On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:02:00 -0800, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Christians against SPAMMING sub-maggot jew parasite BARRY ZACHARY SHEIN
>wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 17:12:17 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Christians against SPAMMING sub-maggot jew parasite BARRY ZACHARY SHEIN
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 04:17:50 -0800, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.md/0nhm3
>>>>>
>>>>> The ‘Jew hunt’ in Amsterdam was no anomaly
>>>>
>>>> It was a fucking MITZVAH!
>>> Wrong!
>>
>> Anything BUTT wrong, gook! 'Israeel' is an ASIAN country like yours -
>> it doesn't BELONG in UEFA.
> Nithing, there is nothing Asian about my country, the United States
>of America.
>>
>>> There was nothing mitzvah about it!
>>
>> It was a MEGAMITZVAH!
> Wrong!
>
>>>>> Antisemitism, the great evil that Daniel Patrick Moynihan warned of, has
>>>>> spread across the globe.
>>>>
>>>> It has ALWAYS been across the globe. It appears, as if by magic,
>>>> anywhere that jews surface.
>>> Mangina, it surfaces because some people hate God-based morals and
>>> ethics,.
>>
>> Needledick, it surfaces because jews DEFY G-d based morals and ethics.
> Wrong.
>
> https://aish.com/84684087/
>>
>> Are there jews in YOUR country, the Flippines, gook? How much
>> 'anti-semitism'®™ is there?
> My country is the United States of America, not this mythical
>flippin' place!
>>
>>>>> By Jeff Jacoby Globe Columnist,Updated November 13, 2024, 3:00 a.m.
>>>>
>>>> Is that asshole Kakobsteen whining and moaning again? Why isn't he in
>>>> 'Israeel' with the rest of the jew bastards?
>>> Jeff Jacoby wrote about Judenhass- history's oldest hatred.
>>
>> Why didn't he write about the ONLY REASON for history's oldest hatred
>> - jew behaviour?
> That Jewish behavior is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>
>>
>>>> You are a gook.
>>> It is immoral for you to call me a gook.
>>
>> It is absurd for a subhuman gook like you, who is EXEMPT from morals,
>> to screech/wail/howl about being called a gook.
> There is nothing subhuman about me.
>
> It is still immoral for you to call people gooks.
>>
>>> What you allege is the shpae of my eyes and the color of my skin is
>>> beside the point!
>>
>> The shpae of your slanty eyes and your shitskin are PRECISELY the
>> point.
> It still does not justify you calling me or anyone else a gook.
>
>>
>>>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani and looks like a Down's Syndrome
>>>> beneficiary, you are, below all else
>>> There is nothing Down's syndrome beneficiary about me.
>>
>> You are a mongoloid. Those are features associated with
>> Down's.beneficiaries.
> There is nothing mongoloid about me.
>
>>
>>> I zsuckle no ani; you fuckle no Judenfraulein vulvae!
>>
>> You zsuckle HEAP ani, you are INELIGIBLE even for filthy diseased
>> judendreckunterhure vulvas.
> Wrong!
>
>>
>>> You are a Nazi.
>>
>> You are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
>>
>>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani and looks like a Down's Syndrome
>> beneficiary, you are, below all else
>>
>> <b'ris>
>>
>>
>> - -
>>
>> Wonderfully hungry? Check out this morbidly obese
>> Asiatic slug:
>> https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy3sTCuxtlf/?hl=en
>>
>> Boedicea said about the gook: Actually, it is obvious
>> he's not all there. Most wannabes are short on IQ and
>> have severe mental problems. I have yet to see a post
>> from this cretin that makes sense. Usually, he just
>> does his "You are a Nazi........." and even *that* he
>> aped from some other imbecile. His other attempts at
>> posting in usenet usually consist of one line or even
>> one word drivel. IMO he's using the computer in the
>> therapy room of his local nutfarm.
> I sure humiliated Boedicia.
>
>
> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>
> Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
>
> Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
>
> by Bill Levinson
> It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
>stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
>knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
>person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
>psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
>that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
>argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
>Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
>against civilians as “resistance.”
>
> We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
>humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
>worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
>English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
>refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
>describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
>word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
>nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
>Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
>term of utmost opprobrium.”
>
> We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
>supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
>Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
>come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
>dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
>harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
>beings.
>nithings
>
> Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
>culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
>become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
>recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
>
> The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
>earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
>obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
>known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
>was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
>retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
>back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
>cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
>
> A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
>enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
>supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
>degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
>tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
>is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
>carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
>and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
>nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
>Humanity.
>
> The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
>outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
>for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
>German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
>kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
>but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
>kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
>
> The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
>complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
>transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
>sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
>Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
>“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
>and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
>to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
>
> "Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
>destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
>“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
>perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
>to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
>in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
>enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
>total antithesis of God the Creator.
>
> The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
>alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
>directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
>matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
>make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
>that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
>than any man can build.
>
> This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
>supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
>comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
>is possible.
>
> In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
>subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
>its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
>toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
>extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
>apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
>others to do likewise.

Quoting jews and niggers, and buddying up with a quack, does nothing
to enhance your already putrid reputation.