Message-ID:

You're definitely on their list. The question to ask next is what list it is.

soc / soc.libraries.talk / Re: sub-multiple

Subject: Re: sub-multiple
From: Adam Funk
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english, alt.religion.kibology, soc.libraries.talk
Organization: $CABAL
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:00 UTC
References: 1 2

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.freedyn.de!not-for-mail
From: a24061@ducksburg.com (Adam Funk)
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,alt.religion.kibology,soc.libraries.talk
Subject: Re: sub-multiple
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:00:09 +0000
Organization: $CABAL
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <pf9otbxh6b.ln2@news.ducksburg.com>
References: <98159371-e939-4d5f-b110-42564bb3dee7@googlegroups.com>
<mdvfn6$jho$1@py.eternal-september.org>
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="28d5725348e2dc225029df8443ed6b10";
logging-data="13733"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LiVlTk03+VP5rZlz9NuIGi/QKyMF8c48="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xFp+Ip4HxLsS8Df6x/YYM855jRo=
X-Received-Body-CRC: 481987172
X-Received-Bytes: 1645

View all headers

On 2015-03-13, Paul Ney wrote:

> It was a kind of entertainment to learn of the "sub-multiple". Lovely
> thread. Fields of science, or professions etc. evolve, and their
> language -- or slang ;-) -- evolve too. Any works on outdated terms
> known?!
>
> In my eyes, "sub-multiple" is very likely to stir confusion. It is
> better to keep that word in a "forbidden dictionary"

ISAGN & Borgesesque possibilities....

--
President Firefly: "You're a brave man. Go and break through the
lines. And remember, while you're out there risking your life and limb
through shot and shell, we'll be in be in here thinking what a sucker
you are." [Duck Soup]

Subject	Author
Re: sub-multiple	Adam Funk