What would happen if
on election day
the machine-reported zero votes for Trump?

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Smartmatic-Dominion-Affidavit-1.txt
>
> DECLARATION OF
>
> I, , hereby state the following:
>
> 1.
>
> 2. I am an adult of sound mine. All statements in this declaration are
> based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.
>
> 3. I am making this statement voluntarily and on my own initiative. I
> have not been promised, nor do I expect to receive, anything in exchange
> for my testimony and giving this statement. I have no expectation of any
> profit or reward and understand that there are those who may seek to
> harm me for what I say in this statement. I have not participated in any
> political process in the United States, have not supported any candidate
> for office in the United States, am not legally permitted to vote in the
> United States, and have never attempted to vote in the United States.
>
> 4. I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the
> corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of
> people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the
> United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental
> rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in
> Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a
> conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves
> political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose
> is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and
> subverting the proper course of governing.
>
> 5.
>
> 6. Due to my training in special operations and my extensive military
> and
>
> - Page 1 of 8
>
> 7.
>
> - Senor Cabello was a long-time confederate of President Chavez and
> instrumental in his gaining power. In 2002, Senor Cabello had very
> briefly taken over the duties of the presidency while Hugo Chavez was
> imp1·isoned. Within hours of Senor Cabello taking over the presidency,
> Hugo Chavez was released from prison and regained the office of
> President. On December 11, 2011, Cabello was installed as the Vice­
> President of the United Socialist Party - the party of President Chavez
> and became the second most powerful figtn·e in the party after Hugo
> Chavez. Cabello was appointed president of the National Assembly in
> early 2012 and was re-elected to that post in Januai·y 2013. After Hugo
> Chavez's death, Cabello was next in line £01· the presidency of the
> country, but he remained president of the National Assembly and yielded
> to Nicolas Maduro holding the position of President of Venezuela.
>
> 8.
>
> precise and exacting in his instructions in the details about meetings
> he wanted, where the meeting was to occ111·, who was to attend, what was
> to
>
> 9.
>
> - Page 2 of8
>
> sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the
> Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national
> and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to
> gain and maintain their power.
>
> 10. Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of
> an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as
> Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.
> This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the
> person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge
> Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from
> Smartmatic which included . The
> purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system
> that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons
> running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to
> maintain control of the government.
>
> 11. In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
> the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits forelected officials,
> including the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This
> permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.
>
> 12. After passage of the referendum, President Chavez instructed me to
> make arrangements for him to meet with Jorge Roch-iguez, then President
> of the National Electoral Council, and three executives from Smartmatic.
> Among the three Smartmatic representatives were
>
> President Chavez had multiple meetings with Rodriguez and the
> Smartmatic team at which I was present. In the first of four meetings,
> Jorge Rodriguez promoted the idea to create software that would
> manipulate elections. Chavez was very excited and made it clear that he
> would provide whatever Smartmatic needed. He wanted them immediately to
> create a voting system which would ensure that any time anything was
> going to be voted on the voting system would guarantee results that
> Chavez wanted. Chavez offered Smartmatic many inducements, including
> large sums of money, for Smartmatic to create or modify the voting
> system so that it would guarantee Chavez would win every election cycle.
> Smartmatic's team agreed to create such a system and did so.
>
> 13. I arranged and attended tlu·ee more meetings between President
> Chavez and the representatives from Smartmatic at which details of the
> new
>
> voting system were discussed and agreed upon. For each of these
> meetings, I communicated directly with on details of where and when to
> meet, where the participants would be picked up and delivered to the
> meetings, and what was to be accomplished. At these meetings, the
> participants called their project the "Chavez revolution." From that
> point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure
> wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.
>
> 14. Smartmatic's electoral technology was called "Sistema de Gesti6n
> Electoral" (the "Electoral Management System"). Smartmatic was a pioneer
> in this area of computing systems. Their system provided for
> transmission of voting data over the internet to a computerized central
> tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had a digital display,
> fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed out
> the voter's ballot. The voter's thumbprint was linked to a computerized
> record of that voter's identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
> entire system.
>
> 15. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
> that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
> detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner
> that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a
> scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's
> name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to
> the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
> setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter
> and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict
> that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed
> vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the
> software and hardware that accomplished that result for President
> Chavez.
>
> 16. After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I
> closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated
> using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when
> Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over
> Manuel Rosales - a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus
> 3.7 million for Rosales.
>
> 17. On April 14, 2013, I witnessed another Venezuelan national election
> in which the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was used to
> manipulate and change the results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez
>
> -- Inside that location was a control room in which there were
> multiple digital display screens -TV screens -for results of voting in
> each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that
> room and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to
> a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that
> room were able to see in "real time" whether the vote that came through
> the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one
> looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from
> any specific area oras a national total was going against either
> candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the
> ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one
> candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.
>
> 18. By two o'clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles
> Radonsky was ahead of Nicolas Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro
> and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky's lead they were
> worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election. The
> Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the
> internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas
> control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the
> entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network
> controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts
> in Venezuela and to change the results.
>
> 19. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make
> the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro. Then, when they
> turned the internet back on and the on-line reporting was up and running
> again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they
> could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At
> that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles
> Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finish, they had
> achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.
>
> 20. After Smartmatic created the voting system President Chavez wanted,
> he exported the software and system all over Latin America. It was sent
> to Bolivia, Nicaragua, Al·gentina, Ecuador, and Chile - countries that
> were in alliance with President Chavez. This was a group of leaders who
> wanted to be able to guarantee they maintained power in their countries.
> ·when Chavez died, Smartmatic was in a position of being the only
>
> company that could guarantee results in Venezuelan elections for the
> party in power.
>
> 21. I want to point out that the software and fundamental design of the
> electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election
> tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the
> Smartmatic Electoral Management System. In short, the Smartmatic
> software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company's software and
> system.
>
> 22. Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the
> United States. Dominion uses the same methods and fundamentally same
> software design for the storage, transfer and computation of voter
> identification data and voting data. Dominion and Smartmatic did
> business together. The software, hardware and system have the same
> fundamental flaws which allow multiple opportunities to corrupt the data
> and mask the process in a way that the average person cannot detect any
> fraud or manipulation. The fact that the voting machine displays a
> voting result that the voter intends and then prints out a paper ballot
> which reflects that change does not matter. It is the software that
> counts the digitized vote and reports the results. The software itself
> is the one that changes the information electronically to the result
> that the operator of the software and vote counting system intends to
> produce that counts. That's how it is done. So the software, the
> software itself configures the vote and voting result -- changing the
> selection made by the voter. The software decides the result regardless
> of what the voter votes.
>
> 23. All of the computer controlled voting tabulation is done in a closed
> environment so that the voter and any observer cannot detect what is
> taking place unless there is a malfunction or other event which causes
> the observer to question the process. I saw first-hand that the
> manipulation and changing of votes can be done in real-time at the
> secret counting center which existed in Caracas, Venezuela. For me it
> was something very surprising and disturbing. I was in awe because I had
> never been present to actually see it occur and I saw it happen. So, I
> learned first­ hand that it doesn't matter what the voter decides or
> what the paper ballot says. It's the software operator and the software
> that decides what counts - not the voter.
>
> 24. If one questions the reliability of my observations, they only have
> to read
>
> which Smartmatic had possession of all the votes and the voting, the
> votes themselves and the voting information at their disposition in
> Venezuela.
>
> -- he was assuring that the voting system implemented or used by
> Smartmatic was completely secure, that it could not be compromised, was
> not able to be altered.
>
> 25. But later, in 2017 when there were elections where Maduro was
> running and elections for legislators in Venezuela, -- and Smartmatic
> broke their secrecy pact with the government of Venezuela. He made a
> public announcement through the media in which he stated that all the
> Smartmatic voting machines used during those elections were totally
> manipulated and they were manipulated by the electoral council of
> Venezuela back then. stated that all of the votes for Nicholas Maduro
> and the other persons running for the legislature were manipulated and
> they actually had lost. So I think that's the greatest proof that the
> fraud can be carried out and will be denied by the software company that
> admitted publicly that Smartmatic had created, used and still uses vote
> counting software that can be manipulated or altered.
>
> 26. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this
> 2020 election for President of the United States. The circumstances and
> events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software
> electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in
> Venezuela. What happened in the United States was that the vote counting
> was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software. At the time
> that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in
> the votes. Then during the weehours of the morning, when there was no
> voting occurring and the vote count reporting was off-line, something
> significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next
> morning there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the
> opposing candidate, Joe Biden.
>
> 27. I have worked in gathering
> information, researching, and working with information technology.
> That's what I know how to do and the special knowledge that I have. Due
> to these recent election events, I contacted a number of reliable and
> intelligent ex-co-workers of mine that are still informants and work
> with the intelligence community. I asked for them to give me information
> that was up-to-date information in as far as how all these businesses
> are acting, what actions they are taking.
>
> I declai·e under penalty of pe1jury that the foregoing is true and
> correct and that this Declai·ation was prepared in Dallas County, State
> of Texas, and executed on November 15, 2020.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > What I don't really understand is...
> >
> > how is Donald Trump going to be able to
> > monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
> > from being rigged????
> >
> > I don't get it!
> >
> > Why even bother ?
> >
> > I just don't get it!
> >
> > Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.
> > > >
> > > > Did you know
> > > > did you know
> > > > did you know...
> > > >
> > > > that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > > > is...Venezuelan-born????
> > >
> > > The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > > is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!
> > >
> > > He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?
> > >
> > > Bribing him is a piece of cake.
> > >
> > > Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
> > > to rig the count?
> > >
> > > "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West
> > >
> > > I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.
> > >
> > > give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...
> > >
> > > How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024
> > >
> > > Let's make it a Netfix special!
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.