The Unadorned Truth About Donald Trump

We must treat him like any other candidate for high office who is
emotionally and mentally unstable.
By Jeffrey Goldberg
June 27, 2024, 6:17 PM ET
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you
through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and
recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
Earlier this year, Atlantic staff writer McKay Coppins suggested that
voters, in the interest of civic hygiene and personal illumination,
attend a Trump rally. This would be the way to understand the candidate,
his thoughts, and his supporters, Coppins argued. He himself has attended
more than 100 such gatherings since 2016, and he noted, correctly, that
�nothing quite captures the Trump ethos like his campaign rallies.�
I myself have attended only a few of these rallies (though among them was
Trump�s January 6, 2020, rally on the Ellipse, which should count
double). But what one derives from the experience is, in the words of our
colleague Tom Nichols, the visceral sense that Trump is deeply unwell.
Attendance at Trump rallies can be metaphysically taxing�and some seem to
go longer than a Taylor Swift concert. So watching them from beginning to
end online is occasionally a welcome substitute.
A couple of weeks ago, on C-SPAN, I watched my first Trump rally in quite
some time, a gathering under a heat dome in Las Vegas. I watched not
because I expected to learn something new about the candidate, but
because I had been alerted by concerned friends and colleagues that Trump
had attacked me by name. This hadn�t happened in quite some time, and
self-interest dictated watching.
Trump is upset with me, and with The Atlantic, for a story I wrote in
September of 2020, in which I reported, among other things, that he
referred to American soldiers killed in action as �suckers� and �losers.�
(For more on the particulars, please read this story by Adrienne
LaFrance.) Trump is also upset by a profile I wrote late last year of
retired General Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, in which Milley, a decorated combat veteran, is portrayed as
someone who defended the Constitution against Trump�s depredations. In
response to this article, Trump suggested that Milley be executed.
At his Las Vegas rally, Trump described me as a �horrible, radical-left
lunatic named Goldberg� (he hit the word Goldberg with what I perhaps, or
perhaps not, overinterpreted as special feeling). He articulated, at
great length, why he would never disparage American service members.
(Dear reader: He disparages the military constantly.)
All of this was to be expected. What I found surprising, as I watched his
entire presentation, was the ratio of gibberish to normal sentences.
Which is to say, there was even more gibberish than I remembered in the
typical Trump speech. The apotheosis of gibberish was his extended
soliloquy on sharks and battery-powered boats. No summary could do it
justice, so here is an extended cut:

�By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. Do you notice that? A lot
of sharks. I watched some guys justifying it today. �Well, they weren�t
really that angry. They bit off the young lady�s leg because of the fact
that they were not hungry, but they misunderstood who she was.� These
people are crazy. He said, �There�s no problem with sharks. They just
didn�t really understand a young woman swimming,� now, who really got
decimated and other people too, a lot of shark attacks. So I said, �So
there�s a shark 10 yards away from the boat, 10 yards or here. Do I get
electrocuted if the boat is sinking, and water goes over the battery�the
boat is sinking; do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted, or do
I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted?� Because I will tell
you he didn�t know the answer. He said, �Nobody�s ever asked me that
question.� I said, �I think it�s a good question. I think there�s a lot
of electric current coming through that water.� But you know what I�d do
if there was a shark or you get electrocuted, I�ll take electrocution
every single time. I�m not getting near the shark. So we going to end
that. We�re going to end it for boats. We�re going to end it for trucks.�

Please watch the whole thing, and as you do, imagine Trump�s words coming
from the mouth of President Biden, and then imagine the Democratic Party
allowing Biden to continue to run for president.
Trump overwhelms us with nonsense. This is the �banality of crazy,� as
the Atlantic contributor Brian Klaas calls it. By �us,� I mean, of
course, the voting public, but I especially mean the editors and
headline-writers of my industry, who sometimes succumb to one of the most
pernicious biases in journalism, the bias toward coherence. We feel,
understandably, that it is our job to make things make sense. But what if
the actual story is that politics today makes no sense?
It works like this: Trump sounds nuts, but he can�t be nuts, because he�s
the presumptive nominee for president of a major party, and no major
party would nominate someone who is nuts. Therefore, it is our
responsibility to sand down his rhetoric, to identify any kernel of
meaning, to make light of his bizarro statements, to rationalize. Which
is why, after the electric-shark speech, much of the coverage revolved
around the high temperatures in Las Vegas, and other extraneities. The
Associated Press headline on a story about the event read this way:
�Trump Complains About His Teleprompters at a Scorching Las Vegas Rally.�
The New York Times headlined its story thus: �In Las Vegas, Trump Appeals
to Local Workers and Avoids Talk of Conviction.� CNN�s headline: �Trump
Proposes Eliminating Taxes on Tips at Las Vegas Campaign Rally.�
In my house, the headline from the Las Vegas rally was the disconcerting
and surprising news that I�m a �radical-left lunatic.� Outside my house,
though, the public should have been informed, above everything else, that
a former and possibly future president went on a ludicrous, illiterate
rant about sharks and batteries, a rant that calls into question not only
his fitness for office but his basic cognitive abilities.
Watching the Las Vegas rally reinforced my view that, at our magazine, we
can best serve our readers by highlighting aspects of Trump�s rhetoric
and behavior that we would highlight about any other politician,
including Joe Biden. I�ve never wanted this magazine to become part of
the �resistance.� (You just have to read our coverage of Biden to
understand that we are not.) I simply believe that we should tell the
unadorned truth about Trump, and treat him like any other candidate for
high office who is emotionally and mentally unstable. A bias toward
coherence is understandable. But reality is what we must live with long
after the debates and rallies are over.