Believe it or not...
they are planning to Rig the voting machine
to read number...57.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:59:18 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Question of course is...
>what NUMBER
>will the Democrats decide to
>rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
>Voting Machine????
>
>by 51, or by 52 percent?
>
>
>No way 100%, or
>90's
>80's
>70's
>60's...
>
>(maybe some other country)
>
>it has to be in the low 50's.
>
>wadda you think?
>
>59 sounds too high and
>unrealistic.
>
>58 i don't think so
>
>
>I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
>
>
>
>"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
>
>The software does the counting.
>
>
>But it is very important that real people
>vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
>
>
>
>Get out your hardhats!
>https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
>
>
>
>there is an election coming...
>
>
>
>Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????"
>
>
>
>didn't you hear, there is an election coming!
>
>
>Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off
>all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods.
>
>
>I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for
>
>
>How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024
>
>
>
>Learn Grasshopper.
>
>
>
> 52 sounds kind of high...what do you think?
>
>51 sounds just right.
>
>
>Not too hot, not too cold..just right.
>
>
>Goldenlocks knows best.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
>>> > could have easily won '
>>> >
>>> > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'
>>> >
>>> > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
>>> > Machines rigs the count.
>>> >
>>> > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
>>> > about it?"
>>> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large
>>> >
>>> > The more things change, the more they remain the same.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
>>> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
>>> > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >I don't see any at all.
>>> > >
>>> > >do you?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
>>> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL
>>> > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>>> > >>*cancel* the election"????
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
>>> > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming
>>> > >>2024 election...
>>> > >>
>>> > >>i think he is having fun.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>What kind of Americans are you?
>>> > >>
>>> > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
>>> > >>she's on the sixth floor
>>> > >>Texas Library.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>and her daughter is on the phone...
>>> > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight)
>>> > >>
>>> > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>election-rigging at it's best!
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if
>>> > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
>>> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>>> > >>> *cancel* the election"????
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Are you people not prepared for this??
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> That's the plan.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> for "technical reasons"...
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> one can come up with
>>> > >>> thousands of reasons..
>>> > >>> like fabricate that all the
>>> > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> election delayed is election denied.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'....
>>> > >>> interfering with the election process.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> or
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> throwing your
>>> > >>> oppenents
>>> > >>> out the window is
>>> > >>> 'election manipulation'.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> It is a..coup d'etat.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
>>> > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always..
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons"..
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > election delayed is election denied.
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
>>> > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > (read about his opponents)
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
>>> > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
>>> > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will
>>> > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they
>>> > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
>>> > >>> > > > there are...
>>> > >>> > > > 1.8 million.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again!
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
>>> > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
>>> > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
>>> > >>> > > > polling place accessibility.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
>>> > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
>>> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
>>> > >>> > > > principle of equal representation.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
>>> > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
>>> > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
>>> > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
>>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
>>> > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
>>> > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
>>> > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
>>> > >>> > > > based on informed choice.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
>>> > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
>>> > >>> > > > in voting.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
>>> > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
>>> > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
>>> > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
>>> > >>> > > > party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
>>> > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
>>> > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
>>> > >>> > > > electorate.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
>>> > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
>>> > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
>>> > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
>>> > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
>>> > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
>>> > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
>>> > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
>>> > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
>>> > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
>>> > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
>>> > >>> > > > identity lines.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
>>> > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
>>> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
>>> > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
>>> > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
>>> > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
>>> > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
>>> > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
>>> > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
>>> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
>>> > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
>>> > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
>>> > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
>>> > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
>>> > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
>>> > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
>>> > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
>>> > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
>>> > >>> > > > field.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
>>> > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
>>> > >>> > > > questionable grounds.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
>>> > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
>>> > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
>>> > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
>>> > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
>>> > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
>>> > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
>>> > >>> > > > opponents.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
>>> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
>>> > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
>>> > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
>>> > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
>>> > >>> > > > systems.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
>>> > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
>>> > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
>>> > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
>>> > >>> > > > demographics.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
>>> > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
>>> > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
>>> > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
>>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
>>> > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
>>> > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
>>> > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
>>> > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
>>> > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
>>> > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
>>> > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
>>> > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
>>> > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
>>> > >>> > > > voter attitudes.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
>>> > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
>>> > >>> > > > strategies.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
>>> > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
>>> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
>>> > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
>>> > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
>>> > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
>>> > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
>>> > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
>>> > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > --
>>> > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > --
>>> > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > --
>>> > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> --
>>> > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>>
>>> --
>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.