Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

BOFH excuse #171: NOTICE: alloc: /dev/null: filesystem full


sci / sci.med.cardiology / Re: (Stanford) Praying w/ Michael Ejercito for "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit on 10/07/24 ...

Subject: Re: (Stanford) Praying w/ Michael Ejercito for "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit on 10/07/24 ...
From: Michael Ejercito
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel, alt.christnet.christianlife
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 13:47 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: MEjercit@HotMail.com (Michael Ejercito)
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology,alt.bible.prophecy,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.israel,alt.christnet.christianlife
Subject: Re: (Stanford) Praying w/ Michael Ejercito for "much more" (Luke
11:13) Holy Spirit on 10/07/24 ...
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 06:47:05 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 179
Message-ID: <ve0oop$1o1u3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vducqv$19mm0$1@dont-email.me>
<qp06gj5rlsacr4tttj0l2lfduji91ioo2v@4ax.com> <vdvamq$1dvp7$3@dont-email.me>
<g5o6gj198sa3nfdmnjin0hdlf4hlb62hac@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:47:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="793eb9fc046517225122815d7ea5ced1";
logging-data="1836995"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HojterRo/fxj8EDVz6xTNTYVTgwkb1Sg="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 14.4; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:N7imYc10DUw8tiEiRViBCIrglEc=
In-Reply-To: <g5o6gj198sa3nfdmnjin0hdlf4hlb62hac@4ax.com>
View all headers

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/1fweoqu/some_of_our_top_schools_are_embarrassing/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some of Our Top Schools Are Embarrassing Themselves Over Covid
>>>> Why are places like Stanford and Johns Hopkins hosting gatherings of
>>>> well-known coronavirus cranks?
>>>>
>>>> Gregg Gonsalves
>>>> Share
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stanford University President Jonathan Levin.
>>>> Stanford University president Jonathan Levin
>>>>
>>>> (Justin Sullivan / Getty Images)
>>>> Today, Stanford University is holding an all-day gathering on the Covid
>>>> pandemic, with its new president making opening remarks. It’s the second
>>>> such meeting at a prestigious university in recent months, after Johns
>>>> Hopkins hosted a “symposium on health policy” in September. They may
>>>> seem fine on the surface, but both events should be a source of
>>>> embarrassment for the institutions involved. (I have a personal stake in
>>>> the former gathering: I’m spending my time this fall at Stanford with a
>>>> group of wonderful, truly talented researchers, who I hope do not get
>>>> sprayed with the stink of this misbegotten affair.)
>>>>
>>>> The video player is currently playing an ad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While the organization and funding for these two meetings isn’t
>>>> explicitly linked, the cast of characters at both are eerily similar.
>>>> They each feature a collection of well-known Covid contrarians: those
>>>> who, in the early days of the pandemic thought we should “let ’er rip”
>>>> and get as many people infected as possible, with a performative nod to
>>>> protecting the vulnerable; suggested that vaccine and mask mandates were
>>>> somehow akin to Nazi totalitarianism; told us not to worry about
>>>> variants (“variants, schmariants,” as one of them remarked months before
>>>> Delta and Omicron blasted their way through the US); and said we’d have
>>>> herd immunity by April 2021.
>>>>
>>>> If you want just one piece of evidence about the kind of cranks we’re
>>>> talking about, consider this: A late addition to the Stanford meeting is
>>>> a senior editor of the Epoch Times, a far-right publication that not
>>>> only dabbles in Covid conspiracies but is a frequent purveyor of climate
>>>> change denialism.
>>>>
>>>> While the organizers have tried to add a few reasonable voices to the
>>>> meeting, it doesn’t change the overall thrust of these gatherings. As
>>>> former Texas governor Ann Richards said, “You can put lipstick and
>>>> earrings on a hog and call it Monique, but it’s still a pig.”
>>>>
>>>> Health reporters like Michael Hiltzik at the Los Angeles Times blew the
>>>> whistle on the Stanford conference in mid-September, and others who have
>>>> focused on debunking the pseudoscience of this crew have written about
>>>> the meetings on both coasts. The faculty at both institutions who are
>>>> pushed for and are behind these convocations have defended them on the
>>>> grounds of academic freedom—a defense that, in our current era of
>>>> freakouts over “cancel culture,” neither Stanford or Hopkins would have
>>>> had an easy time overcoming. Chalk one up to the contrarians for putting
>>>> these schools in an impossible situation—though that still does not
>>>> explain why Stanford’s president feels the need to personally show up today.
>>>>
>>>> The architects of these meetings come with bags and bags of right-wing
>>>> funding, some of it laundered through think tanks and other
>>>> institutions. They have met with Trump officials in the White House and
>>>> guided Florida Governor Ron DeSantis on Covid-19 policy. Some of them
>>>> even got a shout-out from Bret Stephens at The New York Times last week.
>>>>
>>>> They whine on and on about how terribly they’ve been treated, but, far
>>> >from being persecuted, they are celebrated on the right, even if the
>>>> mainstream members of their professions have, time and time again,
>>>> considered their ideas and roundly rejected them on their merits.
>>>>
>>>> My question is: Why host these meetings now and in these venues?
>>>>
>>>> Some have suggested this is about “auditioning” for the next Trump
>>>> administration as much as it is trying to rewrite the history of the
>>>> pandemic. Both are in part probably true. But if you zoom out and think
>>>> about these meetings in the context of the right’s war on higher
>>>> education, I believe the purpose becomes clearer.
>>>>
>>>> These Covid contrarians—who have found little support for their views
>>>> among their peers—have decided that the science has been turned into “a
>>>> dogmatic tool of oppression” for rejecting them. In their minds they are
>>>> Galileos against the church, and now they are tilting their fury against
>>>> the institutions themselves. This tack is of course reminiscent of the
>>>> right’s attacks on the universities as bastions of woke, left-wing
>>>> ideology, which either need to be reformed (by hiring more conservative
>>>> faculty) or gutted and rebuilt to their liking (e.g., New College of
>>>> Florida).
>>>>
>>>> In this light, these two meetings are about establishing a
>>>> beachhead—building credibility in what many of the organizers would
>>>> consider the liberal bastions of academia. If you cannot convince your
>>>> colleagues of the worth of your arguments, then you can cry out that
>>>> you’re being discriminated against for simply having “differing views.”
>>>> But things don’t work like that in science: we don’t teach intelligent
>>>> design alongside evolution, or alternative theories of the cause of
>>>> AIDS. Supporters of those discredited ideas would say we need to “teach
>>>> the controversy” and not be dogmatic, but there is no controversy to be
>>>> had: the preponderance of the evidence supports evolution and HIV as the
>>>> cause of AIDS. Similarly, many of the Covid contrarians’ favorite claims
>>>> have withered in the sunlight of scientific scrutiny.
>>>>
>>>> Current Issue
>>>> Cover of October 2024 Issue
>>>> October 2024 Issue
>>>> But just as the Federalist Society has established influence over law
>>>> schools and the judiciary, the Covid contrarians and their supporters
>>>> would like to do the same for medicine and public health, by
>>>> mainstreaming their views—both in academic settings and then in public
>>>> policy—by sheer brute force. They won’t give up, and they have the money
>>>> and resources to continue their campaigns. Should former president Trump
>>>> regain the White House, their fortunes will rise and these threats to
>>>> academic integrity, and to the public health itself (through adoption of
>>>> their views in practice) will go into overdrive.
>>>>
>>>> And for anyone who thinks this is all academic, in mid-September, the
>>>> surgeon general of Florida recommended against the use of mRNA Covid
>>>> vaccines, just as we’re heading into respiratory virus season,
>>>> endangering the lives of the residents of the state with quackery and
>>>> pseudoscience. Of course, it’s the same Covid contrarians who have
>>>> organized these meetings, who have been advising the DeSantis
>>>> administration for several years now on pandemic policy. Shame on them.
>>>
>>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the US & elsewhere is by
>>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>>> longer effective.
>>>
>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>>
>>> So how are you ?
>>
>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>
> While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
> 8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
> 17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
> COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
> Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
> Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
> always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
> including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
> all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
> the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
>
> Laus DEO !
>
Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Michael

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o Some of Our Top Schools Are Embarrassing Themselves Over Covid Why are places li

By: Michael Ejercito on Sun, 6 Oct 2024

6Michael Ejercito

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor