The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????

by 51, or by 52 percent?

No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...

(maybe some other country)

it has to be in the low 50's.

wadda you think?

59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.

58 i don't think so

I say, not over 52. and not under 51.

"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

The software does the counting.

But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.

Get out your hardhats!
https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

there is an election coming...

Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????"

didn't you hear, there is an election coming!

Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off
all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods.

I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for

How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

Learn Grasshopper.

52 sounds kind of high...what do you think?

51 sounds just right.

Not too hot, not too cold..just right.

Goldenlocks knows best.

>
>
>
>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
>> > could have easily won '
>> >
>> > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'
>> >
>> > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
>> > Machines rigs the count.
>> >
>> > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
>> > about it?"
>> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large
>> >
>> > The more things change, the more they remain the same.
>> >
>> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
>> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
>> > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I don't see any at all.
>> > >
>> > >do you?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
>> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL
>> > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>> > >>*cancel* the election"????
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
>> > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming
>> > >>2024 election...
>> > >>
>> > >>i think he is having fun.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>What kind of Americans are you?
>> > >>
>> > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
>> > >>she's on the sixth floor
>> > >>Texas Library.
>> > >>
>> > >>and her daughter is on the phone...
>> > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight)
>> > >>
>> > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>election-rigging at it's best!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if
>> > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
>> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>> > >>> *cancel* the election"????
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Are you people not prepared for this??
>> > >>>
>> > >>> That's the plan.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> for "technical reasons"...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> one can come up with
>> > >>> thousands of reasons..
>> > >>> like fabricate that all the
>> > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> election delayed is election denied.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'....
>> > >>> interfering with the election process.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> or
>> > >>>
>> > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker
>> > >>>
>> > >>> throwing your
>> > >>> oppenents
>> > >>> out the window is
>> > >>> 'election manipulation'.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It is a..coup d'etat.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
>> > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always..
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons"..
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > election delayed is election denied.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
>> > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > (read about his opponents)
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
>> > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
>> > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will
>> > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they
>> > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
>> > >>> > > > there are...
>> > >>> > > > 1.8 million.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again!
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
>> > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
>> > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
>> > >>> > > > polling place accessibility.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
>> > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
>> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
>> > >>> > > > principle of equal representation.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
>> > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
>> > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
>> > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
>> > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
>> > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
>> > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
>> > >>> > > > based on informed choice.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
>> > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
>> > >>> > > > in voting.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
>> > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
>> > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
>> > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
>> > >>> > > > party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
>> > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
>> > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
>> > >>> > > > electorate.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
>> > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
>> > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
>> > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
>> > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
>> > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
>> > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
>> > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
>> > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
>> > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
>> > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
>> > >>> > > > identity lines.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
>> > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
>> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
>> > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
>> > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
>> > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
>> > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
>> > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
>> > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
>> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
>> > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
>> > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
>> > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
>> > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
>> > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
>> > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
>> > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
>> > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
>> > >>> > > > field.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
>> > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
>> > >>> > > > questionable grounds.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
>> > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
>> > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
>> > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
>> > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
>> > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
>> > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
>> > >>> > > > opponents.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
>> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
>> > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
>> > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
>> > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
>> > >>> > > > systems.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
>> > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
>> > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
>> > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
>> > >>> > > > demographics.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
>> > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
>> > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
>> > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
>> > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
>> > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
>> > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
>> > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
>> > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
>> > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
>> > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
>> > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
>> > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
>> > >>> > > > voter attitudes.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
>> > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
>> > >>> > > > strategies.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
>> > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
>> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
>> > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
>> > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
>> > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
>> > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
>> > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
>> > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > --
>> > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > --
>> > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > --
>> > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.