On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:07:16 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:41:56 -0000 (UTC), kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>
>>yes thanks, i think if we find non-dead groups, we should share.
>>an oasis in a desert. i found alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, it seems
>>to be active.
>
> Now that most of the spammers have departed with GoogleGroups,
> soc.history could be activated again.
>
> alt.usage.english is still active, if you have usage questions.

yes so we have 4 groups to enrich our discourse:

1. alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
2. alt.philosophy
3. soc.history
4. alt.usage.english

everyone, i shall see you in these places with value to add.

In article <ts7lfrj0b0yx$.dlg@tomato.potato>, f00@0f0.00f says...
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:07:16 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:41:56 -0000 (UTC), kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >
> >>yes thanks, i think if we find non-dead groups, we should share.
> >>an oasis in a desert. i found alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, it seems
> >>to be active.
> >
> > Now that most of the spammers have departed with GoogleGroups,
> > soc.history could be activated again.
> >
> > alt.usage.english is still active, if you have usage questions.
>
>
> yes so we have 4 groups to enrich our discourse:
>
> 1. alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
> 2. alt.philosophy
> 3. soc.history
> 4. alt.usage.english
>
> everyone, i shall see you in these places with value to add.
>
>
we all think what we do has major significants

On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 03:48:32 -0400, % wrote:

> In article <ts7lfrj0b0yx$.dlg@tomato.potato>, f00@0f0.00f says...
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:07:16 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:41:56 -0000 (UTC), kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>
>>>>yes thanks, i think if we find non-dead groups, we should share.
>>>>an oasis in a desert. i found alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, it seems
>>>>to be active.
>>>
>>> Now that most of the spammers have departed with GoogleGroups,
>>> soc.history could be activated again.
>>>
>>> alt.usage.english is still active, if you have usage questions.
>>
>>
>> yes so we have 4 groups to enrich our discourse:
>>
>> 1. alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
>> 2. alt.philosophy
>> 3. soc.history
>> 4. alt.usage.english
>>
>> everyone, i shall see you in these places with value to add.
>>
>>
> we all think what we do has major significants

of course, have you seen futurama, the alien who poops candy? i
am like that, valuable candy everywhere i go.

On 9/1/24 10:19 AM, kami wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 03:48:32 -0400, % wrote:
>
>> In article <ts7lfrj0b0yx$.dlg@tomato.potato>, f00@0f0.00f says...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:07:16 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:41:56 -0000 (UTC), kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yes thanks, i think if we find non-dead groups, we should share.
>>>>> an oasis in a desert. i found alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, it seems
>>>>> to be active.
>>>>
>>>> Now that most of the spammers have departed with GoogleGroups,
>>>> soc.history could be activated again.
>>>>
>>>> alt.usage.english is still active, if you have usage questions.
>>>
>>>
>>> yes so we have 4 groups to enrich our discourse:
>>>
>>> 1. alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
>>> 2. alt.philosophy
>>> 3. soc.history
>>> 4. alt.usage.english
>>>
>>> everyone, i shall see you in these places with value to add.
>>>
>>>
>> we all think what we do has major significants
>
>
> of course, have you seen futurama, the alien who poops candy? i
> am like that, valuable candy everywhere i go.

Class - can we spell "hubris" ? Use it in
a sentence ??? :-)

Not in a major city - then go outside tonight and
LOOK UP. See all that ? Think YOU are so fuckin'
important in that vast scheme ??? The Buddha DID
have a lot of it right ... human perceptions are
crap, filtered and more filtered, a cartoon vision
of What Is that only feeds our high estimation of
our own significance and grandeur.

So, cut us some slack ...

On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 23:37:50 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

> On 9/1/24 10:19 AM, kami wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 03:48:32 -0400, % wrote:
>>
>>> In article <ts7lfrj0b0yx$.dlg@tomato.potato>, f00@0f0.00f says...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:07:16 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:41:56 -0000 (UTC), kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> yes thanks, i think if we find non-dead groups, we should share.
>>>>>> an oasis in a desert. i found alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, it seems
>>>>>> to be active.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that most of the spammers have departed with GoogleGroups,
>>>>> soc.history could be activated again.
>>>>>
>>>>> alt.usage.english is still active, if you have usage questions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes so we have 4 groups to enrich our discourse:
>>>>
>>>> 1. alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
>>>> 2. alt.philosophy
>>>> 3. soc.history
>>>> 4. alt.usage.english
>>>>
>>>> everyone, i shall see you in these places with value to add.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> we all think what we do has major significants
>>
>>
>> of course, have you seen futurama, the alien who poops candy? i
>> am like that, valuable candy everywhere i go.
>
>
> Class - can we spell "hubris" ? Use it in
> a sentence ??? :-)
>
> Not in a major city - then go outside tonight and
> LOOK UP. See all that ? Think YOU are so fuckin'
> important in that vast scheme ??? The Buddha DID
> have a lot of it right ... human perceptions are
> crap, filtered and more filtered, a cartoon vision
> of What Is that only feeds our high estimation of
> our own significance and grandeur.
>
> So, cut us some slack ...

actually, when you go outside and look up, out there in space,
stuff is anything but special. its all more of the same
everywhere: stars, planets, galaxies, voids, clusters, black
holes, neutron stars etc

but here on earth, we have something more unique than anything
out there.

compare diamond versus wood. in the grand scheme of things, wood
is 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000x more valuable than diamond,
which is far more common in this universe.

but the weird thing is, both are carbon based.

On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 17:22:05 -0000 (UTC), kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:

>compare diamond versus wood. in the grand scheme of things, wood
>is 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000x more valuable than diamond,
>which is far more common in this universe.
>
>but the weird thing is, both are carbon based.

When people talk about "carbon footprint" I always think of Paul Simon
singing "She's got diamonds on the soles of her shoes."

--
Ignore the following - it's spammers for spambot fodder.

casestudysolutions@hotmail.com
adambag987@gmail.com
darylkabatoff@yahoo.ca
jessicawlyam89@gmail.com
Daryl Kabatoff <doukhoborarchivescanada@gmail.com>
lucymartin161994@gmail.com
lunapetersonmouton@gmail.com
lindaqwhite1@gmail.com
chjichu@gmail.com
olivia.o.miller@gmail.com
adultfriendclubs@gmail.com
kolomenskiy.leonard@mail.ru
edik.grizovskiy@mail.ru
finddatingmen@gmail.com
solutions.for.student@gmail.com
trustsolutionsteam@hotmail.com
searchdatingsingle@gmail.com
tomandrus4@gmail.com
adultsinglesdating@gmail.com
gburdine57@gmail.com
datingpersonalssites@gmail.com
girlsdating170@gmail.com
adultfriendclubs@gmail.com
casualxdating@gmail.com
jenniferjeen526@gmail.com
janicedhensley@gmail.com
meask669@gmail.com
adultsinglesdating@gmail.com
Jersey Marlin <jerseymarlin@gmail.com>
sk.invest.club@gmail.com