORESIGHT*
> / xiān jiàn (先見) *PRESCIENCE* conception circumscribing to the #451 -
> PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as the ontic nucleus of conscious intention.
>
> Thusly in conclusion, to restate the provisional INFORMAL RESEARCH
> proposition is that the function of *PRESCIENCE* occurs within the
> spectrum of a conformity LIMIT (eg: #451 x 2 = #902 - RULE OF LAW + #67
> + #17) to the rationality of being itself:
>
> GRUMBLE (#391, #352)@[80, 60, 73, 34, 48, 56, 15, 81, 81, 49, 27, 55,
> 67, 17] <-- OATH / PLEDGE RULE
>
> How might this be then applied to that elusive creature called the
> journalist as self-referencing integrity especially applied to the #451
> - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM and its resolution dynamic as PROBLEM
> PAIRING and determination of either a CONJURED (ie. cause of esprit de
> corps to appear) SCENARIO or a HYPOTHETICAL / CONTINGENT QUESTION which
> is one based on supposition, not facts. They are typically used to
> elicit opinions and beliefs about imagined situations or conditions that
> don't exist.
>
> From a metalogic perspective (ie. probability is concerned with the
> likelihood of occurrence) as the capability of occurrence we ought to
> have sufficient dialectic category sampling from the new media articles
> to obtain some case study examples of the *FORESIGHT* / *PRESCIENCE*
> (#902 - RULE OF LAW ... #1065 - agnōsía (G56): *NOT* *KNOWING*,
> *IGNORANCE*) DYNAMIC function.
>
> #1064 as [#80, #100, #70, #10, #4, #800] = proeídō (G4275): {UMBRA:
> #1064 % #41 = #39} 1) *TO* *FORESEE*;
>
> Simply put it isn't sufficient to make an appraisal of the dialectic
> categories as strata of conformity as speech and action cohesion
> dynamic, but in the example of the OATH / PLEDGE RULE:
>
> #986 = #902 - RULE OF LAW + #67 - DARKENING (HUI) + #17 - HOLDING BACK
> (JUAN) as [#400, #80, #1, #20, #70, #400, #5, #10] = hypakoúō (G5219):
> {UMBRA: #1771 % #41 = #8} 1) to listen, to harken; 1a) of one who on the
> knock at the door comes to listen who it is, (the duty of a porter); 2)
> to harken to a command; 2a) *TO* *OBEY*, *BE* *OBEDIENT* *TO*, *SUBMIT*
> *TO*;
>
> We want to specifically observe the CONTINGENT nature of the FORESIGHT
> CATEGORY #986 and if such is not quantified appropriately or in
> possessing insufficient resonance, then the circumstance may be
> conforming with the maxim "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO" which means that
> while the speaker may have imperfections or mistakes, they want the
> listener to follow their advice and instructions rather than imitating
> their own actions.
>
> In other words it is perfidious as self justification where the actions
> are not in accordance with the words as then a probable breach of their
> OATH.
>
> A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>
>
> Draft Revision: 17 June 2024
>
> On 17/6/2024 07:36, dolf wrote:
>> And if one was mindful of each of the meta descriptor stasis such as
>> TETRAD #78 that both comprises and comprehends the temporal fabric by
>> which one's presence of being is steeped (ie. #78 - ON THE VERGE
>> (CHIANG)) and must be known to itself in all instances at once
>> although that does not preclude a continual #549 - MORPHOSIS of #540 -
>> KNOWING predicated upon a #579 - qì (氣): METAPHYSICAL CONCEPT OF
>> 'VITAL ENERGY' as instantiation within the here and now.
>>
>> #492 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235 as [#2, #400, #40, #10, #40] /
>> #1106 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #579 as [#6, #400, #40, #10, #40, #10,
>> #600] = tâmîym (H8549): {UMBRA: #490 % #41 = #39} 1) complete, whole,
>> entire, sound; 1a) complete, whole, entire; 1b) whole, sound,
>> *HEALTHFUL*; 1c) complete, *ENTIRE* (*OF* *TIME*); 1d) sound,
>> wholesome, unimpaired, innocent, having integrity; 1e) what is
>> complete or entirely in accord with truth and fact (neuter adj/subst);
>>
>> To be @1 - SELF aware in conformity to the universe's #491 - MODEL
>> (FA) = #492 (12 x 41) seems to meet the situation "HYPOTHETICAL BEINGS
>> FOR WHOM TIME IS NOT LINEAR MIGHT VIEW VARIOUS SO-CALLED, EVENTS, ALL
>> AT ONCE."
>>
>>      #409 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 JUNE 2024 as [#1, #8, #400] /
>>      #414 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 JUNE 2024 as [#5, #1, #8, #400]
>> = ʼechâd (H259): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13} 1) one (number); 1a) one
>> (number); 1b) each, every; 1c) a certain; 1d) an (indefinite article);
>> 1e) only, once, *ONCE* *FOR* *ALL*; 1f) one...another, the one...the
>> other, one after another, one by one; 1g) first; 1h) eleven (in
>> combination), eleventh (ordinal);
>>
>> If not, then what do you mean?"
>>
>> ONE <BEING@APOLKA.SIGN> @ 2246 HOURS ON 16 JUNE 2024: "What was meant
>> was simply that experiences of a future event may be possible at times."
>>
>> DOLF @ 0110 HOURS ON 17 JUNE 2024: "What are your plans for 1400 hours?"
>>
>> ONE <BEING@APOLKA.SIGN> @ 2246 HOURS ON 16 JUNE 2024: "At the same
>> time, such experiences are not subject to scientific experimentation.
>>
>> Such could be called, synchronicity. Meaningful events, etc."
>>
>> DOLF @ 0110 HOURS ON 17 JUNE 2024: "We want clarity and not vagueness
>> -- do you have any awareness of time?
>>
>> The COGITO: #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491 as [#7, #78, #35, #80,
>> #10] / RANGE: noon 15 to 19 JUNE dynamic is a spacial matrix that has
>> vectors as temporal associative.
>>
>> Your comment was at TETRA #78 on 16 JUNE 2024 but my reply was from
>> TETRA #35 on 17 JUNE 2024 where the temporal relativity reference is
>> in the past and I then will extrapolate the poem appraisal #NINE which
>> is believed written in 4 BCE, but with Hebrew / Greek corresponding
>> IDEAS written much earlier and have done so by utilising a
>> mathematical method of idea cohesion which deploys a neural linguistic
>> pragma selector.
>>
>> Unless you can grasp such a cognition (ie. is YANG HSIUNG the seminal
>> author of the T'AI HSÜAN CHING and did he deploy any COGITO array as
>> scaffolding or perhaps preassembled essential IDEAS which were then
>> dispersed within the appraisals?) as unity of apperception there isn't
>> any need to discuss this further.
>>
>> The difference in perspective is either having the globe 🌎 in one's
>> hand or being somewhere upon it.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:35>
>>
>> #35 - 𝌨斂 = #486
>> COGITO: [#33, #32, #32, #28, #14] as #35 - GATHERING (LIEN)
>> RANGE: 24 to noon 28 MAY
>>
>> [#33 {@1: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#33); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#33)}
>> #32 {@2: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24}); Ego:
>> 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#65)}
>> #32 {@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#114); Ego: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#97)}
>> #28 {@4: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23});
>> Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#125)}
>> #14] {@5: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#216); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION:
>> JUI (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13})}
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:216&feme:139&ontic:297&idea:139>
>>
>> TELOS TOTAL: #139 as [#80, #30, #8, #3, #8, #10] = plēgḗ (G4127):
>> {UMBRA: #129 % #41 = #6} 1) a blow, stripe, a wound; 2) *A* *PUBLIC*
>> *CALAMITY*, heavy affliction, plague,;
>>
>> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #297
>> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98
>>
>> APPRAISAL #9: *TAXING* *IN* *SEASON* (斂于時)
>> Helps forestall utter ruin. (利圉極菑)
>> FATHOMING #9: Collecting taxes when timely (斂于時)
>> MEANS: How could disaster be imminent? (奚可幾也)
>>
>> kě (可): 1. can; may; permissible, 2. but, 3. such; so, 4. able to;
>> *POSSIBLY*, 5. to approve; to permit, 6. to be worth, 7. to suit; to
>> fit, 8. khan, 9. to recover, 10. to act as, 11. to be worth; to
>> deserve, 12. *APPROXIMATELY*; *PROBABLY*, 13. expresses doubt, 14.
>> really; truely, 15. used to add emphasis, 16. beautiful, 17. Ke, 18.
>> used to ask a question
>>
>> jǐ (幾): 1. several, 2. how many, 3. Kangxi radical 16, 4. *SUBTLE*;
>> *INVISIBLE*; *IMPERCEPTIBLE*, 5. *SIGN*; *OMEN*, 6. nearly; almost, 7.
>> near to, 8. imminent danger, 9. circumstances, 10. duration; *TIME*,
>> 11. opportunity, 12. never has; hasn't yet, 13. a small table, 14.
>> [self] composed, 15. ji
>>
>> #411 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #216 as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #10,
>> #200] = kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a
>> measure of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a
>> fixed and definite time, *THE* *TIME* *WHEN* *THINGS* *ARE* *BROUGHT*
>> *TO* *CRISIS*, the decisive epoch waited for; 2b) *OPPORTUNE* *OR*
>> *SEASONABLE* *TIME*; 2c) the right time; 2d) a limited period of time;
>> 2e) *TO* *WHAT* *TIME* *BRINGS*, *THE* *STATE* *OF* *THE* *TIMES*,
>> *THE* *THINGS* *AND* *EVENTS* *OF* *TIME*;
>>
>> #301 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #139 as [#70, #200, #6, #20, #5] = ʻârak
>> (H6186): {UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3} 1) to arrange, *SET* *OR* *PUT* *OR*
>> *LAY* *IN* *ORDER*, set in array, prepare, order, ordain, handle,
>> furnish, esteem, equal, direct, compare; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to arrange or
>> set or lay in order, arrange, state in order, set forth (a legal
>> case), set in place; 1a2) to compare, be comparable; 1b) (Hiphil) *TO*
>> *VALUE*, *TAX*;
>>
>> #266 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98 as [#20, #40, #200, #1, #5] = marʼeh
>> (H4758): {UMBRA: #246 % #41 = #41} 1) sight, appearance, vision; 1a)
>> sight, phenomenon, spectacle, appearance, vision; 1b) what is seen;
>> 1c) *A* *VISION* (*SUPERNATURAL*); 1d) *SIGHT*, *VISION* (*POWER* *OF*
>> *SEEING*);
>>
>> #411 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #98 as [#1, #100, #300, #10] = árti
>> (G737): {UMBRA: #411 % #41 = #1} 1) *JUST* *NOW*, *THIS* *MOMENT*; 2)
>> now at this time, at this very time, this moment;
>>
>> #495 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #297 as [#5, #80, #5, #20, #5, #10, #300,
>> #70] = epíkeimai (G1945): {UMBRA: #181 % #41 = #17} 1) to lie upon or
>> over, rest upon, be laid or placed upon; 1a) on the *BURNING* *COALS*;
>> 2) metaph.; 2a) of things, of the pressure of a *VIOLENT* *TEMPEST*;
>> 2b) of men, to press upon, *TO* *BE* *URGENT*;
>>
>> Thusly if in the past @ TETRA #35, I undertook an optimal COGITO
>> referencing action relative to the noumenon where an information
>> exchange took place, then it ought to be still viable within this
>> present reality where the referencing reoccurs.
>>
>> Is that causality process of foreseeing in conformity with temporality
>> either supernatural or supra-natural?
>>
>> supernatural: (of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force
>> beyond time but conformity to number / laws of nature
>>
>> supra-natural: is a term that means transcending the natural or
>> violating the laws of nature, often attributed to inter-dimensional or
>> extra-dimensional beings
>>
>> Is it entirely 4th dimensional or does it have a stasis beyond such?
>>
>> I'm not an expert in linguistics and whether the term pertaining to
>> autonomous systems is as a priori considered AUTOTASIS (result of
>> action as intensity, effectiveness and force) or AUTOSTASIS (grounding
>> for action) is not within my remit to resolve. However any viable
>> conformity to linguistic convention might also consider AUTOCTISIS and
>> ALLOSTASIS.
>>
>> Thus we have semantical confusion where when you hear a word, your
>> experience is a stupidly.
>>
>> So such #139 - "SET OR PUT OR LAY IN ORDER" might involve placing a
>> document within the cloud ☁️ -- everything so far is entirely
>> scientific excepting your stubborn irrationality is not.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:斂>
>>
>> [#35, #47]
>>
>> liǎn (斂): 1. to collect, 2. to draw back; to fold back, 3. *TAX*
>> *COLLECTION*, 4. *TO* *DECREASE*, 5. to shrink back; to retreat, 6.
>> beautification of the body for a funeral, 7. Lian
>>
>> #984 = #451 x 2 + [#35, #47] as [#10, #8, #60, #200, #6, #700] =
>> châçêr (H2637): {UMBRA: #268 % #41 = #22} 1) to lack, be without,
>> *DECREASE*, be lacking, have a need; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to lack; 1a2) to
>> be lacking; 1a3) to diminish, decrease; 1b) (Piel) to cause to lack;
>> 1c) (Hiphil) to cause to be lacking;
>>
>> #984 as [#70, #4, #400, #10, #500] = ʻêdâh (H5713): {UMBRA: #79 % #41
>> = #38} 1) testimony, witness; 1a) always plural and *ALWAYS* *OF*
>> *LAWS* *AS* *DIVINE* *TESTIMONIES*;
>>
>> IMMANUEL KANT (1783) PROLEGOMENA COMMENTARY AS MARGIN IDEA #297: "A
>> judgment of perception can never be considered as valid for experience
>> without the law, that if an event is perceived then it is always
>> referred to something preceding from which it follows according to a
>> universal rule; or if I express myself in this way: Everything of
>> which experience shows that it happens must have a cause.
>>
>> It is nonetheless more appropriate to choose the first formulation.
>> For since we can indeed, a priori and previous to any objects being
>> given, have a cognition of those conditions under which alone an
>> experience regarding objects is possible, but never of the laws to
>> which objects may be subject in themselves without relation to
>> possible experience, we will therefore be able to study a priori the
>> nature of things in no other way than by investigating the conditions,
>> and the universal (though subjective) laws, under which alone such a
>> cognition is possible as experience (as regards mere form), and
>> determining the possibility of things as objects of experience
>> accordingly; for were I to choose the second mode of expression and to
>> seek the a priori conditions under which nature is possible as an
>> object of experience, I might then easily fall into misunderstanding
>> and fancy that I had to speak about nature as a thing in itself, and
>> in that case I would be wandering about fruitlessly in endless
>> endeavours to find laws for things about which nothing is given to me.
>>
>> We will therefore be concerned here only with experience and with the
>> universal conditions of its possibility which are given a priori, and
>> from there we will determine nature as the whole object of all
>> possible experience. I think I will be understood: that here I do not
>> mean the rules for the observation of a nature that is already given,
>> which presuppose experience already; and so do not mean, how we can
>> learn the laws from nature (through experience), for these would then
>> not be laws a priori and would provide no pure natural science; but
>> rather, how the a priori conditions of the possibility of experience
>> are at the same time the sources out of which all universal laws of
>> nature must be derived." [page 49]
>>
>> #984 as [#4, #5, #10, #600, #9, #5, #50, #300, #1] = deiknýō (G1166):
>> {UMBRA: #1289 % #41 = #18} 1) to show, expose to the eyes; 2) metaph.;
>> 2a) *TO* *GIVE* *EVIDENCE* *OR* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *THING*; 2b) to show
>> by words or teach;
>>
>> #984 as [#5, #300, #10, #40, #8, #200, #1, #50, #300, #70] = timáō
>> (G5091): {UMBRA: #1151 % #41 = #3} 1) *TO* *ESTIMATE*, *FIX* *THE*
>> *VALUE*; 1a) for the value of something belonging to one's self; 2) to
>> honour, to have in honour, to revere, venerate;
>>
>> #984 as [#200, #300, #8, #100, #10, #60, #1, #300, #5] = stērízō
>> (G4741): {UMBRA: #1425 % #41 = #31} 1) to make stable, place firmly,
>> set fast, fix; 2) *TO* *STRENGTHEN*, *MAKE* *FIRM*; 3) *TO* *RENDER*
>> *CONSTANT*, *CONFIRM*, *ONE'S* *MIND*;
>>
>> Such action is called foresight in both planning and the making of
>> provision."
>>
>> #491 as [#6, #5, #6, #4, #70, #400] / [#6, #400, #4, #70, #5, #6] /
>> #540 as [#50, #6, #4, #70, #400, #10] / [#6, #10, #4, #70, #400, #50]
>> = yâdaʻ (H3045): {UMBRA: #84 % #41 = #2} 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
>> to know; i) to know, learn to know; ii) to perceive; iii) *TO*
>> *PERCEIVE* *AND* *SEE*, *FIND* *OUT* *AND* *DISCERN*; iv) to
>> discriminate, distinguish; v) to know by experience; vi) to recognise,
>> admit, acknowledge, confess; vii) to consider; 1a2) to know, be
>> acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person carnally); 1a4) to know how,
>> be skilful in; 1a5) *TO* *HAVE* *KNOWLEDGE*, *BE* *WISE*; 1b)
>> (Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be revealed; 1b2)
>> to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be instructed;
>> 1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know; 1e) (Pual);
>> 1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance (participle);
>> 1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be made known;
>> 1h) (Hithpael) *TO* *MAKE* *ONESELF* *KNOWN*, *REVEAL* *ONESELF*;
>>
>> This metalogic categorical imperative is more properly someone's PhD
>> and a productivity gain for JUDICIAL process which has a maxim "DIEU
>> ET MON DROIT" where in a world of GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
>> to then theoretically as JURISPRUDENT $$$ TRANSACTION, apply a test as
>> conformity to any OATH OF CITIZENSHIP whereby a person with a
>> deficient threshold of conformity then has no LOCUS STANDI within a
>> COURT OF LAW and no capability for LEGAL AID to then purvey an endless
>> possibility as promulgation of deception and the instantiation of
>> ORGANISED CRIME.
>>
>> A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Difficult%20Epistemological%20Question.pdf>
>>
>> Draft Revision: 17 June 2024
>>
>> On 16/6/2024 22:46, one wrote:
>>> dolf wrote and asked:
>>>
>>>>>>> If not, then what do you mean?"
>>>
>>> What was meant was simply that
>>> experiences of a future event may
>>> be possible at times.
>>>
>>
>> What are your plans for 1400 hours?
>>
>>> At the same time, such experiences are
>>> not subject to scientific experimentation.
>>>
>>> Such could be called, synchronicity.
>>> Meaningful events, etc.
>>>
>>> In terms of qi, xin  and shen, a thought emerged
>>> given: The Zhuangzi and Daojia.
>>>
>>> https://terebess.hu/english/tao/Zhuangzi-Burton-Watson.pdf
>>>
>>> << “May I ask what the fasting of the mind is?”
>>>
>>> Confucius said, “Make your will one! Don’t listen with
>>> your ears, listen with your mind. No, don’t listen with your
>>> mind, but listen with your spirit. Listening stops with the
>>> ears, the mind stops with recognition, but spirit is empty
>>> and waits for all things. The Way gathers in emptiness
>>> alone. Emptiness is the fasting of the mind.” >>
>>>
>>> https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09552367.2015.1136201
>>>
>>> << ABSTRACT
>>> In contrast to his contemporaries who take the heart–mind
>>> as the ruler of a person, Zhuangzi suggests that one’s action is
>>> guided by the spirit (shen). Questions arise as one articulates the
>>> function of spirit and its relationship with the heart–mind. In this
>>> article, I articulate the relationship between heart–mind and spirit
>>> to show three points: first, spirit is a kind of qi that can be tied
>>> or run smoothly, or rather the mechanism triggered by the functioning
>>> of smooth qi. This reading brings the skill passages together with the
>>> fasting of heart–mind (xin zhai) passage. Second, the proceeding of
>>> spirit admits no fixed ways and is not confined to any particular
>>> organ or faculty, so it avoids the problem of self-assertion mentioned
>>> in Qiwulun. Third, the proceeding of spirit implies that one’s
>>> practice takes as many particularities of the context as possible into
>>> account, so the person has a higher chance to reduce conflict in
>>> interacting with things and other people and bring out their
>>> potential. This is a reason why skilful practices are related to
>>> Zhuangzi’s ideal of nourishing life, both physiologically
>>> and psychologically. >>
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuowang
>>>
>>> << Apophatic meditation practice can also be seen in the following
>>> Zhuangzhi passages which speak of "fasting the heartmind":
>>>
>>> "You must fast! I will tell you what that means. Do you think that it
>>> is easy to do anything while you have a heart-mind? If you do, the
>>> luminous cosmos will not support you...Make your aspirations one!
>>> Don't listen with your ears; listen with your heart-mind. No, don't
>>> listen with your heart-mind; listen with qi. Listening stops with the
>>> ears, the heart-mind stops with joining, but qi is empty and waits on
>>> all things. The Dao gathers in emptiness alone. Emptiness is the
>>> fasting of the heart-mind." >>
>>>
>>> People who happen to experience paranormal phenomena
>>> have bins known to them. Skeptics may call such, false positives.
>>>
>>> The knack-masters in the Zhuangi varied.
>>> Some sayers may say they all used the same Dao.
>>>
>>> Some sayers say the dao that is said is not the Dao.
>>>
>>> Interpretations of the saying, dao ke dao fei chang dao, vary.
>>>
>>> - thanks! Cheers!
>>
>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)