Michael Ejercito wrote:

>https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1dfwo94/cologne_prosecutors_charge_twitter_user_for_the/
>
>Cologne prosecutors charge Twitter user for the crime of assembling a
>list of Covid-era insults that politicians and celebrities directed
>against the unvaccinated
>
>
>EUGYPPIUS
>JUN 14, 2024
>Almost two years ago, on 26 July 2022, a German Twitter user known only
>as MicLiberal posted a thread that culminated in his criminal trial this
>week. His is but the latest in a long line of such prosecutions – the
>tactic our rulers increasingly favour to intimidate and harass those who
>use their freedom of expression in inconvenient ways.
>
>eugyppius: a plague chronicle is a reader-supported publication. maybe
>you subscribe?
>
>Type your email...
>Subscribe
>MicLiberal committed his alleged offence as Germany was still awakening
>from months of hypervaccination insanity. Science authorities and
>politicians had spent the winter decrying the “tyranny of the
>unvaccinated,” demanding that “we have to take care of the unvaccinated,
>and … make vaccination compulsory,” firing people who protested
>institutional vaccine mandates on social media and denouncing the
>unvaccinated for ongoing virus restrictions and Covid deaths. Our
>neighbour, Austria, even went so far as to impose a specific lockdown on
>those who refused the Covid vaccines. Culturally and politically, those
>were the darkest months I have ever lived through; they changed my life
>forever and I will never forget them.
>
>MicLiberal’s thread aimed only to memorialise some of the crazy things
>the vaccinators had said. It opened with this tweet:
>
>We were complicit!
>
>We marginalised, defamed, discredited, insulted and cancelled people. On
>behalf of science!
>
>By popular demand, this brief thread with statements that should not be
>forgotten:
>
>
>There ensued nothing but a series of citations, most of them wholly
>typical samples of vintage 2021/22 vaccinator rhetoric, much of it not
>even that remarkable. For example, MicLiberal included this statement
>from Andreas Berholz, deputy editor-in-chief of the widely read blog Der
>Volksverpetzer:
>
>“Fact-check: The unvaccinated remain the main drivers of the pandemic.”
>
>
>And he included this statement from former President of Germany Wilhelm
>Gauck:
>
>“Opponents of vaccination are idiots.”
>
>
>And he posted this old ad from the city of Erkelenz (Nordrhein-Westfalen):
>
>“Your party is your grandmother’s death. Stay home!”
>
>Bild
>And near the end of his thread he added this citation, from the the
>health economist Willy Oggier:
>
>“Corona sceptics forfeit their right to a place in intensive care in the
>event of overcrowding.”
>
>
>You might be wondering what crime MicLiberal can possibly have committed
>by drawing attention to these already-public statements. The most honest
>answer is that his thread achieved millions of views in a matter of
>days, and at a very awkward moment – precisely when everyone was
>beginning to regret all the illiberal and wildly intemperate things they
>had said in the depths of the virus craze. He had embarrassed some very
>vain and powerful people with their own incredibly stupid words, and
>today many are of the opinion that that ought to be a crime in and of
>itself.
>
>Alas, things have not yet deteriorated that far. Thus the police and
>prosecutors were left to scour our dense thicket of laws for a more
>plausible offence. They decided that their best chance lay with a novel
>provision of the German Criminal Code (Paragraph 126a). This provision
>makes it a crime to “disseminate the personal data of another person in
>a matter that is … intended to expose this person … to the risk of a
>criminal offence directed against them.” On 28 July, two days after
>MicLiberal posted his 25 tweets, Cologne police filed a criminal
>complaint against him, and afterwards the Cologne prosecutor’s office
>brought charges, arguing that MicLiberal had suggested that the people
>he cited were “perpetrators” and therefore associated them with
>“fascism.” The district court declined to approve the charges, but the
>prosecutors appealed to the regional court, where the judges saw things
>differently. They believed that a prosecution was warranted because of
>the “heated social debate” surrounding Covid measures, and because
>MicLiberal’s audience was composed of “homogeneous” like-minded people,
>who (in the summary of the Berliner Zeitung) “could either form groups
>or encourage individual members to commit acts of violence.” MicLiberal
>had furthermore assembled his citations from a website that the judges
>deemed guilty of an “anti-government orientation.”
>
>We must take a moment to ponder this truly amazing argumentation, which
>would seem to criminalise such things as participating in the wrong
>discussions before the wrong kind of people and assembling one’s (wholly
>accurate) data from the wrong sources. In each of these cases, of
>course, it is the prosecutors and the judges eager to apply Paragraph
>126a to their political opponents who get to decide what is “wrong.”
>
>I’m happy to say MicLiberal was acquitted two days ago at the Cologne
>district court, after his lawyer – the excellent Jessica Hamed – drew
>attention to the absurdity of the prosecution:
>
>It is not only legitimate, but even ethically required, to strongly
>object to transgressive statements by people who occupy a prominent
>position in society, such as politicians or doctors. This is because
>these statements were discriminatory and threatened social peace.
>
>Should it be legal [for] the former Federal President Gauck … to say:
>“Opponents of vaccination are idiots,” but illegal for my client to say
>that others have been insulted, defamed and marginalised by these
>statements? …
>
>Anyone who makes public statements … must expect that their statements
>will be commented on, evaluated, socially condemned, and so on. This is
>because there is no entitlement to be free from criticism. There is no
>right to be able to communicate one’s views to the public without
>contradiction or criticism …
>
>Although this is specifically about my client, it is also being decided
>today whether people are being pushed further and further into the
>private sphere by threats of punishment. It is obvious that if my client
>were convicted today, this conviction would send out a devastating signal.
>
>It is a measure of how far the Federal Republic has deteriorated, that
>arguments like these have to be made at criminal trials. Fortunately,
>the authoritarian turn in German politics has penetrated the judiciary
>least of all, and so there is still some protection for those caught
>speaking in inconvenient ways. Emphasis, of course, belongs on some,
>because frivolous prosecutions like that of MicLiberal alone suffice as
>punishment and signal.
>
>Friends often advise me to take a different tone here at the plague
>chronicle. Calling prominent politicians and scientists stupid idiots is
>an unnecessary risk, they argue, and could open me to prosecution for
>insult; some of my posts about mass migration might be interpreted as
>running afoul of criminal provisions against incitement; comparing the
>Federal Republic to the DDR may draw the attention of the constitutional
>protectors. What we learn from MicLiberal’s case is that it doesn’t
>matter at all what you say. All the caution in the world is not
>protection enough; if you embarrass and humiliate the right people,
>they’ll come for you. And I have to admit that it would be quite an
>honour to be prosecuted by these flaming fucking egregious retards, I
>would wear it as a badge of honour for the rest of my life. As I hope
>MicLiberal will.
>
>UPDATE: According to Welt reporter Tim Röhn, the prosecutors intend to
>appeal the acquittal. An incredible travesty of justice.

In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?