![]() |
News from da outaworlds |
mail files register groups login |
Message-ID: |
Smartmatic-Dominion-Affidavit-1.txt
DECLARATION OF
I, , hereby state the following:
1.
2. I am an adult of sound mine. All statements in this declaration are
based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.
3. I am making this statement voluntarily and on my own initiative. I
have not been promised, nor do I expect to receive, anything in exchange
for my testimony and giving this statement. I have no expectation of any
profit or reward and understand that there are those who may seek to
harm me for what I say in this statement. I have not participated in any
political process in the United States, have not supported any candidate
for office in the United States, am not legally permitted to vote in the
United States, and have never attempted to vote in the United States.
4. I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the
corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of
people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the
United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental
rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in
Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a
conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves
political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose
is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and
subverting the proper course of governing.
5.
6. Due to my training in special operations and my extensive military
and
- Page 1 of 8
7.
- Senor Cabello was a long-time confederate of President Chavez and
instrumental in his gaining power. In 2002, Senor Cabello had very
briefly taken over the duties of the presidency while Hugo Chavez was
imp1·isoned. Within hours of Senor Cabello taking over the presidency,
Hugo Chavez was released from prison and regained the office of
President. On December 11, 2011, Cabello was installed as the Vice
President of the United Socialist Party - the party of President Chavez
and became the second most powerful figtn·e in the party after Hugo
Chavez. Cabello was appointed president of the National Assembly in
early 2012 and was re-elected to that post in Januai·y 2013. After Hugo
Chavez's death, Cabello was next in line £01· the presidency of the
country, but he remained president of the National Assembly and yielded
to Nicolas Maduro holding the position of President of Venezuela.
8.
precise and exacting in his instructions in the details about meetings
he wanted, where the meeting was to occ111·, who was to attend, what was
to
9.
- Page 2 of8
sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the
Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national
and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to
gain and maintain their power.
10. Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of
an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as
Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.
This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the
person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge
Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from
Smartmatic which included . The
purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system
that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons
running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to
maintain control of the government.
11. In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits forelected officials,
including the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This
permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.
12. After passage of the referendum, President Chavez instructed me to
make arrangements for him to meet with Jorge Roch-iguez, then President
of the National Electoral Council, and three executives from Smartmatic.
Among the three Smartmatic representatives were
President Chavez had multiple meetings with Rodriguez and the
Smartmatic team at which I was present. In the first of four meetings,
Jorge Rodriguez promoted the idea to create software that would
manipulate elections. Chavez was very excited and made it clear that he
would provide whatever Smartmatic needed. He wanted them immediately to
create a voting system which would ensure that any time anything was
going to be voted on the voting system would guarantee results that
Chavez wanted. Chavez offered Smartmatic many inducements, including
large sums of money, for Smartmatic to create or modify the voting
system so that it would guarantee Chavez would win every election cycle.
Smartmatic's team agreed to create such a system and did so.
13. I arranged and attended tlu·ee more meetings between President
Chavez and the representatives from Smartmatic at which details of the
new
voting system were discussed and agreed upon. For each of these
meetings, I communicated directly with on details of where and when to
meet, where the participants would be picked up and delivered to the
meetings, and what was to be accomplished. At these meetings, the
participants called their project the "Chavez revolution." From that
point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure
wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.
14. Smartmatic's electoral technology was called "Sistema de Gesti6n
Electoral" (the "Electoral Management System"). Smartmatic was a pioneer
in this area of computing systems. Their system provided for
transmission of voting data over the internet to a computerized central
tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had a digital display,
fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed out
the voter's ballot. The voter's thumbprint was linked to a computerized
record of that voter's identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
entire system.
15. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner
that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a
scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's
name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to
the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter
and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict
that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed
vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the
software and hardware that accomplished that result for President
Chavez.
16. After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I
closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated
using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when
Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over
Manuel Rosales - a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus
3.7 million for Rosales.
17. On April 14, 2013, I witnessed another Venezuelan national election
in which the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was used to
manipulate and change the results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez
-- Inside that location was a control room in which there were
multiple digital display screens -TV screens -for results of voting in
each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that
room and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to
a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that
room were able to see in "real time" whether the vote that came through
the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one
looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from
any specific area oras a national total was going against either
candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the
ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one
candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.
18. By two o'clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles
Radonsky was ahead of Nicolas Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro
and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky's lead they were
worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election. The
Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the
internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas
control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the
entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network
controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts
in Venezuela and to change the results.
19. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make
the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro. Then, when they
turned the internet back on and the on-line reporting was up and running
again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they
could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At
that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles
Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finish, they had
achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.
20. After Smartmatic created the voting system President Chavez wanted,
he exported the software and system all over Latin America. It was sent
to Bolivia, Nicaragua, Al·gentina, Ecuador, and Chile - countries that
were in alliance with President Chavez. This was a group of leaders who
wanted to be able to guarantee they maintained power in their countries.
·when Chavez died, Smartmatic was in a position of being the only
company that could guarantee results in Venezuelan elections for the
party in power.
21. I want to point out that the software and fundamental design of the
electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election
tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the
Smartmatic Electoral Management System. In short, the Smartmatic
software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company's software and
system.
22. Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the
United States. Dominion uses the same methods and fundamentally same
software design for the storage, transfer and computation of voter
identification data and voting data. Dominion and Smartmatic did
business together. The software, hardware and system have the same
fundamental flaws which allow multiple opportunities to corrupt the data
and mask the process in a way that the average person cannot detect any
fraud or manipulation. The fact that the voting machine displays a
voting result that the voter intends and then prints out a paper ballot
which reflects that change does not matter. It is the software that
counts the digitized vote and reports the results. The software itself
is the one that changes the information electronically to the result
that the operator of the software and vote counting system intends to
produce that counts. That's how it is done. So the software, the
software itself configures the vote and voting result -- changing the
selection made by the voter. The software decides the result regardless
of what the voter votes.
23. All of the computer controlled voting tabulation is done in a closed
environment so that the voter and any observer cannot detect what is
taking place unless there is a malfunction or other event which causes
the observer to question the process. I saw first-hand that the
manipulation and changing of votes can be done in real-time at the
secret counting center which existed in Caracas, Venezuela. For me it
was something very surprising and disturbing. I was in awe because I had
never been present to actually see it occur and I saw it happen. So, I
learned first hand that it doesn't matter what the voter decides or
what the paper ballot says. It's the software operator and the software
that decides what counts - not the voter.
24. If one questions the reliability of my observations, they only have
to read
which Smartmatic had possession of all the votes and the voting, the
votes themselves and the voting information at their disposition in
Venezuela.
-- he was assuring that the voting system implemented or used by
Smartmatic was completely secure, that it could not be compromised, was
not able to be altered.
25. But later, in 2017 when there were elections where Maduro was
running and elections for legislators in Venezuela, -- and Smartmatic
broke their secrecy pact with the government of Venezuela. He made a
public announcement through the media in which he stated that all the
Smartmatic voting machines used during those elections were totally
manipulated and they were manipulated by the electoral council of
Venezuela back then. stated that all of the votes for Nicholas Maduro
and the other persons running for the legislature were manipulated and
they actually had lost. So I think that's the greatest proof that the
fraud can be carried out and will be denied by the software company that
admitted publicly that Smartmatic had created, used and still uses vote
counting software that can be manipulated or altered.
26. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this
2020 election for President of the United States. The circumstances and
events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software
electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in
Venezuela. What happened in the United States was that the vote counting
was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software. At the time
that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in
the votes. Then during the weehours of the morning, when there was no
voting occurring and the vote count reporting was off-line, something
significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next
morning there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the
opposing candidate, Joe Biden.
27. I have worked in gathering
information, researching, and working with information technology.
That's what I know how to do and the special knowledge that I have. Due
to these recent election events, I contacted a number of reliable and
intelligent ex-co-workers of mine that are still informants and work
with the intelligence community. I asked for them to give me information
that was up-to-date information in as far as how all these businesses
are acting, what actions they are taking.
I declai·e under penalty of pe1jury that the foregoing is true and
correct and that this Declai·ation was prepared in Dallas County, State
of Texas, and executed on November 15, 2020.
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> What I don't really understand is...
>
> how is Donald Trump going to be able to
> monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
> from being rigged????
>
> I don't get it!
>
> Why even bother ?
>
> I just don't get it!
>
> Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.
> > >
> > > Did you know
> > > did you know
> > > did you know...
> > >
> > > that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > > is...Venezuelan-born????
> >
> > The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!
> >
> > He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?
> >
> > Bribing him is a piece of cake.
> >
> > Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
> > to rig the count?
> >
> > "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West
> >
> > I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.
> >
> > give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...
> >
> > How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024
> >
> > Let's make it a Netfix special!
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Subject | Replies | Author |
![]() By: The Starmaker on Fri, 14 Jun 2024 | 82 | The Starmaker |