Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

BOFH excuse #162: bugs in the RAID


soc / soc.support.depression.crisis / Re: No, Israel does -- Israel certainly has a right to defend itself and it's citizens!

SubjectAuthor
o Re: No, Israel does -- Israel certainly has a right to defend itself and it's cia425couple

1
Subject: Re: No, Israel does -- Israel certainly has a right to defend itself and it's citizens!
From: a425couple
Newsgroups: comp.misc, alt.global-warming, edm.general, soc.culture.usa, or.politics, soc.support.depression.crisis
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:03 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: No, Israel does -- Israel certainly has a right to defend itself
and it's citizens!
Newsgroups: comp.misc,alt.global-warming,edm.general,soc.culture.usa,or.politics,soc.support.depression.crisis
References: <0fjhejdo461mgldlt989gla2btli7vde61@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: a425couple@hotmail.com (a425couple)
In-Reply-To: <0fjhejdo461mgldlt989gla2btli7vde61@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 131
Message-ID: <0s5GO.55422$WtV9.44118@fx10.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:03:40 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:03:40 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 5967
View all headers

On 9/16/24 17:35, NefeshBarYochai wrote:
> One of the many disturbing revelations - - is the
> degree to which U.S. and other Western politicians are prepared to
> dutifully stick to a script provided by Israel and its Western
> lobbies, whether the script is true or not. A case in point is the
> oft-repeated “self-defense” canard.
>

It comes down to a pretty simple question.

Do you trust the knowledge, judgement, and decision making of
leaders like Winston Churchill and Harry Truman (or more recently
on a rare topic that both Don Trump and Joe Biden agree on),
joined by a super majority of the United Nations,

or a constantly complaining, NefeshBarYochai ?

I will go with our leaders who have done the best they knew
how, to shape the world to be better than they found it.

-----------

Both groups, Jews and Palestinians had populations there.
But it was a thinly populated area. Terraces that had been
productive when Jews had the majority, but lost to military
conquest to Muhammad lay mostly neglected.
As many said, "A people without a land, for a land without a people."

But the Palestinians continued to make bad choices.
They picked the wrong side in WWI.
They picked the wrong side in WWII.
They refused to compromise, and refused the UN offer in 1947.
They chose to fight with 5 organized Arab Armies against the
Jewish militia and, surprising all, lost in 1948-49.
They made the bad choice to start a war in 1956.
They made the bad choice to start a was in 1967, and lost much land.
They made the bad choice to start a war in 1973.
They made the bad choice to start a war in 1982.
They made the bad choice to start a war in 2006.
They made the bad choice to refuse what POTUS Carter negotiated.
They made the bad choice to refuse what POTUS Clinton negotiated.

----------

Yes, the Palestinians do deserve a right to a homeland.
They were offered one, just as the Jews were offered one
when the UK gave up it's UN mandate.
The Jews accepted what was offered, even tho it was far
from ideal. They created Israel, and have flourished
and they made the desert bloom.
The Palestinians refused to share, and decided to kill
the Jews rather than share. Surprise! Even with the
Armies of five nations helping the Palestinians,
they failed.

And have been consumed by hatred, and refusal to share
for the last 75 years. Every time the Palestinians
are offered a chance to have their own state and
live in peace, they refuse.

Please read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine

Contents hide
(Top)
Background
United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP)
Toggle United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) subsection
Ad hoc Committee
Toggle Ad hoc Committee subsection
The vote
Toggle The vote subsection
Reactions
Toggle Reactions subsection
Subsequent events
Toggle Subsequent events subsection
See also
References
Bibliography
Further reading
External links
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine

Article
Talk
Read
View source
View history

Tools
Page extended-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Partition of Palestine" redirects here. For the partition of Palestine
into Israel, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank, see 1949 Armistice
Agreements.
UN General Assembly
Resolution 181 (II)

UNSCOP (3 September 1947; see green line) and UN Ad Hoc Committee (25
November 1947) partition plans. The UN Ad Hoc Committee proposal was
voted on in the resolution.
Date 29 November 1947
Meeting no. 128
Code A/RES/181(II) (Document)
Voting summary
33 voted for
13 voted against
10 abstained
Result Adopted
The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the
United Nations, which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at
the end of the British Mandate. On 29 November 1947, the UN General
Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II).[1]

The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish
States and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem. The
Partition Plan, a four-part document attached to the resolution,
provided for the termination of the Mandate, the progressive withdrawal
of British armed forces and the delineation of boundaries between the
two States and Jerusalem. Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate
would be terminated as soon as possible and the United Kingdom would
withdraw no later than 1 August 1948. The new states would come into
existence two months after the withdrawal, but no later than 1 October
1948. The Plan sought to address the conflicting objectives and claims
of two competing movements, Palestinian nationalism and Jewish
nationalism, or Zionism.[2][3] The Plan also called for Economic Union
between the proposed states, and for the protection of religious and
minority rights.[4] While Jewish organizations collaborated with UNSCOP
during the deliberations, the Palestinian Arab leadership boycotted it.[5]

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor